sepsis-3

脓毒症 - 3
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:探讨妊娠期间产妇败血症与不良妊娠结局之间的关系,并确定不良分娩结局和不良围产期事件的危险因素。
    方法:我们将台湾出生队列研究(TBCS)数据库和台湾国民健康保险数据库(NHID)联系起来,进行这项基于人群的研究。我们分析了2005年至2017年在妊娠期间符合脓毒症-3标准的孕妇作为孕产妇脓毒症病例的数据,并选择未感染的孕妇作为非脓毒症比较队列。妊娠期脓毒症,符合2016年提出的脓毒症-3定义。主要结局包括低出生体重(LBW,<2500克)和早产(<34周),次要结局是不良围产期事件的发生。
    结果:我们招募了2,732名怀孕期间符合败血症-3标准的女性和196,333名非败血症对照。我们发现母体败血症的发展与不良的妊娠结局高度相关,包括LBW(调整9.51,95%CI8.73-10.36),早产<34周(调整11.69,95CI10.64-12.84),和不良围产期事件(adjOR3.09,95%CI2.83-3.36)。我们还发现,社会经济上处于不利地位与低出生体重和早产的风险增加略有相关。
    结论:我们发现母体败血症的发生与LBW高度相关,早产和不良围产期事件。我们的发现强调了产妇败血症对妊娠结局的长期影响,并表明败血症孕妇需要保持警惕。
    BACKGROUND: To investigate the association between maternal sepsis during pregnancy and poor pregnancy outcome and to identify risk factors for poor birth outcomes and adverse perinatal events.
    METHODS: We linked the Taiwan Birth Cohort Study (TBCS) database and the Taiwanese National Health Insurance Database (NHID) to conduct this population-based study. We analysed the data of pregnant women who met the criteria for sepsis-3 during pregnancy between 2005 and 2017 as the maternal sepsis cases and selected pregnant women without infection as the non-sepsis comparison cohort. Sepsis during pregnancy and fulfilled the sepsis-3 definition proposed in 2016. The primary outcome included low birth weight (LBW, < 2500 g) and preterm birth (< 34 weeks), and the secondary outcome was the occurrence of adverse perinatal events.
    RESULTS: We enrolled 2,732 women who met the criteria for sepsis-3 during pregnancy and 196,333 non-sepsis controls. We found that the development of maternal sepsis was highly associated with unfavourable pregnancy outcomes, including LBW (adjOR 9.51, 95% CI 8.73-10.36), preterm birth < 34 weeks (adjOR 11.69, 95%CI 10.64-12.84), and the adverse perinatal events (adjOR 3.09, 95% CI 2.83-3.36). We also identified that socio-economically disadvantaged status was slightly associated with an increased risk for low birth weight and preterm birth.
    CONCLUSIONS: We found that the development of maternal sepsis was highly associated with LBW, preterm birth and adverse perinatal events. Our findings highlight the prolonged impact of maternal sepsis on pregnancy outcomes and indicate the need for vigilance among pregnant women with sepsis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:没有证据确定乳酸脱氢酶与白蛋白比值(LAR)与脓毒症相关的急性肾损伤(SAKI)的发展之间的关联。我们旨在研究LAR对脓毒症患者SAKI的预测影响。
    方法:纳入来自重症监护医学信息集市IV(MIMICIV)数据库的4,087例脓毒症患者。使用Logistic回归分析来确定LAR与发生SAKI的风险之间的关联。并使用受限三次样条(RCS)可视化关系。采用ROC曲线分析评价LAR的临床预测价值。亚组分析用于搜索交互因素。
    结果:SAKI组LAR水平明显升高(p<0.001)。LAR与发生SAKI的风险之间存在正线性相关(非线性p=0.867)。Logistic回归分析显示LAR对SAKI的发展具有独立的预测价值。LAR具有中等临床价值,AUC为0.644。慢性肾脏病(CKD)被确定为独立的相互作用因素。LAR对SAKI发展的预测价值在有CKD病史的人群中消失,但在没有CKD的人群中仍然存在。
    结论:脓毒症诊断前后12hLAR升高是脓毒症患者发生SAKI的独立危险因素。慢性合并症,尤其是CKD的历史,当使用LAR预测脓毒症患者AKI的发展时,应该考虑这些因素。
    BACKGROUND: There is no evidence to determine the association between the lactate dehydrogenase to albumin ratio (LAR) and the development of sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SAKI). We aimed to investigate the predictive impact of LAR for SAKI in patients with sepsis.
