risk prediction model

风险预测模型
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:分析心脏病危重患者术后血小板减少的影响因素,构建列线图预测模型。
    方法:收集2022年10月至2023年10月我院就诊的319例心脏病危重患者,根据患者术后血小板减少情况分为术后血小板减少组(142例)和术后无血小板减少组(177例)。应用Logistic回归分析筛选心脏病危重患者术后血小板减少的危险因素;应用R软件构建预测心脏病危重患者术后血小板减少的列线图,和ROC曲线,校正曲线,和Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度测试用于评估列线图。
    结果:319名危重患者中有142名患者出现术后血小板减少症,占44.51%。Logistic回归分析显示性别(95%CI1.607~4.402,P=0.000),年龄≥60岁(95%CI1.380-3.697,P=0.001),术前抗血小板治疗(95%CI1.254-3.420,P=0.004),体外循环时间>120min(95%CI1.681~4.652,P=0.000)是重症心脏病患者术后血小板减少的独立危险因素。ROC曲线下面积为0.719(95%CI:0.663-0.774)。校准曲线的斜率接近1,Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验为χ2=6.422,P=0.491。
    结论:心脏病危重患者术后血小板减少受性别影响,年龄≥60岁,术前抗血小板治疗,和体外循环时间>120分钟。基于上述多个独立危险因素建立的列线图为临床预测心脏病危重患者术后血小板减少的风险提供了一种方法。
    OBJECTIVE: To analyze the influencing factors of postoperative thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients with heart disease and construct a nomogram prediction model.
    METHODS: From October 2022 to October 2023, 319 critically ill patients with heart disease who visited our hospital were collected and separated into postoperative thrombocytopenia group (n = 142) and no postoperative thrombocytopenia group (n = 177) based on their postoperative thrombocytopenia, Logistic regression analysis was applied to screen risk factors for postoperative thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients with heart disease; R software was applied to construct a nomogram for predicting postoperative thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients with heart disease, and ROC curves, calibration curves, and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit tests were applied to evaluate nomogram.
    RESULTS: A total of 142 out of 319 critically ill patients had postoperative thrombocytopenia, accounting for 44.51%. Logistic regression analysis showed that gender (95% CI 1.607-4.402, P = 0.000), age ≥ 60 years (95% CI 1.380-3.697, P = 0.001), preoperative antiplatelet therapy (95% CI 1.254-3.420, P = 0.004), and extracorporeal circulation time > 120 min (95% CI 1.681-4.652, P = 0.000) were independent risk factors for postoperative thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients with heart disease. The area under the ROC curve was 0.719 (95% CI: 0.663-0.774). The slope of the calibration curve was close to 1, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test was χ2 = 6.422, P = 0.491.
    CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients with heart disease is influenced by gender, age ≥ 60 years, preoperative antiplatelet therapy, and extracorporeal circulation time > 120 min. A nomogram established based on above multiple independent risk factors provides a method for clinical prediction of the risk of postoperative thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients with heart disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与射血分数降低(HFrEF)的心力衰竭(HF)患者相比,射血分数保持(HFpEF)的心力衰竭(HF)患者更容易发生心房颤动(AF)。然而,HFpEF患者新发房颤(NOAF)的风险预测模型仍然存在明显差距,特别是在成像指标方面。
    我们回顾性分析了2017年至2023年在青岛大学附属医院接受检查的402名HFpEF受试者。进行Cox回归分析以筛选NOAF的预测因子。基于这些因素构建了列线图,并通过Bootstrap重采样方法进行了内部验证。进行列线图和mC2HEST评分之间的性能比较。
    在402名参与者中,62(15%)发展为心房颤动。最终筛选出NOAF的危险因素,包括年龄,慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD),甲状腺功能亢进,肾功能不全,左心房前后径(LAD),肺动脉收缩压(PASP),所有这些都被识别以创建列线图.我们计算了引导校正的C指数(0.819,95%CI:0.762-0.870),并绘制了受试者操作员特征(ROC)曲线[3年曲线下面积(AUC)=0.827,5年AUC=0.825],校正曲线,和临床决策曲线来评估歧视,校准,六因素列线图的临床适应性。根据X-tile软件计算的两个截止值,中危和高危组比低危组有更多的NOAF病例(P<0.0001).我们的列线图显示出比综合判别改善指数(IDI)和净重新分类指数(NRI)估计的mC2HEST评分更好的3年和5年NOAF预测性能(P<0.05)。
    结合临床特征和超声心动图指标的列线图有助于预测HFpEF患者的NOAF。
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are more prone to atrial fibrillation (AF) compared to those with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Nevertheless, a risk prediction model for new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) in HFpEF patients remains a notable gap, especially with respect to imaging indicators.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively analyzed 402 HFpEF subjects reviewed at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from 2017 to 2023. Cox regression analysis was performed to screen predictors of NOAF. A nomogram was constructed based on these factors and internally validated through the bootstrap resampling method. A performance comparison between the nomogram and the mC2HEST score was performed.
