renin angiotensin system

肾素血管紧张素系统
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肾素血管紧张素系统是血压稳态的关键调节因子。血管紧张素1型(AT1R)和2型受体(AT2R)已被研究作为顺铂诱导的急性肾损伤的靶标;然而,他们的治疗潜力仍然没有定论。这项初步研究旨在确定急性顺铂治疗对血管紧张素II(AngII)诱导的血管收缩以及小鼠动脉和肾脏中AT1R和AT2R的表达谱的影响。用媒介物或推注剂量的顺铂(12.5mg/kg)处理18周龄的雄性C57BL/6小鼠(n=8)。胸主动脉(TA),主动脉(AA),头臂动脉(BC),收集髂动脉(IL)和肾脏进行等距张力和免疫组织化学分析。顺铂治疗可降低所有剂量的IL收缩至AngII(p<0.01,p<0.001,p<0.0001);AngII在TA中没有诱导收缩,任一治疗组中的AA或BC。顺铂治疗后,AT1R表达在TA(p<0.0001)和AA(p<0.0001)培养基中显著上调,以及在IL的内皮(p<0.05)介质(p<0.0001)和外膜(p<0.01)中。顺铂处理显著降低TA的内皮(p<0.05)和介质(p<0.05)中的AT2R表达。在肾小管中,顺铂治疗后AT1R(p<0.01)和AT2R(p<0.05)均增加。在这里,我们报道了顺铂可降低IL中AngII介导的收缩,这可能是由AT1R和AT2R的正常反调节表达缺失来解释的。表明涉及其他因素。
    The renin angiotensin system is a key regulator of blood pressure homeostasis. Angiotensin type 1 (AT1R) and 2 receptors (AT2R) have been investigated as targets for cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury; however, their therapeutic potential remains inconclusive. This pilot study aimed to determined the effect that acute cisplatin treatment had on angiotensin II (AngII)-induced contraction in blood vessels and expression profiles of AT1R and AT2R in mouse arteries and kidneys. Male C57BL/6 mice at 18 week of age (n = 8) were treated with vehicle or bolus dose of cisplatin (12.5 mg/kg). Thoracic aorta (TA), adnominal aorta (AA), brachiocephalic arteries (BC), iliac arteries (IL) and kidneys were collected for isometric tension and immunohistochemistry analysis. Cisplatin treatment reduced IL contraction to AngII at all doses (p < 0.01, p < 0.001, p < 0.0001); however, AngII did not induce contraction in TA, AA or BC in either treatment group. Following cisplatin treatment, AT1R expression was significantly upregulated in the media of TA (p < 0.0001) and AA (p < 0.0001), and in the endothelium (p < 0.05) media (p < 0.0001) and adventitia (p < 0.01) of IL. Cisplatin treatment significantly reduced AT2R expression in the endothelium (p < 0.05) and media (p < 0.05) of TA. In renal tubules, both AT1R (p < 0.01) and AT2R (p < 0.05) were increased following cisplatin treatment. Herein, we report that cisplatin reduces AngII-mediated contraction in IL and may be explained by an absence of normal counterregulatory expression of AT1R and AT2R, indicating other factors are involved.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    确定抗高血压药物(AHM)是否通过肾素血管紧张素系统(RAS-AHM)起作用,与其他AHM相比,可以减轻对2型糖尿病(T2DM)人群认知功能的影响和受损风险。
    这项对糖尿病健康随机对照行动(LookAHEAD)研究的二次分析包括712名社区居住的参与者,他们被随访了15年。Logistic回归用于将RAS-AHM的使用与认知障碍联系起来,在调整潜在的混杂因素后,使用线性回归将RAS-AHM的使用与特定领域的认知功能相关联.
    在研究期间,共有563人报告使用RAS-AHM,149人报告使用其他AHM。RAS-AHM用户受过大学或高等教育(53%),基线糖化血红蛋白较高(57mmol/mol),并报告了更高的糖尿病药物使用率(86%),而其他AHM用户更有可能是白人(72%),肥胖(25%)和有心血管病史(19%)。与其他AHM使用相比,RAS-AHM使用与痴呆风险降低无关。我们确实观察到了更好的执行功能(跟踪测试,B部分,P<0.04),处理速度(数字符号替换测试,P<0.004),言语记忆(Rey听觉言语学习测试-延迟回忆,P<0.005),与其他AHM用户相比,RAS-AHM用户的综合得分(P<0.008)。
    在这个2型糖尿病成人样本中,基线时没有痴呆,我们观察到处理速度下降较慢,执行功能,口头记忆,RAS-AHM用户之间的综合得分。
    To determine whether antihypertensive medication (AHM) acting through the renin angiotensin system (RAS-AHM), compared with other AHM, can mitigate effects on cognitive function and risk for impairment in a population with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
    This secondary analysis of the randomized controlled Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD) study included 712 community-dwelling participants who were followed over 15 years. Logistic regression was used to relate RAS-AHM use to cognitive impairment, and linear regression was used to relate RAS-AHM use to domain-specific cognitive function after adjusting for potential confounders.
