randomized control trial

随机对照试验
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在随机临床试验(RCT)中发现强迫症(OCD)的接受和承诺疗法(ACT)有效,但这两个广为人知的RCT是在美国境内进行的,主要是白色样本。需要研究评估典型西方文化之外的强迫症治疗方法,如ACT。当前的范围审查总结了18个RCT的主要特征和发现,这些RCT评估了伊朗的ACT强迫症。这些RCT在更广泛的科学文献中基本上是未知的,尽管代表了强迫症试验的绝大多数ACT,部分原因是大多数是以波斯语出版的。RCT的优势是分组治疗的参与者,大多数方案不包括暴露练习。在18次试验中,5是单身。在许多试验中,使用选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)在治疗前稳定剂量的所有参与者中都很常见。方法学质量低到中等。ACT与非传统比较条件不一致,稍微有利于经验验证的治疗方法,与等候名单和SSRI相比,也是有利的。变化过程数据表明,ACT比认知行为疗法或SSRIs更增加了心理灵活性。这些结果突出表明,来自西方人群的ACT强迫症的发现可以复制并推广到伊朗的个人。这些发现还提供了在伊朗研究ACT所获得的见解,并大大扩展了基于ACT的OCD文献,这些文献可以被所有研究人员纳入奖学金。
    Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has been found efficacious in randomized clinical trials (RCTs), but the two widely known RCTs were conducted within the United States with predominantly White samples. Research that evaluates treatments like ACT for OCD outside the typical Western cultures is needed. The current scoping review summarizes the key characteristics and findings from 18 RCTs that evaluated ACT for OCD in Iran. These RCTs are largely unknown in the broader scientific literature despite representing the vast majority of ACT for OCD trials, in part because the majority are published in Persian. The preponderance of RCTs treated participants in groups, and most protocols did not include exposure exercises. Of 18 trials, 5 were single sex. Use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) was common with all participants on stable doses at pretreatment in many of the trials. Methodological quality was low to medium. ACT was inconsistent against nontraditional comparison conditions, slightly favorable to empirically validated treatments, and favorable compared with the waitlist and SSRIs. The process of change data indicated that ACT increased the psychological flexibility more than cognitive behavior therapy or SSRIs. These results highlight that findings on ACT for OCD from Western populations replicate and generalize to individuals in Iran. These findings also offer insights gained from studying ACT in Iran and significantly expand the literature based on ACT for OCD that can be integrated into scholarship by all researchers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:随机对照试验(RCTs)是评价癌症新疗法疗效和安全性的金标准。然而,将患者纳入临床试验的控制组可能对罕见癌症具有挑战性,特别是在精确肿瘤学和靶向治疗的背景下。外部控制臂(ECA)是解决临床研究设计中这些挑战的潜在解决方案。我们进行了范围审查,以探讨ECA在肿瘤学中的应用。
    方法:我们系统地检索了四个数据库,即MEDLINE,EMBASE,WebofScience,还有Scopus.我们筛选了标题,摘要,以及针对接受癌症治疗的患者的合格文章的全文,雇用ECA,并报告临床结果。
    结果:在筛选的629篇文章中,这次审查中包括23人。最早的纳入研究发表于1996年,而大多数研究发表于过去5年。44%(10/23)的ECA用于血液相关癌症研究。地理上,30%(7/23)的研究是在美国进行的,22%(5/23)在日本,9%(2/23)在韩国。用于构建ECA的主要数据源涉及来自先前试验的汇总数据(35%,8/23),行政健康数据库(17%,4/23)和电子病历(17%,4/23)。虽然52%(12/23)的研究采用了调整治疗和ECA特征的方法,48%(11/23)缺乏明确的策略。
    结论:ECA为肿瘤学研究提供了一种有价值的方法,特别是当替代设计是不可行的。然而,仔细的方法规划和详细的报告对于有意义和可靠的结果至关重要。
    OBJECTIVE: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating the comparative efficacy and safety of new cancer therapies. However, enrolling patients in control arms of clinical trials can be challenging for rare cancers, particularly in the context of precision oncology and targeted therapies. External Control Arms (ECAs) are a potential solution to address these challenges in clinical research design. We conducted a scoping review to explore the use of ECAs in oncology.
    METHODS: We systematically searched four databases, namely MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus. We screened titles, abstracts, and full texts for eligible articles focusing on patients undergoing therapy for cancer, employing ECAs, and reporting clinical outcomes.