    UNASSIGNED: Out of the 402 participants, 62 (15%) developed atrial fibrillation. The risk factors for NOAF were finally screened out to include age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hyperthyroidism, renal dysfunction, left atrial anterior-posterior diameter (LAD), and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), all of which were identified to create the nomogram. We calculated the bootstrap-corrected C-index (0.819, 95% CI: 0.762-0.870) and drew receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves [3-year areas under curves (AUC) = 0.827, 5-year AUC = 0.825], calibration curves, and clinical decision curves to evaluate the discrimination, calibration, and clinical adaptability of the six-factor nomogram. Based on two cutoff values calculated by X-tile software, the moderate- and high-risk groups had more NOAF cases than the low-risk group (P < 0.0001). Our nomogram showed better 3- and 5-year NOAF predictive performance than the mC2HEST score estimated by the Integrated Discriminant Improvement Index (IDI) and the Net Reclassification Index (NRI) (P < 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: The nomogram combining clinical features with echocardiographic indices helps predict NOAF among HFpEF patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: Parathyroidectomy (PTX) is an effective treatment for refractory secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), but it can lead to hungry bone syndrome (HBS), significantly threatening the health of maintenance haemodialysis (MHD) patients. While previous studies have analyzed the risk factors for HBS post-PTX, the predictive performance and clinical applicability of these risk models need further validation. This study aims to construct and validate a risk prediction model for HBS in MHD patients with SHPT post-PTX.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 368 MHD patients with SHPT who underwent PTX at Changsha Jieao Nephrology Hospital from January 2020 to December 2021. Patients were divided into a HBS group and a non-HBS group based on the occurrence of HBS. General data, surgical information, and biochemical indicators were compared between the 2 groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors influencing HBS, and a risk prediction model was established. The model\'s performance was evaluated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curves, and calibration curves. External validation was performed on 170 MHD patients with SHPT who underwent PTX at the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January to December 2022.
    RESULTS: The incidence of HBS post-PTX in MHD patients with SHPT was 60.60%. Logistic regression analysis identified preoperative bone involvement (OR=3.908, 95% CI 2.179 to 7.171), preoperative serum calcium (OR=7.174, 95% CI 2.291 to 24.015), preoperative intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) (OR=1.001, 95% CI 1.001 to 1.001), preoperative alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (OR=1.001, 95% CI 1.000 to 1.001), and serum calcium on the first postoperative day (OR=0.006, 95% CI 0.001 to 0.038) as independent risk factors for HBS (all P<0.01). The constructed risk prediction model demonstrated good predictive performance in both internal and external validation cohorts. The internal validation cohort showed an accuracy of 0.821, sensitivity of 0.890, specificity of 0.776, Youden index of 0.666, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.882 (95% CI 0.845 to 0.919). The external validation cohort showed an accuracy of 0.800, sensitivity of 0.806, specificity of 0.799, Youden index of 0.605, and AUC of 0.863 (95% CI 0.795 to 0.932).
    CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative bone involvement, serum calcium, iPTH, ALP, and serum calcium on the first postoperative day are influencing factors for HBS in MHD patients with SHPT post-PTX. The constructed risk prediction model based on these factors is reliable.