    A total of 563 individuals reported RAS-AHM use and 149 reported other-AHM use during the study. RAS-AHM users have college or higher education (53%), had higher baseline glycated haemoglobin (57 mmol/mol), and reported higher diabetes medication use (86%), while other-AHM users were more likely to be White (72%), obese (25%) and to have cardiovascular history (19%). RAS-AHM use was not associated with a reduced risk of dementia compared with other-AHM use. We did observe better executive function (Trail Making Test, part B, P < 0.04), processing speed (Digit Symbol Substitution Test, P < 0.004), verbal memory (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test-delayed recall, P < 0.005), and composite score (P < 0.008) among RAS-AHM users compared with other-AHM users.
    In this sample of adults with T2DM, free of dementia at baseline, we observed a slower decline in processing speed, executive function, verbal memory, and composite score among RAS-AHM users.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    开始使用肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂后的高钾血症已被证明与心血管和肾脏结局的高风险相关。然而,高钾血症后是否继续或停药仍不清楚.
    数据来自糖尿病和血管疾病的作用:Preterax和Diamicron改良控释评估(ADVANCE)试验,其中包括所有参与者开始基于血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的治疗的导入期(培多普利和茚达帕胺的固定组合).研究人群为2型糖尿病患者,在开始运行时出现正常血钾(血清钾含量为3.5至<5.0mEq/L)。3周后,当总共9694名参与者被归类为高钾血症(≥5.0mEq/L)时,重新测量钾,正常血钾,和低钾血症(<3.5mEq/L)组。磨合后,患者被随机分配至继续接受基于血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的治疗或安慰剂;主要大血管,微血管,在接下来的4.4年中,使用Cox回归分析了死亡率结局(中位数).
    在活动磨合期间,556名(6%)参与者经历了高钾血症。随访期间,1505名参与者经历了主要的大血管和微血管事件的主要复合结局。基于血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的治疗的随机治疗显著降低了主要结局的风险(38.1vs42.0/1000人年;风险比,0.91;95%置信区间,0.83至1.00;P=0.04)与安慰剂相比。通过磨合期间血清钾的短期变化定义的亚组之间的影响程度没有差异(异质性的P=0.66)。对于全因死亡也观察到类似的一致治疗效果,心血管死亡,主要冠状动脉事件,主要脑血管事件,和新的或恶化的肾病(P为异质性≥0.27)。
    继续以血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂为基础的治疗持续降低了随后的临床结局风险,包括心血管和肾脏的结果和死亡,无论血清钾的短期变化。
    在糖尿病和血管疾病中的作用:Preterax和Diamicron修饰的控释评估(ADVANCE),NCT00145925.
    Hyperkalemia after starting renin-angiotensin system inhibitors has been shown to be subsequently associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular and kidney outcomes. However, whether to continue or discontinue the drug after hyperkalemia remains unclear.
    Data came from the Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial, which included a run-in period where all participants initiated angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-based therapy (a fixed combination of perindopril and indapamide). The study population was taken as patients with type 2 diabetes with normokalemia (serum potassium of 3.5 to <5.0 mEq/L) at the start of run-in. Potassium was remeasured 3 weeks later when a total of 9694 participants were classified into hyperkalemia (≥5.0 mEq/L), normokalemia, and hypokalemia (<3.5 mEq/L) groups. After run-in, patients were randomized to continuation of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-based therapy or placebo; major macrovascular, microvascular, and mortality outcomes were analyzed using Cox regression during the following 4.4 years (median).
    During active run-in, 556 (6%) participants experienced hyperkalemia. During follow-up, 1505 participants experienced the primary composite outcome of major macrovascular and microvascular events. Randomized treatment of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-based therapy significantly decreased the risk of the primary outcome (38.1 versus 42.0 per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.00; P=0.04) compared with placebo. The magnitude of effects did not differ across subgroups defined by short-term changes in serum potassium during run-in (P for heterogeneity =0.66). Similar consistent treatment effects were also observed for all-cause death, cardiovascular death, major coronary events, major cerebrovascular events, and new or worsening nephropathy (P for heterogeneity ≥0.27).
    Continuation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-based therapy consistently decreased the subsequent risk of clinical outcomes, including cardiovascular and kidney outcomes and death, regardless of short-term changes in serum potassium.
    Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE), NCT00145925.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:初步研究表明,肾素-血管紧张素系统在危重病中被激活,并与死亡率和肾脏结局相关。我们试图在更大的范围内进行评估,多中心研究重症监护病房(ICU)患者血清肾素与主要不良肾脏事件(MAKE)之间的关系。
    方法:前瞻性,在两个机构中对有和没有急性肾损伤(AKI)的患者进行多中心研究。收集血样用于肾素测量,中位时间为2天,进入指标ICU入院和5-7天后。主要结果是出院时的MAKE,死亡率的综合,肾脏替代疗法,或降低估计肾小球滤过率≤基线的75%。
    结果:肾素三分率最高的患者总体病情严重,包括更多的AKI,血管升压药依赖,和疾病的严重程度。与第一和第二三元组相比,最高肾素三元组的MAKE明显更高。在多变量逻辑回归中,肾素的这种初始测量值仍然与MAKE和死亡率的单个因素显著相关.幸存者中肾素与MAKE的相关性无统计学意义。MAKE患者在第二时间点的肾素测量值也较高。当比较死亡与生存时,时间1和2之间的肾素测量轨迹是不同的,但不是比较MAKE和那些没有。
    结论:在广泛的危重患者队列中,在ICU入院早期测量的血清肾素与出院时的MAKE相关,尤其是死亡率。
    BACKGROUND: Preliminary studies have suggested that the renin-angiotensin system is activated in critical illness and associated with mortality and kidney outcomes. We sought to assess in a larger, multicenter study the relationship between serum renin and Major Adverse Kidney Events (MAKE) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.
