randomized controlled trials as topic

随机对照试验作为主题
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    氨甲环酸是一种抗纤维蛋白溶解剂,广泛用于多种外科手术中以减少术中出血。术中出血是耳部外科医生的关键问题,因为它阻止了手术视野的良好可视化。这项工作的目的是分析有关氨甲环酸在耳部手术中使用的相关文献。与2020年系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)声明的首选报告项目一致进行了文献检索,跨3个数据库(Medline,科克伦,和谷歌学者),带有“氨甲环酸”的术语,“和”耳朵,“和”手术。\"三个潜在的,随机化,双盲临床试验符合纳入标准.由于材料的异质性,研究无法汇总,交付和评估方法,和使用的程序。尽管有这些限制,所有3篇论文都发现术中出血显著减少,允许操作领域的更好的可视化。尽管已发表的试验很少,氨甲环酸是安全的,似乎有助于减少耳部手术的术中出血,从而提高手术视野的可视化。
    Tranexamic acid is an antifibrinolytic agent widely used in several surgical procedures to reduce intraoperative bleeding. Intraoperative bleeding is a crucial problem for the ear surgeon, as it prevents good visualization of the surgical field. The aim of this work was to analyze the relevant literature about the use of tranexamic acid in ear surgery. A literature search was conducted in agreement with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement, across 3 databases (Medline, Cochrane, and Google Scholar), with the terms \"tranexamic acid,\" and \"ear,\" and \"surgery.\" Three prospective, randomized, and double-blind clinical trials met the inclusion criteria. Studies were not able to be pooled because of heterogeneity in material, methods of delivery and evaluation, and procedures used. Despite these limitations, all 3 papers found a significant reduction in intraoperative bleeding, allowing a better visualization of the operating field. Despite the scarcity of published trials, tranexamic acid is safe and seems to be useful in reducing intraoperative bleeding in ear surgery, thus improving operative field visualization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    Bedaquiline(BDQ)用于治疗耐药结核病(DR-TB)的风险和收益尚未确定。我们旨在评估含BDQ方案治疗DR-TB的安全性和有效性,如现有的随机对照试验(RCTs)所证明。在这篇系统综述和荟萃分析中,五个数据库(即,ClinicalTrials.gov,科克伦中部,PubMed,ScienceDirect,和SinoMed)进行了搜索。有控制臂的DR-TB患者的RCT是合格的。安全性终点是全因死亡率和严重不良反应(SAE)。疗效结果为8-12周和24-26周的痰培养转换率,治疗成功,和文化转换的时间。共筛选了476条记录;18条符合资格标准。汇总分析包括2520名参与者(55.8%接受含BDQ的方案,n=1408)。汇总安全性结果显示,BDQ方案组的全因死亡率(相对风险[RR][95%置信区间(CI)]=0.94[0.41-2.20])或SAE(RR[95CI]=0.91[0.67-1.23])没有显著降低。汇总的疗效结果显示,在8-12周(RR[95CI]=1.35[1.10-1.65])和24-26周(RR[95CI]=1.25[1.15-1.36])时,培养物转换率明显较高,更多的治疗成功率(RR[95CI]=1.30[1.17-1.44]),BDQ方案组(参考:非BDQ方案)的培养转化时间减少了17天(标准化平均差[SMD][95CI]=-17.46[-34.82至-0.11])。总的来说,BDQ方案对DR-TB显示出显著的治疗效果,但没有降低死亡率或SAE。
    The risks and benefits of bedaquiline (BDQ) for treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) have not been firmly established. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of BDQ-containing regimens for the treatment of DR-TB as evidenced in available randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, five databases (i.e., ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and SinoMed) were searched. RCTs among DR-TB patients that had a control arm were eligible. The safety endpoints were all-cause mortality and serious adverse effects (SAEs). Efficacy outcomes were sputum culture conversion rate at 8-12 weeks and 24-26 weeks, treatment success, and time to culture conversion. A total of 476 records were screened; 18 met the eligibility criteria. The pooled analysis included 2520 participants (55.8% received BDQ-containing regimens, n = 1408). Pooled safety outcomes showed no significant reduction in all-cause mortality (relative risk [RR] [95%confidence interval (CI)] = 0.94 [0.41-2.20]) or SAEs (RR [95%CI] = 0.91 [0.67-1.23]) in the BDQ-regimen group. Pooled efficacy outcomes showed significantly superior culture conversion rates at 8-12 weeks (RR [95%CI] = 1.35 [1.10-1.65]) and 24-26 weeks (RR [95%CI] = 1.25 [1.15-1.36]), more treatment success (RR [95%CI] = 1.30 [1.17-1.44]), and a 17-day reduction in the time to culture conversion (standardized mean difference [SMD] [95%CI] = -17.46 [-34.82 to -0.11]) in the BDQ-regimen group (reference: non-BDQ regimen). Overall, BDQ regimens showed significant treatment effect against DR-TB but did not reduce mortality or SAEs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:有一个新的需要,系统地调查希腊剖宫产率增加的原因,并采取干预措施,以大幅降低剖宫产率。为此,将探讨参与的希腊产科医生在管理劳动时遵循循证指南并应对其他教育和行为干预措施的能力,以及障碍和推动者。本文讨论的是希腊产科的阶梯式楔形设计干预试验的方案,并牢记上述目标,名为ENGAGE(希腊的ENhancinGvaginaldelevery)。
    方法:希腊的22个选定的产妇单位将参加一项涉及20,000至25,000个分娩的多中心阶梯式随机前瞻性试验,其中两个人每月进入研究的干预期(逐步随机化)。进入研究的产妇护理单位将根据他们进入研究干预阶段的时间将建议的干预措施应用8-18个月。研究的初始阶段还将持续8至18个月,包括观察和记录常规实践(剖宫产,阴道分娩,以及参与单位的孕产妇和围产期发病率和死亡率)。第二阶段,干预期,将包括诸如HSOG(希腊妇产科学会)劳动管理指南的应用等干预措施,关于正确解释心电图的培训,处理阴道分娩中的紧急情况,虽然指导委员会成员将可以讨论和实施组织和行为的变化,回答问题,澄清相关问题,并在定期访问或视频会议期间向参与的医疗保健专业人员提供实际指导。此外,在研究过程中,结果将提供给参与单位,以便他们监测自己的表现,同时也收到关于他们费率的反馈。该研究的最后2个月阶段将致力于完成随访问卷,其中包含干预期结束后发生的孕产妇和新生儿发病率数据。研究的总持续时间估计为28个月。评估的主要结果将是剖宫产率的变化,次要结果将是孕产妇和新生儿的发病率和死亡率。
    结论:该研究预计将产生有关影响的新信息,优势,可能性,以及持续的临床参与和行为实施的挑战,教育,和组织干预措施在希腊剖宫产手术方案中详细描述。这些结果可能会对提高孕产妇和新生儿护理质量的方法产生新的见解,特别是因为这代表了降低希腊高剖宫产率的共同努力,此外,为他们在其他国家的减少指明了道路。
    背景:NCT04504500(ClinicalTrials.gov)。该试验进行了前瞻性登记。伦理参考号:320/23.6.2020,生物伦理和行为委员会,医学院,雅典国立和卡波迪斯大学,雅典,希腊。
    BACKGROUND: There is an emerging need to systematically investigate the causes for the increased cesarean section rates in Greece and undertake interventions so as to substantially reduce its rates. To this end, the ability of the participating Greek obstetricians to follow evidence-based guidelines and respond to other educational and behavioral interventions while managing labor will be explored, along with barriers and enablers. Herein discussed is the protocol of a stepped-wedge designed intervention trial in Greek maternity units with the aforementioned goals in mind, named ENGAGE (ENhancinG vAGinal dElivery in Greece).