    目的: 甲状旁腺切除术(parathyroidectomy,PTX)是治疗难治性继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进(secondary hyperparathyroidism,SHPT)的有效方法,但PTX后极易出现骨饥饿综合征(hungry bone syndrome,HBS),严重威胁维持性血液透析(maintenance hemodialysis,MHD)患者的生命健康。目前已有研究分析PTX后并发HBS的风险因素,但风险预测模型的预测性能和临床适用性仍待进一步验证。本研究旨在构建MHD伴SHPT患者PTX后并发HBS的风险预测模型,并验证其预测效果。方法: 回顾性收集2020年1月至2021年12月在长沙捷奥肾病医院行PTX的MHD伴SHPT的368例患者为训练集,按照是否发生HBS分为HBS组和non-HBS组,对2组的一般资料、手术相关信息、生化指标等进行比较,应用多因素logistic回归筛选HBS的影响因素,建立风险预测模型。采用受试者操作特征(receiver operator characteristic,ROC)曲线、决策曲线、校准曲线对模型进行评价。收集2022年1至12月在中南大学湘雅三医院行PTX的MHD伴SHPT的170例患者为验证集进行外部验证。结果: MHD伴SHPT患者PTX后HBS发生率为60.60%,logistic回归分析结果显示:术前骨骼受累(OR=3.908,95% CI 2.179~7.171)、术前血钙(OR=7.174,95% CI 2.291~24.015)、术前全段甲状旁腺激素(intact parathyroid hormone,iPTH)(OR=1.001,95% CI 1.001~1.001)、术前碱性磷酸酶(alkaline phosphatase,ALP)(OR=1.001,95% CI 1.000~1.001)、术后第1天血钙(OR=0.006,95% CI 0.001~0.038)是MHD患者伴SHPT行PTX后并发HBS的独立危险因素(均P<0.01)。构建的风险预测模型在内部训练集和外部验证集中均表现出良好的预测结果,内部验证集的准确度为0.821,灵敏度为0.890,特异度为0.776,约登指数为0.666,曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)为0.882(95% CI 0.845~0.919);外部验证集的准确度为0.800,灵敏度为0.806,特异度为0.799,约登指数为0.605,AUC为0.863(95% CI 0.795~0.932)。结论: 术前骨骼受累、术前血钙、术前iPTH、术前ALP、术后第1天血钙水平是MHD伴SHPT患者行PTX后并发HBS的影响因素,基于上述因素构建的风险预测模型可靠。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    早期预测和干预对于原因不明复发性流产(uRSA)的预后至关重要。本研究的主要目的是建立基于常规孕前试验的uRSA风险预测模型,以便为临床医生提供患者是否处于高风险的指征。
    这是2019年1月至2022年12月在河南省人民医院产前诊断中心进行的一项回顾性研究。收集了12项常规孕前测试和4项基本个人信息特征。孕前测试包括促甲状腺激素(TSH),游离三碘甲状腺原氨酸(FT3),游离甲状腺素甲状腺(FT4),甲状腺素(TT4),总三碘甲状腺原氨酸(TT3),过氧化物酶抗体(TPO-Ab),甲状腺球蛋白抗体(TG-Ab),25-羟基维生素D[25-(OH)D],铁蛋白(Ferr),同型半胱氨酸(Hcy),维生素B12(VitB12),叶酸(FA)。基本个人信息特征包括年龄、体重指数(BMI),吸烟史和饮酒史。采用Logistic回归分析建立风险预测模型,采用受试者工作特性曲线(ROC)和决策曲线分析(DCA)对预测模型的性能进行评价。
    将uRSA组的140名患者和对照组的152名女性随机分为训练集(n=186)和测试集(n=106)。每个单一特征的卡方检验结果表明,FT3(p=0.018),FT4(p=0.048),25-(OH)D(p=0.013)和FA(p=0.044)与RSA密切相关。根据临床经验,TG-Ab和TPO-Ab也是重要的特征,因此,我们建立了基于以上六个特征的RSA风险预测模型,采用logistic回归分析。模型在测试集上的预测准确率为74.53%,ROC曲线下面积为0.710。DCA曲线表明该模型具有良好的临床应用价值。
    孕前测试,如FT3,FT4,TG-Ab,25-(OH)D和FA与uRSA亲密相干。本研究成功建立了基于常规孕前试验的RSA风险预测模型。
    UNASSIGNED: Early prediction and intervention are crucial for the prognosis of unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion (uRSA). The main purpose of this study is to establish a risk prediction model for uRSA based on routine pre-pregnancy tests, in order to provide clinical physicians with indications of whether the patients are at high risk.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective study conducted at the Prenatal Diagnosis Center of Henan Provincial People\'s Hospital between January 2019 and December 2022. Twelve routine pre-pregnancy tests and four basic personal information characteristics were collected. Pre-pregnancy tests include thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free triiodothyronine (FT3), free thyroxine thyroid (FT4), thyroxine (TT4), total triiodothyronine (TT3), peroxidase antibody (TPO-Ab), thyroid globulin antibody (TG-Ab), 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25-(OH) D], ferritin (Ferr), Homocysteine (Hcy), vitamin B12 (VitB12), folic acid (FA). Basic personal information characteristics include age, body mass index (BMI), smoking history and drinking history. Logistic regression analysis was used to establish a risk prediction model, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were employed to evaluate the performance of prediction model.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 140 patients in uRSA group and 152 women in the control group were randomly split into a training set (n = 186) and a testing set (n = 106). Chi-square test results for each single characteristic indicated that, FT3 (p = 0.018), FT4 (p = 0.048), 25-(OH) D (p = 0.013) and FA (p = 0.044) were closely related to RSA. TG-Ab and TPO-Ab were also important characteristics according to clinical experience, so we established a risk prediction model for RSA based on the above six characteristics using logistic regression analysis. The prediction accuracy of the model on the testing set was 74.53%, and the area under ROC curve was 0.710. DCA curve indicated that the model had good clinical value.
