rotator cuff

肩袖
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    文献中先前提出的评估肩袖相关肩痛患者的方法,基于特殊的骨科测试来精确识别导致肩部症状的结构最近受到了挑战。这开启了另一种体检方式的可能性。
    要分析肩部活动范围的差异,肩袖相关肩痛患者与无症状组之间的力量和胸椎后凸。
    本研究的方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价登记册(PROSPERO)(注册号CRD42021258924)中注册。在MEDLINE中进行了观察性研究的数据库搜索,EMBASE,WOS和CINHAL至2023年7月,与无症状组相比,评估肩部或颈部神经肌肉骨骼非侵入性体检。两名研究人员评估了资格和研究质量。采用纽卡斯尔渥太华量表评价方法学质量。
    选择8项研究(N=604)进行定量分析。荟萃分析显示,肩关节屈曲的影响较大(I2=91.7%,p<0.01,HG=-1.30),外旋转(I2=83.2%,p<0.01,HG=-1.16)和内部旋转运动范围(I2=0%,p<0.01,HG=-1.32)。关于肩部力量;只有内旋强度显示出统计学差异,影响很小(I2=42.8%,p<0.05,HG=-0.3)。
    有中度到有力的证据表明肩袖相关的肩痛患者肩关节屈曲较少,内部和外部旋转的运动范围和小于无症状个体的内部旋转强度。
    UNASSIGNED: The methods previously proposed in the literature to assess patients with rotator cuff related shoulder pain, based on special orthopedic tests to precisely identify the structure causing the shoulder symptoms have been recently challenged. This opens the possibility of a different way of physical examination.
    UNASSIGNED: To analyze the differences in shoulder range of motion, strength and thoracic kyphosis between rotator cuff related shoulder pain patients and an asymptomatic group.
    UNASSIGNED: The protocol of the present research was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review (PROSPERO) (registration number CRD42021258924). Database search of observational studies was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, WOS and CINHAL until July 2023, which assessed shoulder or neck neuro-musculoskeletal non-invasive physical examination compared to an asymptomatic group. Two investigators assessed eligibility and study quality. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the methodology quality.
    UNASSIGNED: Eight studies (N = 604) were selected for the quantitative analysis. Meta-analysis showed statistical differences with large effect for shoulder flexion (I2 = 91.7%, p < 0.01, HG = -1.30), external rotation (I2 = 83.2%, p < 0.01, HG = -1.16) and internal rotation range of motion (I2 = 0%, p < 0.01, HG = -1.32). Regarding to shoulder strength; only internal rotation strength showed statistical differences with small effect (I2 = 42.8%, p < 0.05, HG = -0.3).
    UNASSIGNED: There is moderate to strong evidence that patients with rotator cuff related shoulder pain present less shoulder flexion, internal and external rotation range of motion and less internal rotation strength than asymptomatic individuals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)是否有效减轻疼痛和残疾,在改善功能方面,肩袖钙化性肌腱病患者的生活质量和钙化完全吸收率。探讨ESWT的哪一种模式在高(HE)-SWT和低能量(LE)-SWT之间以及在局灶性(F)-SWT和径向(R)-SWT之间带来最大的临床改善。
    方法:MEDLINE,EMBASE,CENTRAL数据库,和PEDro数据库直到2024年2月都被搜索。进一步调查研究记录。使用修订的CochraneRoB工具(RoB2)评估偏倚(RoB)的风险。证据的确定性按等级评定。
    结果:纳入21项随机对照试验。没有人被认为是整体低RoB。比较ESWT和超声引导针手术(USGNP),汇总结果显示,在<24周和<48周时,USGNP在疼痛方面存在显着差异(MD=1.17,p=0.004,I2=59%;MD=1.31,p=0.004,I2=42%,分别)。比较ESWT和假ESWT,汇总结果报告了24周时在疼痛和功能方面有利于ESWT的临床显着差异(MD=-5.72,p<0.00001,I2=0%;标准化平均差=2.94,p=0.02I2=98%,分别)。比较HE-SWT和LE-SWT,在<24周时,HE-SWT在疼痛和功能方面具有统计学和临床优势(MD=-1.83,p=0.03,I2=87%;MD=14.60,p=0.002,I2=77%,分别),并在12周时显示出明显更高的钙化完全吸收率(风险比=2.53,p=0.001,I2=0%)。F-SWT和R-SWT在减轻疼痛方面表现同样有效,提高残疾和吸收率。通过分级方法,证据的确定性被评为非常低。
    结论:在<24周和<48周时,USGNP在减轻疼痛方面在统计学上优于ESWT。在24周时,ESWT在疼痛减轻和功能改善方面在临床上优于假ESWT。HE-SWT在临床上比LE-SWT更有效地减轻疼痛,在<24周时改善功能,并在12周时解决钙化沉积物,而F-SWT和R-SWT之间没有差异。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate if Extracorporeal Shock Wave therapy (ESWT) is effective in reducing pain and disability, in improving function, quality of life and complete resorption rate of calcification in patients with Rotator Cuff Calcific Tendinopathy. To investigate which modality of ESWT brings the greatest clinical improvements between High (HE)-SWT and Low Energy (LE)-SWT and between Focal (F)-SWT and Radial (R)-SWT.
    METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL Database, and PEDro databases until February 2024 were searched. Study registers were further investigated. The Risk of Bias (RoB) was assessed with the Revised Cochrane RoB Tool (RoB 2). The certainty of evidence was rated with GRADE.
    RESULTS: Twenty-one randomized controlled trials were included. None was judged as overall low RoB. Comparing ESWT and Ultrasound Guided Needling Procedures (USGNP), the pooled results reported a significant difference favoring USGNP in pain at <24 and <48 weeks (MD = 1.17, p = 0.004, I2 = 59%; MD = 1.31, p = 0.004, I2 = 42%, respectively). Comparing ESWT and sham-ESWT, the pooled results reported a clinically significant difference favoring ESWT in pain and function at 24 weeks (MD = -5.72, p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%; Standardized Mean Difference = 2.94, p = 0.02 I2 = 98%, respectively). Comparing HE-SWT and LE-SWT, HE-SWT was statistically and clinically superior in pain and function at <24 weeks (MD = -1.83, p = 0.03, I2 = 87%; MD = 14.60, p = 0.002, I2 = 77%, respectively) and showed a significantly higher complete resorption rate of calcification at 12 weeks (Risk Ratio = 2.53, p = 0.001, I2 = 0%). F-SWT and R-SWT appear equally effective in reducing pain, improving disability and resorption rate. The certainty of evidence was rated as very low through GRADE approach.
    CONCLUSIONS: USGNP was statistically superior to ESWT in pain reduction at <24 and <48 weeks. ESWT was clinically better to sham-ESWT in pain reduction and function improvement at 24 weeks. HE-SWT was clinically more effective than LE-SWT in reducing pain, improving function at <24 weeks, and resolving calcific deposits at 12 weeks, while no differences between F-SWT and R-SWT were reported.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估不同频率的运动干预的疗效,强度,肩袖相关性肩痛(RCRSP)患者肩痛和残疾的类型和时间(FITT)。设计:干预系统评价与荟萃分析。文献搜索:电子搜索一直进行到2023年5月。研究选择标准:根据FITT原则比较不同处方的运动干预效果的随机对照试验(RCT),在有RCRSP的人中。数据综合:进行了单独的荟萃分析,比较了运动类型(特异性与非特异性运动)和强度(高与低)。采用GRADE评价证据的确定性。结果:纳入了22个RCT(n=1281)。有适度的确定性证据表明,运动控制锻炼计划,与非特定的锻炼计划相比,短期(SMD:-0.29;95CI:-0.51至-0.07;n=323;7个随机对照试验)和中期(SMD:-0.33;95CI:-0.57至-0.09;n=286;5个随机对照试验),但短期内没有疼痛(SMD:-0.19;95CI:-0.41至0.03;n=323;7个随机对照试验)。其他运动类型(偏心和以肩胛骨为中心的运动计划)与非特定运动计划的不确定性仍然存在,和运动强度由于低到非常低的确定性证据。没有发现比较不同频率或时间的试验。结论:对于患有RCRSP的成年人,运动控制锻炼计划可能略优于非特定锻炼计划。然而,目前尚不清楚这些影响是由于运动控制锻炼还是其他程序特征,如进展和剪裁。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of exercise interventions with differing frequency, intensity, type and time (FITT) on shoulder pain and disability in people with rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP). DESIGN: Intervention systematic review with meta-analyses. LITERATURE SEARCH: Electronic searches were conducted up to May 2023. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of exercise interventions differing in prescription according to the FITT principle, in people with RCRSP. DATA SYNTHESIS: Separate meta-analyses comparing exercise type (specific versus non-specific exercise) and intensity (high versus low) were conducted. GRADE was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence. RESULTS: Twenty-two RCTs (n=1281) were included. There was moderate certainty evidence that motor control exercise programs, when compared to non-specific exercise programs, significantly reduced disability in the short- (SMD: -0.29; 95%CI: -0.51 to -0.07; n=323; 7 RCTs) and medium-term (SMD: -0.33; 95%CI: -0.57 to -0.09; n=286; 5 RCTs), but not pain in the short-term (SMD: -0.19; 95%CI: -0.41 to 0.03; n=323; 7 RCTs). Uncertainties remained regarding other exercise types (eccentric and scapula-focused exercise programs) versus non-specific exercise programs, and exercise intensity due to low to very low certainty evidence. No trials were identified that compared different frequencies or times. CONCLUSION: For adults with RCRSP, motor control exercise programs were probably slightly superior to non-specific exercise programs. However, it is unclear if the effects were due to motor control exercise or to other program characteristics such as progression and tailoring.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:总结FITT(频率,强度,时间,类型),包括在随机对照试验(RCT)中的运动计划的组成部分,该试验比较了2个或更多治疗肩袖相关肩痛(RCRSP)的计划。设计:范围审查。文献搜索:电子搜索一直进行到2023年5月。研究选择标准:RCT比较两种或更多种类型的锻炼计划的效果,根据FITT原则,处方不同,在有RCRSP的人中。数据综合:我们从每个试验报告中提取数据,以便我们能够回答运动报告模板共识(CERT)中的1-10和13-15项。通过总结和呈现FITT特征,对锻炼计划进行了描述性分析。和其他相关CERT特征(材料,提供者,delivery,裁缝)。结果:从22项试验中纳入的46项运动项目中提取FITT特征。锻炼计划分为4类(根据原始作者的描述和建议的基本原理定义):运动控制(n=8),肩胛骨聚焦(n=7),偏心(n=8),和非特异性锻炼计划(n=28)。五个程序被分配到两个不同的类别。不同的程序类型具有相似的参数。锻炼计划的频率从每周2到7次不等,剂量范围为1~3组,每组重复4~30次,运动项目持续时间为4~16周.结论:用于规定RCRSP练习的参数存在很大差异。寻求来自试验的FITT参数指导的临床医生应该谨慎行事,因为没有一种适合所有人的方法。
    OBJECTIVE: To summarize the FITT (frequency, intensity, time, type) components of exercise programs included in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared 2 or more programs for managing rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP). DESIGN: Scoping review. LITERATURE SEARCH: Electronic searches were conducted up to May 2023. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs comparing the effects of 2 or more types of exercise programs, differing in prescription according to the FITT principle, in people with RCRSP. DATA SYNTHESIS: We extracted data from each trial report so that we could answer items 1-10 and 13-15 from the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT). Descriptive analysis of the exercise programs was performed by summarising and presenting the FITT characteristics, and other relevant CERT characteristics (material, provider, delivery, tailoring). RESULTS: FITT characteristics from 46 exercise programs included in 22 trials were extracted. The exercise programs were divided into 4 categories (defined in accordance to the original authors\' description and proposed rationale): motor control (n=8), scapula-focused (n=7), eccentric (n=8), and non-specific exercise programs (n=28). Five programs were allocated to 2 different categories. The different program types had similar parameters. Exercise programs frequency ranged from 2 to 7 times per week, dose ranged from 1 to 3 sets and 4 to 30 repetitions per sets and exercise program duration ranged from 4 to 16 weeks. CONCLUSION: There was considerable variability in the parameters used to prescribe exercises for RCRSP. Clinicians seeking guidance on FITT parameters derived from trials should do so cautiously because there was no one size-fits-all approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们通过荟萃分析比较了早期和延迟康复对肩袖修复后患者功能的影响,以寻找有效的干预措施来促进肩关节功能的恢复。
    该荟萃分析在PROSPERO(CRD42023466122)中注册。我们在Cochrane文库中手动搜索了随机对照试验(RCT),Pubmed,科克伦图书馆,EMBASE,中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI),中国VIP数据库(VIP),和万方数据库评价关节镜肩袖手术后早期和延迟康复对肩关节功能恢复的影响。使用ReviewManager5.3软件对提取的数据进行分析。然后,采用PEDro量表对纳入研究的方法学质量进行评价。
    这项研究包括9个RCT和830个肩袖损伤患者。根据荟萃分析的结果,术后6个月和12个月,早期康复组和延迟康复组的VAS评分无明显差异,SST评分,随访肩袖愈合率,和最终随访时的肩袖再撕裂率。术后6个月早期康复组和延迟康复组的ASES评分无差异。然而,尽管术后12个月早期康复组的ASES评分与延迟康复组的ASES评分有显著差异,根据对最小临床重要差异(MCID)的分析,结果无临床意义。
