BACKGROUND: Patients with urosepsis associated with upper urinary tract stones require further stone management after emergency drainage.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of elective flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (F-URSL) for upper urinary tract stones in patients with prior urosepsis who have undergone emergency drainage using retrograde ureteral stent(RUS) or percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN).
METHODS: Between January 2017 and December 2021, clinical data were collected for 102 patients who underwent elective F-URSL following emergency drainage for urosepsis caused by upper ureteral or renal stones. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the drainage method used: the RUS group and the PCN group. The collected data included patient demographics, stone parameters, infection recovery after emergency drainage, and clinical outcomes post F-URSL. Subsequently, the data underwent statistical analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were included in the statistical analysis, with 58 (56.86%) in the RUS group and 44 (43.14%) in the PCN group. Among the patients, 84 (82.35%) were female and 18 (17.65%) were male, with an average age of 59.36 years. Positive urine cultures were observed in 71 (69.61%) patients. Successful drainage was achieved in all patients in both groups, and there were no significant differences in the time required for normalization of white blood cell count (WBC) and body temperature following drainage. Additionally, all patients underwent F-URSL successfully, and no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of operative time, stone-free rates, postoperative fever, and postoperative hospital stay.
CONCLUSIONS: Both RUS and PCN have been established as effective approaches for managing urosepsis caused by upper urinary tract stones. Furthermore, the impact of these two drainage methods on the subsequent management of stones through elective F-URSL has shown consistent outcomes.

Drainage catheters are used almost routinely to provide urinary drainage, prevent extravasation of urine, and create tamponade against bleeding after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). In the literature, there is no standardized approach to determining which type of catheter is superior. In this context, we aimed to comparatively analyze two different types of catheters (re-entry malecot catheter and nelaton catheter) in terms of success and complications, which we use for drainage after a PNL operation and which have very different costs. Patients who underwent PNL for kidney stones between January 2018 and October 2022 were included in the study. The data of a total of 148 patients who had a 16-F reentry malecot nephrostomy catheter or a 16-F nelaton catheter were analyzed. In addition to the demographic characteristics of the patients, stone characteristics, operative data, hospitalization time, analgesia requirement, hemoglobin exchange, amount of blood transfusion, and postoperative data (success and complications) were comparatively evaluated. The current unit price for a reentry malecot and a nelaton catheter is 4.7 United States dollars (USD) and 0.11 USD, respectively. There were a total of 148 patients in the study, 63 of whom were nelaton catheters and 85 were reentry malecots, and the mean age was 39.95 ± 13.28 years. There was no statistically significant difference between preoperative stone sizes and residual stone rates according to the groups. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of access site and stone localization. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of complication rates according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, Hb levels, blood transfusion rates, operation times, or hospitalization times. In conclusion, if a second procedure is planned, a reentry malecot catheter may be preferred. Apart from this situation, nelaton catheters should be preferred because they are similar to reentry catheters in terms of effectiveness, and side effects and are more economical than reentry catheters in terms of cost.

UNASSIGNED: The objective of this study is to compare the outcome of percutaneous nephrostomy by ultrasound (US) versus fluoroscopy including access time, volume of anesthesia required, success rate, and complications.
UNASSIGNED: One hundred patients were enrolled in a prospective randomized study. Patients were divided into two groups, 50 cases each. Comparing the two groups was done regarding the need for dye, radiation effect, time taken, trial number, rate of complication, volume of anesthesia, and success rate.
UNASSIGNED: Patient demographics were comparable between both groups with no statistically significant difference. According to the modified Clavien-Dindo classification, the complications were Grade I (pain and mild hematuria) in each group. Procedural pain was present in 41 (82%) patients in Group I and in 48 (96%) patients in Group II. It was treated in both groups with a simple analgesic. Mild hematuria was present in 5 (10%) patients in the US group and 13 (26%) in the fluoroscopic group and treated by hemostatic drugs only. There was a statistically significant difference between both groups regarding the volume of required local anesthesia, the trial numbers, the puncture numbers, bleeding, extravasation, and change in the hemoglobin level.
UNASSIGNED: US percutaneous renal access is a safe and effective modality with a high success rate, less operative time, and complication rate. However, a minimum of 50 cases with some pelvicalyceal system dilation may be preliminary requisites to achieve good orientation and competence in achieving safe US percutaneous renal access for future endourological procedures.

