UNASSIGNED: To determine whether clinical decision support systems (CDSS) for acute kidney injury (AKI) would enhance patient outcomes in terms of mortality, dialysis, and acute kidney damage progression.
UNASSIGNED: The systematic review and meta-analysis included the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and SCOPUS databases until 21st January 2024. The meta-analysis was done using (RevMan 5.4.1). PROSPERO ID: CRD42024517399.
UNASSIGNED: Our meta-analysis included ten RCTs with 18,355 patients. There was no significant difference between CDSS and usual care in all-cause mortality (RR: 1.00 with 95% CI [0.93, 1.07], p = 0.91) and renal replacement therapy (RR: 1.11 with 95% CI [0.99, 1.24], p = 0.07). However, CDSS was significantly associated with a decreased incidence of hyperkalemia (RR: 0.27 with 95% CI [0.10, 0.73], p = 0.01) and increased eGFR change (MD: 1.97 with 95% CI [0.47, 3.48], p = 0.01).
UNASSIGNED: CDSS were not associated with clinical benefit in patients with AKI, with no effect on all-cause mortality or the need for renal replacement therapy. However, CDSS reduced the incidence of hyperkalemia and improved eGFR change in AKI patients.

BACKGROUND: Methylmalonic Aciduria (MA) without homocystinuria (or isolated MA) is a group of rare inherited metabolic disorders which leads to the accumulation of methylmalonic acid (MMA), a toxic molecule that accumulates in blood, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid, causing acute and chronic complications including metabolic crises, acute kidney injury (AKI), and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Detailed Case Description: Herein, we report a case of a 39-year-old male with MA and stage IV CKD who experienced acute metabolic decompensation secondary to gastrointestinal infection. The patient underwent a single hemodialysis (HD) session to correct severe metabolic acidosis unresponsive to medical therapy and to rapidly remove MMA. The HD session resulted in prompt clinical improvement and shortening of hospitalization.
CONCLUSIONS: MMA accumulation in MA patients causes acute and life-threatening complications, such as metabolic decompensations, and long-term complications such as CKD, eventually leading to renal replacement therapy (RRT). Data reported in the literature show that, overall, all dialytic treatments (intermittent HD, continuous HD, peritoneal dialysis) are effective in MMA removal. HD, in particular, can be useful in the emergency setting to control metabolic crises, even with GFR > 15 mL/min. Kidney and/or liver transplantations are often needed in MA patients. While a solitary transplanted kidney can be rapidly affected by MMA exposure, with a decline in renal function even in the first year of follow-up, the combined liver-kidney transplantation showed better long-term results due to a combination of reduced MMA production along with increased urinary excretion.
CONCLUSIONS: Early diagnosis, multidisciplinary management and preventive measures are pivotal in MA patients to avoid recurrent AKI episodes and, consequently, to slow down CKD progression.

BACKGROUND: Paediatric acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with significant adverse outcomes such as increased mortality, progression to chronic kidney disease and longer length of stay in hospital. Postoperative AKI is a common and recognized complication after surgery in adults. In the paediatric population, AKI postoperatively to cardiac surgery has been extensively studied. However, the incidence of postoperative AKI after non-cardiac surgery is less clear. Therefore, we aim to assess the available literature on this topic.
METHODS: We will conduct a systematic review of observational and randomized controlled trials assessing the incidence of paediatric postoperative AKI after non-cardiac surgery. Pairs of reviewers will independently screen the literature and extract data and assess risk of bias from eligible studies. The databases Pubmed, Cochrane and Web of Sciences will be searched. We will conduct the review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. If sufficient homogeneity within the included trials we will conduct meta-analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review aims to investigate the incidence of postoperative AKI in the paediatric non-cardiac surgery population. The results of this review will provide a foundation for future research in the field of paediatric postoperative AKI.

Metformin is a common diabetes drug that may reduce lactate clearance by inhibiting mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, leading to metformin-associated lactic acidosis (MALA). As diabetes mellitus is a common chronic metabolic condition found in critically ill patients, pre-existing metformin use can often be found in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit or the high dependency unit. The aim of this narrative mini review is therefore to update clinicians about MALA, and to provide a practical approach to its diagnosis and treatment. MALA in critically ill patients may be suspected in a patient who has received metformin and who has a high anion gap metabolic acidosis, and confirmed when lactate exceeds 5 mmol/L. Risk factors include those that reduce renal elimination of metformin (renal impairment from any cause, histamine-2 receptor antagonists, ribociclib) and excessive alcohol consumption (as ethanol oxidation consumes nicotinamide adenine dinucleotides that are also required for lactate metabolism). Treatment of MALA involves immediate cessation of metformin, supportive management, treating other concurrent causes of lactic acidosis like sepsis, and treating any coexisting diabetic ketoacidosis. Severe MALA requires extracorporeal removal of metformin with either intermittent hemodialysis or continuous kidney replacement therapy. The optimal time to restart metformin has not been well-studied. It is nonetheless reasonable to first ensure that lactic acidosis has resolved, and then recheck the kidney function post-recovery from critical illness, ensuring that the estimated glomerular filtration rate is 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or better before restarting metformin.