    关节镜肩袖手术后肩关节功能的改善在早期和延迟康复之间没有临床差异。当在肩袖修复后实施康复时,必须考虑肩关节活动范围和肌腱解剖愈合的悖论。根据患者满足预定临床目标或标准的能力,允许灵活进展的程序可能是更好的选择。
    UNASSIGNED: We compared the effects of early and delayed rehabilitation on the function of patients after rotator cuff repair by meta-analysis to find effective interventions to promote the recovery of shoulder function.
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023466122). We manually searched the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), the China VIP Database (VIP), and the Wanfang Database to evaluate the effect of early and delayed rehabilitation after arthroscopic shoulder cuff surgery on the recovery of shoulder joint function. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to analyze the extracted data. Then, the PEDro scale was employed to appraise the methodological quality of the included research.
    UNASSIGNED: This research comprised nine RCTs and 830 patients with rotator cuff injuries. According to the findings of the meta-analysis, there was no discernible difference between the early rehabilitation group and the delayed rehabilitation group at six and twelve months after the surgery in terms of the VAS score, SST score, follow-up rotator cuff healing rate, and the rotator cuff retear rate at the final follow-up. There was no difference in the ASES score between the early and delayed rehabilitation groups six months after the operation. However, although the ASES score in the early rehabilitation group differed significantly from that in the delayed rehabilitation group twelve months after the operation, according to the analysis of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), the results have no clinical significance.
    UNASSIGNED: The improvement in shoulder function following arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery does not differ clinically between early and delayed rehabilitation. When implementing rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair, it is essential to consider the paradoxes surrounding shoulder range of motion and tendon anatomic healing. A program that allows for flexible progression based on the patient\'s ability to meet predetermined clinical goals or criteria may be a better option.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肌腱是肌肉骨骼系统的重要组成部分,促进运动和支持机械负荷。新出现的证据表明维生素D,除了其在骨骼健康中公认的作用之外,对肌腱生理有显著影响。本手稿的目的是回顾维生素D对肌腱的影响,着眼于其行动机制,临床意义,和治疗应用。对科学电子数据库进行了全面搜索,以确定有关维生素D对肌腱健康影响的文章。本综述包括14项研究。在体外进行了五项研究,并在体内进行了九项研究。尽管有一些相互矛盾的结果,纳入的研究表明,维生素D调节胶原蛋白的合成,炎症,并通过与维生素D受体的相互作用在肌腱内矿化。流行病学研究将维生素D缺乏与肌腱疾病联系起来,包括肌腱病和愈合受损。补充维生素D有望改善肌腱的力量和功能,特别是在运动员和老年人等高危人群中。未来的研究应该解决最佳补充策略,并探索维生素D与其他影响肌腱健康的因素之间的相互作用。将维生素D优化整合到临床实践中可以增强肌腱完整性并减轻肌腱相关病变的负担。
    Tendons are vital components of the musculoskeletal system, facilitating movement and supporting mechanical loads. Emerging evidence suggests that vitamin D, beyond its well-established role in bone health, exerts significant effects on tendon physiology. The aim of this manuscript is to review the impact of vitamin D on tendons, focusing on its mechanisms of action, clinical implications, and therapeutic applications. A comprehensive search of scientific electronic databases was conducted to identify articles on the effects of vitamin D on tendon health. Fourteen studies were included in this review. Five studies were performed in vitro, and nine studies were conducted in vivo. Despite some conflicting results, the included studies showed that vitamin D regulates collagen synthesis, inflammation, and mineralization within tendons through its interaction with vitamin D receptors. Epidemiological