respiratory plasticity

呼吸可塑性
  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    呼吸衰竭是肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)的主要死亡原因。由于没有有效的治疗方法来保持独立呼吸,迫切需要新疗法来保持或恢复呼吸能力。由于急性间歇性缺氧(AIH)在啮齿动物ALS模型中引起脊髓呼吸运动可塑性,并可能恢复ALS患者的呼吸能力,我们进行了一项原则验证研究,以调查ALS患者的这种可能性.安静的呼吸,在13名ALS患者和10名年龄匹配的对照组中测试了嗅鼻吸气压力(SNIP)和最大吸气压力(MIP)。AIH之前和之后60分钟(15、1分钟的10%O2发作,2分钟的常氧间隔)或假AIH(持续的常氧)。左右隔膜的均方根(RMS),第二胸骨旁,监测斜角肌和胸锁乳突肌。使用矢量分析来计算安静呼吸期间集体EMG活动的总和矢量幅度(Mag)和相似性指数(SI),SNIP和MIP机动。AIH促进潮气量和分钟通气(治疗主要效果:p<0.05),和Mag(即。集体呼吸肌活动;p<0.001)在ALS和对照受试者的安静呼吸期间,但在安静呼吸期间对SI没有影响。AIH后两组SNIPSI均下降(p<0.005),而Mag没有变化(p=0.09)。两组中AIH后SNIP或MIP均无差异。任何受试者在AIH期间均未报告不适,也没有观察到不良事件.因此,AIH可能是增加ALS患者安静呼吸期间集体吸气肌肉活动的安全方法,尽管单一的AIH表现不足以显著增加峰值吸气压力的产生.这些初步结果提供了证据,表明AIH可以改善ALS患者的呼吸功能,以及未来对长期的研究,重复的AIH方案是必要的。
    Respiratory failure is the main cause of death in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Since no effective treatments to preserve independent breathing are available, there is a critical need for new therapies to preserve or restore breathing ability. Since acute intermittent hypoxia (AIH) elicits spinal respiratory motor plasticity in rodent ALS models, and may restore breathing ability in people with ALS, we performed a proof-of-principle study to investigate this possibility in ALS patients. Quiet breathing, sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) and maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) were tested in 13 persons with ALS and 10 age-matched controls, before and 60 min post-AIH (15, 1 min episodes of 10% O2, 2 min normoxic intervals) or sham AIH (continuous normoxia). The root mean square (RMS) of the right and left diaphragm, 2nd parasternal, scalene and sternocleidomastoid muscles were monitored. A vector analysis was used to calculate summated vector magnitude (Mag) and similarity index (SI) of collective EMG activity during quiet breathing, SNIP and MIP maneuvers. AIH facilitated tidal volume and minute ventilation (treatment main effects: p < 0.05), and Mag (ie. collective respiratory muscle activity; p < 0.001) during quiet breathing in ALS and control subjects, but there was no effect on SI during quiet breathing. SNIP SI decreased in both groups post-AIH (p < 0.005), whereas Mag was unchanged (p = 0.09). No differences were observed in SNIP or MIP post AIH in either group. Discomfort was not reported during AIH by any subject, nor were adverse events observed. Thus, AIH may be a safe way to increase collective inspiratory muscle activity during quiet breathing in ALS patients, although a single AIH presentation was not sufficient to significantly increase peak inspiratory pressure generation. These preliminary results provide evidence that AIH may improve breathing function in people with ALS, and that future studies of prolonged, repetitive AIH protocols are warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号