背景:等动测力法(IKD)被认为是偏心腿筋强度测量的黄金标准方法,但是其他设备更便携,成本效益高,提供实时数据,因此更适合体育运动所需的大规模测试。这篇评论旨在综合与测量成人偏心腿筋强度的设备和等速测力计的可靠性和一致性有关的证据。
方法:MEDLINE,EMBASE,PubMed,CINAHL和运动铁饼数据库,除了搜索灰色和预印文献(从成立到2021年),使用。也将使用向前和向后的滚雪球。如果用于量化健康的偏心腿筋强度的设备之间的可靠性和/或协议,已对娱乐活动或业余/精英运动员进行了调查。如果(1)参与者在测试时受伤或不适,以及(2)同心强度测量或研究非绳肌肌群,则将排除研究。基于CONSENUS的健康测量指标选择标准(COSMIN)工具将用于评估纳入研究的报告质量。如果可能,数据将被合并,如果合适,可以进行荟萃分析和/或荟萃回归.我们的目标是使用改编的推荐分级进行叙事综合,评估,开发和评估(等级)。
结论:本系统综述旨在分析测量偏心腿筋强度的设备的可靠性,以及这些设备在成年人口中使用时与等速测力计的一致性。预计本综述的结果可用于告知临床医生有关可用于在临床实践中监测偏心腿筋强度的合适设备。不需要道德批准。预计该审查将提交给该领域的领先同行评审期刊,以供出版考虑。
背景:www.researchregistry.com(reviewregistry1070)。
BACKGROUND: Isokinetic dynamometry (IKD) is considered as the gold standard method of eccentric hamstring strength measurement, but other devices are more portable, cost-effective, provide real-time data and are thus better suited to the mass testing required in sport. This
review aims to synthesise the evidence related to the reliability of and agreement between devices that measure eccentric hamstring strength and isokinetic dynamometers in adults.
METHODS: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL and Sport Discus databases, alongside a search of grey and pre-print literature (from inception to 2021), are used. Forward and backward snowballing will also be used. Studies will be included if the reliability and/or agreement between devices used to quantify eccentric hamstring strength in healthy, recreationally active or amateur/elite sportspeople has been investigated. Studies will be excluded if (1) participants were injured or unwell at the time of testing and (2) concentric strength measurements or if non-hamstring muscle groups were investigated. The COnsenus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) tool will be used to assess the quality of reporting of included studies. If possible, data will be pooled and a meta-analysis and/or meta-regression may be performed if appropriate. We will aim to conduct a narrative synthesis using an adapted Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic
review will aim to analyse the reliability of devices that measure eccentric hamstring strength, and the agreement of these devices with isokinetic dynamometers when used in an adult population. It is anticipated that the results of this
review could be used to inform clinicians regarding suitable devices that can be employed to monitor eccentric hamstring strength in clinical practice. No ethics approval is required. It is anticipated that this
review will be submitted to a leading peer-reviewed journal in this field for publication consideration.
BACKGROUND: www.researchregistry.com (reviewregistry1070).