Patients with ureteral calculi and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) often require emergency drainage, and percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) and retrograde ureteral stent insertion (RUSI) are the most commonly used methods. Our study aimed to identify the best choice (PCN or RUSI) for these patients and to examine the risk factors for progression to urosepsis after decompression.
A prospective, randomized clinical study was performed at our hospital from March 2017 to March 2022. Patients with ureteral stones and SIRS were enrolled and randomized to the PCN or RUSI group. Demographic information, clinical features and examination results were collected.
Patients (n = 150) with ureteral stones and SIRS were enrolled into our study, with 78 (52%) patients in the PCN group and 72 (48%) patients in the RUSI group. Demographic information was not significantly different between the groups. The final treatment of calculi was significantly different between the two groups (p < .001). After emergency decompression, urosepsis developed in 28 patients. Patients with urosepsis had a higher procalcitonin (p = .012) and blood culture positivity rate (p < .001) and more pyogenic fluids during primary drainage (p < .001) than patients without urosepsis.
PCN and RUSI were effective methods of emergency decompression in patients with ureteral stone and SIRS. Patients with pyonephrosis and a higher PCT should be carefully treated to prevent the progression to urosepsis after decompression.Key messageIn this study, we evaluate the best choice (PCN or RUSI) for patients who have ureteral stones and SIRS and to examine the risk factors for progression to urosepsis after decompression. This study found that PCN and RUSI were effective methods of emergency decompression. Pyonephrosis and higher PCT were risk factors for patients to develop to urosepsis after decompression.

BACKGROUND: Serum creatinine trajectory (SCr-Tr) is a neglected prognostic tool for chronic and acute kidney injury. We aimed to assess the predictors of SCr-Tr during the time-to-nadir and serum creatinine (SCr) normalization rate after drainage, using percutaneous nephrostomy in patients with bilateral malignant ureteral obstruction.
METHODS: A prospective non-randomized study was performed on SCr-Tr in patients with bilateral malignant ureteral obstruction from August 2019 to March 2022. The primary outcome was SCr-Tr during the time-to-nadir.
RESULTS: This study included 102 patients with a mean age ± SD of 59.6 ± 14.7 years. SCr-Tr was non-linear with a mean ± SD (range) of 0.5 ± 0.4 (0.03-2.3) mg/dl/day. Multivariate analyses revealed that female gender (p = 0.016), body mass index (BMI; p = 0.005), and SCr at presentation (p < 0.001) were predictors of rapid SCr-Tr during the time-to-nadir. However, age (p = 0.008) and low urine output at presentation (p = 0.015) were associated with a lower SCr-Tr. In contrast, laterality of drainage (p = 0.544) and mean parenchymal thickness (p = 0.066) were not associated with mean SCr-Tr. Also, only the mean parenchymal thickness (p = 0.002) was a predictor of rapid SCr-Tr at ≥ 0.5 mg/dl/day. However, low BMI (p = 0.023) was associated with a high SCr normalization rate, while unilateral drainage (p = 0.045) was associated with a lower rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Female gender, low BMI, and SCr at presentation were predictors of rapid SCr-Tr during the time-to-nadir. Bilateral drainage was an independent predictor of SCr normalization rate, but not of rapid SCr-Tr. The mean parenchymal thickness was the only independent predictor for rapid SCr-Tr at ≥ 0.5 mg/dl/day.

UNASSIGNED: The conventional Seldinger and trocar techniques of percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) have inherent limitations in infants and younger children. We studied the role of a novel coaxial technique of PCN in children under the age of 5 years in comparison to the conventional techniques.
UNASSIGNED: This was a single-center feasibility trial based on 24 consecutive patients (n = 24 kidneys) under the age of 5 years, conducted over 12 months, substratified into Group I (n = 10): PCN with conventional Seldinger (n = 2) and trocar (n = 8) techniques and Group II (n = 14): PCN with proposed coaxial technique. In the proposed technique, catheter was inserted through the bore of a 14-G needle. The observation parameters included successful placement of PCN into the renal pelvis with free drainage of urine, number of needle punctures, duration of procedure, need for fluoroscopy, and procedural complications.
UNASSIGNED: Proposed technique was successful in all cases with single-needle puncture, while conventional techniques were successful in 8/10 (80%) cases with multiple needle punctures required in 3/10 (33.3%) cases (P = 0.163 and 0.059, respectively). Proposed technique was associated with lower median procedure time (6 min vs. 10.5 min; P < 0.001) and lower incidence of fluoroscopy use (0/14, 0% vs. 5/10, 50%; P = 0.006) than the conventional techniques. No complications were seen with either technique.
UNASSIGNED: The proposed coaxial technique is a feasible alternative to the conventional techniques of PCN in young children. It reduces the procedure time and the need for fluoroscopy in these patients.

UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study is to demonstrate the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (M-PCNL) in the management of 1-2 cm renal stones, with factors considered being operative time, duration of hospital stay, complication rate, and auxiliary procedure rate.
UNASSIGNED: This is a single-center, prospective study on patients diagnosed with 1-2 cm renal calculi between April 2018 and March 2020. Informed written consent was obtained from all the patients. A total of 60 patients were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups - Group I and Group II; Group I: 30 patients who underwent RIRS and Group II: 30 patients who underwent Mini-PCNL-Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Data were collected to compare the operative data, postoperative complications, duration of hospital stay, stone-free rate, and auxiliary procedure rate associated with RIRS and Mini pcnl for the treatment of 1-2 cm renal calculi.
UNASSIGNED: All patients who presented with 1-2 cm renal calculi between April 2018 and March 2020Age >15 years.
UNASSIGNED: Stones larger than 2 cm and smaller than 1 cm. More than 3 stones in the pelvicalyceal systemPregnant women.
UNASSIGNED: The mean age in the Mini Perc and RIRS groups was 30.40 ± 14.36 years and 39.20 ± 12.45 years, respectively, with no statistical significance. Of the 60 renal units, 66.7% were male and 33.3% were female in the Mini Perc group. In the RIRS group, 73.3% were male and 26.7% were female. There was no statistical significance. In the Mini Perc group, 53.3% were operated on the right side and 46.7% were operated on the left side, and in the RIRS group, 33.3% were operated on the right side and 66.7% were operated on the left side, with no statistical significance. The mean stone size in the Mini Perc group was 1.4 ± 0.37 cm and the mean stone size in the RIRS group was 1.3 ± 0.27 cm, with no statistical significance. Of the 60 renal units, 3.3% and 6.7% in Mini Perc and RIRS groups had diabetes alone, and 3.3% and 16.7% in Mini Perc and RIRS groups had hypertension alone. 3.3% in RIRS group had tuberculosis, 6.7% and 13.3% in Mini Perc and RIRS groups had both hypertension and diabetes, and 6.7% in Mini Perc group had diabetes with hypertension with coronary artery disease. The mean operating time in the Mini Perc group was 44.07 ± 9.05 min. The mean operating time in the RIRS group was 72.23 ± 11.01 min. There is statistical significance noted in terms of operating time. There were complications noted in both the groups, of which 6.7% and 16.7% in Mini Perc and RIRS groups had postoperative fever, and 3.3% and 6.7% in Mini Perc and RIRS groups had postoperative hematuria with no statistical significance noted. The mean postoperative pain in the first 24 h was 3.63 ± 1.35 in Mini Perc group, whereas it was 1.43 ± 0.72 in RIRS group; the mean postoperative pain at 48 h was 1.80 ± 0.96 in Mini Perc group, whereas it was 1.03 ± 0.18 in RIRS group, with significance between both the groups. The mean hemoglobin drop in Mini Perc group was 0.88 ± 0.44 g in Mini Perc group, whereas it was 0.99 ± 0.65 in RIRS group, with no statistical significance between both the groups. The mean stone clearance rate for Mini Perc group is 99% ± 5.47%, whereas it was 96.33% ± 10.98% in RIRS group, with no statistical significance. In comparison with both the groups, the retreatment rate was 3.3% in Mini Perc group and 13.3% in RIRS group, with no statistical significance.
UNASSIGNED: The result of this study revealed that between both the techniques, patients undergoing RIRS procedure had significantly less pain than Mini Perc, though RIRS procedure took longer operating times. We found that both the techniques were safe, in regard to complications (both intraoperative and postoperative), and there was no significant difference in hospital stay between the groups.