    UNASSIGNED: Pre-pregnancy tests such as FT3, FT4, TG-Ab, 25-(OH)D and FA were closely related to uRSA. This study successfully established a risk prediction model for RSA based on routine pre-pregnancy tests.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在开发一种综合动态列线图,包括N端原B型天然肽(NT-proBNP)和估算的肾小球滤过率(eGFR),用于预测HFmrEF患者全因死亡率的风险。
    790例HFmrEF患者被前瞻性纳入模型的发展队列。采用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归和随机生存森林(RSF)来选择全因死亡率的预测因子。开发基于Cox比例风险模型的列线图,用于预测长期死亡率(1-,3-,和5年)在HFmrEF。使用Bootstrap进行内部验证,最终模型在338例连续成年患者的外部队列中得到验证.通过计算时间依赖性一致性指数(C指数)来评估辨别和预测性能,ROC曲线下面积(AUC),和校准曲线,通过决策曲线分析(DCA)评估临床价值。综合鉴别改善(IDI)和净重新分类改善(NRI)用于评估NT-proBNP和eGFR对列线图的贡献。最后,使用“Dynnom”包开发动态列线图。
    全因死亡率的最佳独立预测因子(APSELNH:A:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂/血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽抑制剂(ACEI/ARB/ARNI),P:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗/冠状动脉旁路移植术(PCI/CABG),S:行程,E:eGFR,L:lgNT-proBNP,N:NYHA,H:医疗保健)被纳入动态列线图。开发队列和验证队列的C指数分别为0.858和0.826,AUC超过0.8,具有良好的辨别力和预测能力。DCA曲线和校准曲线证明了临床适用性和列线图的良好一致性。NT-proBNP和eGFR为列线图提供了显著的净益处。
    在这项研究中,开发的动态APSELNH列线图用作可访问的,功能,和有效的临床决策支持计算器,为HFmrEF患者提供准确的预后评估。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to develop an integrative dynamic nomogram, including N-terminal pro-B type natural peptide (NT-proBNP) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), for predicting the risk of all-cause mortality in HFmrEF patients.
    UNASSIGNED: 790 HFmrEF patients were prospectively enrolled in the development cohort for the model. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and Random Survival Forest (RSF) were employed to select predictors for all-cause mortality. Develop a nomogram based on the Cox proportional hazard model for predicting long-term mortality (1-, 3-, and 5-year) in HFmrEF. Internal validation was conducted using Bootstrap, and the final model was validated in an external cohort of 338 consecutive adult patients. Discrimination and predictive performance were evaluated by calculating the time-dependent concordance index (C-index), area under the ROC curve (AUC), and calibration curve, with clinical value assessed via decision curve analysis (DCA). Integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and net reclassification improvement (NRI) were used to assess the contributions of NT-proBNP and eGFR to the nomogram. Finally, develop a dynamic nomogram using the \"Dynnom\" package.
    UNASSIGNED: The optimal independent predictors for all-cause mortality (APSELNH: A: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers/angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ACEI/ARB/ARNI), P: percutaneous coronary intervention/coronary artery bypass graft (PCI/CABG), S: stroke, E: eGFR, L: lg of NT-proBNP, N: NYHA, H: healthcare) were incorporated into the dynamic nomogram. The C-index in the development cohort and validation cohort were 0.858 and 0.826, respectively, with AUCs exceeding 0.8, indicating good discrimination and predictive ability. DCA curves and calibration curves demonstrated clinical applicability and good consistency of the nomogram. NT-proBNP and eGFR provided significant net benefits to the nomogram.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, the dynamic APSELNH nomogram developed serves as an accessible, functional, and effective clinical decision support calculator, offering accurate prognostic assessment for patients with HFmrEF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    创伤患者的预后高度依赖于早期医学诊断。通过构建列线图模型,不良后果的风险可以直观和单独地显示,这对医学诊断具有重要的临床意义。
    开发和评估可用于中国不同数据可用性设置的创伤不良结局患者预测模型。
    这是一项回顾性预后研究,使用2018年中国8家公立三甲医院的数据。将数据随机分为开发集和验证集。简单,开发了预测不良结局的改进和扩展模型,不良结局定义为院内死亡或ICU转移,和患者的临床特征,生命体征,诊断,和实验室测试值作为预测因子。模型的结果以列线图的形式呈现,并使用接受者工作特征曲线下面积(ROC-AUC)评估性能,精度-召回(PR)曲线(PR-AUC),Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度测试,校正曲线,和决策曲线分析(DCA)。
    我们的最终数据集包括18,629名患者(40.2%为女性,平均年龄52.3),其中1,089人(5.85%)导致不良后果。在外部验证集中,三个模型的ROC-AUC分别为0.872、0.881和0.903,PR-AUC分别为0.339、0.337和0.403。就校准曲线和DCA而言,模型也表现良好。
    这项预后研究发现,包括患者临床特征在内的三种预测模型和列线图,生命体征,诊断,和实验室检测值可以支持临床医生基于数据可用性更准确地识别在不同环境中存在不良结局风险的患者.
