BACKGROUND: Preoperative pain sensitivity (PPS) can be associated with postsurgical pain. However, estimates of this association are scarce. Confirming this correlation is essential to identifying patients at high risk for severe postoperative pain and for developing analgesic strategy. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarises PPS and assessed its correlation with postoperative pain.
METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO were searched up to October 1, 2023, for studies reporting the association between PPS and postsurgical pain. Two authors abstracted estimates of the effect of each method independently. A random-effects model was used to combine data. Subgroup analyses were performed to investigate the effect of pain types and surgical procedures on outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 70 prospective observational studies were included. A meta-analysis of 50 studies was performed. Postoperative pain was negatively associated with pressure pain threshold (PPT; r=-0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.23 to -0.07]) and electrical pain threshold (EPT; r=-0.28, 95% CI -0.42 to -0.14), but positively correlated with temporal summation of pain (TSP; r=0.21, 95% CI 0.12-0.30) and Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ; r=0.25, 95% CI 0.13-0.37). Subgroup analysis showed that only TSP was associated with acute and chronic postoperative pain, whereas PPT, EPT, and PSQ were only associated with acute pain. A multilevel (three-level) meta-analysis showed that PSQ was not associated with postoperative pain.
CONCLUSIONS: Lower PPT and EPT, and higher TSP are associated with acute postoperative pain while only TSP is associated with chronic postoperative pain. Patients with abnormal preoperative pain sensitivity should be identified by clinicians to adopt early interventions for effective analgesia.
UNASSIGNED: PROSPERO (CRD42023465727).

BACKGROUND: Herein, we describe a case of Meigs\' syndrome, a complex condition that poses a challenge for anesthesiologists to manage. Good anesthetic management of this syndrome is necessary to preserve the prognosis.
METHODS: An 80-year-old woman was admitted to the emergency department with complaints of abdominal pain, particularly in the left lower abdomen, with aggravation after activity. The patient was unable to sleep in a supine position. Her serum carbohydrate antigen 125 level was 253.15 U/mL-1, and laboratory examinations were nonspecific. On auscultation, breath sounds were absent from the base of the right lung. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) was performed to screen for a possible tumor consisting of both solid and cystic components, but the findings were inconclusive. Chest CT showed large right pleural effusions and hiatal hernia.
CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary team conducted careful preoperative preparation, while the anesthesiology team prepared detailed peri-anesthesia management strategies to regulate acid-base and electrolyte balance and maintain respiratory and hemodynamic stability. The surgeon resected the tumor successfully. The patient was discharged after 1 week. A postoperative pathology test confirmed fibrothecomas.
CONCLUSIONS: We provided an effective strategy for the anesthetic management of Meigs\' syndrome, which remains a complex challenge for anesthesiologists. It is important that anesthesiologists perform adequate preoperative evaluation and prudent peri-anesthesia management to ensure that patients have a good prognosis and discharge healthily. A multidisciplinary team is essential when caring for patients with Meigs\' syndrome.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep-breathing disorder associated with significant comorbidities and perioperative complications. This narrative review is aimed at comprehensively overviewing preoperative risk evaluation and perioperative management strategies for patients with OSA. OSA is characterized by recurrent episodes of upper airway obstruction during sleep leading to hypoxemia and arousal. Anatomical features, such as upper airway narrowing and obesity, contribute to the development of OSA. OSA can be diagnosed based on polysomnography findings, and positive airway pressure therapy is the mainstay of treatment. However, alternative therapies, such as oral appliances or upper airway surgery, can be considered for patients with intolerance. Patients with OSA face perioperative challenges due to difficult airway management, comorbidities, and effects of sedatives and analgesics. Anatomical changes, reduced upper airway muscle tone, and obesity increase the risks of airway obstruction, and difficulties in intubation and mask ventilation. OSA-related comorbidities, such as cardiovascular and respiratory disorders, further increase perioperative risks. Sedatives and opioids can exacerbate respiratory depression and compromise airway patency. Therefore, careful consideration of alternative pain management options is necessary. Although the association between OSA and postoperative mortality remains controversial, concerns exist regarding adverse outcomes in patients with OSA. Understanding the pathophysiology of OSA, implementing appropriate preoperative evaluations, and tailoring perioperative management strategies are vital to ensure patient safety and optimize surgical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of thyroid cancer has significantly increased in recent decades. Although most thyroid cancers are small and carry an excellent prognosis, a subset of patients present with advanced thyroid cancer, which is associated with increased rates of morbidity and mortality. The management of thyroid cancer requires a thoughtful individualized approach to optimize oncologic outcomes and minimize morbidity associated with treatment. Because endocrinologists usually play a key role in the initial diagnosis and evaluation of thyroid cancers, a thorough understanding of the critical components of the preoperative evaluation facilitates the development of a timely and comprehensive management plan. The following review outlines considerations in the preoperative evaluation of patients with thyroid cancer.
METHODS: A clinical review based on current literature was generated by a multidisciplinary author panel.
RESULTS: A review of considerations in the preoperative evaluation of thyroid cancer is provided. The topic areas include initial clinical evaluation, imaging modalities, cytologic evaluation, and the evolving role of mutational testing. Special considerations in the management of advanced thyroid cancer are discussed.
CONCLUSIONS: Thorough and thoughtful preoperative evaluation is critical for formulating an appropriate treatment strategy in the management of thyroid cancer.