    METHODS: Prospective, multicenter study at two institutions of patients with and without acute kidney injury (AKI). Blood samples were collected for renin measurement a median of 2 days into the index ICU admission and 5-7 days later. The primary outcome was MAKE at hospital discharge, a composite of mortality, kidney replacement therapy, or reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate to ≤ 75% of baseline.
    RESULTS: Patients in the highest renin tertile were more severely ill overall, including more AKI, vasopressor-dependence, and severity of illness. MAKE were significantly greater in the highest renin tertile compared to the first and second tertiles. In multivariable logistic regression, this initial measurement of renin remained significantly associated with both MAKE as well as the individual component of mortality. The association of renin with MAKE in survivors was not statistically significant. Renin measurements at the second time point were also higher in patients with MAKE. The trajectory of the renin measurements between time 1 and 2 was distinct when comparing death versus survival, but not when comparing MAKE versus those without.
    CONCLUSIONS: In a broad cohort of critically ill patients, serum renin measured early in the ICU admission is associated with MAKE at discharge, particularly mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Lung protective ventilation with low tidal volume (TV) and increased positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) can have unfavorable effects on the cardiovascular system. We aimed to investigate whether lung protective ventilation has adverse impact on hemodynamic, renal and hormonal variables.
    In this randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled study, 24 patients scheduled for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy were included. Patients were equally randomized to receive either ventilation with a TV of 6 ml/IBW and PEEP of 10 cm H2O (LTV-h.PEEP) or ventilation with a TV of 10 ml/IBW and PEEP of 4 cm H2O (HTV-l.PEEP). Before, during and after surgery, hemodynamic variables were measured, and blood and urine samples were collected. Blood samples were analyzed for plasma concentrations of electrolytes and vasoactive hormones. Urine samples were analyzed for excretions of electrolytes and markers of nephrotoxicity.
    Comparable variables were found among the two groups, except for significantly higher postoperative levels of plasma brain natriuretic peptide (p = 0.033), albumin excretion (p = 0.012) and excretion of epithelial sodium channel (p = 0.045) in the LTV-h.PEEP ventilation group compared to the HTV-l.PEEP ventilation group. In the combined cohort, we found a significant decrease in creatinine clearance (112.0 [83.4;126.7] ml/min at baseline vs. 45.1 [25.4;84.3] ml/min during surgery) and a significant increase in plasma concentrations of renin, angiotensin II, and aldosterone.
    Lung protective ventilation was associated with minor adverse hemodynamic and renal effects postoperatively. All patients showed a substantial but transient reduction in renal function accompanied by activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.
    ClinicalTrials, NCT02551341 . Registered 13 September 2015.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia worldwide. Despite the extensive research, its pathophysiology remains largely unelucidated. Currently, more attention is being given to the disease\'s vascular and inflammatory aspects. In this context, the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) emerges as a credible player in AD pathogenesis. The RAS has multiple physiological functions, conducted by its two opposing axes: the classical, led by Angiotensin II (Ang II), and the alternative, driven by Angiotensin-(1-7) [Ang-(1-7)]. These peptides were shown to interact with AD pathology in animal studies, but evidence from humans is scarce. Only 20 studies dosed RAS molecules in AD patients\' bloodstream, none of which assessed both axes simultaneously. Therefore, we conducted a cross-sectional, case-control exploratory study to compare plasma levels of Ang II and Ang-(1-7) in AD patients vs. age-matched controls. Within each group, we searched for correlations between RAS biomarkers and measures from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
    UNASSIGNED: We evaluated patients with AD (n = 14) and aged-matched controls (n = 14). Plasma Ang II and Ang-(1-7) were dosed using ELISA. Brain MRI was performed in a 3 Tesla scan, and a three-dimensional T1-weighted volumetric sequence was obtained. Images were then processed by FreeSurfer to calculate: (1) white matter hypointensities (WMH) volume; (2) volumes of hippocampus, medial temporal cortex, and precuneus. Statistical analyses used non-parametrical tests (Mann-Whitney and Spearman).
