retained hemothorax

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    创伤性血胸约占创伤性胸部损伤的20%。尽管大多数可以通过及时放置肋间管(ICT)引流来管理,由于与保留的血胸相关的高并发症发生率,其余病例构成了挑战.尽管各种治疗方式,包括胸膜内滴注纤维蛋白溶解剂,射线图像引导引流,确实存在VATS引导的疏散和胸腔镜切除术来解决保留的血胸,但采用特定治疗方案的适应症和时机仍不清楚和模糊.
    在留置ICT48小时后超声检查时出现残余血胸(>200mL)的患者被随机分为早期电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)或常规方法队列。早期的VATS队列接受了电视辅助胸腔镜下不排水的血液排空以及生理盐水冲洗和ICT放置。常规队列连续3天接受胸膜内溶栓滴注。结果衡量标准是留置ICT的持续时间,胸廓置管切开率,住院时间,重症监护病房(ICU)监测的持续时间,需要机械通风,肺和胸膜并发症的发生率,以及需要额外的干预措施来解决未排水的血胸和死亡率。
    早期VATS队列的住院时间较短(7.50±0.85vs.9.50±3.03,P=0.060),减少留置ICT的持续时间(6.70±1.25vs.8.30±2.91,P=0.127),具有较高的胸廓置管切开率(70%vs.30%,P=0.003)和较少需要额外干预(0%与30%,P=0.105)。开胸手术(3例)和图像引导引流术(4例)是常规队列中治疗保留的血胸的额外干预措施。然而,呼吸机辅助的相似长度(0.7±0.48vs.0.60±1.08,P=0.791)和延长ICU监测(1.30±1.06vs.在VATS早期队列中观察到0.90±1.45,P=0.490)。这两个队列都没有死亡率。
    VATS指导的创伤性血胸的早期疏散与住院时间缩短以及留置ICT持续时间缩短有关,减少并发症的发生率,再入院次数较少,提高了胸腔置管切开率。然而,呼吸机需求的持续时间,ICU停留,死亡率保持不变。
    UNASSIGNED: Traumatic hemothorax is accounted for about 20% of traumatic chest injuries. Although majority can be managed with the timely placement of intercostal tube (ICT) drainage, the remaining pose a challenge owing to high complication rates associated with retained hemothorax. Although various treatment modalities including intrapleural instillation of fibrinolytics, radioimage guided drainage, VATS guided evacuation and thoractomy do exist to address the retained hemothorax, but indications along with timing to employ a specific treatment option is still unclear and ambiguous.
    UNASSIGNED: Patient with residual hemothorax (>200 mL) on ultrasonography after 48 h of indwelling ICT was randomized into either early video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) or conventional approach cohort. Early VATS cohort was subjected to video-assisted thoracoscopic evacuation of undrained blood along with normal saline irrigation and ICT placement. The conventional cohort underwent intrapleural thrombolytic instillation for 3 consecutive days. The outcome measures were the duration of indwelling ICT, removal rate of tube thoracostomy, length of hospital stay, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) monitoring, need for mechanical ventilation, incidence of pulmonary and pleural complications, and requirement of additional intervention to address undrained hemothorax and mortality rate.