    UNASSIGNED: The prognosis of trauma patients is highly dependent on early medical diagnosis. By constructing a nomogram model, the risk of adverse outcomes can be displayed intuitively and individually, which has important clinical implications for medical diagnosis.
    UNASSIGNED: To develop and evaluate models for predicting patients with adverse outcomes of trauma that can be used in different data availability settings in China.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective prognostic study using data from 8 public tertiary hospitals in China from 2018. The data were randomly divided into a development set and a validation set. Simple, improved and extended models predicting adverse outcomes were developed, with adverse outcomes defined as in-hospital death or ICU transfer, and patient clinical characteristics, vital signs, diagnoses, and laboratory test values as predictors. The results of the models were presented in the form of nomograms, and performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), precision-recall (PR) curves (PR-AUC), Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
    UNASSIGNED: Our final dataset consisted of 18,629 patients (40.2% female, mean age of 52.3), 1,089 (5.85%) of whom resulted in adverse outcomes. In the external validation set, three models achieved ROC-AUC of 0.872, 0.881, and 0.903, and a PR-AUC of 0.339, 0.337, and 0.403, respectively. In terms of the calibration curves and DCA, the models also performed well.
    UNASSIGNED: This prognostic study found that three prediction models and nomograms including the patient clinical characteristics, vital signs, diagnoses, and laboratory test values can support clinicians in more accurately identifying patients who are at risk of adverse outcomes in different settings based on data availability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非自杀自我伤害(NSSI)是一个重大的社会问题,尤其是在患有重度抑郁症(MDD)的青少年中。本研究旨在利用机器学习(ML)算法构建风险预测模型,如XGBoost和随机森林,确定针对青少年MDD的医疗保健专业人员的干预措施。
    这项研究调查了488名患有MDD的青少年。将青少年随机分为75%的训练集和25%的测试集,以证明风险预测模型的预测价值。利用XGBoost和随机森林算法构建预测模型。我们评估了受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC),灵敏度,特异性,准确度,召回,F两种模型的得分,用于比较两种模型的性能。
    有161名(33.00%)参与者患有NSSI。与没有NSSI相比,性别差异有统计学意义(P=0.035),年龄(P=0.036),抑郁症状(P=0.042),睡眠质量(P=0.030),功能失调的态度(P=0.048),儿童创伤(P=0.046),人际关系问题(P=0.047),精神病性(P)(P=0.049),神经质(N)(P=0.044),NSSI的惩罚和严厉(F2)(P=0.045)和过度干预和保护(M2)(P=0.047)。随机森林和XGBoost的AUC值分别为0.780和0.807。两种机器学习方法确定的前五名最重要的风险预测因子是功能失调的态度,童年创伤,抑郁症状,F2和M2。
    该研究证明了基于ML的预测模型对中国青少年MDD患者NSSI行为的适用性。该模型改善了工作的医疗保健专业人员对患有MDD的青少年NSSI的评估。这为与这些青少年合作的卫生保健专业人员的重点预防和干预提供了基础。
    UNASSIGNED: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a significant social issue, especially among adolescents with major depressive disorder (MDD). This study aimed to construct a risk prediction model using machine learning (ML) algorithms, such as XGBoost and random forest, to identify interventions for healthcare professionals working with adolescents with MDD.