studies link vitamin D deficiency with tendon disorders, including tendinopathy and impaired healing. Supplementation with vitamin D shows promise in improving tendon strength and function, particularly in at-risk populations such as athletes and the elderly. Future research should address optimal supplementation strategies and explore the interplay between vitamin D and other factors influencing tendon health. Integrating vitamin D optimization into clinical practice could enhance tendon integrity and reduce the burden of tendon-related pathologies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    肩痛是最常见的肌肉骨骼疾病,通常会导致严重的功能障碍和疼痛,影响生活质量。家庭康复计划为有效的肩部疾病治疗提供了更容易获得和方便的解决方案,解决与传统物理治疗相关的后勤和财政限制。本系统审查的目的是报告目前提出并在家庭环境中进行肩部康复测试的监测设备。研究问题是使用PICO方法制定的,PRISMA准则被应用,以确保系统审查过程的方法透明。对PubMed和Scopus进行了全面搜索,结果包括从2014年到2023年。三种不同的工具(即,Rob2版本的Cochrane偏差风险工具,乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)批判性评估工具,和ROBINS-I工具)用于评估偏倚风险。纳入了15项研究,因为它们符合纳入标准。结果表明,可穿戴系统代表了一个有前途的解决方案,作为远程监控技术,提供对康复途径中个体进展的定量和临床意义的见解。最近的趋势表明,越来越多地使用低成本,非侵入式视觉跟踪设备,例如基于摄像头的监控系统,在远程康复领域。基于家庭的监测设备与传统的康复方法的集成正在获得极大的关注,提供更广泛的高质量护理,并有可能降低与面对面治疗相关的医疗保健成本。
    Shoulder pain represents the most frequently reported musculoskeletal disorder, often leading to significant functional impairment and pain, impacting quality of life. Home-based rehabilitation programs offer a more accessible and convenient solution for an effective shoulder disorder treatment, addressing logistical and financial constraints associated with traditional physiotherapy. The aim of this systematic review is to report the monitoring devices currently proposed and tested for shoulder rehabilitation in home settings. The research question was formulated using the PICO approach, and the PRISMA guidelines were applied to ensure a transparent methodology for the systematic review process. A comprehensive search of PubMed and Scopus was conducted, and the results were included from 2014 up to 2023. Three different tools (i.e., the Rob 2 version of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal tool, and the ROBINS-I tool) were used to assess the risk of bias. Fifteen studies were included as they fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The results showed that wearable systems represent a promising solution as remote monitoring technologies, offering quantitative and clinically meaningful insights into the progress of individuals within a rehabilitation pathway. Recent trends indicate a growing use of low-cost, non-intrusive visual tracking devices, such as camera-based monitoring systems, within the domain of tele-rehabilitation. The integration of home-based monitoring devices alongside traditional rehabilitation methods is acquiring significant attention, offering broader access to high-quality care, and potentially reducing healthcare costs associated with in-person therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肩袖损伤(RCI)是一种常见的肌肉骨骼疾病,是导致肩痛和功能受限的主要原因。随之而来的疼痛和活动受限显著影响整体生活质量。本研究旨在系统评价体外冲击波治疗(ESWT)对RCI的影响。
    方法:本方案遵循系统评价和荟萃分析方案的首选报告项目。文献检索,从成立到2023年11月1日,将包括PubMed等数据库,WebofScience,Cochrane图书馆,Scopus,MEDLINE,EMBASE,EBSCO,和中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)确定RCI治疗的ESWT研究。不包括回顾,偏差风险将使用Cochrane工具进行评估。两名研究人员将独立筛选,提取数据,并评估偏差风险。采用Revman5.3软件进行数据分析。
    结果:本研究旨在客观、全面地评价ESWT治疗RCI的随机对照试验的有效性和安全性,并详细分析ESWT治疗RCI的效果。结果将使用疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行分析,Constant-Murley得分,加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)和美国肩肘外科医生(ASES)。如果适用,亚组分析还将根据ESWT的能量水平将患者分组,干预的时间,以及RCI的撕裂程度。最后,结果提交给同行评审的期刊发表.
