OBJECTIVE: Ependymomas are the third most common brain tumors in children. Standard of care is surgery followed by adjuvant radiation therapy. Controversy in the literature still exists over optimal radiation therapy dose. We completed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the optimal dose for local control (LC), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in pediatric patients.
METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science through January 2024. We included cohort studies that compared adjuvant radiation therapy of ≤54 Gy with >54 Gy in pediatric patients (≤22 years) with nonmetastatic intracranial ependymomas. We assessed study quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale of Cohort Studies. We pooled studies using a random effects meta-analysis for hazard ratios (HR), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and assessed statistical heterogeneity via I2. When HRs were unavailable, we transformed risks using established methods. We narratively summarized qualitative outcomes.
RESULTS: Seven studies met our inclusion criteria, covering a combined 1321 patients. Studies included a range of doses from 45 to 66.6 Gy. Compared with >54 Gy, we found no difference in LC for those receiving ≤54 Gy (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.56-1.24; I2, 49.1%), in EFS (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.95-1.09; I2, 0.00%), and OS (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.82-1.20; I2, 37.5%). Two studies reported on subtotal resection by radiation therapy dose, neither study reporting statistical differences in LC, EFS, or OS, although the number of patients was small (n ≤ 30). Five studies reported on late effects, with brainstem radionecrosis, radiation-induced vasculopathy, and secondary tumors being the most frequent. Overall study quality was high, although lower scores were consistently seen in comparability of cohorts. To our knowledge, no studies reported on molecular subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in LC, EFS, or OS for those treated with ≤54 Gy compared with >54 Gy. There were insufficient data to complete a subgroup meta-analysis on radiation therapy dosing based on extent of resection or molecular subgroups.

UNASSIGNED: Chondrosarcoma is a rare malignant bone tumor. Particle beam therapy (PT) can concentrate doses to targets while reducing adverse events. A meta-analysis based on a literature review was performed to examine the efficacy of PT and photon radiotherapy for skull base chondrosarcoma.
UNASSIGNED: The meta-analysis was conducted using 21 articles published from 1990 to 2022.
UNASSIGNED: After PT, the 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 94.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91.0-96.2%) and 93.9% (95% CI: 90.6-96.1%), respectively, and the 3- and 5-year local control rates were 95.4% (95% CI: 92.0-97.4%) and 90.1% (95% CI: 76.8-96.0%), respectively. Meta-regression analysis revealed a significant association of PT with a superior 5-year OS rate compared to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (p < 0.001). In the studies used in the meta-analysis, the major adverse event of grade 2 or higher was temporal lobe necrosis (incidence 1-18%, median 7%).
UNASSIGNED: PT for skull base chondrosarcoma had a good outcome and may be a valuable option among radiotherapy modalities. However, high-dose postoperative irradiation of skull base chondrosarcoma can cause adverse events such as temporal lobe necrosis.

Proton radiotherapy may be a compelling technical option for the treatment of breast cancer due to its unique physical property known as the \"Bragg peak.\" This feature offers distinct advantages, promising superior dose conformity within the tumor area and reduced radiation exposure to surrounding healthy tissues, enhancing the potential for better treatment outcomes. However, proton therapy is accompanied by inherent challenges, primarily higher costs and limited accessibility when compared to well-developed photon irradiation. Thus, in clinical practice, it is important for radiation oncologists to carefully select patients before recommendation of proton therapy to ensure the transformation of dosimetric benefits into tangible clinical benefits. Yet, the optimal indications for proton therapy in breast cancer patients remain uncertain. While there is no widely recognized methodology for patient selection, numerous attempts have been made in this direction. In this review, we intended to present an inspiring summarization and discussion about the current practices and exploration on the approaches of this treatment decision-making process in terms of treatment-related side-effects, tumor control, and cost-efficiency, including the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model, the tumor control probability (TCP) model, genomic biomarkers, cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs), and so on. Additionally, we conducted an evaluation of the eligibility criteria in ongoing randomized controlled trials and analyzed their reference value in patient selection. We evaluated the pros and cons of various potential patient selection approaches and proposed possible directions for further optimization and exploration. In summary, while proton therapy holds significant promise in breast cancer treatment, its integration into clinical practice calls for a thoughtful, evidence-driven strategy. By continuously refining the patient selection criteria, we can harness the full potential of proton radiotherapy while ensuring maximum benefit for breast cancer patients.