    UNASSIGNED: Ang-(1-7) levels in plasma were significantly lower in the AD patients than in controls [median (25th-75th percentiles)]: AD [101.5 (62.43-126.4)] vs. controls [209.3 (72-419.1)], p = 0.014. There was no significant difference in circulating Ang II. In the AD patients, but not in controls, there was a positive and significant correlation between Ang-(1-7) values and WMH volumes (Spearman\'s rho = 0.56, p = 0.038). Ang-(1-7) did not correlate with cortical volumes in AD or in controls. Ang II did not correlate with any MRI variable in none of the groups.
    UNASSIGNED: If confirmed, our results strengthen the hypothesis that RAS alternative axis is downregulated in AD, and points to a possible interaction between Ang-(1-7) and cerebrovascular lesions in AD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase III
    肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)抑制剂可降低CKD患者的心血管发病率和死亡率。我们评估了血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂雷米普利对维持性血液透析患者的心脏保护作用。
    在这个阶段3,预期,随机化,开放标签,盲化终点,平行,多中心试验,我们从28个意大利中心招募了维持性血液透析合并高血压和/或左心室肥厚的患者.在2009年7月至2014年2月之间,140名参与者被随机分配到雷米普利(1.25-10mg/d),129名参与者被分配到非RAS抑制治疗。两者均滴定至最大耐受剂量,以达到预定的目标BP值.主要疗效终点是心血管死亡,心肌梗塞,或中风。次要终点包括主要终点的单个组成部分,房颤新发或复发,有症状的液体超负荷住院,动静脉瘘的血栓形成或狭窄,和心脏质量指数的变化。所有结果在随机分组后42个月内进行评估。
    在可比的BP控制下,使用雷米普利的23名参与者(16%)和非RAS抑制剂治疗的24名参与者(19%)达到了主要复合终点(风险比,0.93;95%置信区间,0.52至1.64;P=0.80)。雷米普利在随访1年时降低了心脏质量指数(与基线相比变化的组间差异:-16.3g/m2;95%置信区间,-29.4至-3.1),但对其他次要结局无显著影响.在分配给雷米普利的参与者中,低血压发作的频率高于对照组(41%对12%)。20名雷米普利参与者和9名对照者患了癌症,包括6例雷米普利的胃肠道恶性肿瘤(4例致命),与对照组中没有相比。
    雷米普利并未降低维持性血液透析患者发生主要心血管事件的风险。
    ARCADIA,NCT00985322和欧盟药物监管机构临床试验数据库编号2008-003529-17。
    Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with CKD. We evaluated the cardioprotective effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril in patients on maintenance hemodialysis.
    In this phase 3, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point, parallel, multicenter trial, we recruited patients on maintenance hemodialysis with hypertension and/or left ventricular hypertrophy from 28 Italian centers. Between July 2009 and February 2014, 140 participants were randomized to ramipril (1.25-10 mg/d) and 129 participants were allocated to non-RAS inhibition therapy, both titrated up to the maximally tolerated dose to achieve predefined target BP values. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Secondary end points included the single components of the primary end point, new-onset or recurrence of atrial fibrillation, hospitalizations for symptomatic fluid overload, thrombosis or stenosis of the arteriovenous fistula, and changes in cardiac mass index. All outcomes were evaluated up to 42 months after randomization.
    At comparable BP control, 23 participants on ramipril (16%) and 24 on non-RAS inhibitor therapy (19%) reached the primary composite end point (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 1.64; P=0.80). Ramipril reduced cardiac mass index at 1 year of follow-up (between-group difference in change from baseline: -16.3 g/m2; 95% confidence interval, -29.4 to -3.1), but did not significantly affect the other secondary outcomes. Hypotensive episodes were more frequent in participants allocated to ramipril than controls (41% versus 12%). Twenty participants on ramipril and nine controls developed cancer, including six gastrointestinal malignancies on ramipril (four were fatal), compared with none in controls.
    Ramipril did not reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events in patients on maintenance hemodialysis.