    RESULTS: Of the 629 articles screened, 23 were included in this review. The earliest included studies were published in 1996, while most studies were published in the past 5 years. 44% (10/23) of ECAs were employed in blood-related cancer studies. Geographically, 30% (7/23) of studies were conducted in the United States, 22% (5/23) in Japan, and 9% (2/23) in South Korea. The primary data sources used to construct the ECAs involved pooled data from previous trials (35%, 8/23), administrative health databases (17%, 4/23) and electronic medical records (17%, 4/23). While 52% (12/23) of the studies employed methods to align treatment and ECAs characteristics, 48% (11/23) lacked explicit strategies.
    CONCLUSIONS: ECAs offer a valuable approach in oncology research, particularly when alternative designs are not feasible. However, careful methodological planning and detailed reporting are essential for meaningful and reliable results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:本研究旨在回顾和分析对儿童癌症幸存者进行心理社会干预的证据。
    方法:电子数据库(PubMed,Embase,Medline,WebofScience,科学直接,和Scopus)和manuel搜索了心理社会随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验是针对18岁以下被诊断出并已完成治疗的幸存者进行的。进行荟萃分析以评估干预措施对心理社会健康结果的影响。这些试验在2000年1月1日至2022年6月30日以英文发表。提取的数据使用ReviewManager5.4进行分析。
    结果:对955名儿童癌症幸存者进行的10项试验纳入系统评价。六个随机对照试验的Meta分析显示一般生活质量(SMD,0.07;95%CI:[-0.09至0.23],I20%,(p>0.05))和三个RCT在身体活动自我效能感(SMD,0.12;95%CI:[-0.35至0.58],I275%,(p>0.05))干预组和对照组之间。超过24周的干预(包括随访)对幸存者的生活质量和身体活动自我效能感有效。证据的总体质量较低,因为只有一半的研究(50%)的总体偏倚风险较低。
    结论:心理社会干预对儿童癌症幸存者的生活质量和身体活动自我效能感没有效果,然而,长期干预措施改善了这些结局.
    背景:荟萃分析的方案已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42022375053/22Nov2022)。
    OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed to review and analyze the evidence of the psychosocial interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.
    METHODS: Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Scopus) and manuel search were performed for psychosocial randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted with survivors who were diagnosed under the age of 18 and have completed treatment. Meta-analyses were performed to evaluate the effects of interventions on psychosocial health outcomes. The trials were published in English between 1 January 2000 to 30 June 2022 were included. Extracted data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4.
    RESULTS: Ten trials conducted with 955 childhood cancer survivors were included in the systematic review. Meta-analysis of six RCTs showed no difference in the general quality of life (SMD, 0.07; 95% CI: [-0.09 to 0.23], I2 0%, (p > 0.05)) and three RCTs showed no difference in the physical activity self-efficacy (SMD, 0.12; 95% CI: [-0.35 to 0.58], I2 75%, (p > 0.05)) between intervention and control group. Interventions longer than 24 weeks (including follow-up) were effective in the quality of life and physical activity self-efficacy of the survivors. The overall quality of the evidence was low due to overall low risk of bias for only half of the studies (50%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial interventions were not effective on quality of life and physical activity self-efficacy of childhood cancer survivors, however, long-term interventions provided improvement in these outcomes.