    结论:现有证据表明ESWT可能有助于改善与肩袖损伤(RCI)相关的疼痛和功能限制。这项系统的审查旨在更新,巩固,并严格评估ESWT对RCI影响的相关证据。预期的结果可以作为临床ESWT实践的有价值的参考,涵盖治疗方法,定时,和强度。此外,本综述旨在为ESWT对RCI相关疼痛的影响提供高质量的证据.同时,本系统综述的结果将为临床医师和康复治疗师提供指导.本指南旨在加强对RCI患者所经历的疼痛和功能障碍的管理,最终改善他们的身体健康。
    背景:协议注册号CRD42023441407。https://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023441407。
    BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff injury (RCI) is a common musculoskeletal ailment and a major cause of shoulder pain and limited functionality. The ensuing pain and restricted movement significantly impact overall quality of life. This study aims to systematically review the effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on RCI.
    METHODS: This protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols. A literature search, spanning inception to November 1, 2023, will include databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBSCO, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) to identify ESWT studies for RCI treatment. Excluding retrospectives, bias risk will be assessed with the Cochrane tool. Two researchers will independently screen, extract data, and evaluate bias risk. Revman 5.3 software will be used for data analysis.
    RESULTS: This study aims to objectively and comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness and safety of randomized controlled trials of ESWT in the treatment of RCI, and analyze in detail the effect of ESWT in the treatment of RCI. Results will be analyzed using the Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Constant-Murley score, University of California Los Angeles score (UCLA), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons form (ASES). If applicable, subgroup analysis will also be performed to divide patients into groups according to the energy level of ESWT, the time of intervention, and the degree of tearing of RCI. Finally, the results are submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
    CONCLUSIONS: There is existing evidence suggesting that ESWT may contribute to the amelioration of pain and functional limitations associated with Rotator Cuff Injury (RCI). This systematic review aims to update, consolidate, and critically evaluate relevant evidence on the effects of ESWT for RCI. The anticipated outcomes may serve as a valuable reference for clinical ESWT practices, covering treatment methods, timing, and intensity. Moreover, this review aspires to provide high-quality evidence addressing the impact of ESWT on RCI-related pain. Simultaneously, the findings of this systematic review are poised to offer guidance to clinicians and rehabilitation therapists. This guidance is intended to enhance the management of pain and functional impairments experienced by individuals with RCI, ultimately leading to improvements in their physical well-being.
    BACKGROUND: Protocol registration number CRD42023441407. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023441407.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肩袖肌腱病(RCT)是一种广泛的肌肉骨骼疾病,是肩痛和功能受限的主要原因。由此产生的疼痛和有限的功能对整体生活质量具有不利影响。这项研究的目的是对体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)对RCT的影响进行系统评价。
    方法:从开始到2024年2月20日,对以下数据库进行了文献检索:PubMed,WebofScience,Cochrane图书馆,Scopus,MEDLINE,EMBASE,EBSCO,和中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)进行了检查,以确定探索ESWT治疗肩袖肌腱病(钙化或非钙化)的潜在研究,对照组为假,其他治疗(包括安慰剂),没有日期限制,语言。两名研究人员独立筛选文献,提取的数据,评估了纳入研究中的偏倚风险,并使用RevMan5.3软件进行荟萃分析。
    结果:共纳入16个RCTs,共1093例患者。结果表明,与对照组相比,ESWT用于疼痛评分视觉模拟评分/评分(VAS)(SMD=-1.95,95%CI-2.47,-1.41,P<0.00001),功能评分Constant-Murley评分(CMS)(SMD=1.30,95%CI0.67,1.92,P<0.00001),加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)评分(SMD=2.69,95%CI1.64,3.74,P<0.00001),美国肩肘外科医师形态(ASES)(SMD=1.29,95%CI0.93,1.65,P<0.00001),运动范围(ROM)外部旋转(SMD=1.00,95%CI0.29,1.72,P=0.02),总有效率(TER)(OR=3.64,95%CI1.85,7.14,P=0.0002),以上结果的差异有统计学意义。但ROM-外展(SMD=0.72,95%CI-0.22,1.66,P=0.13),差异无统计学意义。
    结论:目前有限的证据表明,与对照组相比,ESWT可以提供更好的疼痛缓解,功能恢复,和RCT患者功能的维持。
    BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff tendinopathy (RCT) is a widespread musculoskeletal disorder and a primary cause of shoulder pain and limited function. The resulting pain and limited functionality have a detrimental impact on the overall quality of life. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for RCT.
