Seborrheic Dermatitis of the scalp (SSD) is a chronic and relapsing inflammatory skin condition. Current SSD treatments mainly consist of topical applications of anti-fungals and anti-inflammatory agents. to review information about SSD and to provide dermatologists with practical recommendations for managing adult SSD. Material and methods: Between September and December 2023, an international group of experts in dermatology and hair and scalp disorders met to discuss published data about SD, SSD, dandruff, and management options. A total of 131 manuscripts available from PubMed were analysed, discussed and used for the present consensus. Each author was asked to complete a table listing currently used treatments to treat SSD according to the literature and to their own experience. The authors confirmed their use and regimen and commented on local treatment exceptions. They then agreed on prescription practices and proposed a general treatment approach. Currently, approved therapies to manage moderate and severe forms of SSD do not exist and there is a need for adapted and approved medications that treat efficiently and safely the disease. We propose a treatment algorithm that allows for the treatment of all severity grades of SSD. This algorithm may be completed with local treatment specifications. Despite the lack of approved therapies to manage moderate forms of SSD, a treatment algorithm is proposed and may help prescribers to manage SSD more efficiently.

Chronic nodular prurigo (CNP) is a chronic dermatological disease characterized by the presence of chronic pruritus and pruritic nodular lesions. The aim of this study was to reach consensus among a group of experts based on a non-systematic literature review and an algorithm for the clinical diagnosis of CNP. The resulting algorithm is structured in 3 blocks: 1) early identification of the patient with a possible diagnosis of CNP; 2) diagnosis and assessment of CNP; and 3) categorization of CNP (identification of the underlying causes or associated comorbidities). We believe that this clinical algorithm can facilitate the correct diagnosis of patients with CNP. Additionally, it raises awareness on the need for a multidisciplinary approach and specific treatment of CNP, steps of paramount importance to make better therapeutic decisions.

BACKGROUND: Itch is the most troublesome symptom of atopic dermatitis, and it is important to assess it appropriately for optimal treatment. We discussed issues regarding itch and the most appropriate methods of assessment at the Atopic Itch Consensus Meeting (AICOM), attended by physicians and researchers with expertise in itch treatment and research.
METHODS: The AICOM participants prepared a draft consensus statement that addressed the most appropriate itch assessment methods for age groups <2 years, 2-6 years, 7-14 years, and ≥15 years. Consensus was defined as agreement by ≥80% of the participants.
RESULTS: Votes were cast by 20 participants (8 dermatologists, 7 pediatricians, and 5 researchers), and a consensus on the best current methods of itch assessment was reached with 95% agreement. For infants and preschool children, because subjective evaluation is difficult, a checklist for itch assessment was developed for caregivers.
CONCLUSIONS: For itch assessment, we recommend subjective evaluation by the patient using a rating scale. For infants and preschoolers, evaluation should be done by the caregiver using a checklist, combined with objective evaluation (of skin lesions, for example) by a physician. We anticipate that more objective itch assessment indices will be established in the future.

BACKGROUND: Anogenital disorders encompass a broad spectrum of conditions with diverse pathogenetic origins, often presenting with nonspecific symptoms and overlapping causative factors, thereby posing diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Effective management requires interdisciplinary knowledge and the use of medical guidelines. Guidelines can play an important role in translating current knowledge into clinical practice and ensuring consistent care, minimizing complications, and optimizing patient outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: The dermatologically relevant guidelines for anogenital disorders, categorized by etiological groups, are reviewed.
METHODS: A selective literature review was conducted, incorporating data from the guideline repository of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF).
RESULTS: A broad range of current guidelines pertinent to the management of anogenital disorders with relevance for dermatologists is available. These encompass guidelines for the management of chronic inflammatory dermatoses with (potential) involvement of the anogenital region, such as anal eczema, psoriasis, lichen sclerosus, or lichen ruber, as well as sexually transmitted infections and associated conditions, involving a broad range of pathogens, including gonorrhea, chlamydia, syphilis, or human papillomaviruses (HPV)-associated disorders. In this article, we provide an overview of the available guidelines.
CONCLUSIONS: The present article does not claim to be exhaustive. The validity of the mentioned guidelines and the availability of updates needs to be verified in each case.
UNASSIGNED: HINTERGRUND: Im Anogenitalbereich treten vielfältige Erkrankungen mit sehr unterschiedlichen pathogenetischen Ursachen auf. Teils unspezifische Symptome und überlappende Ursachen erschweren die Diagnose und Behandlung. Die effektive Diagnose und Behandlung erfordern interdisziplinäres Wissen und die Anwendung von medizinischen Leitlinien. Leitlinien spielen eine wichtige Rolle beim Transfer des aktuellen Wissensstands in die klinische Praxis und bei der Gewährleistung einer konsistenten Versorgung, Minimierung von Komplikationen und Optimierung der Ergebnisse für Patient*innen.
UNASSIGNED: Ziel war die Erstellung einer Übersicht über die aktuell vorliegenden dermatologisch relevanten Leitlinien für das Management von ausgewählten Erkrankungen des Anogenitalbereichs.
METHODS: Es erfolgte eine elektive Literaturrecherche unter Einbezug des Leitlinienregisters der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF).
UNASSIGNED: Es liegt eine Vielzahl aktueller Leitlinien zur Behandlung anogenitaler Erkrankungen von dermatologischer Relevanz vor. Dies umfasst insbesondere Leitlinien für chronisch entzündliche Dermatosen mit (möglicher) Beteiligung des Anogenitalbereichs, wie etwa das Analekzem, die Psoriasis, den Lichen sclerosus oder Lichen ruber, sowie sexuell übertragbare Infektionen und assoziierte Erkrankungen mit einer großen Bandbreite an Pathogenen, etwa Gonorrhö, Chlamydien, Syphilis oder HPV(humane Papillomaviren)-assoziierte Erkrankungen. Im vorliegenden Beitrag geben wir eine Übersicht über die bestehenden Leitlinien.
UNASSIGNED: Die vorliegende Übersicht erhebt keinen Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit. Die Gültigkeit der genannten Leitlinien oder das Vorliegen von Aktualisierungen ist im Einzelfall zu prüfen.