    UNASSIGNED: The early VATS cohort had shorter length of hospital stay (7.50 ± 0.85 vs. 9.50 ± 3.03, P = 0.060), reduced duration of indwelling ICT (6.70 ± 1.25 vs. 8.30 ± 2.91, P = 0.127) with higher rate of tube thoracostomy removal (70% vs. 30%, P = 0.003) and lesser need of additional interventions (0% vs. 30%, P = 0.105). Thoracotomy (3 patients) and image-guided drainage (4 patients) were additional interventions to address retained hemothorax in the conventional cohort. However, similar length of ventilator assistance (0.7 ± 0.48 vs. 0.60 ± 1.08, P = 0.791) and prolonged ICU monitoring (1.30 ± 1.06 vs. 0.90 ± 1.45, P = 0.490) was observed in early VATS cohort. Both the cohorts had no mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: VATS-guided early evacuation of traumatic hemothorax is associated with shorter length of hospital stay along with abbreviated indwelling ICT duration, reduced incidence of complications, lesser readmissions, and improved rate of tube thoracostomy removal. However, the duration of ventilator requirement, ICU stay, and mortality remain unchanged.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:早期电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)是保留血胸(RH)的推荐治疗选择。进行了一项前瞻性单中心随机对照研究,以比较在资源有限的单位中穿透性创伤后的RH患者的VATS和胸腔镜造口管(TT)重新插入的结果。我们的假设是,接受VATS而不是TT重新插入的RH患者的住院时间较短,并发症较少。
    方法:从2014年1月至2019年11月,将稳定的胸部穿通伤合并保留血胸的患者随机分为VATS或TT再插入。结果为住院时间(LOS)和并发症。
    结果:在评估合格的77名患者中,65名患者被随机分配并分析了62名:VATS组30名,TT再插入组32名。两组之间的人口统计学和损伤机制具有可比性。住院时间为:术前:VATS6.8(+/-2.8)天和TT6.6(+/-2.4)天(p=0.932),术后:VATS5.1(+/-2.3)天,TT7.1(+/-6.3)天(p=0.459),总LOSVATS12(+/-3.9)天,和TT14.4(+/-7)天(p=0.224)。与VATS组的4例相比,TT组有15例并发症(p=0.004)。在VATS臂中有两个额外的程序,在TT臂中有10个额外的程序(p=0.014)。
    结论:VATS被证明是RH较好的治疗方式,并发症少,需要额外的手术。而两组间的LOS无统计学差异。
    Early video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is the recommended treatment of choice for retained hemothorax (RH). A prospective single-center randomized control study was conducted to compare outcomes between VATS and thoracostomy tube (TT) reinsertion for patients with RH after penetrating trauma in a resource constrained unit. Our hypothesis was that patients with a RH receiving VATS instead of TT reinsertion would have a shorter hospital stay and lesser complications.
    From January 2014 to November 2019, stable patients with thoracic penetrating trauma complicated with retained hemothoraces were randomized to either VATS or TT reinsertion. The outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOS) and complications.
    Out of the 77 patients assessed for eligibility, 65 patients were randomized and 62 analyzed: 30 in the VATS arm and 32 in the TT reinsertion arm. Demographics and mechanisms of injury were comparable between the two arms. Length of hospital stay was: preprocedure: VATS 6.8 (+/-2.8) days and TT 6.6 (+/- 2.4) days (p = 0.932) and postprocedure: VATS 5.1 (+/-2.3) days, TT 7.1 (+/-6.3) days (p = 0.459), total LOS VATS 12 (+/- 3.9) days, and TT 14.4 (+/-7) days (p = 0.224). The TT arm had 15 complications compared to the VATS arm of four (p = 0.004). There were two additional procedures in the VATS arm and 10 in the TT arm (p = 0.014).
    VATS proved to be the better treatment modality for RH with fewer complications and less need of additional procedures, while the LOS between the two groups was not statistically different.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Upward of 20% of patients undergoing thoracostomy tube (TT) placement develop retained hemothorax (HTx) requiring secondary intervention. The aim of this study was to define the rate of secondary intervention in patients undergoing prophylactic thoracic irrigation.
    A prospective observational trial of 20 patients who underwent thoracic irrigation at the time of TT placement was conducted. Patients with HTx identified on chest x-ray were included. After standard placement of a 36-French TT, the HTx was evacuated using a sterile suction catheter advanced within the TT. Warmed sterile saline was instilled into the chest through the TT followed by suction catheter evacuation. The TT was connected to the sterile drainage atrium and suction applied. TTs were managed in accordance with our standard division protocol.
    The population was predominantly (70%) male at median age 35 years, median ISS 13, with 55% suffering penetrating trauma. Thirteen (65%) patients underwent TT placement within 6 h of trauma with the remainder within 24 h. Nineteen patients received the full 1000-mL irrigation. The majority demonstrated significant improvement on postprocedure chest x-ray. The secondary intervention rate was 5%. A single patient required VATS on post-trauma day zero for retained HTx. Median TT duration was 5 d with median length of stay of 7 d. No adverse events related to the pleural lavage were noted.
    Thoracic irrigation at the time of TT placement for traumatic HTx may decrease the rate of retained HTx.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号