    METHODS: Twenty-two selected maternity units in Greece will participate in a multicenter stepped-wedge randomized prospective trial involving 20,000 to 25,000 births, with two of them entering the intervention period of the study each month (stepped randomization). The maternity care units entering the study will apply the suggested interventions for a period of 8-18 months depending on the time they enter the intervention stage of the study. There will also be an initial phase of the study lasting from 8 to 18 months including observation and recording of the routine practice (cesarean section, vaginal birth, and maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality) in the participating units. The second phase, the intervention period, will include such interventions as the application of the HSOG (the Hellenic Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology) Guidelines on labor management, training on the correct interpretation of cardiotocography, and dealing with emergencies in vaginal deliveries, while the steering committee members will be available to discuss and implement organizational and behavioral changes, answer questions, clarify relevant issues, and provide practical instructions to the participating healthcare professionals during regular visits or video conferences. Furthermore, during the study, the results will be available for the participating units in order for them to monitor their own performance while also receiving feedback regarding their rates. Τhe final 2-month phase of the study will be devoted to completing follow-up questionnaires with data concerning maternal and neonatal morbidities that occurred after the completion of the intervention period. The total duration of the study is estimated at 28 months. The primary outcome assessed will be the cesarean section rate change and the secondary outcomes will be maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study is expected to yield new information on the effects, advantages, possibilities, and challenges of consistent clinical engagement and implementation of behavioral, educational, and organizational interventions described in detail in the protocol on cesarean section practice in Greece. The results may lead to new insights into means of improving the quality of maternal and neonatal care, particularly since this represents a shared effort to reduce the high cesarean section rates in Greece and, moreover, points the way to their reduction in other countries.
    BACKGROUND: NCT04504500 (ClinicalTrials.gov). The trial was prospectively registered. Ethics Reference No: 320/23.6.2020, Bioethics and Conduct Committee, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:阿片类药物使用与室性心律失常(VA)风险之间的关联知之甚少。
    目的:本研究的目的是综合与阿片类药物使用相关的VA风险的证据。
    方法:我们系统地搜索了Cochrane库,Embase,MEDLINE,2022年7月和CINAHL数据库。使用Cochrane用于随机对照试验(RCTs)的偏倚风险工具和ROBINS-I用于观察性研究的偏倚风险进行评估。使用等级评估证据的确定性。
    结果:我们纳入了15项研究(12项观察性,对RCT进行2次事后分析,1RCT)。大多数研究集中在阿片类药物用于维持治疗(n=9),比较美沙酮与丁丙诺啡(n=13),并报告QTc延长(n=13)。六项观察性研究存在严重的偏倚风险,1例RCT存在高偏倚风险.两项研究无法纳入荟萃分析,因为它们报告了不同的结果并研究了阿片类药物拮抗剂。对13项研究的荟萃分析表明,与使用丁丙诺啡相比,使用美沙酮与VA风险增加相关。吗啡,安慰剂,或左乙酰美沙多(风险比[RR],2.39;95%CI,1.31-4.35;I2=60%)。观察性研究之间的汇总估计值差异很大(RR,2.12;95%CI,1.15-3.91;I2=62%)和RCT(RR,14.09;95%CI,1.52-130.61;I2=0%),但两者都表明风险增加。
    结论:在本系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们发现,美沙酮的使用与对照组相比,VA的风险是前者的两倍多.然而,鉴于现有证据的质量有限,我们的研究结果应谨慎解释.
    BACKGROUND: The association between opioid use and the risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) is poorly understood.
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to synthesize the evidence on the risk of VA associated with opioid use.
    METHODS: We systematically searched the Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, and CINAHL databases in July 2022. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk for bias tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and ROBINS-I for observational studies. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE.