    METHODS: A total of 4,087 patients with sepsis from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC IV) database were included. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the association between LAR and the risk of developing SAKI, and the relationship was visualized using restricted cubic spline (RCS). The clinical predictive value of LAR was evaluated by ROC curve analysis. Subgroup analysis was used to search for interactive factors.
    RESULTS: The LAR level was markedly increased in the SAKI group (p < 0.001). There was a positive linear association between LAR and the risk of developing SAKI (p for nonlinearity = 0.867). Logistic regression analysis showed an independent predictive value of LAR for developing SAKI. The LAR had moderate clinical value, with an AUC of 0.644. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was identified as an independent interactive factor. The predictive value of LAR for the development of SAKI disappeared in those with a history of CKD but remained in those without CKD.
    CONCLUSIONS: Elevated LAR 12 h before and after the diagnosis of sepsis is an independent risk factor for the development of SAKI in patients with sepsis. Chronic comorbidities, especially the history of CKD, should be taken into account when using LAR to predict the development of AKI in patients with sepsis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们旨在通过分析presepsin(PSEP)和凝溶胶蛋白(GSN)水平以及一种新的标志物来促进脓毒症相关器官功能障碍的诊断和预后。presepsin:gelsolin(PSEP:GSN)比例。
    在三个时间点(T1-3)从重症监护病房(ICU)的脓毒症患者收集血样:T1:入院后12小时内;T2:第二天早晨;T3:第三天早晨。非脓毒症ICU患者的采样点为T1和T3。PSEP通过基于化学发光的POCT方法测量,而GSN通过自动免疫比浊法测定。将数据与常规实验室和临床参数进行比较。根据脓毒症-3定义对患者进行分类。PSEP:GSN比率在主要败血症相关器官功能障碍中进行评估,包括血流动力学不稳定,呼吸功能不全和急性肾损伤(AKI)。
    在我们的单中心前瞻性观察研究中,纳入126例患者(23例对照,38例非脓毒症患者和65例脓毒症患者)。与控件相比,在非脓毒症和脓毒症患者中发现PSEP:GSN比率显著升高(p<0.001).关于10天死亡率预测,PSEP:GSN比率在存活者中低于非存活者(p<0.05),而PSEP:GSN比值的预后表现与广泛使用的临床评分相似(APACHEII,SAPSII,SOFA)。PSEP:在随访期间,脓毒症相关AKI患者的GSN比率也高于脓毒症非AKI患者(p<0.001),尤其是在需要肾脏替代治疗的脓毒症相关AKI患者中。此外,在脓毒症患者中,PSEP:GSN比值的增加与血管加压药的剂量和持续时间非常吻合(p<0.001).此外,感染性休克患者的PSEP:GSN比率明显高于无休克患者(p<0.001)。与需要补充氧气的败血症患者相比,在有机械通气需求的脓毒症患者中观察到PSEP:GSN比率显著升高(p<0.001),而更高的PSEP:GSN比值(p<0.001)也与脓毒症患者机械通气需求延长相关。
    PSEP:GSN比值除了常规使用的SOFA评分外,对于脓毒症的诊断和短期死亡率预测可能是一个有用的补充指标。此外,这种生物标志物的显著增加也可能表明脓毒症患者需要延长血管加压药或需要机械通气.PSEP:GSN比率可产生关于脓毒症期间炎症程度和患者清除剂能力同时消耗的有价值信息。
    NIH美国国家医学图书馆,ClinicalTrails.gov.试验标识符:NCT05060679,(https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05060679)23.03.2022,回顾性注册。
    UNASSIGNED: We aimed to facilitate the diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis-related organ dysfunction through analyzing presepsin (PSEP) and gelsolin (GSN) levels along with a novel marker, the presepsin:gelsolin (PSEP:GSN) ratio.
    UNASSIGNED: Blood samples were collected from septic patients at the intensive care unit (ICU) at three time points (T1-3): T1: within 12 h after admission; T2: second day morning; T3: third day morning. Sampling points for non-septic ICU patients were T1 and T3. PSEP was measured by a chemiluminescence-based POCT method while GSN was determined by an automated immune turbidimetric assay. Data were compared with routine lab and clinical parameters. Patients were categorized by the Sepsis-3 definitions. PSEP:GSN ratio was evaluated in major sepsis-related organ dysfunctions including hemodynamic instability, respiratory insufficiency and acute kidney injury (AKI).