The demand for cardiac surgery procedures is increasing globally. Thanks to an improvement in survival driven by medical advances, patients with liver disease undergo cardiac surgery more often. Liver disease is associated with the development of heart failure, especially in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Cardiovascular risk factors can also contribute to the development of both cardiomyopathy and liver disease and heart failure itself can worsen liver function. Despite the risk that liver disease and cirrhosis represent for the perioperative management of patients who undergo cardiac surgery, liver function is often not included in common risk scores for preoperative evaluation. These patients have worse short and long-term survival when compared with other cardiac surgery populations. Preoperative evaluation of liver function, postoperative management and close postoperative follow-up are crucial for avoiding complications and improving results. In the present narrative review, we discuss the pathophysiological components related with postoperative complications and mortality in patients with liver disease who undergo cardiac surgery and provide recommendations for the perioperative management.

UNASSIGNED: Colorectal cancer holds a high morbidity and mortality rate. As a common method for colorectal cancer detection, colonoscopy has difficulty in passing through the malignant stenosis in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer, which results in incomplete detection and missed diagnosis. The missed synchronous lesions increase the risk of metachronous cancer. Therefore, detecting proximal synchronous lesions in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer should be appreciated before operation.
UNASSIGNED: This review evaluates related literature, aiming at providing clinicians with more ideas and attention for detecting proximal synchronous lesions in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer.
UNASSIGNED: In patients with obstructive colorectal cancer, missed diagnosis of lesions proximal to the obstruction may lead to metachronous colorectal cancer. Except for preoperative colonoscopy which is difficult to pass through malignant stenosis, other methods that can evaluate proximal colon segment are critical. This article introduced several preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative measures for synchronous lesions detection. The choice of methods should base on patients\' conditions, aiming at a high diagnostic yield and low risk. Early detection and resection of synchronous lesions in the proximal section of malignant obstruction are expected to minimize the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer and even effect follow-up treatment strategy, which deserves the attention of clinicians.

UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCEUS) in the preoperative T staging of gastric cancer (GC).
UNASSIGNED: Literature searches for eligible studies were performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve of DCEUS in the diagnosis of each T stage tumor were calculated. Meta-analyses were performed to obtain the pooled effects of risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) in the comparison of DCEUS with CT/endoscopic ultrasound (EUS).
UNASSIGNED: A total of 8 studies including 1,232 patients were identified for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.78 (95% CI = 0.64-0.88) and 0.98 (95% CI = 0.96-0.99) for T1, 0.81 (95% CI = 0.76-0.86) and 0.96 (95% CI = 0.91-0.98) for T2, 0.88 (95% CI = 0.84-0.91) and 0.85 (95% CI = 0.79-0.90) for T3, and 0.81 (95% CI = 0.69-0.89) and 0.96 (95% CI = 0.93-0.97) for T4. Moreover, DCEUS demonstrated significant superiority to CT in diagnosing T1 (RR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.20-2.05, p = 0.001) and T2 (RR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.16-1.71, p = 0.001) and to EUS in diagnosing T3 (RR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.08-1.42, p = 0.003) and T4 (RR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.09-1.79, p = 0.008). However, it showed a lower diagnostic accuracy than EUS in T1 tumors (RR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.62-0.94, p = 0.013).
UNASSIGNED: DCEUS is a feasible complementary diagnostic tool for clinical T staging of GC. However, it is still far from a definitive conclusion for DCEUS to be proposed for use in routine clinical practice.