To systematically review all dosimetric studies investigating the impact of deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) compared with free breathing (FB) in mediastinal lymphoma patients treated with proton therapy as compared to IMRT (intensity-modulated radiation therapy)-DIBH.
We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline using the PubMed database to identify studies of mediastinal lymphoma patients with dosimetric comparisons of proton-FB and/or proton-DIBH with IMRT-DIBH. Parameters included mean heart (MHD), lung (MLD), and breast (MBD) doses, among other parameters. Case reports were excluded. Absolute differences in mean doses > 1 Gy between comparators were considered to be clinically meaningful.
As of April 2021, eight studies fit these criteria (n = 8), with the following comparisons: proton-FB vs IMRT-DIBH (n = 5), proton-DIBH vs proton-FB (n = 5), and proton-DIBH vs IMRT-DIBH (n = 8). When comparing proton-FB with IMRT-DIBH in 5 studies, MHD was reduced with proton-FB in 2 studies, was similar (<1 Gy difference) in 2 studies, and increased in 1 study. On the other hand, MLD and MBD were reduced with proton-FB in 3 and 4 studies, respectively. When comparing proton-DIBH with proton-FB, MHD and MLD were reduced with proton DIBH in 4 and 3 studies, respectively, while MBD remained similar. Compared with IMRT-DIBH in 8 studies, proton-DIBH reduced the MHD in 7 studies and was similar in 1 study. Furthermore, MLD and MBD were reduced with proton-DIBH in 8 and 6 studies respectively. Integral dose was similar between proton-FB and proton-DIBH, and both were substantially lower than IMRT-DIBH.
Accounting for heart, lung, breast, and integral dose, proton therapy (FB or DIBH) was superior to IMRT-DIBH. Proton-DIBH can lower dose to the lungs and heart even further compared with proton-FB, depending on disease location in the mediastinum, and organ-sparing and target coverage priorities.

暂无摘要。

Recurrent and second primary head and neck cancers represent a clinical challenge due to frequently unresectable and/or locally advanced disease. Given that many of these patients have received definitive doses of radiation previously, reirradiation is associated with significant morbidity. Use of modern approaches such as conformal photon-based planning and charged particle therapy using protons or carbon ions allows for greater sparing of normal tissues while maintaining or escalating doses to tumor volumes. While the reirradiation data has consistently shown benefits to local control and even survival from escalation of radiotherapy dose, excessive cumulative doses can result in severe toxicities, including fatal carotid blowout syndrome. For all modalities, appropriate patient selection is of utmost importance. Large-scale trials and multi-institutional registry data are needed to standardize treatment modalities, and to determine optimal doses and volumes for reirradiation.

Sticky skin is a dermatologic phenomenon in which the skin may cause objects to adhere to it on contact or adhere to itself or both. The entire skin can be affected in patients with sticky skin. Alternatively, just acral sites, such as the hand, can be involved. The acquisition of sticky skin has been described in patients treated with certain medications. These drugs include retinoids, proton pump inhibitors, and antifungals; they also include combination therapy utilizing an antineoplastic agent and an antifungal drug in patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer. The pathogenesis of acquired cutaneous adherence in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer was postulated to be the result of therapy-induced elevation of endogenous retinoids. Retinoids have multiple biological effects on epidermal differentiation that may contribute to the pathogenesis of acquired cutaneous adherence. These include the induction of fine, granular, mucus-like deposits within and between the keratinocytes in the upper stratum spinosum and stratum corneum, modulation of lipid composition in keratinocytes, prevention of cross-linked, cornified envelope formation in keratinocytes by the inhibition of epidermal transglutaminase, and altered and decreased content of keratin within the epidermis. We describe an older man who developed non-medication acquired sticky skin (NoMasts). His acquired cutaneous adherence was considered to be idiopathic. We postulate that aging may be associated with elevated endogenous retinoid levels in older individuals and may have resulted in his sticky skin. Further investigation into these retinoid-induced effects and to what extent they promote acquired cutaneous adherence is still needed.