    UNASSIGNED: In our single center prospective observational study, 126 patients were enrolled (23 control, 38 non-septic and 65 septic patients). In contrast to controls, significantly elevated (p < 0.001) admission PSEP:GSN ratios were found in non-septic and septic patients. Regarding 10-day mortality prediction, PSEP:GSN ratios were lower (p < 0.05) in survivors than in non-survivors during follow-up, while the prognostic performance of PSEP:GSN ratio was similar to widely used clinical scores (APACHE II, SAPS II, SOFA). PSEP:GSN ratios were also higher (p < 0.001) in patients with sepsis-related AKI than septic non-AKI patients during follow-up, especially in sepsis-related AKI patients needing renal replacement therapy. Furthermore, increasing PSEP:GSN ratios were in good agreement (p < 0.001) with the dosage and the duration of vasopressor requirement in septic patients. Moreover, PSEP:GSN ratios were markedly greater (p < 0.001) in patients with septic shock than in septic patients without shock. Compared to septic patients requiring oxygen supplementation, substantially elevated (p < 0.001) PSEP:GSN ratios were observed in septic patients with demand for mechanical ventilation, while higher PSEP:GSN ratios (p < 0.001) were also associated with extended periods of mechanical ventilation requirement in septic patients.
    UNASSIGNED: PSEP:GSN ratio could be a useful complementary marker besides the routinely used SOFA score regarding the diagnosis and short term mortality prediction of sepsis. Furthermore, the significant increase of this biomarker may also indicate the need for prolonged vasopressor or mechanical ventilation requirement of septic patients. PSEP:GSN ratio could yield valuable information regarding the extent of inflammation and the simultaneous depletion of the patient\'s scavenger capacity during sepsis.
    UNASSIGNED: NIH U.S. National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrails.gov. Trial identifier: NCT05060679, (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05060679) 23.03.2022, Retrospectively registered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:评估血清无机磷酸盐(Pi)对脓毒症患者预后的影响。
    UNASSIGNED:对从重症监护医学信息集市(MIMIC)-IV数据库中选择的脓毒症患者进行了回顾性分析。根据关于脓毒症和脓毒性休克的第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)诊断脓毒症。分析脓毒症前24小时内血清Pi测量值的时间加权值。使用广义线性模型(对数二项模型)评估血清Pi与住院死亡率之间的关联。
    UNASSIGNED:对来自六个重症监护病房(ICU)的11,658名患者的分析显示,所有败血症患者的血清Pi与院内死亡率之间几乎呈线性关系,尤其是急性肾损伤(AKI)患者。血清Pi的增加与AKI的风险增加有关。更高的去甲肾上腺素剂量,ICU死亡率,和住院死亡率。广义线性模型显示,即使在正常范围内,血清Pi也是所有脓毒症患者院内死亡率的独立预测因子。根据肾功能,亚组分析中调整后的风险比(RR)也很重要,性别,呼吸道感染,血管加压药的使用,和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分。
    未经证实:血清Pi水平较高,即使在正常范围内,无论肾功能如何,败血症患者的住院死亡率均与较高的风险显着相关,性别,呼吸道感染,血管加压药的使用,和SOFA得分。
    UNASSIGNED: To assess the effect of serum inorganic phosphate (Pi) on the prognosis of patients with sepsis.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective analysis of patients with sepsis selected from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database was performed. Sepsis was diagnosed according to the Third International Consensus Definition for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). The time-weighted values of the serum Pi measurements within the first 24 h of sepsis were analyzed. The association between serum Pi and in-hospital mortality was evaluated with a generalized linear model (log-binomial model).
    UNASSIGNED: The analysis of 11,658 patients from six intensive care units (ICUs) showed a nearly linear correlation between serum Pi and in-hospital mortality in all patients with sepsis, especially in those with acute kidney injury (AKI). The increase of serum Pi was related to a higher risk of AKI, higher norepinephrine doses, ICU mortality, and in-hospital mortality. The generalized linear model showed that serum Pi was an independent predictor for in-hospital mortality in all patients with sepsis even within the normal range. The adjusted risk ratios (RRs) were also significant in subgroup analyses according to kidney function, gender, respiratory infection, vasopressor use, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score.