    BACKGROUND: The protocol for the meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42022375053/22 Nov 2022).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    强效P2Y12受体拮抗剂已广泛用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者,并取得了不同的效果。不同方案的益处在试验之间不同。随机对照试验(RCTs)有限制性的纳入和排除标准;因此,它们可能会限制研究结果在更广泛人群中的普遍性。这项研究旨在全面调查接受PCI的患者中强效P2Y12抑制剂的结果,包括RCT和真实世界证据(RWE)研究。对多个电子数据库进行了系统审查,并搜索了有效的P2Y12抑制剂与氯吡格雷的比较。主要疗效终点为复合缺血性心血管事件,主要安全性终点为大出血。使用固定效应模型计算比例和发病率的总体估计值以及95%置信区间(CI)。共有24项研究(140,986例患者)接受了冠状动脉介入治疗,包括18项随机对照试验和6项倾向评分匹配的大型队列研究。强效的P2Y12抑制剂,包括坎格雷洛,普拉格雷,还有替格瑞洛,显著降低复合不良心血管缺血事件的风险(95%CI0.89-0.96,p<0.001),但与氯吡格雷相比,大出血(95%CI1.15-1.33,p<0.001)或任何出血(95%CI1.21-1.33,p<0.001)增加。这项荟萃分析合并了RCTs和RWE研究,并全面证明了新型有效的P2Y12抑制剂在减少复合不良血栓事件方面明显比氯吡格雷更有效。但与氯吡格雷相比,大出血或任何出血的发生率更高。
    Potent P2Y12 receptor antagonists have been used widely for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with different results. Benefits from different regimens various between trials. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have restrictive inclusion and exclusion criteria; thus, they may limit the generalizability of the findings to a broader population. This study was aimed to comprehensively investigate the outcomes of potent P2Y12 inhibitors in patients undergoing PCI, including RCTs and real-world evidence (RWE) studies. Multiple electronic databases were systemically reviewed and searched on compared potent P2Y12 inhibitors with clopidogrel. The primary efficacy end point was composite ischemic cardiovascular event and primary safety endpoint was major bleeding. Overall estimates of proportions and incidence rates with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using fixed-effects models. Total 24 studies (140,986 patients) underwent coronary intervention were included in this meta-analysis, including 18 RCTs and 6 large cohort studies with propensity score matching. The potent P2Y12 inhibitors including cangrelor, prasugrel, and ticagrelor, significantly decreased the risk of composite adverse cardiovascular ischemic events (95 % CI 0.89-0.96, p < 0.001), but increased major bleeding (95 % CI 1.15-1.33, p < 0.001) or any bleeding (95 % CI 1.21-1.33, p < 0.001) compared with Clopidogrel. This meta-analysis merges RCTs and RWE studies and comprehensively evidences newer potent P2Y12 inhibitors are significantly more effective than clopidogrel in reduction of composite adverse thrombotic events, but the incidence of major or any bleeding was higher compared with clopidogrel.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:本研究旨在评估同伴支持干预对生活质量(QOL)的有效性,自我管理,自我效能感,糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c),2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的抑郁症。
    方法:通过搜索10个数据库进行了系统综述,即PubMed,科克伦图书馆,Embase,Medline,CINHAL,WebofScience,Sinomed,CNKI,万方数据,和VIP为1974年1月至2023年4月发表的文章。
    结果:共纳入12项研究。对结果进行叙述性综合显示,同伴支持显着提高了QOL,自我管理,自我效能感,和2型糖尿病患者的HbA1c控制,但对抑郁症没有显著影响。
    结论:同伴支持对T2DM患者是一种有效的干预措施。未来的研究应该集中在更严格设计和更大样本的研究上。
    结论:同伴支持被证明对管理T2DM患者有效。当前的同伴支持干预措施可以提供有价值的想法,可以指导未来的研究方向。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a peer support intervention on the quality of life (QOL), self-management, self-efficacy, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and depression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
    METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by searching 10 databases, namely PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, CINHAL, Web of Science, Sinomed, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP for articles published from January 1974 to April 2023.
    RESULTS: A total of 12 studies were included. A narrative synthesis of the results showed that peer support significantly improved QOL, self-management, self-efficacy, and HbA1c control in patients with T2DM, but had no significant effect on depression.
    CONCLUSIONS: Peer support is an effective intervention for individuals with T2DM. Future research should focus on more rigorously designed and larger-sample studies.