    ARCADIA, NCT00985322 and European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database number 2008-003529-17.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    目标:截至12月,1st,2020年,由SARS-CoV-2引起的2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)导致全球超过1472917人死亡,死亡人数仍呈指数增长。许多COVID-19感染者无症状或出现中度症状,无需医疗干预即可康复。然而,老年人和患有高血压的人,糖尿病,肥胖,或者心脏病死亡的风险更高。因为目前对COVID-19患者的治疗选择仅限于有风险的老年人群,Biophitis正在发展BIO101(20-羟基蜕皮激素,aMas受体激活剂)作为在严重阶段管理SARS-CoV-2感染患者的新治疗选择。血管紧张素转换酶2(ACE2)充当SARS-CoV-2的受体。ACE2与SARS-CoV2刺突蛋白之间的相互作用似乎改变了ACE2的功能,ACE2是肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)的关键参与者。COVID-19的临床表现包括急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS),心肌病,多器官功能障碍和休克,所有这些都可能是由于RAS的不平衡造成的。我们建议通过ACE2活性下游的MasR激活可以在COVID-19患者中恢复RAS平衡,20-羟基蜕皮激素(BIO101)是一种非肽Mas受体(MasR)激活剂。的确,20-羟基蜕皮激素的MasR激活具有抗炎作用,抗血栓,和抗纤维化特性。BIO101,一种97%的药物级20-羟基蜕皮激素,可以通过改善呼吸功能并最终促进COVID-19患者的生存,从而提供一种新的治疗选择,这些患者患上了这种严重的破坏性疾病。因此,这项COVA研究的目的是评估BIO101的安全性和有效性,其活性成分是20-羟基蜕皮激素,COVID-19重症肺炎患者。
    方法:随机化,双盲,安慰剂对照,多中心,组顺序和适应性,将分2部分进行。第1部分:确定BIO101的安全性和耐受性,并获得BIO101在预防目标人群呼吸恶化方面的活性的初步指示。第2部分:重新评估确认部分2所需的样本量,并确认在第1部分中观察到的BIO101在目标人群中的作用。这项研究被设计为小组顺序,以允许有效的贯穿,从获得活动的早期指示到最终确认。和适应性-允许在第2部分中积累早期数据并调整样本量,以告知试验验证部分的最终设计。
    方法:纳入标准1.年龄:45岁及以上2.确诊为COVID-19感染,在过去的14天内,在随机化之前,通过PCR或其他批准的商业或公共卫生检测确定,在所使用的试验规定的试样中。3.住院治疗,因COVID-19感染症状观察或计划住院,预计住院时间≥3天4.肺炎的证据基于以下所有方面:a.体格检查的临床发现b.在过去7天内出现呼吸道症状5.有呼吸代偿失调的证据在研究药物开始前不超过4天开始,并在筛查时出现,符合以下标准之一,经医护人员评估:a.呼吸急促:每分钟≥25次呼吸b.动脉血氧饱和度≤92%c.如果怀疑COVID-19相关心肌炎或心包炎,应特别注意,因为这些的存在是一个分层标准6。肝功能检查无明显恶化:a.ALT和AST≤5x正常上限(ULN)b.γ-谷氨酰转移酶(GGT)≤5xULNc.总胆红素≤5×ULN7.愿意参加并能够签署知情同意书(ICF)。或者,当相关时,合法授权代表(LAR)可以代表研究参与者签署ICF8.女性参与者应:绝经后至少5年(即,在没有其他医学原因的情况下持续闭经5年)或手术无菌;ORa.在筛查时尿液妊娠试验为阴性b.愿意使用纳入标准9中概述的避孕方法,从筛查到最后一次给药后30天。9.与女性伴侣性活跃的男性参与者必须同意在整个研究中使用有效的节育方法,直到最后一次服用研究产品后3个月。(注意:参与者和/或伴侣可能使用的医学上可接受的避孕方法包括联合口服避孕药,避孕阴道环,避孕注射,宫内节育器,依托孕烯植入,每个都补充了避孕套,以及灭菌和输精管切除术)。10.哺乳期的女性参与者必须同意在研究期间和干预后14天内不母乳喂养。11.男性参与者必须同意在整个研究过程中以及在最后一次施用研究产品后3个月之前不捐赠精子用于生殖目的。12.仅适用于法国:隶属于欧洲社会保障。排除标准1.在研究期间不需要或不愿意留在医疗机构2.由于其他和非COVID-19相关的疾病3.通过气管内导管参与有创机械通气,或体外膜氧合(ECMO),或高流量氧气(以≥16L/min的流量输送氧气。).4.参与者不能口服药物(如胶囊或粉末,混合在水中)。5.不允许的伴随用药:食用任何含有20-羟基蜕皮激素和来自Leuzeacarthamoides的草药产品;不允许使用阴道炎或鼠尾草炎(例如性能增强剂)。6.任何已知的对任何成分的超敏反应,或研究药物的赋形剂,BIO101.7.需要透析的肾脏疾病,或已知肾功能不全(eGFR≤30mL/min/1.73m2,基于Cockcroft&Gault公式)。8.仅在法国:a。不属于法国强制性社会保障计划(受益人或权利持有人)。b.受监护或法定监护。参与者将从比利时大约30个临床中心招募,法国,英国,美国和巴西。参与研究的最大患者将持续28天。出院的参与者的随访将在14(±2)天和60(±4)天通过干预后电话进行。
    在这项研究中将测试两个治疗组:BIO101(AP20-羟基蜕皮激素)的介入组350mgb.i.d和安慰剂比较组350mgb.i.d。每日剂量的施用在整个治疗期间是相同的。参与者将在住院期间接受研究药物治疗长达28天或直到达到临床终点(即,\'负\'或\'正\'事件)。正式出院的参与者将不再接受研究药物治疗。
    结果:主要研究终点:28天内出现“阴性”事件的参与者比例。“阴性”事件定义为呼吸恶化和全因死亡率。出于本研究的目的,呼吸恶化将被定义为以下任何一种:需要机械通气(包括由于资源限制和分诊而不会插管的病例)。需要体外膜氧合(ECMO)。需要高流量氧气,定义为在≥16L/min的流量下输送氧气。只有当主要终点在主要最终分析中具有显著性时,以下关键次要终点才将按该顺序进行测试:在第28天有呼吸衰竭事件的参与者的比例在第28天有“阳性”事件的参与者的比例。在第28天时出现全因死亡事件的参与者比例A“阳性”事件定义为由于参与者病情改善而由科室正式出院。次要和探索性终点:此外,各种功能测量和生物标志物(包括SpO2/FiO2比,病毒载量和与炎症相关的标志物,肌肉,组织和RAS/MAS途径)也将被收集。
    在基线访视期间使用IBM临床开发IWRS系统进行随机化。分组置换随机化将用于以1:1的比例分配符合条件的参与者。在第1部分中,随机化将通过RAS途径调节剂的使用(是/否)和合并症(无与1及以上)。在第2部分中,随机化将按中心分层,性别,RAS通路调节剂使用(是/否),合并症(无vs.1及以上),在研究进入时接受持续气道正压/双水平气道正压(CPAP/BiPAP)(是/否),并怀疑COVID-19相关心肌炎或心包炎(存在或不存在)。