    UNASSIGNED: Higher levels of serum Pi, even within the normal range, were significantly associated with a higher risk of in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis regardless of kidney function, gender, respiratory infection, vasopressor use, and SOFA score.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:孕产妇败血症是全球范围内,尤其是在中国,妊娠发病率和新生儿死亡率的主要原因。
    目的:探讨产妇败血症的病因及危险因素。
    方法:在这项回顾性研究中,我们对2009年1月1日至2018年6月30日广州医科大学附属第三医院收治的70698例产科患者进行了评估.根据脓毒症发生率分为脓毒症组和非脓毒症组。收集有关病史(手术和产科史)和人口统计信息的数据。Mann-WhitneyU检验用于比较患者年龄,两组的胎龄和住院时间。采用单因素和多因素logistic回归模型分析产妇败血症的病因和危险因素。报告了未调整和调整后的比值比(OR)。
    结果:在70698例产科患者中,共561例确诊为感染;在感染患者中,492例非脓毒症相关感染(87.7%),而69人出现脓毒症(12.3%)。产妇败血症的发病率为9.76/10000,败血症组病死率为11.6%(8/69)。急诊入院(OR=2.183)或转院(OR=2.870),不规则的产前护理(OR=2.953),引产(OR=4.665),宫颈环扎术(OR=14.214),妊娠早期(OR=6.806)和妊娠中期(OR=2.09)是产妇败血症的显著危险因素。
    结论:入院方式,不良的产前护理,引产,宫颈环扎术,妊娠早期和妊娠中期是产妇败血症的危险因素。大肠杆菌是产妇败血症最常见的病原体,子宫是最常见的感染部位。
    BACKGROUND: Maternal sepsis is a major cause of gestational morbidity and neonatal mortality worldwide and particularly in China.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the etiology of maternal sepsis and further identify its risk factors.
    METHODS: In this retrospective study, we evaluated 70698 obstetric patients who were admitted to the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University between January 1, 2009 and June 30, 2018. Subjects were divided into sepsis group and non-sepsis group based on the incidence of sepsis. Data about medical history (surgical and obstetric history) and demographic information were collected. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare patient age, gestational age and duration of hospitalization between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze the etiology and the risk factors for maternal sepsis. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (OR) are reported.
    RESULTS: A total of 561 of 70698 obstetric patients were diagnosed with infection; of the infected patients, 492 had non-sepsis associated infection (87.7%), while 69 had sepsis (12.3%). The morbidity rate of maternal sepsis was 9.76/10000; the fatality rate in the sepsis group was 11.6% (8/69). Emergency admission (OR = 2.183) or transfer (OR = 2.870), irregular prenatal care (OR = 2.953), labor induction (OR = 4.665), cervical cerclage (OR = 14.214), first trimester (OR = 6.806) and second trimester (OR = 2.09) were significant risk factors for maternal sepsis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Mode of admission, poor prenatal care, labor induction, cervical cerclage, first trimester and second trimester pregnancy were risk factors for maternal sepsis. Escherichia coli was the most common causative organism for maternal sepsis, and the uterus was the most common site of infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    使用日本全国数据库调查了败血症的发生率和结果的趋势。
    这是一项回顾性队列研究。成年患者,同时患有严重感染和急性器官功能障碍,2010年至2017年期间,使用行政和电子健康记录数据的组合方法从日本全国医疗索赔数据库中提取,2017年,占所有急性护理医院的71.5%。使用血液培养测试记录和抗生素施用来定义假定的严重感染。根据疾病和相关健康问题的国际统计分类,使用诊断记录定义急性器官功能障碍。第十次修订,和器官支持的记录。主要结果是每1000例住院患者的脓毒症年发病率和脓毒症死亡。次要结局是败血症患者的住院死亡率和住院时间。
    分析的数据集包括2010年至2017年期间收治的50,490,128名成人住院患者。其中,2,043,073(4.0%)患者患有败血症。在八年期间,脓毒症患者在住院患者中的年度比例显着增加(斜率=0.30%/年,P<0.0001),占2017年住院患者总数的4.9%。每1000例住院患者的脓毒症年死亡率显着增加(斜率=1.8/1000例住院患者年,P=0.0001),占2017年每1000例住院患者7.8例死亡。在研究期间,住院死亡率和住院时间中位数(四分位距)显着降低(P<0.001),2017年分别为18.3%和27(15-50)天。
    日本全国的数据表明,脓毒症住院患者的脓毒症和死亡的年发病率显著增加;然而,脓毒症患者的年死亡率和住院时间显著降低.脓毒症的发病率和死亡的增加似乎是一个重要的和持续的问题。
    Trends in the incidence and outcomes of sepsis using a Japanese nationwide database were investigated.