    UNASSIGNED: This study investigated 488 adolescents with MDD. Adolescents was randomly divided into 75% training set and 25% test set to testify the predictive value of risk prediction model. The prediction model was constructed using XGBoost and random forest algorithms. We evaluated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, recall, F Score of the two models for comparing the performance of the two models.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 161 (33.00%) participants having NSSI. Compared without NSSI, there were statistically significant differences in gender (P=0.035), age (P=0.036), depressive symptoms (P=0.042), sleep quality (P=0.030), dysfunctional attitudes (P=0.048), childhood trauma (P=0.046), interpersonal problems (P=0.047), psychoticism (P) (P=0.049), neuroticism (N) (P=0.044), punishing and Severe (F2) (P=0.045) and Overly-intervening and Protecting (M2) (P=0.047) with NSSI. The AUC values for random forest and XGBoost were 0.780 and 0.807, respectively. The top five most important risk predictors identified by both machine learning methods were dysfunctional attitude, childhood trauma, depressive symptoms, F2 and M2.
    UNASSIGNED: The study demonstrates the suitability of prediction models for predicting NSSI behavior in Chinese adolescents with MDD based on ML. This model improves the assessment of NSSI in adolescents with MDD by health care professionals working. This provides a foundation for focused prevention and interventions by health care professionals working with these adolescents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    中国大约有200万成人先天性心脏病患者,中度和重度患者的数量正在增加。然而,很少有研究调查导管插入后严重不良事件(SAE)的风险.这项研究的目的是确定与心导管插入相关的SAE的危险因素,并提供预测SAE的风险评分模型。
    回顾性收集2018年1月至2022年1月在武汉科技大学附属武汉亚洲心脏医院行心导管插入术的中重度成人先天性心脏病(ACHD)患者690例,随后分为建模组和验证组。对已识别的SAE危险因素进行了单变量分析,然后将显著因素纳入多因素logistic回归模型以筛选SAE的独立预测因子.受试者工作特性曲线(ROC)和Hosmer-Lemeshow试验用于评估模型的鉴别和校准,分别。
    符合纳入标准的690例导管插入手术中有69例(10.0%)发生SAE。建立的SAE风险计算公式为logit(p)=-6.1340.992×肺动脉高压(是)+1.459×疾病严重程度(严重)+2.324×手术类型(诊断和介入)+1.436×cTnI(≥0.028μg/L)+1.537×NT-proBNP(≥126.65pg/mL)。基于各预测因子效应大小的最终风险评分模型总分为0~7分,涉及肺动脉高压(1分),疾病严重程度(1分),程序类型(2分),cTnI(1分)和NT-proBNP(2分),得分大于3表示高风险。推导和验证队列的ROC曲线下面积的C统计量为0.840和0.911,分别。根据Hosmer-Lemeshow测试,模型组和验证组的p值分别为0.064和0.868.
    本研究建立的风险预测模型具有很高的辨别力和校准性,可为临床预测和评估中重度ACHD患者心导管术后SAE风险提供参考。
    UNASSIGNED: There are almost 2 million adult patients with congenital heart disease in China, and the number of moderate and severe patients is increasing. However, few studies have investigated the risk of serious adverse events (SAE) after catheterization among them. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for SAE related to cardiac catheterization and to provide the risk scoring model for predicting SAE.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 690 patients with moderate and severe adult patients with congenital heart disease (ACHD) who underwent cardiac catheterization in Wuhan Asian Heart Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology from January 2018 to January 2022 were retrospectively collected and subsequently divided into a modeling group and a verification group. A univariate analysis was performed on the identified SAE risk factors, and then significant factors were included in the multivariate logistic regression model to screen for independent predictors of SAE. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test were used to evaluate the discrimination and calibration of the model, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: A SAE occurred in 69 (10.0%) of the 690 catheterization procedures meeting inclusion criteria. The established SAE risk calculation formula was logit(p) = -6.134 + 0.992 × pulmonary artery hypertension (yes) + 1.459 × disease severity (severe) + 2.324 × procedure type (diagnostic and interventional) + 1.436 × cTnI ( ≥ 0.028 μ g/L) + 1.537 × NT-proBNP ( ≥ 126.65 pg/mL). The total score of the final risk score model based on the effect size of each predictor was 0 to 7, involving pulmonary artery hypertension (1 point), disease severity (1 point), procedure type (2 points), cTnI (1 point) and NT-proBNP (2 points), and the score greater than 3 means high risk. The C-statistic of the area under the ROC curve was 0.840 and 0.911 for the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively. According to the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, the p values in the modeling group and the verification group were 0.064 and 0.868, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: The risk prediction model developed in this study has high discrimination and calibration, which can provide reference for clinical prediction and evaluation of SAE risk after cardiac catheterization in patients with moderate and severe ACHD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的主要目的是综合住院患者压力性损伤的流行预测模型,目的是确定与住院患者压力损伤相关的常见预测因素。这项努力有可能为临床护士提供有价值的参考,为高风险患者提供有针对性的护理。