These guidelines present a systematic approach to diagnosis, treatment, and management of allergic skin diseases in dogs and cats. The guidelines describe detailed diagnosis and treatment plans for flea allergy, food allergy, and atopy in dogs and for flea allergy, food allergy, and feline atopic skin syndrome in cats. Management of the allergic patient entails a multimodal approach with frequent and ongoing communication with the client. Obtaining a comprehensive history is crucial for diagnosis and treatment of allergic skin diseases, and the guidelines describe key questions to ask when presented with allergic canine and feline patients. Once a detailed history is obtained, a physical examination should be performed, a minimum dermatologic database collected, and treatment for secondary infection, ectoparasites, and pruritus (where indicated) initiated. The process of diagnosing and managing allergic skin disease can be prolonged and frustrating for clients. The guidelines offer recommendations and tips for client communication and when referral to a dermatologist should be considered, to improve client satisfaction and optimize patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To identify strategies for reducing neonatal and maternal morbidity associated with intrahepatic cholestasis pregnancy (ICP).
METHODS: The quality of evidence of the literature was assessed following the GRADE methodology with questions formulated in the PICO format (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) and outcomes defined a priori and classified according to their importance. An extensive bibliographic search was performed on PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE and Google Scholar databases. The quality of the evidence was assessed (high, moderate, low, very low) and a (i) strong or (ii) weak recommendations or (iii) no recommendation were formulated. The recommendations were reviewed in two rounds with external reviewers (Delphi survey) to select the consensus recommendations.
RESULTS: Of the 14 questions (from 12 PICO questions and one definition question outside the PICO format), there was agreement between the working group and the external reviewers on 14 (100%). The level of evidence of the literature was insufficient to provide a recommendation on two questions. ICP is defined by the occurrence of suggestive pruritus (palmoplantar, nocturnal) associated with a total bile acid level>10μmol/L or an alanine transaminase level above 2N after ruling out differential diagnoses. In the absence of suggestive symptoms of a differential diagnosis, it is recommended not to carry out additional biological or ultrasound tests. In women with CIP, ursodeoxycholic acid is recommended to reduce the intensity of maternal pruritus (Strong recommendation. Quality of the evidence moderate) and to decrease the level of total bile acids and alanine transaminases. (Strong recommendation. Quality of the evidence moderate). S-adenosyl-methionine, dexamethasone, guar gum or activated charcoal should not be used to reduce the intensity of maternal pruritus (Strong recommendation. Quality of evidence low), and there is insufficient data to recommend the use of antihistamines (No recommendation. Quality of evidence low). Rifampicin (Weak recommendation. Very low quality of evidence) or plasma exchange (Strong recommendation. Very low quality of evidence) should not be used to reduce maternal pruritus and perinatal morbidity. Serum monitoring of bile acids is recommended to reduce perinatal morbidity and mortality (stillbirth, prematurity) (Low recommendation. Quality of the evidence low). The level of evidence is insufficient to determine whether fetal heart rate or fetal ultrasound monitoring are useful to reduce perinatal morbidity (No recommendation). Birth is recommended when bile acid level is above 99μmol/L from 36 weeks gestation to reduce perinatal morbidity, in particular stillbirth. When bile acid level is above 99μmol/L is below 100μmol/L, women should be informed that induction of labor could be considered 37 and 39 weeks gestation to reduce perinatal morbidity. (Strong recommendation. Quality of evidence low). In postpartum, total bile acids and alanine transaminases level should be checked and normalized before prescribing estrogen-progestin contraception, ideally with a low estrogen dose (risk of recurrence of pruritus and cytolysis) (Low recommendation. Quality of evidence very low).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the quality of evidence regarding ICP gestational cholestasis remains low, there is a strong consensus in France, as shown by our Delphi study, on how to manage women with ICP. The reference first-line treatment is ursodeoxycholic acid.

Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a pregnancy liver disease, characterised by pruritus and increased total serum bile acids (TSBA), Australian incidence 0.6-0.7%. ICP is diagnosed by non-fasting TSBA ≥19 μmol/L in a pregnant woman with pruritus without rash without a known pre-existing liver disorder. Peak TSBA ≥40 and ≥100 μmol/L identify severe and very severe disease respectively, associated with spontaneous preterm birth when severe, and with stillbirth, when very severe. Benefit-vs-risk for iatrogenic preterm birth in ICP remains uncertain. Ursodeoxycholic acid remains the best pharmacotherapy preterm, improving perinatal outcome and reducing pruritus, although it has not been shown to reduce stillbirth.

Fufang Jingjie for Fumigation and Washing is one of the commonly used and effective drugs for external fumigation and washing of traditional Chinese medicine, it has the functions of dispelling wind, drying and dampness, alleviating edema, and reducing swelling, relieving pain and relieving itching. It is widely used for the treatment of external hemorrhoids, mixed hemorrhoids, internal hemorrhoids prolapse and incarceration, anal fissures, perianal abscess, anal fistula acute attack, perianal eczema and other diseases. It has a significant effect on the uncomfortable symptoms caused by various anal diseases, such as swelling, pain, wet itching, falling and swelling, and many secretions, as well as various postoperative complications. Fufang Jingjie for Fumigation and Washing has been used in clinic for many years, it has a lot of research evidence and experience in clinical application. In order to further improve the clinicians\' knowledge of Fufang Jingjie for Fumigation and Washing and guide clinical medication more reasonably, this consensus invites front-line clinical experts from anorectal department to compile, referring to the relevant clinical literature and guide, combining with the clinical treatment experience of experts, the function, usage, dosage, adverse reactions and points for attention were discussed of Fufang Jingjie for Fumigation and Washing. This consensus was formed to provide reference for the clinical application of Fufang Jingjie for Fumigation and Washing.

Pruritus is a cross-disciplinary leading symptom of numerous diseases and represents an interdisciplinary diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. In contrast to acute pruritus, chronic pruritus (CP) is a symptom of various diseases that is usually difficult to treat. Scratching and the development of scratch-associated skin lesions can alter the original skin status. In the presence of an itch-scratch-cycle, even secondary diseases such as chronic prurigo can develop. Chronic pruritus leads to considerable subjective suffering of those affected, which can result in restrictions on the health-related quality of life such as sleep disturbances, anxiety, depressiveness, experience of stigmatization and/or social withdrawal up to clinically relevant psychic comorbidities. Medical care of patients should therefore include (a) interdisciplinary diagnosis and therapy of the triggering underlying disease, (b) therapy of the secondary symptoms of pruritus (dermatological therapy, sleep promotion, in the case of an accompanying or underlying psychological or psychosomatic disease an appropriate psychological-psychotherapeutic treatment) and (c) symptomatic antipruritic therapy. The aim of this interdisciplinary guideline is to define and standardize the therapeutic procedure as well as the interdisciplinary diagnosis of CP. This is the short version of the updated S2k-guideline for chronic pruritus. The long version can be found at www.awmf.org.

Measuring outcomes in clinical practice can aid patient care, quality improvement, and real-world evidence generation. The Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) Clinical Practice initiative is developing a list of validated, feasible instruments to measure atopic eczema in clinical care. Prior work identified symptoms and long-term control as the most important domains to measure in clinical practice. The Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) and the Patient-Oriented Scoring Atopic Dermatitis Index (PO-SCORAD) were recommended by consensus to measure symptoms in clinical practice, but a need for instruments to measure itch intensity specifically was recognized. The HOME group also previously decided that long-term control should be captured by repeated measurements of eczema control. Recommended instruments to measure eczema control in clinical practice have not been defined.
To recommend instruments to measure eczema control and itch intensity in patients with atopic eczema in clinical practice.
Available instruments to measure eczema control and itch intensity were identified through systematic reviews, informing a consensus process held at the HOME VIII virtual online meeting (October 6 and October 9, 2020). Feasibility aspects were highlighted to optimize instrument selection for the clinical practice. Consensus on an instrument was reached if fewer than 30% of the voters disagreed.
Of 7 identified instruments, the Recap of Atopic Eczema (RECAP) and Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT) were the recommended instruments to measure eczema control (3 of 63 [5%] and 7 of 69 [10%] of voters disagreed, respectively). A single-question patient global assessment garnered support, but the current available instrument did not reach consensus. Six available itch-intensity instruments were identified. Of them, 3 instruments were recommended by consensus: a peak 24-hour numeric rating scale (NRS)-itch, and 1-week NRS-itch instruments from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Itch Questionnaire, measuring average and peak itch (11 of 63 [17%], 14 of 63 [22%], and 16 of 59 [27%] voters disagreed, respectively).
Clinicians and patients are encouraged to incorporate these well-validated, quick-to-perform, and easy-to-use instruments into their clinic, selecting the instruments that best fit their need. These assessments are meant to enhance, not replace, the patient-clinician encounter, and to support real-world research and health care improvement.