Introduction The vast pleiotropic effect of statins has intrigued many researchers to select them as potential candidates against bacterial infections. The role of statins against bacterial pathogens remains debatable. This study was undertaken to evaluate and compare the antibacterial effect of commonly available statins against the most frequently isolated bacterial pathogens causing respiratory tract infections in our tertiary care hospital using sputum as a sample. Materials and methods The study was conducted in the Microbiology Laboratory of our hospital. Drugs including atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin were purchased in pure form from Sigma Aldrich. Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) was used as a solvent for all three drugs. The positive controls used were gentamycin and amoxicillin for Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, respectively. Data regarding all the culture and sensitivity results of sputum samples of patients admitted to the Respiratory Intensive Care Unit over the past 12 months were analyzed. The most common bacterial pathogens Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from sputum specimens were taken for our study. The antibacterial effect of statins was studied using two methods: the agar cup diffusion method and the broth dilution method. The zone of inhibition and minimum inhibitory concentration of the drugs were calculated and analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software version 10.2.0. A one-way ANOVA test was used to determine if there was any statistical difference between the different statins and antibiotic groups. An unpaired t-test was used to determine the statistical difference between the statins. Results and discussion For the agar cup diffusion method, our results displayed a lack of antibacterial activity of all three statins atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin against all three bacterial strains Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae after overnight incubation by agar cup method at concentrations of 3.125 μg/ml, 6.25 μg/ml, 12.5 μg/ml, 25 μg/ml and 50 μg/ml, respectively. The zone of inhibition observed was less than 4 mm (resistant) for all the serial dilutions of atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin. For the broth dilution method, the ANOVA test showed amoxicillin and gentamicin to have high statistically significant microbial growth inhibitory activity (p-value < 0.005) compared to atorvastatin and rosuvastatin. Statistically, though atorvastatin showed significant antimicrobial activity compared to normal saline and rosuvastatin, this was not considered clinically significant as the antimicrobial activity shown by atorvastatin was very negligible compared to the controls used and did not correspond to the serial dilutions of the drug.  Conclusion Atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin lacked antibacterial activity against all three bacterial strains isolated from sputum specimens: Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Hence, the use of statins as an antimicrobial drug for respiratory tract infections has limited applications.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension related cardiovascular (CV) complications could be amplified by the presence of metabolic co-morbidities. Azilsartan medoxomil (AZL-M) is the eighth approved member of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), a drug class of high priority in the management of hypertensive subjects with diabetes mellitus type II (DMII).
METHODS: Under this prism, we performed a systematic review of the literature for all relevant articles in order to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and possible clinical role of AZL-M in hypertensive diabetic patients.
RESULTS: AZL-M was found to be more effective in terms of reducing indices of blood pressure over alternative ARBs or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors with minimal side effects. Preclinical studies have established pleiotropic effects for AZL-M beyond its primary antihypertensive role through differential gene expression, up-regulation of membrane receptors and favorable effect on selective intracellular biochemical and pro-atherosclerotic pathways.
CONCLUSIONS: Indirect but accumulating evidence from recent literature supports the efficacy and safety of AZL-M among diabetic patients. However, no clinical data exist to date that evince a beneficial role of AZL-M in patients with metabolic disorders on top of its antihypertensive effect. Further clinical studies are warranted to assess the pleiotropic cardiometabolic benefits of AZL-M that are derived from preclinical research.

BACKGROUND: The clinical benefit of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel in ACS patients suggested off-target property. Such pleiotropic effect could be mediated by circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) which are critical for vascular healing. We aimed to investigate the impact of ticagrelor on EPC in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
METHODS: We prospectively randomized 106 ACS patients to ticagrelor or clopidogrel. Sub-populations of CD34+ circulating progenitor cells (PC) were analyzed by flow cytometry allowing one to determine the levels of CD34+ PC, CD34+CD45+ Hematopoietic PC, CD34+133+ immature PC and CD34+KDR+ EPC on admission and at 1 month. Changes in PC level were calculated as the difference between 1 month and baseline value.
RESULTS: The 2 groups were similar regarding baseline characteristics including PC numbers on admission. The 2 groups had similar change in overall CD34+ PC and hematopoietic CD34+45+ PC level (p=0.2). On the contrary, when considering CD34+133+ PC and CD34+KDR+ EPC, we observed that patients treated by ticagrelor had a significantly higher increase in levels of these PC subtypes compared to those treated by clopidogrel (0.23 (-0.33; 0.79) vs 0.00 (-0.5; 0.34); p=0.04 and 0.01 (-0.04; 0.05) vs -0.01 (-0.06; 0.03); p=0.02). Changes in the level of CD34+CD133+ PC correlated with platelet activity measured by the VASP index (r=-0.30; p=0.008). By contrast the increase in the level of CD34+KDR+ EPC in the ticagrelor group was independent of platelet activity.
CONCLUSIONS: Ticagrelor increases the number of EPC in ACS patients suggesting a benefit on endothelial regeneration that may participate in the pleiotropic property of the drug.