Background: To evaluate the outcomes of arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tear (RCT) in individuals under 45 years, focusing on their ability to return to sports (RTS) and work, along with different patient-reported outcomes (PROMs). Methods: Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, this systematic review encompassed articles that studied the outcomes of arthroscopic treatment of RCT in the young population (those under 45 years old). The literature search was conducted in PubMed/Medline and EMBASE until 21 May 2024. The primary outcome was the RTS, with secondary outcomes including the return to work and various PROMs. These PROMs included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and 10 other PROMs. Results: Out of 6267 articles, 15 met the inclusion criteria, involving 659 patients, predominantly male athletes with a weighted mean age of 28.3 years. The RCT etiology (14 studies) was primarily traumatic (72.3%), followed by chronic microtrauma in overhead athletes (16.8%) and non-traumatic (10.9%). The RTS rate (12 studies) varied between 47% and 100%, with a cumulative rate of 75.2%. The cumulative rate of return to the same or higher RTS level (11 studies) was 56.1%. Excluding non-athletes and patients treated with debridement, the RTS rates increased to 79.8% (143/179) overall, with a 61% (108/177) rate of returning to the same or higher level. The return to work (3 studies) was successful in 90.6% of cases. Postoperative ASES scores (5 studies) improved markedly to a weighted post-operative mean of 75.6, with similar positive trends across other PROMs. Conclusions: Young adults undergoing arthroscopic RCT repair typically experience a 75% RTS rate at any level, and 56.1% RTS at the same level. Excluding non-athletes and debridement patients, RTS rates rise to 79.8% (143/179), with 61% (108/177) achieving the same or higher level. Level of evidence: IV, systematic review including case series.

Rotator cuff tears (RCT) and instability are the most common surgically treated shoulder pathologies. The concept of augmentation using the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) autograft was created to improve the results of surgical treatment of these pathologies, especially in cases of chronic and massive injuries. The popularity of using the LHBT for augmentation is evidenced by the significant number of publications on this topic published in the last 3 years; however, only one systematic review has been published regarding only LHBT augmentation for massive RCTs. Several studies comparing partial repair with partial repair and additional LHBT augmentation for RCT showed superior clinical outcomes and lower re-tear rates when LHBT augmentation was performed. There is a rising popularity of using LHBT as an autograft to perform superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) in case of irreparable rotator cuff tears. In recent years, shoulder stabilization by arthroscopic Bankart repair with biceps augmentation has been promoted with very promising short-term results. The evidence provided by studies appears to be sufficient to recommend the use of LHBT for augmentation whenever necessary; however, larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present systematic review is to collect all the available evidence regarding the clinical and radiological results of revision to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) of modular anatomic shoulder prostheses (TSA) using a convertible metal-backed glenoid (MBG).
METHODS: This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Studies investigating revision of TSA to RSA utilizing a convertible MBG and reporting clinical and radiological outcomes were identified.
RESULTS: A total of five studies on the use of convertible modular glenoid component in the setting of TSA revision to RSA were finally included in the present systematic review. A total of 60 procedures were reported. Mean operative times was 65 min. Intraoperative complications included 3 cases of glenoid loosening. Only one case of dislocation was reported as postoperative complication. At mean follow-up of 32.3 months post-revision, no glenoid loosening was reported, VAS score decreased from 7.7 to 1.5, Constant Score increased from 24.8 to 57.6.
CONCLUSIONS: Revision to RSA after failed TSA using a convertible modular glenoid component was associated with a low rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications, low surgical time and led to good results in term of pain relieve and functional outcomes. Given the complexity and risk associated with revision of anatomic shoulder prosthesis having a convertible glenoid may help to simplify the procedure and improve clinical results.

BACKGROUND: Delamination of cuff tendons has a negative impact on outcomes following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). The purpose of this study is to compare en masse repair (EMR) and separate double-layer repair (SDLR) for delaminated rotator cuff tears.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted on major databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus) until 1 June 2023. Comparative studies with a minimum 24-month follow-up of patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR for delaminated tears were included. The outcomes assessed retear rates and functional outcomes.
RESULTS: Five eligible studies involving 325 cases were analyzed. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference in retear rates between SDLR and EMR for delaminated tears (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.35-1.49). However, the meta-analysis demonstrated a significant intergroup difference in favor of the SDLR for the total Constant score (SMD = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.35 to 1.02), SST score (SMD = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.71), and postoperative range of abduction (SMD = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.64).
CONCLUSIONS: The evidence suggests that the SDLR in arthroscopic RCR for delaminated rotator cuff tears leads to improved short-term functional outcomes and range of motion compared to EMR. However, there is no significant difference in retear risk between the two approaches.