UNASSIGNED: In patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), the effects of initiating treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) on the risk for kidney failure with replacement therapy (KFRT) and death remain unclear.
UNASSIGNED: To examine the association of ACEi or ARB treatment initiation, relative to a non-ACEi or ARB comparator, with rates of KFRT and death.
UNASSIGNED: Ovid Medline and the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Clinical Trials Consortium from 1946 through 31 December 2023.
UNASSIGNED: Completed randomized controlled trials testing either an ACEi or an ARB versus a comparator (placebo or antihypertensive drugs other than ACEi or ARB) that included patients with a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2.
UNASSIGNED: The primary outcome was KFRT, and the secondary outcome was death before KFRT. Analyses were done using Cox proportional hazards models according to the intention-to-treat principle. Prespecified subgroup analyses were done according to baseline age (<65 vs. ≥65 years), eGFR (<20 vs. ≥20 mL/min/1.73 m2), albuminuria (urine albumin-creatinine ratio <300 vs. ≥300 mg/g), and history of diabetes.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 1739 participants from 18 trials were included, with a mean age of 54.9 years and mean eGFR of 22.2 mL/min/1.73 m2, of whom 624 (35.9%) developed KFRT and 133 (7.6%) died during a median follow-up of 34 months (IQR, 19 to 40 months). Overall, ACEi or ARB treatment initiation led to lower risk for KFRT (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.55 to 0.79]) but not death (hazard ratio, 0.86 [CI, 0.58 to 1.28]). There was no statistically significant interaction between ACEi or ARB treatment and age, eGFR, albuminuria, or diabetes (P for interaction > 0.05 for all).
UNASSIGNED: Individual participant-level data for hyperkalemia or acute kidney injury were not available.
UNASSIGNED: Initiation of ACEi or ARB therapy protects against KFRT, but not death, in people with advanced CKD.
UNASSIGNED: National Institutes of Health. (PROSPERO: CRD42022307589).

UNASSIGNED: Globally, renal replacement therapy especially haemodialysis remains pivotal in the effective care of patients with kidney diseases since its acceptance as a treatment modality. Despite being widely embraced as a therapeutic option, several factors still hamper its utilization. A clinical audit of this modality option will allow elucidation of haemodialysis practises and peculiarities.
UNASSIGNED: The charts and records of 280 patients with renal impairments dialyzed between March 1st 2019 and February 28th 2023 were evaluated in retrospect. Data on retrieved demographic and clinical information were analyzed using SPSS 25 and patients\' short-term survival was determined using the Kaplan Meier survival analysis and log rank test.
UNASSIGNED: Out of the 280 patients who had 1716 dialysis sessions, 184 (65.7%) were males. The mean age was 47.9 ± 17.5 years. The majority (80.7%) of the patients had chronic kidney disease (CKD), as 90.2% of the dialysis sessions were for CKD. There was a male preponderance (69.1%) in the population. Hypertension was the commonest cause of CKD (41.2%) while sepsis was the commonest cause of acute kidney injury (50%). The median number of dialysis session was 4.0. The mean pre-dialysis hematocrit was 24.4 ± 7.1% and the mean single pool Kt/V was 0.9 ± 0.02. The femoral vein was the most used vascular access (95.4%). The short-term survival was positively related to the dialysis frequency on Kaplan-Meier analysis.
UNASSIGNED: Haemodialytic therapy in patients with renal disease is still of huge impact on survival despite the numerous factors affecting its effective delivery, especially in low-income nations.