    RESULTS: We included 15 studies (12 observational, 2 post hoc analyses of RCTs, 1 RCT). Most studies focused on opioid use for maintenance therapy (n = 9), comparing methadone to buprenorphine (n = 13), and reported QTc prolongation (n = 13). Six observational studies had a critical risk of bias, and one RCT was at high risk of bias. Two studies could not be included in the meta-analysis as they reported a different outcome and studied an opioid antagonist. Meta-analysis of 13 studies indicated that the use of methadone was associated with an increased risk of VA compared to the use of buprenorphine, morphine, placebo, or levacetylmethadol (risk ratio [RR], 2.39; 95% CI, 1.31-4.35; I2 = 60%). The pooled estimate varied greatly between observational studies (RR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.15-3.91; I2 = 62%) and RCTs (RR, 14.09; 95% CI, 1.52-130.61; I2 = 0%), but both indicated an increased risk.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that methadone use is associated with more than twice the risk of VA compared to comparators. However, our findings should be interpreted cautiously given the limited quality of the available evidence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管最近在牛皮癣治疗方面取得了进展,管理方面的挑战依然存在。最近,患者对补充和替代药物(CAM)的兴趣越来越高,在对更自然的渴望的驱使下,整体方法和对常规治疗的不满。高达41%的银屑病患者报告使用替代疗法,39.5%使用补充疗法(MurphyEC,努斯鲍姆D,PrussickR,弗里德曼·AJ(2019)银屑病患者使用补充和替代药物。JAmAcadDermatol81:280-283)。尽管它们的患病率迅速增长,缺乏CAM治疗牛皮癣的文献,使他们的推荐困难。自2018年发表关于这一主题的最后一次系统综述以来,已经出现了新的替代疗法的证据。促进对其功效的进一步调查(GamretAC,价格A,FertigRM,Lev-TovH,NicholsAJ(2018)银屑病的补充和替代医学治疗:系统评价。JAMADermatol154:1330-1337)。本系统综述旨在收集有关研究最多的牛皮癣替代疗法的最新文献,并进一步讨论其有效性,以建议临床医生指导患者使用这些非标准方法。在PubMed进行了文献检索,EMBASE,Cochrane中央控制试验登记册,和Clinicaltrials.gov数据库,用于2018年3月至2024年4月期间银屑病辅助和替代疗法的随机对照试验(RCT),导致12项研究纳入本综述.许多治疗如姜黄素的初步结果,饮食调整和添加,天然靛蓝,冥想,针灸,和护理疗法显示出积极的临床效果。然而,我们还需要更多精心设计的随机试验来确认潜在的有益效果,并确定使用的安全性.
    Despite recent advancements in psoriasis treatment, challenges in management persist. Recently, there has been a rising interest amongst patients in complementary and alternative medicines (CAM), driven by the desire for more natural, holistic approaches and dissatisfaction with conventional treatments. Up to 41% of patients with psoriasis reported using alternative therapies and 39.5% use complementary therapies (Murphy EC, Nussbaum D, Prussick R, Friedman AJ (2019) Use of complementary and alternative medicine by patients with psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol 81:280-283). Despite their rapidly growing prevalence, literature on CAM therapies for psoriasis is lacking, making their recommendation difficult. Since the last systematic review on this topic published in 2018, evidence for new alternative therapies has emerged, promoting a further investigation of their efficacy (Gamret AC, Price A, Fertig RM, Lev-Tov H, Nichols AJ (2018) Complementary and Alternative Medicine Therapies for Psoriasis: A Systematic Review. JAMA Dermatol 154:1330-1337). This systematic review aims to compile recent literature on the most studied alternative therapies for psoriasis and further discuss their effectiveness in order to counsel clinicians in guiding patients on the use of these non-standard approaches. A literature search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases for randomized controlled trials (RCT) on complementary and alternative therapies in psoriasis from March 2018 through April 2024, resulting in 12 studies being included in this review. The preliminary results for many treatments such as curcumin, dietary modification and additions, indigo naturalis, meditation, acupuncture, and balneotherapy showed positive clinical effects. However, additional well-designed randomized trials are needed to confirm the potential beneficial effects and to establish safety of use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:血液透析(HD)患者通常从事低水平的体育锻炼,这可能会影响该组的预后和死亡率。健身气功八段锦,来自中医的体育锻炼,已知对慢性心力衰竭患者和腹膜透析患者有益处。然而,目前关于八段锦在HD患者中的研究有限。所以,本研究的目的是调查目前HD患者的运动强度及其影响因素,探讨八段锦对HD患者的影响。