UNASSIGNED: This review aims to describe the origin and development of critical shoulder angle (CSA) and its correlation with different shoulder pathologies. Current literature is inconclusive in characterizing the role of CSA in predicting pathology and surgical outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: A literature search of both historical and more contemporary research articles on CSA was conducted to compare data points on the impact of CSA on shoulder pathology and postoperative clinical outcomes. This compilation of studies ranges from retrospective reviews to case series as well as cadaveric imaging studies.
UNASSIGNED: The CSA is a reliable radiographic measure in predicting shoulder pathology in correctly oriented radiographs. Surgically modifying the CSA with arthroscopic lateral acromioplasty and results has largely shown improved recovery of strength postoperatively as with no increase in postsurgical complication rates. However, it remains unclear whether surgical alteration of CSA has a role in preventing clinical failure after arthroscopic procedures such as acromioplasty and rotator cuff repair as well as following shoulder arthroplasty.
UNASSIGNED: Stronger conclusions regarding the prognostic utility of CSA are limited by the fact that most studies evaluating CSA are smaller retrospective cohorts. Moving forward, randomized controlled trials being conducted may offer greater insight as to how CSA can improve patient-reported outcomes postoperatively.

The management of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) during shoulder arthroscopy has been a subject of controversy for many years, with evolving discussions and trends. Despite long-standing debate, the nature of the surgical indication regarding how to treat concomitent LHBT injuries has undergone changes in recent years. It now extends beyond the timing of tenotomy to encompass considerations of alternative methods for preserving the LHBT, along with an ongoing exploration of how it can be effectively utilized in reconstructive shoulder surgery. Recent techniques describe approaches to using LHBT in a wide range of procedures, from shoulder instability to rotator cuff tears. Additionally, LHBT-based reconstructive techniques have surfaced for addressing what were formerly denoted as irreparable rotator cuff tears. While current literature provides detailed anatomical descriptions of the LHBT and many reports of novel, advanced techniques, there is still much debate regarding the decision-making process in each case. Because of the growing number of emerging techniques and the escalating debate in the subsequent paper, a decision has been made to present the current literature review concerning the potential utilization of LHBT in shoulder arthroscopy. In a dedicated video, we demonstrate the main arthroscopic techniques employed by the authors in their daily practice.

UNASSIGNED: Arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair techniques used to rely on knot-tying double row techniques, but the advent of knotless transosseous equivalent procedures introduced a new variable to the debate. The purpose of this study is to determine which technique is associated with lower retear rates. For its\' biomechanical advantages, the authors\' hypothesis is that knotless techniques would have lower retear rates.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature search was performed via PubMed and Google Scholar by two independent reviewers following PRISMA guidelines. Papers reporting retear rates after rotator cuff arthroscopic repair using knotted double-row or knotless transosseous equivalent techniques, evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging at least 6 months after surgery, were retrieved. Studies that do not differentiate between techniques and nonclinical reports were excluded. Eligible data was analyzed with Review Manager 5.4.1 using Mantel-Haenszel statistics with a fixed effect model.
UNASSIGNED: The authors\' initial literature search retrieved 511 reports. After the selection process, 24 articles were available for this review, and 9 were eligible for meta-analysis. A comparison of 1888 subjects from noncomparative reports and a meta-analysis of reports in which both techniques were studied could not show a statistically significant difference in technique retear rates.
UNASSIGNED: The current report revealed no significant difference in retear rates between the two arthroscopic repair techniques. Studies\' quality was a limitation. Only two reported level 1 evidence. This review could not control variables such as cuff tear size, tissue quality, or individual comorbidities. Larger and longer follow-up studies could be helpful to further investigate this topic.