    参与者,看护者,评估结果的研究团队对小组分配视而不见。所有治疗单位(TU),BIO101b.i.d.或安慰剂b.i.d.,不能按照双盲过程进行区分。一个独立的数据监测委员会(DMC)将进行2个中期分析。第一个基于来自第1部分的数据,第二个基于来自第1部分和第2部分的数据。第一个将告知BIO101的安全性,为了允许开始招募进入第二部分,然后分析疗效数据,以获得活动的指示。第二个中期分析将告知第2部分所需的样本量,以实现足够的统计能力。要随机分配的人数(样本量)随机分配的参与者人数:最多465人,总计第1部分:50(以获得COVID-19患者的概念证明)。第2部分:310,可能增加了50%(基于中期分析2,高达465)(以确认第1部分中观察到的BIO101的作用)。
    当前协议版本为V10.0,日期为2020年9月24日。从2020年9月1日开始的招聘正在进行中,预计将在2021年3月完成整个研究。
    背景:该试验在试验登记处开始之前进行了登记:EudraCT,不。2020-001498-63,注册于2020年5月18日;和Clinicaltrials.gov,标识符NCT04472728,2020年7月15日注册。
    完整协议作为附加文件附加,可从试验网站访问(附加文件1)。为了加快这一材料的传播,熟悉的格式已被删除;这封信作为完整协议的关键要素的摘要。
    OBJECTIVE: As of December, 1st, 2020, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2, resulted in more than 1 472 917 deaths worldwide and death toll is still increasing exponentially. Many COVID-19 infected people are asymptomatic or experience moderate symptoms and recover without medical intervention. However, older people and those with comorbid hypertension, diabetes, obesity, or heart disease are at higher risk of mortality. Because current therapeutic options for COVID-19 patients are limited specifically for this elderly population at risk, Biophytis is developing BIO101 (20-hydroxyecdysone, a Mas receptor activator) as a new treatment option for managing patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection at the severe stage. The angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) serves as a receptor for SARS-CoV-2. Interaction between ACE2 and SARS-CoV2 spike protein seems to alter the function of ACE2, a key player in the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). The clinical picture of COVID-19 includes acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), cardiomyopathy, multiorgan dysfunction and shock, all of which might result from an imbalance of the RAS. We propose that RAS balance could be restored in COVID-19 patients through MasR activation downstream of ACE2 activity, with 20-hydroxyecdysone (BIO101) a non-peptidic Mas receptor (MasR) activator. Indeed, MasR activation by 20-hydroxyecdysone harbours anti-inflammatory, anti-thrombotic, and anti-fibrotic properties. BIO101, a 97% pharmaceutical grade 20-hydroxyecdysone could then offer a new therapeutic option by improving the respiratory function and ultimately promoting survival in COVID-19 patients that develop severe forms of this devastating disease. Therefore, the objective of this COVA study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BIO101, whose active principle is 20-hydroxyecdysone, in COVID-19 patients with severe pneumonia.
    METHODS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre, group sequential and adaptive which will be conducted in 2 parts. Part 1: Ascertain the safety and tolerability of BIO101 and obtain preliminary indication of the activity of BIO101, in preventing respiratory deterioration in the target population Part 2: Re-assessment of the sample size needed for the confirmatory part 2 and confirmation of the effect of BIO101 observed in part 1 in the target population. The study is designed as group sequential to allow an efficient run-through, from obtaining an early indication of activity to a final confirmation. And adaptive - to allow accumulation of early data and adapt sample size in part 2 in order to inform the final design of the confirmatory part of the trial.
