UNASSIGNED: Prescription opioid use and evidence of the harm caused by these medicines has increased over the past 20-30 years. Despite a number of system level interventions, the opioid crisis has not yet resolved in Australia or globally. Pharmacists are increasingly required to take a proactive, clinical role to fulfil their responsibility for patient outcomes relating to both medication efficacy and safety.
UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the current health system guidelines available to pharmacists dispensing opioids and to examine the implications of this guidance on pharmacist responsibility.
UNASSIGNED: A scoping review was conducted by searching in CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed and Web of Science, in addition to the grey literature and referral from topic experts to collate a list of current health system guidelines relevant to pharmacists dispensing opioids. These guidelines were then examined through thematic analysis and the use of the \"Appraisal of Guidelines Research & Evaluation-Health Systems\" tool (AGREE-HS).
UNASSIGNED: Ten health system guidelines were identified in the search. Identified guidelines were published in Australia, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Health system guidelines analysed in this study most commonly provide general practice statements that are not specific to opioid medicines. Current guidelines frequently recommend risk assessment, but less commonly provide implementable risk mitigation advice. Additionally, guidelines are of poor overall quality when analysed through metrics relating to their development and implementation.
UNASSIGNED: There are gaps in current health system guidelines which contribute to perceived barriers in pharmacy practice. Current health system guidance does not provide a clear account of the responsibilities of pharmacists when dispensing opioids. This study provides an argument for the development of implementable health system guidelines that support pharmacists in taking direct responsibility for patient outcomes when dispensing opioid medicines.

BACKGROUND: Decentralization ultimately involves the execution of most health care activities at lower levels of the health system. However, when poorly implemented, decentralization can create confusion about roles and responsibilities. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the presence and use of legislative guidelines depicting the distribution of decentralized authority for decision making in the Jimma Zone health system, Southwest Ethiopia.
METHODS: A cross sectional study employing both qualitative and quantitative methods was undertaken from 16(th) January to 15(th) March 2007 in Jimma Zone. Health managers at relevant departments of the Federal Ministry of Health, Oromia Regional Health Bureau (RHB), Jimma Zonal Health Department, 13 Woreda Health Offices of Jimma Zone and the health centers and health posts in these districts were included in the study. Data was collected using interview guides and self administered structured questionnaires prepared for each level of the health system. Tape-recorded qualitative data was transcribed and analyzed using thematic framework approach while SPSS for windows version 12.0.1 was used to analyze the quantitative data obtained.
RESULTS: According to the regional guidelines, ensuring achievement of regional health service targets is the responsibility of the RHB. This was clear to 97 (97.9%) of the health managers included in this study. However, almost equivalent proportion of the respondents, 95 (95.9%) agreed that the FMOH should be responsible for this. Similarly, 71 (73.9%) of the health managers knew that approval of health budgets and efforts for local resource generation is the responsibility of the Woreda Administrative Council while the remaining 27.1% were uncertain or disagreed about this regional direction. Such confusions were observed in almost every functional area. Moreover, legislative guidelines were not available in most of the district health offices and health facilities.
CONCLUSIONS: Legislative guidelines depicting the distribution of decentralized authority in decision making in the health system were prepared at national and regional levels. However, the findings of this study suggested that health managers in the Jimma Zone health system did not appear to have the right perceptions about roles and responsibilities of the various levels. It is, therefore, very important to clarify such confusions along with capacity building efforts to match the changing roles of each level.