Ovarian tumors in the pediatric population are rare. The incidence and frequency of subtypes differ between children and adults. Although not all tumors are aggressive, they may still lead to morbidity. The goal of this study was a comprehensive review of malignant ovarian tumors in children and adolescents diagnosed and registered in Sweden.
Individuals were identified through a search in the National Cancer Register, limited for ages 0-19, years 1970-2014. Stored tumor diagnostic material from regional biobanks was retrieved and reviewed.
The study includes 345 individuals with ovarian tumors and 70.7% of them were between 15 and 19 years at time of diagnosis. No differences in incidence over time or geographic location were identified. The average follow-up time was 21.2 years and 5-year survival was 88.4%. Survival was similar in the different time periods, except for 1970-1979. Review was possible for 260 cases, resulting in 85 epithelial tumors, 121 GCTs, 47 SCSTs and 7 others. For age 0-4 years SCSTs dominated (85.7%), for 5-9- and 10-14-years GCTs dominated (70,8% and 75.0% respectively), and for age 15-19 years epithelial tumors dominated (43.8%). There was a strong agreement between review diagnosis and original diagnosis (Cohen\'s κ 0.944). Differentiating between entities within the sex cord-stromal group posed the biggest diagnostic challenge.
Ovarian tumors in children and adolescents are rare and distinct from their adult counterparts regarding incidence and frequency. There was a strong concurrence between original and review diagnoses. The greatest diagnostic difficulty was subtyping of epithelial tumors and differentiating between tumors within the SCST group.

Estimates of pes planus (\"flatfoot\") prevalence vary considerably across studies. Moreover, there is uncertainty over which factors are associated with the pes planus prevalence. We aimed to systematically review the prevalence and clinical factors associated with flatfoot among children and adults. We searched Web of Science, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases reporting population-based flatfoot prevalence. Two reviewers independently extracted the data and assessed the qualities of the studies. Subgroup analysis was conducted to analyze the associated factors on flatfoot prevalence. Frequencies, odds ratios (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed using descriptive analysis and chi-square test accounting for heterogeneity. Any conflict in the data analysis was discussed by all the reviewers. Twelve studies including 2509 flatfoot cases were analyzed (overall prevalence 15.6%, n = 16,000). The subgroup analysis indicated that male gender (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.15-1.37), age groups 3 to 5 years (OR = 2.02, 95% CI: 1.78-2.30) and 11 to 17 years (OR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.64-2.22), Asian race (OR = 2.34, 95% CI: 2.10-2.60), and obesity (OR = 2.62, 95% CI: 2.06-3.32) were more associated with flatfoot (p < .001). Conversely, female gender (OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.40-0.48) and White race (OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.47-0.57) were less associated with flatfoot (p < .001). Our findings may be valuable for clinical/surgical settings, particularly, for those modifiable findings and targeted populations. However, we suggest that future studies estimating flatfoot should consider prospective/multicenter designs using a common screening methods in random samples populations.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the demographic characteristics of patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) through an analysis of 3000 consecutive, surgically treated Swedish patients and a systematic review of the literature.
METHODS: Data on age, sex, comorbidities, diagnostic delay, initial symptoms, and severity of symptoms at diagnosis were extracted from the Swedish Hydrocephalus Quality Registry. In addition, a systematic PRISMA-based review of the literature published from database inception until August 2019 was performed using the PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases on the basis of two concepts: normal pressure hydrocephalus and demography and their association with related terms. Of 1020 unique articles, 16 were eligible for study inclusion and were assessed for quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Mean and weighted mean values were calculated.
UNASSIGNED: The mean patient age at the time of surgery was 74.4 years, 79% of patients were in their 70s, and 60% of the patients were men. Almost 50% of the patients had symptoms from four main domains (i.e., balance, gait, cognition, and urinary dysfunction) at disease onset. Patients aged < 60 years (2%) reported more headaches and fewer balance problems than those aged ≥ 60. Women were more impaired in function than men at the time of diagnosis. Dementia (Mini-Mental State Examination score < 25) was found in 47% of the patients. Men had more diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, and stroke than women, and comorbidity correlated with increased impairment. The incidence of surgery for iNPH was 20%-40% of the disease incidence according to survey and operation-based studies.
CONCLUSIONS: Most iNPH patients undergo surgery in their 70s. Those aged < 60 years show slightly different symptomatology and probably present with a specific disease entity, indicating that the lower age limit for iNPH should be 60 years. iNPH patients have severe impairment preceded by a long diagnostic delay. Even though the included study designs differed, the systematic review showed that the disorder has a very low treatment incidence. The importance of diagnosing and treating iNPH is further emphasized by the fact that iNPH may account for a considerable part of all cases of dementia.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact on recall rate (RR) of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) associated with digital mammography (DM+DBT), compared to DM alone, evaluate the impact of double reading (DR) and review the literature.
METHODS: Ethics committees approved this multicenter study. Patients gave informed consent. Women recalled from population-based screening reading were included. Reference standard was histology and/or ≥ 1 year follow up. Negative multiple assessment was considered for patients lost at follow up. Two blinded readers (R1, R2) evaluated first DM and subsequently DM+DBT. RR, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), were calculated for R1, R2, and DR. Cohen κ and χ(2) were used for R1-R2 agreement and RR related to breast density.
RESULTS: We included 280 cases (41 malignancies, 66 benign lesions, and 173 negative examinations). The RR reduction was 43% (R1), 58% (R2), 43% (DR). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV were: 93%, 67%, 71%, 33%, 98% for R1; 88%, 73%, 75%, 36%, 97% for R2; 98%, 55%, 61%, 27%, 99% for DR. The agreement was higher for DM+DBT (κ=0.459 versus κ=0.234). Reduction in RR was independent from breast density (p=0.992).
CONCLUSIONS: DBT was confirmed to reduce RR, as shown by 13 of 15 previous studies (reported reduction 6-82%, median 31%). This reduction is confirmed when using DR. DBT allows an increased inter-reader agreement.