    CONCLUSIONS: Peer support proves to be effective for managing patients with T2DM. Current peer support interventions can provide valuable ideas that can guide the direction of future research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:目前尚不清楚下肢肌腱病变治疗的临床试验是否包括临床上同质的参与者人群(荟萃分析的假设)。我们评估了在研究下肢肌腱病变的任何治疗方法的随机对照试验(RCTs)中使用的招募设置和参与者特征。设计:范围审查。方法:我们在PubMed进行了系统的文献检索,Embase,科克伦中部,和WebofScience数据库。所有正在调查成人(≥18岁)下肢肌腱病变治疗的RCT均符合纳入条件。至少有两位作者对全文论文进行了独立筛选和选择,并从纳入的研究中提取数据。结果:在18,341条记录中,342项RCT(21,897名参与者)符合纳入和数据提取的条件。最常见的诊断是足底筋膜病(n=195,57%),跟腱病(n=82,24%),和髌腱病(n=41,12%)。二级保健(n=144,42%)是报告最多的招聘环境,其次是开放设置(n=44,13%)。在93个(27%)随机对照试验中,没有描述招聘设置。我们发现参与者特征具有高度异质性(例如,症状持续时间,年龄,身体质量指数,和维多利亚州体育评估学院(VISA)问卷得分)在招聘设置内和之间。结论:我们的结果质疑在下肢肌腱病变的临床试验中是否可以充分假设临床同质性,因为缺乏明确的招募设置报告以及关键参与者特征的招募设置内部和之间的差异。这些发现威胁到下肢肌腱病变荟萃分析的假设。
    OBJECTIVE: It is unclear if clinical trials of treatments for lower-limb tendinopathies include clinically homogeneous participant populations (an assumption for pooling in meta-analyses). We assessed the recruitment setting and participant characteristics used in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were investigating any treatment for lower-limb tendinopathies. DESIGN: Scoping review. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases. All RCTs that were investigating treatments for lower-limb tendinopathies in an adult population (≥18 years) were eligible for inclusion. At least 2 authors conducted independent screening and selection of full-text papers, and extracted data from included studies. RESULTS: Of 18 341 records, 342 RCTs (21 897 participants) were eligible for inclusion and data extraction. The most common diagnoses were plantar fasciopathy (n = 195, 57%), Achilles tendinopathy (n = 82, 24%), and patellar tendinopathy (n = 41, 12%). Secondary care (n = 144, 42%) was the most reported recruitment setting, followed by an open setting (n = 44, 13%). In 93 (27%) RCTs, the recruitment setting was not described. We found high heterogeneity in participant characteristics (eg, symptom duration, age, body mass index, and the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment [VISA] questionnaire score) within and between recruitment settings. CONCLUSION: Our results question whether clinical homogeneity can be adequately assumed in clinical trials of lower-limb tendinopathies due to the lack of clear reporting of the recruitment setting and the variability within and between recruitment settings of key participant characteristics. These findings threaten assumptions for meta-analyses in lower-limb tendinopathies. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(1):1-10. Epub 5 December 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11722.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    尽管长期阿片类药物治疗(LTOT)有其自身的风险,阿片类药物停药可能对接受LTOT的高危退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)患者造成伤害。关于要求提供者对具有活性阿片类药物处方的高风险患者进行病例审查的任务规定的影响的信息有限(即,强制性病例审查政策)关于阿片类药物停药和死亡率。
    我们的研究是对2018年4月至2020年3月期间一项为期23个月的阶梯式楔形集群随机对照试验的次要数据分析。该研究包括10685名LTOT患者,其预测的严重不良事件风险介于全国前1%至5%之间,他们在2018年4月18日至2019年11月9日之间进入了风险范围。我们检查了强制性病例审查政策是否对患者的阿片类药物停药和死亡率有影响。
    在10685名LTOT患者中(男性占88.2%;平均[SD]年龄,61.1[11.7]年),29.1%的患者出现停药,死亡率为9.5%。接受强制病例审查的患者阿片类药物停药的风险降低(平均边际效应[AME],-11.16[95%CI,-15.30至-7.01]个百分点)和全因死亡率(AME,-3.31[95%CI,-5.63至-1.00]个百分点),相对于不在任务范围内的患者。
    对于接受LTOT的高危患者,VHA强制病例审查政策与更低的停药概率和全因死亡率相关。维持护理参与度同时优化高危患者疼痛管理的干预措施可能有利于最大程度地减少死亡率和与停药相关的其他风险。
    Although long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) has its own risks, opioid discontinuation could pose harm for high-risk Veterans Health Administration (VHA) patients receiving LTOT. There is limited information on the impact of a mandate requiring providers to perform case reviews on high-risk patients with an active opioid prescription (ie, mandated case review policy) on opioid discontinuation and mortality.
    Our study is a secondary data analysis of a 23-month stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial between April 2018 and March 2020. The study included 10 685 LTOT patients with a predicted risk of a serious adverse event between the top 1% to 5% nationally who entered the risk range between 4/18/2018 and 11/9/2019. We examined whether the mandated case review policy had an impact on opioid discontinuation and mortality for the patients.
    Among 10 685 LTOT patients (88.2% male; mean [SD] age, 61.1 [11.7] years), 29.1% experienced discontinuation and the mortality rate was 9.5%. Patients under mandated case review had a decreased risk of opioid discontinuation (average marginal effect [AME], -11.16 [95% CI, -15.30 to -7.01] percentage points) and all-cause mortality (AME, -3.31 [95% CI, -5.63 to -1.00] percentage points), relative to patients who were not under the mandate.