    方法:这种前瞻性,非致盲,随机对照试验将纳入HD稳定3个月以上的终末期肾病患者.所有符合条件的参与者将以1:1的比例随机分为接受八段锦的干预组和没有八段锦的对照组。干预组要求每天做两次八段锦,早餐和晚餐后30分钟开始,每次45分钟,共6个月,从2024年6月10日开始。实验室生化检查指标等信息,放射学检查结果和相关量表和问卷将在基线时收集,1个月随访,3个月随访和6个月随访。所有统计检验均通过双尾检验进行,和p值≤0.05将被认为是统计学上显著的差异被测试。数量化指标的描述将用于计算案例数量,意思是,SD,中位数和IQR法。分类指标将用于描述病例数和百分比(频率和频率率)。
    背景:研究方案经浙江中医药大学附属第一医院伦理委员会批准(V20230521)。结果将在同行评审的期刊和相关的学术会议上报告。
    背景:ChiCTR2300074659。
    BACKGROUND: Haemodialysis (HD) patients usually engage in a low level of physical activities, which could impact the prognosis and mortality of this group. Fitness Qigong Baduanjin, a physical exercise from traditional Chinese Medicine, is known to have benefit in chronic heart failure patients and peritoneal dialysis patients. However, researches about Baduanjin in HD patients are currently limited. So, the aim of the study is to investigate the current exercise intensity of HD patients and its influencing factors, and to explore the effects of Baduanjin on HD patients.
    METHODS: This prospective, non-blinded, randomised controlled trial will enrol patients with end-stage kidney disease who were stable on HD for more than 3 months. All eligible participants will be randomly divided into the intervention group undergoing Baduanjin and the control group without Baduanjin in a 1:1 ratio. The intervention group is required to perform Baduanjin two times per day, starting 30 min after breakfast and dinner, 45 min per session for a total of a 6 month, starting from 10 June 2024. Information such as laboratory biochemical examination indicators, radiological examination results and related scales and questionnaires will be collected at baseline, 1 month follow-up, 3 month follow-up and 6 month follow-up. All statistical tests are conducted through the two-tailed test, and a p-value≤0.05 will be considered statistically significant for the difference being tested. The description of quantitative indicators will be used in calculating the number of cases, mean, SD, median and IQR method. The classification indicators will be used to describe the number of cases and percentages (frequency and frequency rate).
    BACKGROUND: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (V20230521). The results will be reported in a peer-reviewed journal and a relevant academic conference.
    BACKGROUND: ChiCTR2300074659.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:青少年使用电子烟,在全球和澳大利亚境内,近年来有所增加。作为回应,公共卫生机构呼吁制定针对青少年的教育和交流计划。尽管有这样的建议,目前对此类干预措施的严格评估很少。这项研究的主要目的是检查针对父母和青少年的短信干预对青少年使用电子烟易感性的潜在影响(例如,使用电子烟的意图)。次要目标是(1):检查干预措施对青少年电子烟和可燃烟草使用的影响,以及(2)检查干预措施的可接受性。
    方法:一项采用2×2因子设计的随机对照试验将对父母-青少年(12-15岁)进行。Dyads将被随机分配到四个手臂之一:手臂1-仅向青少年提供短信干预;手臂2-仅向青少年父母提供短信干预;手臂3-向父母和青少年提供短信干预;手臂4-仅控制信息,由只提供给父母的电子烟概况表组成。参与者招募于2023年3月开始,目的是招募120名父母-青少年二元组合。评估研究结果的数据收集将在基线进行,干预开始后的6、12和24个月。主要终点是6个月的随访。主要结果将是青少年容易使用电子烟,使用经过验证的项目进行评估。将在意向治疗框架下对试验结果进行分析,将所有参与者纳入被分配组的分析范围.
    背景:伦理学已获得纽卡斯尔大学人类研究伦理学委员会的批准(H-2022-0340)。研究结果将在同行评审的期刊和会议上传播。
    背景:该试验在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12623000079640)进行了前瞻性注册。
    BACKGROUND: Adolescent e-cigarette use, globally and within Australia, has increased in recent years. In response, public health agencies have called for the development of education and communication programmes targeting adolescents. Despite such recommendations, few rigorous evaluations of such interventions currently exist. The main objective of this study is to examine the potential effect of a text message intervention targeting parents and adolescents on adolescent susceptibility to e-cigarette use (eg, intentions towards using e-cigarettes). Secondary objectives are to (1): examine the effect of the intervention on adolescent e-cigarette and combustible tobacco use and (2) examine the acceptability of the intervention.