    This was a retrospective cohort study. Adult patients, who had both presumed serious infections and acute organ dysfunction, between 2010 and 2017 were extracted using a combined method of administrative and electronic health record data from the Japanese nationwide medical claim database, which covered 71.5% of all acute care hospitals in 2017. Presumed serious infection was defined using blood culture test records and antibiotic administration. Acute organ dysfunction was defined using records of diagnosis according to the international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, 10th revision, and records of organ support. The primary outcomes were the annual incidence of sepsis and death in sepsis per 1000 inpatients. The secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality rate and length of hospital stay in patients with sepsis.
    The analyzed dataset included 50,490,128 adult inpatients admitted between 2010 and 2017. Of these, 2,043,073 (4.0%) patients had sepsis. During the 8-year period, the annual proportion of patients with sepsis across inpatients significantly increased (slope = + 0.30%/year, P < 0.0001), accounting for 4.9% of the total inpatients in 2017. The annual death rate of sepsis per 1000 inpatients significantly increased (slope = + 1.8/1000 inpatients year, P = 0.0001), accounting for 7.8 deaths per 1000 inpatients in 2017. The in-hospital mortality rate and median (interquartile range) length of hospital stay significantly decreased (P < 0.001) over the study period and were 18.3% and 27 (15-50) days in 2017, respectively.
    The Japanese nationwide data indicate that the annual incidence of sepsis and death in inpatients with sepsis significantly increased; however, the annual mortality rates and length of hospital stay in patients with sepsis significantly decreased. The increasing incidence of sepsis and death in sepsis appear to be a significant and ongoing issue.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Thrombocytopenia is common in critical illness. But there are no studies that focus on thrombocytopenia and platelet recovery in Sepsis-3 patients. We employed a large database to identify sepsis based on Sepsis-3 criteria. Patients were grouped by nadir platelet count during ICU, propensity score matching was used to eliminate covariates imbalance, multivariable cox proportional hazard model was used for evaluating mortality. A total of 9709 patients were enrolled based on Sepsis-3, 1794 (18%) patients developed thrombocytopenia, with 858 (8.8%) exhibiting thrombocytopenia at ICU admission (prevalent), 891 (9.2%) developed thrombocytopenia during ICU stay (incident). In the incident thrombocytopenia group, survivors exhibited higher nadir platelet count, higher rate in platelet count recovery and shorter time to platelet recovery compared to non-survivors. Platelet recovery was not observed until 1 days (IQR, 1-2) after weaning of mechanical ventilation and 1 days (IQR, 1-3) after discontinuation of vasopressor in survivors of incident thrombocytopenia. Furthermore, thrombocytopenia was associated with longer duration of ICU length of stay, longer duration of mechanical ventilation and vasopressor use compared to no thrombocytopenia. Moderate (20-50 × 109/L) and severe (<20 × 109/L) thrombocytopenia group showed increased 28 days mortality compared to no thrombocytopenia, while the mortality rate between mild (51-100 × 109/L) and no thrombocytopenia group (≥100 × 109/L) showed no significant difference. Taken together these data revealed that thrombocytopenia occurred in 18% Sepsis-3 patients; platelet recovery occurred more frequent and earlier in survivors; platelet recovery was not observed until clinical improvement. Thrombocytopenia in Sepsis-3 demonstrated increased disease severity, and patients with platelet count <50 × 109/L showed increased 28 days mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自2016年引入以来,脓毒症-3指南,重点是快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分,引发了很多争论和争议。人们认识到,新定义需要在特定的临床环境中进行验证,尚未被普遍采用。我们旨在验证急性肝胆感染的新Sepsis-3指南。
    方法:对2016年7月至2017年6月急诊科收治的急性肝胆感染患者进行前瞻性队列研究。全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准,计算SOFA和qSOFA评分,并通过接收器工作特征(AUROC)曲线下的面积评估预测性能,以评估这些指标对重症监护病房入院和发病率的预测能力。
    结果:124例患者,中位年龄64.5岁,大多数男性(n=75,60.5%)在研究期间因急性肝胆感染入院。急性胆囊炎是最常见的入院诊断(n=83,66.9%),大多数患者在普通病房接受治疗(n=91,73.3%),中位住院时间为6天(范围1-40)。在多变量分析中,糖尿病(p=0.003)预测高依赖性单位(HDU)入院,而年龄(p=0.001),血培养阳性(p=0.012),阳性液体培养(p=0.015)和SOFA评分(p=0.002)可预测住院时间.SIRS预测HDU入院的敏感性(60%vs.4%),重症监护病房(ICU)入院(62.5%vs.0%)和发病率(66.7%vs.0%)高于qSOFA评分。qSOFA预测HDU入院的特异性(100%vs.49.5%),入住ICU(99.1%vs.53.3%)和发病率(99.2%vs.47.9%)高于SIRS标准。
    结论:SIRS标准在预测急性肝胆感染患者预后方面具有较高的敏感性,qSOFA评分具有较高的特异性。
    BACKGROUND: Since its introduction in 2016, the Sepsis-3 guidelines, with emphasis on the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score, have generated much debate and controversy. It is recognised that the new definitions require validation in specific clinical settings and have yet to be universally adopted. We aim to validate new Sepsis-3 guidelines in acute hepatobiliary infection.