    The VHA mandated case review policy was associated with lower probability of discontinuation and all-cause mortality for high-risk patients receiving LTOT. Interventions that maintain care engagement while optimizing pain management for high-risk patients may be beneficial for minimizing mortality and other risks associated with discontinuation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    反向肩关节成形术(RSA)用于治疗创伤性和关节炎病变,随着临床适应症的扩大,因此对该主题的临床研究有所增加。这项研究的目的是检查报告RSA结果的随机对照试验(RCT)的统计脆弱性。进行了系统的搜索,以寻找调查RSA的RCT。脆性指数(FI)使用Fisher精确检验计算,通过顺序改变事件的数量,直到有一个逆转的意义。通过将FI除以试验群体来计算脆性商(FQ)。每个试验都分配了总体FI和FQ,计算为其报告结果的中位数结果。总的来说,19项RCT值得纳入审查,代表1146名患者,其中41.2%是男性,平均年龄74.2±4.3岁,平均随访22.1±9.9个月。中位RCT人群为59,中位有9例患者失去随访。中位FI为4.5,中位FQ为0.083,表明未完成试验的患者数量多于必须改变才能逆转显著性发现的结果数量。这篇综述发现,RSA管理的RCT证据可能容易受到统计脆弱性的影响,需要一些事件来扭转一个有意义的发现。
    Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is used in the treatment of traumatic and arthritic pathologies, with expanding clinical indications and as a result there has been an increase in clinical research on the topic. The purpose of this study was to examine the statistical fragility of randomized control trials (RCTs) reporting outcomes from RSA. A systematic search was undertaken to find RCTs investigating RSA. The Fragility Index (FI) was calculated using Fisher\'s exact test, by sequentially altering the number of events until there was a reversal of significance. The Fragility Quotient (FQ) was calculated by dividing the FI by the trial population. Each trial was assigned an overall FI and FQ calculated as the median result of its reported findings. Overall, 19 RCTs warranted inclusion in the review, representing 1146 patients, of which 41.2% were male, with a mean age of 74.2 ± 4.3 years and mean follow-up of 22.1 ± 9.9 months. The median RCT population was 59, with a median of 9 patients lost to follow-up. The median FI was 4.5, and median FQ was 0.083, indicating more patients did not complete the trial than the number of outcomes which would have to change to reverse the finding of significance. This review found that the RCT evidence for RSA management may be vulnerable to statistical fragility, with a handful of events required to reverse a finding of significance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:文献中的新兴研究继续预测,人群中的负面心理健康和睡眠健康结果将急剧增加,特别是在COVID-19大流行之后,这极大地影响了人们的生活方式。随着精神卫生药物干预措施继续受到污名化,在人群中无法获得,天然补充剂为干预提供了机会。
    目的:本研究旨在对有关营养补充剂对焦虑症状具有最大治疗作用的最新综合证据的文献进行系统回顾。抑郁症,和失眠。
    方法:系统的文献搜索,利用几个数据库,包括PubMed和WebofScience,于2022年4月29日进行。我们使用开发的关键字和MeSH术语进行搜索。研究资格标准包括(1)随机对照试验;(2)调查基于植物的治疗或天然补充剂作为干预措施;(3)测量以下至少一种健康结果:焦虑症状,抑郁症状,或睡眠健康结果;(4)利用经过验证的测量工具来测量感兴趣的结果;(5)用英语书写;(6)同行评审;(7)专注于成年人和老年人群。
    结果:遵循PRISMA指南,本综述包括76项研究。我们使用修订的风险偏倚工具(RoB2)来评估所有纳入的随机对照试验的质量。进行了定性数据合成。总的来说,我们从文献中的证据中发现了一些有价值的见解,包括证明益生菌和维生素B复合物对焦虑症状有益的证据,抑郁症状,和睡眠质量。关键发现的含义:这篇综述提供了有关该主题的文献中最新的发现,包括过去5年发表的大量研究。考虑到大流行后负面精神和睡眠健康结果的预期上升,本研究中确定的补充剂和治疗应成为干预措施的目标,以增加其可及性和可负担性,并将其纳入临床治疗指南.PROSPERO注册号:CRD42022361130。
    The emerging research in the literature continues to forecast a drastic and alarming increase in negative mental health and sleep health outcomes among populations, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, which significantly influenced people\'s way of life. With mental health pharmaceutical interventions continuing to be stigmatized and inaccessible among populations, natural supplements provide an opportunity for intervention.