Abstract Introduction: A considerable proportion of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications occurs during renal puncture. An option to decrease the complications rate is needle modification to make the procedure less traumatic. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the novel MG needle in a preclinical study. Materials and Methods: We developed an original MG needle based on the Veress needle concept containing an atraumatic (blunt) mandrin connected through a spring to the cannula. The MG needle\'s properties were compared with those of the conventional Chiba and Trocar needles in two experiments. In the first experiment, we assessed the force required to puncture the model. In the second experiment, we punctured a porcine kidney and analyzed histology report after the puncture. Results: We performed a series of 30 punctures of polypropylene block by each needle. The force required to make a puncture with the Chiba needle (6.53 ± 0.87 N) was significantly lower compared with the MG needle (7.1 ± 1.07 N), p = 0.027. However, the MG needle turned out to be superior to the Trocar needle (8.71 ± 1.08 N), p = 0.001. A total of 15 specimens were obtained after three renal punctures were made with each needle. A microscopy of the specimen after puncture with the Chiba and Trocar needles showed small fragments of epithelium and erythrocytes inside the canal with uneven margins where the needle passed. A microscopy of the specimen after puncture with a novel MG needle showed a canal with even margins. No tissue fragments inside the canal were observed. Conclusion: The force required to puncture with the novel MG needle is comparable with conventional needles. According to preclinical experiments, histology report of porcine kidney indicates that renal puncture with an MG needle is less traumatic. It may reduce the risk of bleeding, and this should be proved during clinical trials.

Objective In obstructed poorly functioning kidneys, management depends on the recovery potential of the kidney. Some kidneys have good recovery capability and diversion may unfold the real condition of the kidney. This study evaluated whether pre-operative drainage for six weeks results in improvement of renal function in unilateral obstructed poorly functioning kidney with split renal function (SRF) less than 20%. Methods This was a prospective interventional study conducted between March 2013 and December 2015. All patients between 15 and 65 years, with unilaterally obstructed kidney with SRF ≤20% underwent percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) drainage for six weeks. Patients having post-drainage SRF of ≥15% and per day urine output from PCN > 400 ml were considered for the reconstructive procedure. Nephrectomy was performed in cases with SRF <15% after considering patient preferences. Results Twelve of 17 patients had improvement in SRF; four had no change while one had a decrease in SRF after drainage. The mean improvement in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and SRF was 1.4 ml/min and 3%, respectively (P = 0.08). Three out of seven patients with SRF of ≥15% showed an improvement of 5% or more while none of the patients with SRF <15% had such an improvement. Eight patients had final SRF <15% and underwent nephrectomy. Factors such as pre-existing SRF, duration of symptoms, kidney size, transverse pelvic diameter, 24-hour urinary output, and etiology for obstruction were not significant in predicting functional improvement. Conclusion Diversion and decompression of poorly functioning kidneys do not result in a significant functional improvement in obstructed kidneys with SRF <15%.

To define pre-morbid, clinical, laboratory, and imaging features and identify prognostic factors associated with morbidity and mortality in patients with emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) and develop a prognostic scoring system for improving management outcomes.
From January 2009 to December 2019, we performed a prospective study of all patients with a suspected diagnosis of EPN referred to a specialist tertiary centre in South India. All patients who underwent non-contrast computed tomography of the abdomen and those diagnosed with EPN were included in this study. Demographic parameters, imaging, haematological and microbiology results were recorded. Patients were divided into three groups: Group 1, patients who survived without any intervention; Group 2, those who survived with surgical intervention; and Group 3, those who died with or without intervention. A prognostic scoring system was developed from 18 different parameters and risk stratification was developed. The scores were correlated with overall prognosis.
Data from 131 patients with EPN enrolled in the study were analysed: Group 1 (n = 22), Group 2 (n = 102) and Group 3 (n = 7). By using univariate analysis, 10 factors were identified to be significantly associated with prognosis. Diabetes mellitus was the most common comorbidity. Shock at initial admission indicated a poor prognosis and warranted immediate attention (P < 0.001).
A multi-disciplinary approach, a high index of clinical suspicion, an early diagnosis and administration of culture-specific antibiotics with identification of prognostic indicators and risk stratification, allows prompt and appropriate medical and surgical treatments that could improve EPN management outcomes.