    METHODS: Inclusion criteria 1. Age: 45 and above 2. A confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 infection, within the last 14 days, prior to randomization, as determined by PCR or other approved commercial or public health assay, in a specimen as specified by the test used. 3. Hospitalized, in observation or planned to be hospitalized due to COVID-19 infection symptoms with anticipated hospitalization duration ≥3 days 4. With evidence of pneumonia based on all of the following: a. Clinical findings on a physical examination b. Respiratory symptoms developed within the past 7 days 5. With evidence of respiratory decompensation that started not more than 4 days before start of study medication and present at screening, meeting one of the following criteria, as assessed by healthcare staff: a. Tachypnea: ≥25 breaths per minute b. Arterial oxygen saturation ≤92% c. A special note should be made if there is suspicion of COVID-19-related myocarditis or pericarditis, as the presence of these is a stratification criterion 6. Without a significant deterioration in liver function tests: a. ALT and AST ≤ 5x upper limit of normal (ULN) b. Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) ≤ 5x ULN c. Total bilirubin ≤ 5×ULN 7. Willing to participate and able to sign an informed consent form (ICF). Or, when relevant, a legally authorized representative (LAR) might sign the ICF on behalf of the study participant 8. Female participants should be: at least 5 years post-menopausal (i.e., persistent amenorrhea 5 years in the absence of an alternative medical cause) or surgically sterile; OR a. Have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening b. Be willing to use a contraceptive method as outlined in inclusion criterion 9 from screening to 30 days after last dose. 9. Male participants who are sexually active with a female partner must agree to the use of an effective method of birth control throughout the study and until 3 months after the last administration of the investigational product. (Note: medically acceptable methods of contraception that may be used by the participant and/or partner include combined oral contraceptive, contraceptive vaginal ring, contraceptive injection, intrauterine device, etonogestrel implant, each supplemented with a condom, as well as sterilization and vasectomy). 10. Female participants who are lactating must agree not to breastfeed during the study and up to 14 days after the intervention. 11. Male participants must agree not to donate sperm for the purpose of reproduction throughout the study and until 3 months after the last administration of the investigational product. 12. For France only: Being affiliated with a European Social Security. Exclusion criteria 1. Not needing or not willing to remain in a healthcare facility during the study 2. Moribund condition (death likely in days) or not expected to survive for >7 days - due to other and non-COVID-19 related conditions 3. Participant on invasive mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), or high-flow Oxygen (delivery of oxygen at a flow of ≥16 L/min.). 4. Participant is not able to take medications by mouth (as capsules or as a powder, mixed in water). 5. Disallowed concomitant medication: Consumption of any herbal products containing 20-hydroxyecdysone and derived from Leuzea carthamoides; Cyanotis vaga or Cyanotis arachnoidea is not allowed (e.g. performance enhancing agents). 6. Any known hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients, or excipients of the study medication, BIO101. 7. Renal disease requiring dialysis, or known renal insufficiency (eGFR≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2, based on Cockcroft & Gault formula). 8. In France only: a. Non-affiliation to compulsory French social security scheme (beneficiary or right-holder). b. Being under tutelage or legal guardianship. Participants will be recruited from approximately 30 clinical centres in Belgium, France, the UK, USA and Brazil. Maximum patients\' participation in the study will last 28 days. Follow-up of participants discharged from hospital will be performed through post-intervention phone calls at 14 (± 2) and 60 (± 4) days.
    UNASSIGNED: Two treatment arms will be tested in this study: interventional arm 350 mg b.i.d. of BIO101 (AP 20-hydroxyecdysone) and placebo comparator arm 350 mg b.i.d of placebo. Administration of daily dose is the same throughout the whole treatment period. Participants will receive the study medication while hospitalized for up to 28 days or until a clinical endpoint is reached (i.e., \'negative\' or \'positive\' event). Participants who are officially discharged from hospital care will no longer receive study medication.
    RESULTS: Primary study endpoint: The proportion of participants with \'negative\' events up to 28 days. \'Negative\' events are defined as respiratory deterioration and all-cause mortality. For the purpose of this study, respiratory deterioration will be defined as any of the following: Requiring mechanical ventilation (including cases that will not be intubated due to resource restrictions and triage). Requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Requiring high-flow oxygen defined as delivery of oxygen at a flow of ≥16 L/min. Only if the primary endpoint is significant at the primary final analysis the following Key secondary endpoints will be tested in that order: Proportion of participants with events of respiratory failure at Day 28 Proportion of participants with \'positive\' events at Day 28. Proportion of participants with events of all-cause mortality at Day 28 A \'positive\' event is defined as the official discharge from hospital care by the department due to improvement in participant condition. Secondary and exploratory endpoints: In addition, a variety of functional measures and biomarkers (including the SpO2 / FiO2 ratio, viral load and markers related to inflammation, muscles, tissue and the RAS / MAS pathways) will also be collected.
    UNASSIGNED: Randomization is performed using an IBM clinical development IWRS system during the baseline visit. Block-permuted randomization will be used to assign eligible participants in a 1:1 ratio. In part 1, randomization will be stratified by RAS pathway modulator use (yes/no) and co-morbidities (none vs. 1 and above). In Part 2, randomization will be stratified by centre, gender, RAS pathway modulator use (yes/no), co-morbidities (none vs. 1 and above), receiving Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP/BiPAP) at study entry (Yes/No) and suspicion of COVID-19 related myocarditis or pericarditis (present or not).