UNASSIGNED: Chordoma located in the skull base is usually a challenging surgical condition. It is often not possible to achieve gross total resection. Residual tumors have been treated with adjuvant focal radiation therapy employing high-energy particles most commonly through proton beam. In this review, we systematically analyzed indications and outcomes of this treatment with respect to local control rates of the lesion and factors determining recurrence of skull base chordomas. In addition, we collected data on treatment-associated radiation-induced side effects.
UNASSIGNED: In line with the PRISMA guidelines, the authors performed a literature search algorithm for relevant articles using three databases: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to evaluate all identified studies published between 1980 and 2018.
UNASSIGNED: Our review included 11 studies for analysis (n = 511 patients). The mean age of the study population was 47.3 ± 5.8 years. The mean dose of postsurgical irradiation at the time of initial treatment was 71.1 ± 3.1 Gy. The mean follow-up duration was 45.0 ± 17.5 months. Within this follow-up duration, recurrence occurred in 26.8% of the patients. The mean time to recurrence was 34.5 ± 15.2 months. A significant number of patients experienced side effects varying from Grade 1 (mild dermatitis) to Grade 4 (temporal lobe necrosis and visual disorders).
UNASSIGNED: Despite advances in proton therapy, recurrence rates in skull base chordoma remain high. The toxicity of proton therapy may be more prevalent than generally thought. Unfortunately, there is substantial variation in the methods of data reporting.

Pseudoprogression (PsP) following radiation therapy (RT) for low grade glioma (LGG, WHO grade I and II), including both photon-based intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and proton beam therapy (PBT), has been described. However, its incidence has yet to be consolidated. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to pool the current literature and establish the incidence of PsP in these groups to better inform surveillance protocols in the future.
Searches of 4 electronic databases from inception to April 2019 were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened against pre-specified criteria. The incidence of outcomes was then extracted and pooled by random-effects meta-analysis of proportions.
A total of 5 pediatric and 4 adult cohort studies describing 517 and 424 LGG subjects respectively satisfied all selection criteria. The estimated incidences of PsP in pediatric subjects following IMRT and PBT were 33% (95% CI, 20-47%) and 34% (95% CI, 23-45%) respectively, with no difference between modalities. The estimated incidences of PsP in adult subjects following IMRT and PBT were 18% (95% CI, 12-25%) and 30% (95% CI, 21-39%) respectively, with PsP significantly less common following IMRT than PBT (P-heterogeneity = 0.04). Median time from radiation initiation to first detection of PsP ranged from 6 to 12 months across all modalities and age groups.
The incidence of PsP following both IMRT and PBT in the management of pediatric and adult LGG is not negligible, and should therefore be recognized as a pertinent sequala within the first year at least following treatment. However, a lack of accountability in the current literature for the differences in PsP interpretation, radiation modality, radiobiology and molecular biology of LGGs precludes any firm surveillance recommendations at this time.

UNASSIGNED: Embryonal tumors with multilayered rosettes (ETMRs) are aggressive tumors that typically occur in young children. Radiation is often deferred or delayed for these patients due to late effects; proton therapy may mitigate some of these concerns. This study reviews the role of radiation in ETMR and describes initial results with proton therapy.
UNASSIGNED: Records of patients with embryonal tumor with abundant neuropil and true rosettes (ETANTR), medulloepithelioma (MEP), and ependymoblastoma (EPL) treated with proton therapy at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. A literature review of cases of CNS ETANTR, MEP, and EPL published since 1990 was also conducted.
UNASSIGNED: Seven patients were treated with proton therapy. Their median age at diagnosis was 33 months (range 10-57 months) and their median age at radiation start was 42 months (range 17-58 months). Their median overall survival (OS) was 16 months (range 8-64 months), with three patients surviving 36 months or longer. Five patients had disease progression prior to starting radiation; all 5 of these patients failed in the tumor bed. A search of the literature identified 204 cases of ETMR with a median OS of 10 months (range 0.03-161 months). Median OS of 18 long-term survivors (≥36 months) in the literature was 77 months (range 37-184 months). Of these 18 long-term survivors, 17 (94%) received radiotherapy as part of their initial treatment; 14 of them were treated with craniospinal irradiation.
UNASSIGNED: Outcomes of patients with ETMR treated with proton therapy are encouraging compared to historical results. Further study of this rare tumor is warranted to better define the role of radiotherapy.