    背景:压力伤害(PI)是全世界经常发生的健康问题。关于已报告和发表的PI风险预测模型的研究越来越多。然而,模型的预测性能尚不清楚。
    方法:系统评价和荟萃分析:Cochrane图书馆,PubMed,Embase,CINAHL,WebofScience和中国数据库,包括CNKI(中国国家知识基础设施),万方数据库,维普数据库和CBM(中国生物医学)。
    方法:本系统评价是根据PRISMA的建议进行的。Cochrane图书馆的数据库,PubMed,Embase,CINAHL,WebofScience,和CNKI,Weipu数据库,搜索了2023年9月之前发表的所有研究的万方数据库和煤层气。我们纳入了队列研究,案例控制设计,报告风险模型的发展,并已在住院患者中进行外部和内部验证。两名研究人员根据纳入和排除标准选择了检索到的研究,并根据CHARMS清单严格评估研究质量。PRISMA指南用于报告系统评价和荟萃分析。
    结果:纳入了62项研究,其中包含99个压力伤害风险预测模型。据报道,32个预测模型的AUC(ROC曲线下面积)范围为.70至.99,而38个模型的验证AUC范围为.70至.98。性别(OR=1.41,CI:.99~1.31),年龄(WMD=8.81,CI:8.11~9.57),糖尿病(OR=1.64,CI:1.36~1.99),机械通气(OR=2.71,CI:2.05~3.57),住院时间(WMD=7.65,CI:7.24~8.05)是压力性损伤最常见的预测因素。
    结论:住院患者PIs风险预测模型研究具有较高的研究质量,风险预测模型也具有良好的预测性能。然而,一些纳入的研究缺乏内部或外部建模验证,影响了稳定性和可扩展性。老年人,ICU的男性患者,白蛋白,血细胞比容,低血红蛋白水平,糖尿病,机械通气和住院时间是住院患者压力性损伤的高危因素。在未来,建议临床护士,在实践中,选择性能较好的预测模型,根据实际情况识别高危患者,并针对高危因素提供护理,以预防疾病的发生。
    结论:风险预测模型是一种有效的工具,用于识别有发生PIs风险的患者。借助风险预测工具,护士可以识别高危患者和常见的预测因素,预测发展PI的可能性,然后提供具体的预防措施,以改善这些患者的预后。
    CRD42023445258。
    OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study is to synthesize the prevalent predictive models for pressure injuries in hospitalized patients, with the goal of identifying common predictive factors linked to pressure injuries in hospitalized patients. This endeavour holds the potential to provide clinical nurses with a valuable reference for providing targeted care to high-risk patients.
    BACKGROUND: Pressure injuries (PIs) are a frequently occurring health problem throughout the world. There are mounting studies about risk prediction model of PIs reported and published. However, the prediction performance of the models is still unclear.
    METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis: The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and Chinese databases including CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), Wanfang Database, Weipu Database and CBM (China Biology Medicine).
    METHODS: This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA recommendations. The databases of Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and CNKI, Weipu Database, Wanfang Database and CBM were searched for all studies published before September 2023. We included studies with cohort, case-control designs, reporting the development of risk model and have been validated externally and internally among the hospitalized patients. Two researchers selected the retrieved studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and critically evaluated the quality of studies based on the CHARMS checklist. The PRISMA guideline was used to report the systematic review and meta-analysis.
    RESULTS: Sixty-two studies were included, which contained 99 pressure injuries risk prediction models. The AUC (area under ROC curve) of modelling in 32 prediction models were reported ranged from .70 to .99, while the AUC of verification in 38 models were reported ranged from .70 to .98. Gender (OR = 1.41, CI: .99 ~ 1.31), age (WMD = 8.81, CI: 8.11 ~ 9.57), diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.64, CI: 1.36 ~ 1.99), mechanical ventilation (OR = 2.71, CI: 2.05 ~ 3.57), length of hospital stay (WMD = 7.65, CI: 7.24 ~ 8.05) were the most common predictors of pressure injuries.
    CONCLUSIONS: Studies of PIs risk prediction model in hospitalized patients had high research quality, and the risk prediction models also had good predictive performance. However, some of the included studies lacked of internal or external validation in modelling, which affected the stability and extendibility. The aged, male patient in ICU, albumin, haematocrit, low haemoglobin level, diabetes, mechanical ventilation and length of stay in hospital were high-risk factors for pressure injuries in hospitalized patients. In the future, it is recommended that clinical nurses, in practice, select predictive models with better performance to identify high-risk patients based on the actual situation and provide care targeting the high-risk factors to prevent the occurrence of diseases.