UNASSIGNED: Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCT) are a significant cause of shoulder disability and pain, presenting a unique challenge in terms of management with multiple options for care ranging from debridement alone to partial rotator cuff repair. In this study we investigate how clinical outcomes and complications of partial rotator cuff repair compare to simple debridement in the treatment of irreparable rotator cuff tears.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 1594 publications were identified on PubMed from 1946 to 2017 with 16 level III to level IV studies that were reviewed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 709 shoulders from 706 patients were reviewed, with 380 patients receiving a partial repair and 329 shoulders receiving debridement. Fifteen outcome measures were utilized with visual analog scale (VAS) pain score and patient satisfaction being the most common. Pre- and post-operative mean VAS scores reported in 155 shoulders treated with partial repair were 6.0 (5.1-6.9) and 2.0 (1.7-3.2), respectively. Pre- and post-operative mean VAS scores in 113 shoulders treated with debridement were 6.5 (4.5-7.9) and 1.9 (1-2.9), respectively. Patient satisfaction in 111 shoulders treated with partial repair was reported as 75 % (51.6-92). In 153 shoulders treated with debridement, post-operative satisfaction was 80.7 % (78-83.9).
UNASSIGNED: This systematic review study demonstrates that both partial repair and debridement alone can result in acceptable clinical outcomes with no significant differences noted for patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears in short to mid-term follow up.

BACKGROUND: Muscle fatty degeneration following rotator cuff tears has been unequivocally associated with poorer functional outcomes and increased risk for retear following rotator cuff repair. Promising results have emerged from animal studies, with the implementation of various interventions for biologic inhibition of this fatty muscle degeneration. The lack of high quality randomized human evidence on this topic, increases the impact of pooled results from animal literature. The aim of the present study was to systematically review the available published literature for animal studies evaluating the ability of several interventions used to mitigate muscle fatty degeneration following the repair of massive rotator cuff tears.
METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted on Pubmed, Scopus and Google Scholar, covering the period from conception until 16th April 2022. Datasets were stratified based on the type of intervention performed. SYRCLE risk of bias instrument was implemented for quality assessment of the included studies.
RESULTS: Rotator cuff repair augmentation with Adipose derived stem cells (ADSC\'s), Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC\'s) and Nandrolone was effective against fatty infiltration, but less effective against muscle atrophy. More beneficial effect was shown by the utilization of Beige adipose tissue - Fibroadipogenic progenitors (BAT-FAP) stimulation, using either Amibregon or BAT-FAPs transplantation. Both provided good results in mitigating muscle atrophy, fatty infiltration and fibrosis.
CONCLUSIONS: ADSC\'s, MSC\'s, Nandrolone and BAT-FAP stimulation may have a role in mitigating muscle fatty degeneration following rotator cuff tears. Large scale human studies are required to further elucidate their role in the clinical setting.
METHODS: V; systematic review of pre-clinical studies.

UNASSIGNED: Delamination of rotator cuff tears during arthroscopic shoulder surgery has an incidence of 38% to 92%. Double-layer (DL) repair and en masse (EM) repair are most commonly used in this situation.
UNASSIGNED: To compare the clinical results of the DL versus EM repair techniques for delaminated rotator cuff tears using a meta-analysis.
UNASSIGNED: Systematic review; level of evidence, 3.
UNASSIGNED: We identified relevant studies comparing the clinical results of DL and EM repair for delaminated rotator cuff injuries in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases after the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The primary outcomes were the Constant score and retear rate. Additionally, we compared other postoperative shoulder functional scores, shoulder range of motion, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores between the 2 suture methods using a meta-analysis. The mean difference (MD) was compared for continuous outcomes, and the odds ratios (ORs) were compared for categorical outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Of the 197 studies initially identified, 6 studies were included in this analysis. There were significant differences in the Constant score (MD, 8.64 [95% CI, 4.47 to 12.8]; P < .05) and external rotation (MD, 5.10 [95% CI, 2.63 to 7.56]; P < .05) between the 2 techniques, with DL repair having superior outcomes. No significant differences were observed between the 2 techniques in forward flexion (MD, 0.62 [95% CI, -1.18 to 2.43]; P = .50), VAS pain (MD, -0.03 [95% CI, -0.34 to 0.27]; P = .84), or retear rate (OR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.37 to 1.41]; P = .35).
UNASSIGNED: Results of this review and meta-analysis suggest that DL repair was more beneficial than EM repair in terms of the Constant score and shoulder external rotation in patients with delaminated rotator cuff injuries.