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a high-risk precursor to dementia, post-operative delirium, and prolonged hospitalization. There is a need for preoperative rapid cognitive screening tools.
To evaluate the predictive parameters of rapid MCI screening tools in different clinical settings for preoperative application.
Systematic review and meta-analyses searching Medline, and other databases from inception to May 26, 2021. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed for data curation and quality assessment. Title and abstract screening were conducted independently via Rayyan. Data was curated through a random-effects model and statistical analysis used R-software.
Community, memory clinic, emergency, long-term care, and in-patient settings. There were no studies in the preoperative setting.
Twenty-three studies with 9973 patients (≥ 60 years old) undergoing rapid MCI screening.
Rapid (≤ 5 min) MCI screening tools.
Pooled predictive parameters (sensitivity, specificity) of screening tests.
Eighteen screening tools, compared to neuropsychological tests, were identified. The overall prevalence of MCI among the Rapid Cognitive Screen (RCS), Six-item Screener (SIS), Mini-Cog, and Clock Drawing Test (CDT) studies were 24.6%, 28.3%, 40.9%, and 20.7%, respectively. RCS has 82% sensitivity and 79% specificity in detecting MCI. SIS has 61% sensitivity and 89% specificity. Mini-Cog has 52% sensitivity and 80% specificity. CDT has 56% sensitivity and 59% specificity. Seven other index tools had high sensitivities of 97%-82% and specificities of 90%-73% but were studied only once.
No rapid screening tools had been validated in the surgical population. In other populations, RCS may be a promising screening tool for MCI with stronger sensitivity and specificity than Mini-Cog, SIS, and CDT. CDT alone is ineffective for MCI detection. Further validation in the preoperative setting is required to determine the efficacy of these screening tools.

BACKGROUND: Patient factors (increased body mass index [BMI], smoking, and diabetes) may impact outcomes after spine surgery. There is a lack of consensus regarding which factors should be screened for and potentially modified preoperatively to optimize outcome.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this evidence-based clinical practice guideline is to determine if preoperative patient factors of diabetes, smoking, and increased BMI impact surgical outcomes.
METHODS: A systematic review of the literature for studies relevant to spine surgery was performed using the National Library of Medicine PubMed database and the Cochrane Library. Clinical studies evaluating the impact of diabetes or increased BMI with reoperation and/or surgical site infection (SSI) were selected for review. In addition, the impact of preoperative smoking on patients undergoing spinal fusion was reviewed.
RESULTS: A total of 699 articles met inclusion criteria and 64 were included in the systematic review. In patients with diabetes, a preoperative hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) >7.5 mg/dL is associated with an increased risk of reoperation or infection after spine surgery. The review noted conflicting studies regarding the relationship between increased BMI and SSI or reoperation. Preoperative smoking is associated with increased risk of reoperation (Grade B). There is insufficient evidence that cessation of smoking before spine surgery decreases the risk of reoperation.
CONCLUSIONS: This evidence-based guideline provides a Grade B recommendation that diabetic individuals undergoing spine surgery should have a preoperative HbA1c test before surgery and should be counseled regarding the increased risk of reoperation or infection if the level is >7.5 mg/dL. There is conflicting evidence that BMI correlates with greater SSI rate or reoperation rate (Grade I). Smoking is associated with increased risk of reoperation (Grade B) in patients undergoing spinal fusion.The full guidelines can be accessed at https://www.cns.org/guidelines/browse-guidelines-detail/2-preoperative-surgical-risk-assessement.

Corneal topography is a mandatory investigation in the preoperative evaluation of the patient candidate for laser keratorefractive surgery, in order to assess the corneal shape, to determine the radii of curvature and the corneal thickness. Abnormal corneal topography is the most important identifiable risk factor for corneal ectasia. This paper reviews the principles of successive generations of topographers and illustrates several normal and abnormal corneal topographies.