    METHODS: A randomised controlled trial employing a 2×2 factorial design will be conducted with parent-adolescent dyads (aged 12-15 years). Dyads will be randomly allocated to one of four arms: arm 1-a text message intervention delivered to adolescents only; arm 2-a text message intervention delivered to the parents of adolescents only; arm 3-a text message intervention delivered to both the parents and adolescents; and arm 4-an information only control, consisting of an e-cigarette factsheet provided to parents only. Participant recruitment commenced in March 2023 with the aim to recruit 120 parent-adolescent dyads. Data collection to assess study outcomes will occur at baseline, 6, 12 and 24 months post the commencement of the intervention. The primary endpoint will be 6-month follow-up. The primary outcome will be adolescent susceptibility to e-cigarette use, assessed using validated items. Analyses of trial outcomes will be undertaken under an intention-to-treat framework, with all participants included in the analysis in the group they were allocated.
    BACKGROUND: Ethics approval has been obtained from the human research ethics committee of the University of Newcastle (H-2022-0340). Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at conferences.
    BACKGROUND: The trial was registered prospectively with Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12623000079640).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:多发性硬化症(MS)引起广泛的症状,根据患者自己的说法,身体功能是最致残的后果之一。锻炼有效改善下肢身体机能。尽管如此,尚不清楚哪种运动方式最有效,保持MS患者长期坚持运动仍具有挑战性.因此,本研究旨在调查运动助推器课程(EBS)如何影响运动对身体功能的可持续性,而且,研究哪种运动方式(有氧训练或阻力训练)在改善身体机能方面最有效。
    方法:这项研究是一项多臂研究,平行组,研究EBS效应的开放标签多中心随机对照试验.参与者(n=150)最初被随机分配到12周的阻力训练+常规护理,有氧训练+常规护理或常规护理。经过12周的干预,在40周的随访期间,运动组的参与者将再次随机接受EBS+常规治疗或常规治疗.主要结果是身体功能(基于6分钟步行测试和5次坐着站立的综合评分),次要结果是疲劳,认知,身体活动,抑郁症状和生活质量。
    背景:该研究得到了丹麦中部地区健康研究伦理委员会(1-10-72-237-21)的批准,并在丹麦数据保护局(2016-051-000001)和Clinicaltrials.gov(NCT04913012)注册。所有研究结果将发表在科学同行评审期刊上,并在科学会议上发表。
    背景:NCT04913012。
    BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) causes a broad range of symptoms, with physical function being one of the most disabling consequences according to patients themselves. Exercise effectively improves lower extremity physical function. Nonetheless, it is unknown which exercise modality is most effective and it remains challenging to keep persons with MS adhering to exercise over a longer period. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate how exercise booster sessions (EBS) influence the sustainability of exercise-induced effects on physical function, and furthermore, to investigate which exercise modality (aerobic training or resistance training) is most effective in terms of improving physical function.
    METHODS: This study is a multi-arm, parallel-group, open-label multicentre randomised controlled trial investigating the effects of EBS. Participants (n=150) are initially randomised to 12 weeks of either resistance training+usual care, aerobic training+usual care or usual care. After 12 weeks of intervention, participants in the exercise groups will again be randomised to either EBS+usual care or usual care during a 40-week follow-up period. The primary outcome is physical function (composite score based on 6-min walk test and five-time sit to stand), and the secondary outcomes are fatigue, cognition, physical activity, symptoms of depression and quality of life.
    BACKGROUND: The study is approved by the Central Denmark Region Committees on Health Research Ethics (1-10-72-237-21) and is registered at the Danish Data Protection Agency (2016-051-000001) and at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04913012). All study findings will be published in scientific peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences.
    BACKGROUND: NCT04913012.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号