    METHODS: The literature search was conducted on the following databases from inception to February 20, 2024: PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBSCO, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were checked to identify the potential studies exploring the effect of ESWT for the treatment of Rotator cuff tendinopathy (Calcification or non-calcification), control group for sham, other treatments (including placebo), without restriction of date, language. Two researchers independently screened literature, extracted data, evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies, and performed meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3 software.
    RESULTS: A total of 16 RCTs with 1093 patients were included. The results showed that compared with the control group, ESWT for pain score Visual Analogue Scale/Score (VAS) (SMD = -1.95, 95% CI -2.47, -1.41, P < 0.00001), function score Constant-Murley score (CMS) (SMD = 1.30, 95% CI 0.67, 1.92, P < 0.00001), University of California Los Angeles score (UCLA) (SMD = 2.69, 95% CI 1.64, 3.74, P < 0.00001), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons form (ASES) (SMD = 1.29, 95% CI 0.93, 1.65, P < 0.00001), Range of motion (ROM) External rotation (SMD = 1.00, 95% CI 0.29, 1.72, P = 0.02), Total effective rate (TER) (OR = 3.64, 95% CI 1.85, 7.14, P = 0.0002), the differences in the above results were statistically significant. But ROM-Abduction (SMD = 0.72, 95% CI -0.22, 1.66, P = 0.13), the difference was not statistically significant.
    CONCLUSIONS: Currently limited evidence suggests that, compared with the control group, ESWT can provide better pain relief, functional recovery, and maintenance of function in patients with RCT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对于循证实践,临床医生和研究人员可以依靠进行良好的随机临床试验,这些试验表现出良好的方法学质量,提供充分的干预说明,和实现保真度。
    目的:评估肩袖撕裂患者临床试验中基于运动的干预措施的描述和实施保真度。
    方法:在PubMed中进行了系统搜索,Embase,CINAHL,LILACS,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,SCOPUS和SciELO。包括评估通过影像学检查确认的肩袖撕裂个体的随机临床试验。所有个人都必须接受过基于运动的治疗。使用物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)量表对方法学质量进行评分。干预描述和复制模板(TIDieR)清单和美国国立卫生研究院行为改变联盟(NIHBCC)用于评估干预描述和实施保真度,分别。
    结果:共纳入13项研究。尽管他们有足够的方法质量,对干预措施的描述较差,24个总分中TIDeR评分为6~15分.TIDeR得分最高的项目是项目1(简要名称),在所有研究中报告。考虑到保真度,NIHBCC的五个域中只有一个(即,治疗设计)刚刚超过50%。
    结论:在肩袖撕裂患者的研究中使用基于运动的干预措施的报道很少。需要更好地报告干预措施的描述和保真度,以帮助临床决策并支持循证实践。
    BACKGROUND: For evidence-based practice, clinicians and researchers can rely on well-conducted randomized clinical trials that exhibit good methodological quality, provide adequate intervention descriptions, and implementation fidelity.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the description and implementation fidelity of exercise-based interventions in clinical trials for individuals with rotator cuff tears.
    METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, LILACS, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, SCOPUS and SciELO. Randomized clinical trials that assessed individuals with rotator cuff tears confirmed by imaging exam were included. All individuals must have received an exercise-based treatment. The methodological quality was scored with the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist and the National Institutes of Health Behaviour Change Consortium (NIHBCC) were used to assess intervention description and implementation fidelity, respectively.
    RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were included. Despite their adequate methodological quality, the description of the intervention was poor with TIDieR scores ranging from 6 to 15 out of 24 total points. The TIDieR highest-scoring item was item 1 (brief name) that was reported in all studies. Considering fidelity, only one of the five domains of NIHBCC (i.e., treatment design) reached just over 50%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Exercise-based interventions used in studies for individuals with rotator cuff tears are poorly reported. The description and fidelity of the intervention need to be better reported to assist clinical decision-making and support evidence-based practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号