    CONCLUSIONS: The risk prediction model is an effective tool for identifying patients at the risk of developing PIs. With the help of risk prediction tool, nurses can identify the high-risk patients and common predictive factors, predict the probability of developing PIs, then provide specific preventive measures to improve the outcomes of these patients.
    UNASSIGNED: CRD42023445258.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:进行系统评价,以评估糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)风险预测模型中的药物暴露处理,进行网络荟萃分析以确定与DR相关的药物,并进行荟萃分析以确定哪些药物有助于增强模型性能.
    方法:系统评价和荟萃分析。
    方法:我们纳入了以药物暴露为预测因子的DR模型研究。我们搜索了EMBASE,MEDLINE和SCOPUS从成立到2023年12月。我们使用预测模型偏差风险评估工具和使用GRADE的确定性评估研究质量。我们进行了网络荟萃分析和荟萃分析,以估计优势比(OR)和合并的C统计量,分别,和95%置信区间(CI)(PROSPERO:CRD42022349764)。
    结果:在确定的5,653条记录中,我们纳入了678,837名1型或2型糖尿病参与者的28项研究,其中38,579(5.7%)有DR。共有19项、3项和7项研究处于高位,不清楚,低偏见风险,分别。模型中作为预测因子的药物包括:胰岛素(n=24),抗高血压药(n=5),口服抗糖尿病药(n=12),降脂药物(n=7),抗血小板(n=2)。药物暴露主要被建模为分类变量(n=23项研究)。两项研究将药物暴露作为时变协变量处理,和一个作为时间依赖的协变量。胰岛素与DR风险增加相关(OR=2.50;95%-CI:1.61-3.86)。包含胰岛素的模型(n=9)具有较高的合并C统计量(C统计量=0.84,CI:0.80-0.88),与将药物与胰岛素结合在一起的模型(n=9)相比(C统计量=0.79,CI:0.74-0.84),以及不包括胰岛素的模型(n=3)(C统计量=0.70,CI:0.64-0.75)。局限性包括在综述的研究中偏倚的高风险和显著的异质性。
    结论:这是评估DR预测模型中药物暴露处理的第一篇综述。药物暴露主要被建模为分类变量,胰岛素与改善模型性能相关。然而,由于药物处理欠佳,其他药物与模型性能之间的关联可能被忽视了。这篇综述对未来的DR预测模型提出了以下几点:1)评估药物暴露作为变量,2)使用时变方法,3)考虑药物方案细节。改善药物暴露处理可能会揭示能够显着增强预测模型预测能力的新变量。
    OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review to assess drug exposure handling in diabetic retinopathy (DR) risk prediction models, a network-meta-analysis to identify drugs associated with DR and a meta-analysis to determine which drugs contributed to enhanced model performance.
    METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    METHODS: We included studies presenting DR models incorporating drug exposure as a predictor. We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and SCOPUS from inception to December 2023. We evaluated the quality of studies using the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and certainty using GRADE. We conducted network meta-analysis and meta-analysis to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and pooled C-statistic, respectively, and 95% confidence intervals (CI) (PROSPERO: CRD42022349764).
    RESULTS: Of 5,653 records identified, we included 28 studies of 678,837 type 1 or 2 diabetes participants, of which 38,579 (5.7%) had DR. A total of 19, 3, and 7 studies were at high, unclear, and low risk of bias, respectively. Drugs included in models as predictors were: insulin (n = 24), antihypertensives (n = 5), oral antidiabetics (n = 12), lipid-lowering drugs (n = 7), antiplatelets (n = 2). Drug exposure was modelled primarily as a categorical variable (n = 23 studies). Two studies handled drug exposure as time-varying covariates, and one as a time-dependent covariate. Insulin was associated with an increased risk of DR (OR = 2.50; 95% CI: 1.61-3.86). Models that included insulin (n = 9) had a higher pooled C-statistic (C-statistic = 0.84, CI: 0.80-0.88), compared to models (n = 9) that incorporated a combination of drugs alongside insulin (C-statistic = 0.79, CI: 0.74-0.84), as well as models (n = 3) not including insulin (C-statistic = 0.70, CI: 0.64-0.75). Limitations include the high risk of bias and significant heterogeneity in reviewed studies.
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the first review assessing drug exposure handling in DR prediction models. Drug exposure was primarily modelled as a categorical variable, with insulin associated with improved model performance. However, due to suboptimal drug handling, associations between other drugs and model performance may have been overlooked. This review proposes the following for future DR prediction models: (1) evaluation of drug exposure as a variable, (2) use of time-varying methodologies, and (3) consideration of drug regimen details. Improving drug exposure handling could potentially unveil novel variables capable of significantly enhancing the predictive capability of prediction models.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号