    This study sought to conduct a systematic review of the literature on the most recent comprehensive evidence for which nutritional supplements have the greatest therapeutic impact on symptoms of anxiety, depression, and insomnia.
    A systematic search of the literature, utilizing several databases, including PubMed and Web of Science, was conducted on 29 April 2022. We used developed keywords and MeSH terms for the search. The study eligibility criteria included (1) a randomized control trial; (2) investigating a plant-based therapeutic or natural supplement as the intervention; (3) measuring at least one health outcome of the following: anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, or sleep health outcomes; (4) utilizing validated measurement tools to measure the outcome of interest; (5) written in the English language; (6) peer reviewed; and (7) focused on adults and elderly populations.
    Following the PRISMA guidelines, 76 studies were included in this review. We used the revised Risk of Bias tool (RoB2) to assess the quality of all included randomized control trials. A qualitative data synthesis was conducted. Overall, we found several valuable insights from the evidence in the literature, including evidence that demonstrates the benefits of probiotics and vitamin B complexes on anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, and sleep quality. Implication of Key Findings: This review provides the most updated findings in the literature on the topic, including an abundance of research that was published in the past 5 years. Given the expected rise in negative mental and sleep health outcomes following the pandemic, the supplements and therapeutics identified in this study should be the target of intervention measures to increase their accessibility and affordability and allow them to be incorporated into clinical guidelines of treatment. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022361130.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:迄今为止,数十篇系统评价(SRs)和荟萃分析(MAs)总结了围产期抑郁症预防干预措施的有效性。然而,结果尚无定论,迫切需要加强更高水平的证据综合。
    目的:总结和比较来自SR&MA的证据,以检查所有类型的干预措施预防围产期抑郁症的有效性。
    方法:PubMed,PsycINFO,从成立到2022年12月,搜索了Cochrane系统评论数据库和OpenGrey。我们选择了SR和MA的随机对照试验(RCTs),比较了围产期抑郁症的所有类型的预防干预措施与对照组,其结果是抑郁症状的减少和/或围产期抑郁症新病例的发生率(PROSPERO:CRD42020173125)。
    结果:共有19个SR和MA评估了152个独特的RCT,其中包括来自26个国家和五大洲的83,408名女性。任何干预措施的中位效应大小为SMD=0.29(95%CI:0.20至0.38)。基于锻炼/身体活动,心理,和任何类型的干预显示,中位效应大小分别为0.43,0.28和0.36.RCT之间的重叠程度轻微。根据AMSTAR-2,其中79%被评为低质量或严重低质量。证据的力量,根据等级,报道不佳,在大多数情况下,很低。
    结论:基于运动/体力活动和心理干预对减少围产期抑郁症状具有小到中等的效果。没有足够的证据表明膳食补充剂和药物干预措施可有效预防围产期抑郁症。需要高质量的RCTSR&MA,主要侧重于普遍的预防性干预。
    To date, dozens of systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) summarize the effectiveness of preventive interventions for perinatal depression. However, the results are inconclusive, making an urgent need to step up to higher levels of evidence synthesis.
    To summarize and compare the evidence from the SR&MA examining the effectiveness of all types of interventions for preventing perinatal depression.
    PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and OpenGrey were searched from inception to December 2022. We selected SR&MA of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared all types of preventive interventions for perinatal depression with control groups whose outcome was the reduction of depressive symptoms and/or incidence of new cases of perinatal depression (PROSPERO: CRD42020173125).
    A total of 19 SRs and MAs evaluated 152 unique RCTs that included 83,408 women from 26 countries and five continents. The median effect size for any intervention was SMD = 0.29 (95% CI: 0.20 to 0.38). Exercise/physical activity-based, psychological, and any type of intervention showed median effect sizes of 0.43, 0.28 and 0.36, respectively. The degree of overlap among RCTs was slight. According to AMSTAR-2, 79% of them were rated as low or critically low-quality. The strength of evidence, according to GRADE, was poorly reported and, in most cases, was low.
    Exercise/physical activity-based and psychological interventions have a small-to-medium effect on reducing perinatal depressive symptoms. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that dietary supplements and pharmacological interventions are effective in preventing perinatal depression. There is a need for high-quality SR&MA of RCTs, mainly focusing on universal preventive interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号