periodic paralysis

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    这项研究的目的是确定布美他尼是否可以中止HypoPP患者的急性虚弱发作。这是一个随机的,双盲,cross-over,安慰剂对照II期临床试验。通过ADM的等距运动然后休息(McManis方案)引起局灶性弱点发作。参与者进行了两次研究访问,并在发作时接受了安慰剂或2mg布美他尼(定义为外展人的极小值CMAP振幅从峰值下降40%)。CMAP测量评估攻击严重性和持续时间。9名参与者完成了两次访问。治疗后1小时,布美他尼(40.6%)与安慰剂(34.9%)组的CMAP峰值振幅百分比没有显着差异(估计效果差异为5.9%(95%CI:(-5.7%;17.5%),p=0.27,主要结果)。通过早期(治疗后0-2小时)和晚期(治疗后2-4小时)疗效的曲线下面积评估的CMAP振幅在布美他尼和安慰剂之间没有统计学差异(早期疗效估计值0.043,p=0.3;晚期疗效估计值0.085,p=0.1)。两名参与者在摄入布美他尼后从发作中恢复过来;安慰剂后没有人康复。在大多数患者中,布美他尼的耐受性良好,但对挽救固定手的局灶性发作无效。尽管数据支持对这种药物的进一步研究。
    The aim of this study was to establish whether bumetanide can abort an acute attack of weakness in patients with HypoPP. This was a randomised, double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled phase II clinical trial. Focal attack of weakness was induced by isometric exercise of ADM followed by rest (McManis protocol). Participants had two study visits and received either placebo or 2 mg bumetanide at attack onset (defined as 40 % decrement in the abductor digiti minimi CMAP amplitude from peak). CMAP measurements assessed attack severity and duration. Nine participants completed both visits. CMAP percentage of peak amplitudes in the bumetanide (40.6 %) versus placebo (34.9 %) group at 1hr following treatment did not differ significantly (estimated effect difference 5.9 % (95 % CI: (-5.7 %; 17.5 %), p = 0.27, primary outcome). CMAP amplitudes assessed by the area under the curve for early (0-2hr post-treatment) and late (2-4 h post-treatment) efficacy were not statistically different between bumetanide and placebo (early effect estimate 0.043, p = 0.3; late effect estimate 0.085, p = 0.1). Two participants recovered from the attack following bumetanide intake; none recovered following placebo. Bumetanide was well tolerated but not efficacious to rescue a focal attack in an immobilised hand in the majority of patients, although data supports further studies of this agent.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase I
    Single-and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and safety were investigated in this phase 1 study of dichlorphenamide, a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor approved in the United States for treatment of primary periodic paralysis. Dichlorphenamide was administered to 6 cohorts (n = 6 each) of healthy adults. Cohorts A through E received single doses of 25-400 mg followed by 50-800 mg/day in divided doses for 10 total doses. Cohort F (safety analysis only) received up to 28 titrated doses from 100-800 mg/day. Plasma for pharmacokinetics sampling was obtained predose and up to 48 hours postdose. Twenty-five of 36 enrolled subjects completed. Median time to maximum plasma concentration ranged from 1.5-3 hours, and mean half-life from 32-68 hours. Mean area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to tau (length of the dosing interval estimated using the trapezoidal method) and maximum observed plasma concentration increased dose-proportionally after multiple doses. The incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) were dose-related, with at least one mild AE reported among 17%, 17%, and 67% of patients in cohorts A, B, and C, respectively; and at least one mild-to-moderate AE among 100% of subjects in cohorts D, E, and F. One serious AE of rash was reported in cohort F. Eleven subjects discontinued; 10 due to AEs at 400 or 800 mg/day (cohorts E and F), including 100% of cohort F. Hypokalemia contributed to 5 of 6 discontinuations in cohort F (all 800 mg/day).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: There is paucity of reports on thyrotoxic periodic paralysis (TPP) from India. We report the patients with TPP and compare them with idiopathic hypokalemic periodic paralysis (IHPP).
    METHODS: Patients with hypokalemic periodic paralysis (HPP) treated during the past 11 years were evaluated retrospectively. Their demographic parameters, family history, clinical features, precipitating factors, severity of weakness, laboratory parameters and rapidity of recovery were recorded. The demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters of TPP and IHPP were compared.
    RESULTS: During the study period, we managed 52 patients with HPP; nine (17.3%) of whom had TPP and 27 (52%) had IHPP. The demographic, precipitating factors, number of attacks and severity of limb weakness were similar between the TPP and IHPP groups, except in the IHPP group, bulbar weakness was present in four and respiratory paralysis in six, needing artificial ventilation in two patients. Serum potassium was significantly lower in TPP (2.21 ± 0.49) compared with IHPP (2.67 ± 0.59, P = 0.04). Four patients with TPP had subclinical thyrotoxicosis and two had subclinical hyperthyroidism. Rebound hyperkalemia occurred in both TPP and IHPP (three versus eight patients). The recovery was faster in IHPP (26.7 ± 15.4 h) compared with TPP (34.0 ± 14.0 h), but was statistically insignificant.
    CONCLUSIONS: TPP constitutes 17.3% of HPP, and absence of clinical features of thyrotoxicosis and subclinical hyperthyroidism in TPP is not uncommon. Clinical features, demographic profile and rebound hyperkalemia are similar in both TPP and IHPP. The serum potassium level is significantly low in the TPP compared with the IHPP group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号