    UNASSIGNED: Participants, caregivers, and the study team assessing the outcomes are blinded to group assignment. All therapeutic units (TU), BIO101 b.i.d. or placebo b.i.d., cannot be distinguished in compliance with the double-blind process. An independent data-monitoring committee (DMC) will conduct 2 interim analyses. A first one based on the data from part 1 and a second from the data from parts 1 and 2. The first will inform about BIO101 safety, to allow the start of recruitment into part 2 followed by an analysis of the efficacy data, to obtain an indication of activity. The second interim analysis will inform about the sample size that will be required for part 2, in order to achieve adequate statistical power. Numbers to be randomised (sample size) Number of participants randomized: up to 465, in total Part 1: 50 (to obtain the proof of concept in COVID-19 patients). Part 2: 310, potentially increased by 50% (up to 465, based on interim analysis 2) (to confirm the effects of BIO101 observed in part 1).
    UNASSIGNED: The current protocol Version is V 10.0, dated on 24.09.2020. The recruitment that started on September 1st 2020 is ongoing and is anticipated to finish for the whole study by March2021.
    BACKGROUND: The trial was registered before trial start in trial registries: EudraCT , No. 2020-001498-63, registered May 18, 2020; and Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04472728 , registered July 15, 2020.
    UNASSIGNED: The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    AKI后血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗的风险-获益比可能由于对复发性AKI的担忧而改变。我们评估,在一个前瞻性队列中,使用(与不使用)血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与随后的AKI风险和有或无AKI的住院后其他不良结局之间的关联.
    我们研究了1538名最近出院的多中心患者,前瞻性评估-AKI研究,大约一半的患者在住院期间经历AKI。所有参与者均在住院后3个月的基线访视,并在当时对他们是否使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂进行分类。我们使用多变量Cox回归,适应人口统计,合并症,eGFR,尿蛋白-肌酐比值,和使用其他药物,为了检查血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的使用与随后的AKI风险之间的关系,死亡,肾脏疾病进展,并裁定心力衰竭事件。
    在住院期间患有AKI的患者中,使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的比例为50%(386/769),在没有AKI的患者中为47%(362/769)。在索引住院期间患有AKI的患者中,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的使用与复发性住院AKI的较高风险无关(调整后的风险比,0.88;95%置信区间,0.69至1.13)。血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂使用与死亡之间的关联,肾脏疾病进展,在住院期间发生和未发生AKI的研究参与者中,判定的心力衰竭事件相似(所有交互作用P值>0.05).
    无论住院期间是否发生AKI,出院后使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂治疗的风险-获益比似乎相似。
    The risk-benefit ratio of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker therapy after AKI may be altered due to concerns regarding recurrent AKI. We evaluated, in a prospective cohort, the association between use (versus nonuse) of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and the subsequent risk of AKI and other adverse outcomes after hospitalizations with and without AKI.
    We studied 1538 patients recently discharged from the hospital who enrolled in the multicenter, prospective ASSESS-AKI study, with approximately half of patients experiencing AKI during the index hospitalization. All participants were seen at a baseline visit 3 months after their index hospitalization and were categorized at that time on whether they were using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers or not. We used multivariable Cox regression, adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, eGFR, urine protein-creatinine ratio, and use of other medications, to examine the association between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker use and subsequent risks of AKI, death, kidney disease progression, and adjudicated heart-failure events.
    The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers was 50% (386/769) among those with AKI during the index hospitalization and 47% (362/769) among those without. Among those with AKI during the index hospitalization, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker use was not associated with a higher risk of recurrent hospitalized AKI (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.69 to 1.13). Associations between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker use and death, kidney disease progression, and adjudicated heart-failure events appeared similar in study participants who did and did not experience AKI during the index hospitalization (all interaction P values >0.05).
    The risk-benefit ratio of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker therapy after hospital discharge appears to be similar regardless of whether AKI occurred during the hospitalization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Renin is the starting point of the renin angiotensin (RA) system cycle. Aliskiren (AL), which is a direct renin inhibitor, suppressed the entire RA cycle. In the present study, the efficacy of add-on of AL treatment in patients with essential hypertension (HT) was investigated.
    METHODS: This study was a multi-center, open-label, prospective, observational study. Study subjects were patients with essential HT and poor blood pressure (BP) control, who had received calcium channel blocker monotherapy or angiotensin II receptor blocker monotherapy or had not received any BP lowering drugs. Following add-on of AL for 12 months, BP and additional laboratory findings were analyzed.
    RESULTS: A total of 150 subjects were enrolled. There were 50 dropout subjects including discontinuation. Dropouts were the highest in the ARB combination therapy group at 9 subjects due to adverse events, and 3 of them were due to hyperkalemia. A significantly higher number of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) dropped out compared to patients without CKD (φ = 0.166, p < .05). BP before add-on of AL was 155/88 mmHg. After add-on of AL, BP was significantly improved and this lowering was sustained for 3 months (136/78 mmHg, p < .001), 6 months (136/77 mmHg, p < .001) and 12 months (134/78 mmHg, p < .001). In contrast, add-on of AL increased the potassium level and decreased the estimated glomerular filtration rate.
    CONCLUSIONS: While add-on AL treatment achieved a favorable and sustained decrease of BP in this study, caution is necessary with regard to elevation of potassium levels and renal impairment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号