OBJECTIVE: Postoperative cognitive decline (POCD) is characterised by deficits in attention, memory, executive function, and information processing that persist beyond the early postoperative period. Its incidence ranges from 10%-25% after noncardiac surgery. Limited literature exists on POCD after gynecologic oncology surgery. Our primary objective was to identify the incidence of POCD among patients 55 years or older undergoing major gynecologic oncology surgery.
METHODS: This mixed-methods, prospective, observational cohort study followed patients 55 years or older who underwent surgery for gynecologic malignancies between February and July 2022. Semi-structured interviews and the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) were administered before surgery as well as 1 and 3 months after. Assessments were delivered virtually and in-person in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. POCD was defined as ≥2-point decline from baseline MMSE score.
RESULTS: Twenty-four patients participated; 19 completed the 1-month follow-up, and 15 completed the 3-month follow-up. The average age was 64 (range: 56-90). The mean preoperative MMSE score was 16.6 out of 17 (virtual) and 12.9 out of 13 (in-person). Two patients had a 1-point decline in their 1-month MMSE score; both recovered by 3 months. One patient had a 1-point decline in their 3-month MMSE score. Semi-structured interviews revealed common themes of \"brain fog\" at the 1-month follow-up and mild, persistent attention and word-finding deficits at 3 months postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: This study\'s qualitative component captured subtle subjective findings suggestive of potential POCD. Larger studies are required, and a more extensive neuropsychological test battery may be required to elicit subtle findings not clearly reflected by MMSE scores.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether echocardiographic assessment using the subcostal-only window (EASy) compared with focused transthoracic echocardiography (FTTE) using three windows (parasternal, apical, and subcostal) can provide critical information to serve as an entry-point technique for novice sonographers.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study to compare diagnostic information acquired during EASy and FTTE examinations on qualitative left ventricular (LV) size, LV contractility, right ventricular (RV) size, RV contractility, interventricular septal position, and the presence of a significant pericardial effusion. Anesthesiology residents (novice users) performed FTTE for hemodynamic instability and/or respiratory distress or to define volume status in the perioperative setting, and later collected images were grouped into EASy and FTTE examinations. Both examinations were reviewed independently by a board-certified cardiologist and an anesthesiologist proficient in critical care echocardiography. FTTE and EASy findings were compared utilizing Gwet\'s AC1 coefficient to consider disagreement due to chance.
RESULTS: We reviewed 102 patients who received FTTE over a period of 14 months. Of those, 82 had usable subcostal views and were included in the analysis. There was substantial agreement for qualitatively evaluating RV size (Gwet\'s AC1, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 0.85), LV size (Gwet\'s AC1, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.88), and LV contractility (Gwet\'s AC1, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.88) utilizing EASy and FTTE. Additionally, there was an almost perfect agreement when assessing the presence of pericardial effusion (Gwet\'s AC1, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.0) and RV contractility (Gwet\'s AC1, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.95) and evaluating the motion of the interventricular septum (Gwet\'s AC1, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.85 to 0.99).
CONCLUSIONS: When images could be obtained from the subcostal window (the EASy examination), qualitative diagnostic information was sufficiently accurate compared with information obtained during FTTE examination. Our findings suggest that the EASy examination can serve as the entry point technique to FTTE for novice clinicians.
RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Déterminer si l’évaluation échocardiographique se fondant sur la fenêtre unique sous-costale (EASy) par rapport à une échocardiographie transthoracique ciblée (ETTC) fondée sur trois fenêtres (parasternale, apicale et sous-costale) pouvait fournir des informations critiques et servir de technique de départ pour enseigner l’échographie aux novices. MéTHODE: Nous avons réalisé une étude rétrospective afin de comparer les informations diagnostiques acquises lors des examens échocardiographiques EASy et ETTC concernant la taille qualitative du ventricule gauche (VG), la contractilité du VG, la taille du ventricule droit (VD), la contractilité du VD, la position septale interventriculaire et la présence d’un épanchement péricardique significatif. Les résidents en anesthésiologie (utilisateurs novices) ont réalisé une ETTC pour détecter une instabilité hémodynamique et / ou une détresse respiratoire ou pour définir l’état volémique dans un contexte périopératoire; par la suite les images colligées ont été regroupées en examens EASy et ETTC. Les deux examens ont été indépendamment passés en revue par un cardiologue certifié et un anesthésiologiste formé en échocardiographie de soins intensifs. Les résultats des examens d’ETTC et d’EASy ont été comparés en utilisant le coefficient AC1 de Gwet pour tenir compte des désaccords dus au hasard. RéSULTATS: Nous avons passé en revue 102 patients ayant reçu une ETTC sur une période de 14 mois. De ce nombre, 82 ont présenté des vues sous-costales utilisables qui ont été incluses dans l’analyse. Il y avait une importante concordance entre les examens EASy et ETTC pour évaluer qualitativement la taille du VD (AC1 de Gwet, 0,70; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 0,54 à 0,85), la taille du VG (AC1 de Gwet, 0,73; IC 95 %, 0,58 à 0,88) et la contractilité du VG (AC1 de Gwet, 0,73; IC 95 %, 0,58 à 0,88). De plus, il y avait une concordance quasi parfaite lors de l’évaluation de la présence d’épanchement péricardique (AC1 de Gwet, 0,98; IC 95 %, 0,95 à 1,0) et de la contractilité du VD (AC1 de Gwet, 0,84; IC 95 %, 0,74 à 0,95) et de l’évaluation du mouvement du septum interventriculaire (AC1 de Gwet, 0,92; IC 95 %, 0,85 à 0,99). CONCLUSION: Lorsque les images pouvaient être obtenues à partir de la fenêtre sous-costale (examen EASy), les informations diagnostiques qualitatives étaient suffisamment précises par rapport aux informations obtenues lors de l’examen d’ETTC. Nos résultats suggèrent que l’examen EASy peut servir de technique d’apprentissage précédant l’ETTC pour les cliniciens novices.

With the extended life expectancy of the Chinese population and improvements in surgery and anesthesia techniques, the number of aged patients undergoing surgery has been increasing annually. However, safety, effectiveness, and quality of life of aged patients undergoing surgery are facing major challenges. In order to standardize the perioperative assessment and procedures, we have developed a perioperative evaluation and auxiliary decision-making system named \"Aged Patient Perioperative Longitudinal Evaluation-Multidisciplinary Trial (APPLE-MDT)\".
We will conduct a perioperative risk evaluation and targeted intervention, with follow-ups at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the \"Aged Patient Perioperative Longitudinal Evaluation-Multiple Disciplinary Trial Path\" (hereinafter referred to as the APPLE-MDT path) in surgical decision-making for aged patients (≥75 years) undergoing elective surgery under non-local anesthesia in the operating room. The secondary objectives of the study are to evaluate the postoperative outcome and health economics of the APPLE-MDT path applied to the surgical decision-making of aged patients (≥75 years) undergoing elective surgery under non-local anesthesia and to optimize intervention strategies for aged patients undergoing surgery to reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications and improve the quality of life after surgery.
It is necessary to formulate a reliable, effective, and concise evaluation tool, which can effectively predict the perioperative complications and mortality of aged patients, support targeted intervention strategies, and allow for a more comprehensive risk and benefit analysis, thereby forming an effective senile perioperative surgery management path. It is expected that the implementation of this protocol can reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications, improve the postoperative quality of life, shorten hospital stay, reduce hospitalization expenses, reduce social burden, and allow the elderly to have a good quality of life after surgery.
ChiCTR, ChiCTR1800020363 , Registered 15 December 2018.