UNASSIGNED: A three-dose regimen is the current standard for COVID-19 vaccination, but systematic data on immunogenicity and safety in chronic kidney disease patients remains limited.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a meta-analysis on the immunogenicity and safety of three-dose COVID-19 vaccination in patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT).
UNASSIGNED: Systematic literature search in four electronic databases yielded twenty eligible studies (2,117 patients, 94% of whom received mRNA vaccines) for meta-analysis.
UNASSIGNED: The overall seropositivity rate of anti-SARS-CoV-2 was 74.2% (95% CI: 65.0-83.4%) after three-dose COVID-19 vaccination. The seropositivity rate of anti-SARS-CoV-2 in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) was 64.6% (95% CI: 58.7-70.5%), and 43.5% (95% CI: 38.5-48.6%) of non-responders after second dose became seropositive after third dose. The seropositivity rate of anti-SARS-CoV-2 was 92.9% (95% CI: 89.5-96.2%) in dialysis patients, and 64.6% (95% CI: 46.8-82.3%) of non-responders after second dose became seropositive after third dose. In KTRs, each year increase in transplant vintage was associated with 35.6% increase in anti-SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity (95% CI: 15.9-55.4%, p = 0.01). There were no serious adverse events attributed to vaccination in KTRs, and the commonest local and systemic adverse events were injection site pain and fatigue, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: Three-dose COVID-19 vaccination regimen in patients on RRT is associated with reduced immunogenicity, especially in KTRs. There are no adverse events associated with third-dose COVID-19 vaccine in KTRs.

BACKGROUND: Timely referral of individuals with chronic kidney disease from primary care to secondary care is evidenced to improve patient outcomes, especially for those whose disease progresses to kidney failure requiring kidney replacement therapy. A shortage of specialist nephrology services plus no consistent criteria for referral and reporting leads to referral pattern variability in the management of individuals with chronic kidney disease.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review was to explore the referral patterns of individuals with chronic kidney disease from primary care to specialist nephrology services. It focused on the primary-specialist care interface, optimal timing of referral to nephrology services, adequacy of preparation for kidney replacement therapy, and the role of clinical criteria vs. risk-based prediction tools in guiding the referral process.
METHODS: A narrative review was utilised to summarise the literature, with the intent of providing a broad-based understanding of the referral patterns for patients with chronic kidney disease in order to guide clinical practice decisions. The review identified original English language qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods publications as well as systematic reviews and meta-analyses available in PubMed and Google Scholar from their inception to 24 March 2023.
RESULTS: Thirteen papers met the criteria for detailed review. We grouped the findings into three main themes: (1) Outcomes of the timing of referral to nephrology services, (2) Adequacy of preparation for kidney replacement therapy, and (3) Comparison of clinical criteria vs. risk-based prediction tools. The review demonstrated that regardless of the time frame used to define early vs. late referral in relation to the start of kidney replacement therapy, better outcomes are evidenced in patients referred early.
CONCLUSIONS: This review informs the patterns and timing of referral for pre-dialysis specialist care to mitigate adverse outcomes for individuals with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis. Enhancing current risk prediction equations will enable primary care clinicians to accurately predict the risk of clinically important outcomes and provide much-needed guidance on the timing of referral between primary care and specialist nephrology services.

Acute kidney injury is a common complication of decompensated cirrhosis, frequently requires hospitalization, and carries a high short-term mortality. This population experiences several characteristic types of acute kidney injury: hypovolemic-mediated (prerenal), ischemic/nephrotoxic-mediated (acute-tubular necrosis), and hepatorenal syndrome. Prerenal acute kidney injury is treated with volume resuscitation. Acute-tubular necrosis is treated by optimizing perfusion pressure and discontinuing the offending agent. Hepatorenal syndrome, a unique physiology of decreased effective arterial circulation leading to renal vasoconstriction and ultimately acute kidney injury, is treated with plasma expansion with albumin and splanchnic vasoconstrictors such as terlipressin or norepinephrine. Common acute stressors such as bleeding, infection, and volume depletion often contribute to multifactorial acute kidney injury. Even with optimal medical management, many clinicians are faced with the challenge of initiating renal replacement therapy in these patients. This article reviews the epidemiology, indications, and complex considerations of renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury in decompensated cirrhosis.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication of acute liver failure (ALF) and it worsens the already worse prognoses of ALF. ALF is an uncommon disease, with varying etiologies and varying definitions in different parts of the world. There is limited literature on the impact of AKI on the outcome of ALF with or without transplantation. The multifaceted etiology of AKI in ALF encompasses factors such as hemodynamic instability, systemic inflammation, sepsis and direct nephrotoxicity. Indications of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for AKI in ALF patients extend beyond the conventional criteria for dialysis and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may have a role in transplant-free survival or bridge to liver transplantation (LT). LT is a life-saving option for ALF, so despite somewhat lower survival rates of LT in ALF patients with AKI, LT is not usually deferred. In this review, we will discuss the guidelines\' recommended definition and classification of AKI in ALF, the impact of AKI in ALF, the pathophysiology of AKI and the role of CRRT and LT in ALF patients with AKI.