    METHODS: A prospective cohort of patients admitted with acute hepatobiliary infection from the emergency department from July 2016 to June 2017 was studied. The Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria, SOFA and qSOFA scores were calculated and predictive performance evaluated with area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves for predictive ability of these indices for critical care unit admission and morbidity.
    RESULTS: 124 patients with a median age of 64.5 years and majority males (n = 75, 60.5%) were admitted with acute hepatobiliary infection during the study period. Acute cholecystitis was the most common admission diagnosis (n = 83, 66.9%) and most patients were managed in general ward (n = 91, 73.3%) with median length of stay of 6 days (range 1-40). On multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus (p = 0.003) predicted high dependency unit (HDU) admission, while age (p = 0.001), positive blood culture (p = 0.012), positive fluid culture (p = 0.015) and SOFA score (p = 0.002) predicted length of hospital stay. The sensitivity of SIRS in predicting HDU admission (60% vs. 4%), intensive care unit (ICU) admission (62.5% vs. 0%) and morbidity (66.7% vs. 0%) was higher than qSOFA score. The specificity of qSOFA in predicting HDU admission (100% vs. 49.5%), ICU admission (99.1% vs. 53.3%) and morbidity (99.2% vs. 47.9%) was higher than SIRS criteria.
    CONCLUSIONS: The SIRS criteria has high sensitivity and the qSOFA score has high specificity in predicting outcomes of patients with acute hepatobiliary infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: With Sepsis-3, the increase in sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) as a clinical score for the identification of patients with sepsis and quickSOFA (qSOFA) for the identification of patients at risk of sepsis outside the intensive care unit (ICU) were introduced in 2016. However, their validity has been questioned, and their applicability in different settings and subgroups, such as hematological cancer patients, remains unclear. We therefore assessed the validity of SOFA, qSOFA, and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria regarding the diagnosis of sepsis and the prediction of in-hospital mortality in a multicenter cohort of hematological cancer patients treated on ICU and non-ICU settings.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively calculated SIRS, SOFA, and qSOFA scores in our cohort and applied the definition of sepsis as \"life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by dysregulated host response to infection\" as reference. Discriminatory capacity was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
    UNASSIGNED: Among 450 patients with hematological cancer (median age 58 years, 274 males [61%]), 180 (40%) had sepsis of which 101 (56%) were treated on ICU. For the diagnosis of sepsis, sensitivity was 86%, 64%, and 42% for SIRS, SOFA, and qSOFA, respectively. However, the AUROCs of SOFA and qSOFA indicated better discrimination for sepsis than SIRS (SOFA, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.64-0.73] p < 0.001; qSOFA, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.62-0.71] p < 0.001; SIRS, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.53-0.61] p < 0.001).In-hospital mortality was 40% and 14% in patients with and without sepsis, respectively (p < 0.001). Regarding patients with sepsis, mortality was similar in patients with positive and negative SIRS scores (39% vs. 40% (p = 0.899), respectively). For patients with qSOFA ≥ 2, mortality was 49% compared to 33% for those with qSOFA < 2 (p = 0.056), and for SOFA 56% vs. 11% (p < 0.001), respectively. SOFA allowed significantly better discrimination for in-hospital mortality (AUROC 0.74 [95% CI, 0.69-0.79] p < 0.001) than qSOFA (AUROC 0.65 [95% CI, 0.60-0.71] p < 0.001) or SIRS (AUROC 0.49 [95% CI, 0.44-0.54] p < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: An increase in SOFA score of ≥ 2 had better prognostic accuracy for both diagnosis of sepsis and in-hospital mortality in this setting, and especially on ICU, we observed limited validity of SIRS criteria and qSOFA in identifying hematological patients with sepsis and at high risk of death.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号