perinatal outcomes

围产期结局
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2009年医学研究所(IOM)妊娠期体重增加(GWG)指南最初是在美国为孕妇制定的。
    本研究旨在调查IOM指南是否适合中国孕妇。
    在北京妇产医院(2018年1月1日至2019年12月31日)进行了一项包括20,593名单胎孕妇的回顾性队列研究。通过将预测的复合风险曲线的最低点对应的GWG与2009年IOMGWG指南进行比较来评估适用性。国际移民组织指南是GWG类别和孕前体重指数的标准。采用指数函数模型对孕期体重增加和剖宫产概率进行拟合,早产,小于胎龄,和大的胎龄。采用二次函数模型拟合上述不良妊娠结局的综合概率。通过将最低预测概率对应的权重与IOM指南建议的GWG范围进行比较,评估了IOM指南的适用性。
    根据2009年IOMGWG指南,43%的女性达到了足够的体重,近32%的人体重增加过多,25%的人体重不足。IOM提出的GWG范围包括体重不足女性的最低预测概率值,超过了正常体重的最低预测概率值,超重,肥胖的女人.
    2009年IOM指南适用于孕前体重指数被归类为体重不足的中国女性。指南不适用于正常人,超重,或肥胖的孕前体重指数分类。因此,根据上述证据,2009年国际移民组织指南并不适合所有中国女性。
    The 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) gestational weight gain (GWG) guidelines were initially developed for pregnant women in the United States.
    This study aimed to investigate whether the IOM guidelines were suitable for pregnant Chinese women.
    A retrospective cohort study comprising 20,593 singleton pregnant women was conducted at the Beijing Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital (1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019). Applicability was evaluated by comparing the GWG corresponding to the lowest point of the predicted composite risk curve with the 2009 IOM GWG Guidelines. The IOM Guidelines serve as the standard for the GWG categories and the pre-pregnancy body mass index. An exponential function model was used to fit the weight gain during pregnancy and the probability of caesarean section, preterm birth, small for gestational age, and large for gestational age. A quadratic function model was used to fit the combined probability of the above-mentioned adverse pregnancy outcomes. The applicability of the IOM guidelines was evaluated by comparing the weights corresponding to the lowest predicted probability with the GWG range recommended by the IOM guidelines.
    According to the 2009 IOM GWG Guidelines, 43% of the women achieved adequate weight, almost 32% gained excessive weight, and 25% gained inadequate weight. The GWG range proposed by the IOM included the lowest predicted probability value for underweight women and exceeded the lowest predicted probability for normal weight, overweight, and obese women.
    The 2009 IOM guidelines were suitable for Chinese women whose pre-pregnancy body mass index was classified as underweight. The guidelines were not suitable for normal, overweight, or obese pre-pregnancy body mass index classifications. Therefore, based on the above evidence, the 2009 IOM guidelines are not suitable for all Chinese women.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:根据中国营养学会(CNS)和医学研究所(IOM)的GWG指南,分析妊娠期体重增加(GWG)与围产期结局之间的关系。
    方法:这是一项对9075名低风险单胎孕妇的回顾性研究。使用Logistic回归模型分析GWG类别与围产期结局之间的关联。敏感性分析是根据孕前体重指数(以千克为单位的体重除以米为单位的身高平方计算)进行的。
    结果:两个指南定义的过高GWG与不良围产期结局的风险相关。GWG不足与更高的小于胎龄的风险(调整后的比值比[aOR]1.34,95%置信区间[CI]1.10-1.64)和早产(aOR1.70,95%CI1.22-2.36)相关,但根据IOM指南,孕龄较大(LGA)的风险较低(aOR0.77,95%CI0.63-0.95)。使用CNS指南时,GWG不足仅与较低的早产风险相关(aOR1.80,95%CI1.19-2.70).敏感性分析表明,在体重不足的女性中,过度GWG与LGA的高风险相关。
    结论:这两个指南都可以证明GWG与不良围产期结局之间的关系。CNS指南更适合孕前体重不足或体重正常的中国人群,而IOM更适合GWG不足的孕妇。
    OBJECTIVE: To analyze the associations between gestational weight gain (GWG) and perinatal outcomes based on the GWG guidelines of the Chinese Nutrition Society (CNS) and the Institute of Medicine (IOM).
    METHODS: This was a retrospective study with 9075 low-risk singleton pregnant women. Logistic regression model was used to analyze associations between GWG categories and perinatal outcomes. Sensitivity analyses were performed based on pre-pregnancy body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters).
    RESULTS: Excessive GWG as defined by the two guidelines was associated with a higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Inadequate GWG was associated with higher risks of small for gestational age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.64) and preterm birth (aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.22-2.36), but a lower risk of large for gestational age (LGA) (aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.95) according to the IOM guidelines. When using the CNS guidelines, inadequate GWG was associated with only a lower risk of preterm birth (aOR 1.80, 95% CI 1.19-2.70). Sensitivity analyses suggested that excessive GWG was associated with a higher risk of LGA in underweight women.
    CONCLUSIONS: Both guidelines could demonstrate the relationship between GWG and adverse perinatal outcomes. The CNS guidelines were more suitable for the Chinese population with underweight or normal weight before pregnancy, whereas IOM was more suitable for pregnant women with inadequate GWG.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    医学研究所(IOM)建议的妊娠期体重增加(GWG)对中国双胎妊娠的适用性尚不确定。在这篇文章中,我们的目的是调查GWG在双胎妊娠之间的关联,根据2009年国际移民组织指南和成都围产期结局进行分类,中国。进行了一项在三级妇幼医院分娩≥28周活双胞胎的孕妇的回顾性队列研究。比较了3组围产期结局的发生率-即,女人低,adequate,以及过多的GWG。接下来进行Logistic回归分析以确认关联,同时考虑潜在的混杂因素。结果显示,低GWG与更高的早产风险相关,低和非常低的出生体重,新生儿重症监护病房入院,和妊娠糖尿病,而子痫前期在GWG过度的女性中更常见。总之,遵守国际移民组织2009年双胎妊娠指南与改善围产期结局相关.这有可能改善短期和长期公共卫生结果。
    The applicability of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommendations of gestational weight gain (GWG) for Chinese twin gestations is uncertain. In this article, we aimed to investigate the associations between GWG among twin gestations, as categorized according to the 2009 IOM guidelines and perinatal outcomes in Chengdu, China. A retrospective cohort study of pregnant women delivering live twins ≥28 weeks at a tertiary maternal and child hospital was conducted. The incidences of perinatal outcomes were compared across 3 groups-that is, women with low, adequate, and excessive GWG. Logistic regression analyses were next performed to confirm the associations while taking into account potential confounders. Results showed that low GWG was associated with a higher risk of preterm birth, low and very low birthweight, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and gestational diabetes, whereas preeclampsia was more frequent among excessive GWG women. In conclusion, adherence to the 2009 IOM guidelines for twin pregnancies are associated with improved perinatal outcomes. This has the potential to improve short- and long-term public health outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号