OBJECTIVE: Surgical repair is the mainstay of genital prolapse management. Among native-tissue apical procedures, high uterosacral ligaments suspension is considered a valid and effective option for central compartment repair. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, complications rate, and functional results of high USL suspension as a primary prolapse repair technique in a large cohort of patients.
METHODS: Patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy followed by high uterosacral ligaments suspension for POP between January 2008 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Questionnaires and clinical interviews were preoperatively performed to assess symptoms and severity of urinary, bowel, and sexual dysfunctions. After surgical procedure, diagnostic cystoscopy was performed to evaluate ureteral patency. Postoperative data, objective, and subjective cure rate were then noted at the follow-up evaluation.
RESULTS: A total of 1099 patients underwent high uterosacral ligaments suspension. The total complication rate was 3.4 % and recurrence in any of the vaginal compartments was 12.4 %. Reoperation for symptomatic prolapse recurrence or pessary treatment was required in 9 women (0.9 %). In the evaluation of postoperative questionnaires, functional outcomes analysis revealed a significant improvement (p < 0.05) in terms of stress urinary incontinence, urge urinary incontinence, voiding symptoms, constipation, and dyspareunia after prolapse repair.
CONCLUSIONS: Uterosacral ligament suspension is a safe and effective procedure for primary surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Anatomical, functional, and subjective outcomes were very satisfactory, and the reoperation rate for recurrence was below 1%.

Introduction: Inconsistencies exist in the nomenclature pertaining to the terms dorsal and ventral female urethra. This survey study was devised to demonstrate this inconsistency, and to identify any surgeon characteristics that contribute to this confusion in urologic and gynecologic reconstructive surgeons.Methods: Genitourinary surgeons were anonymously surveyed using email and social media platforms and asked how they would anatomically label 2 distinctly indicated regions of the female urethra using \"dorsal\" and \"ventral\" nomenclature. χ2 statistical analyses were used to compare categorical responses.Results: We received a total of 155 responses: 128 urologists, 26 gynecologists, and 1 medical student. The medical student was excluded from the analysis. Responses to the red/dorsal marker were 48% dorsal, 27% ventral, and 25% free response. Responses to the green/ventral marker were 52% ventral, 26% dorsal, and 22% free response. Urologists were more likely than gynecologists to use the correct \"dorsal\" label (χ2 [1, N = 122] = 33.6, P < .00001) and \"ventral\" label (χ2 [1, N = 124] = 32.3, P < .00001). There was no statistically significant difference between attendings vs trainees responding either \"dorsal\" or \"ventral\" to describe the red marker (χ2 [1, N = 124] = 0.24, P < .63) or the green marker (χ2 [1, N = 122] = 0.21, P < .65).Conclusions: The terms dorsal and ventral female urethra are not consistent between urologist and gynecologist reconstructive surgeons, and efforts to standardize terminology should be made at the residency training level.

In the past, quadratus lumborum block (QLB) was mostly used for postoperative analgesia in patients, and few anesthesiologists applied it during surgery with opioid-free anesthesia (OFA). Consequently, it is still unclear whether QLB in the supine position can provide perfect analgesia and inhibit anesthetic stress during surgery under the OFA strategy. To observe the clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block (US-QLB) in the supine position with OFA for lower abdominal and pelvic surgery. A total of 122 patients who underwent lower abdominal or pelvic surgery in People\'s Hospital of Wanning between March 2021 and July 2022 were selected and divided into a quadratus lumborum block group (Q) (n = 62) and control group (C) (n = 60) according to the random number table method. Both groups underwent general anesthesia combined with QLB in the supine position. After sedation, unilateral or bilateral QLB was performed via the ultrasound guided anterior approach based on images resembling a \"human eye\" and \"baby in a cradle\" under local anesthesia according to the needs of the operative field. In group Q, 20 ml of 0.50% lidocaine and 0.20% ropivacaine diluted in normal saline (NS) were injected into each side. In group C, 20 ml of NS was injected into each side. The values of BP, HR, SPO2, SE, RE, SPI, NRS, Steward score, dosage of propofol, dexmedetomidine, and rocuronium, the number of patients who needed remifentanil, propofol, or diltiazem, puncture point, block plane, duration of anesthesia, catheter extraction, and wakefulness during the operation were monitored. There were no significant differences in the general data, number of cases requiring additional remifentanil, propofol, or diltiazem treatment, as well as puncture point and puncture plane between the two groups (P > 0.05). HR, SBP, and DBP values were higher in group Q than in group C at T1; HR, SPI, and SE, while RE values were lower in group Q than in group C at T3, SE, and RE; the Steward score was higher in group Q than in group C at T4 and T5, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The extubation and awake times were lower in group Q than in group C, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The SE, RE, and SPI values were lower at T1, T2, T3, and T4 than at T0. The Steward scores at T4 and T5 were higher in group Q than in group C, and were lower than at T0, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). There were significant differences in the effectiveness of postoperative analgesia between the two groups at t1, t3 and t4 (P < 0.05). US-QLB in the supine position with OFA is effective in patients undergoing lower abdominal or pelvic surgery with stable intraoperative vital signs, complete recovery and better postoperative analgesia.

Background Gender-affirming pelvic surgery (GAPS) can be associated with significant postoperative pelvic pain. Given the lack of available peripheral nerve blocks to the perineum, intrathecal morphine (ITM) injection could offer a potent analgesic modality for this patient population. No prior studies to date have been performed examining the analgesic effects of intrathecal morphine for these patients. Methods This retrospective case-control study aims to understand the postoperative analgesic effects of intrathecal morphine for these patients with a historical comparison group of patients who did not receive intrathecal morphine. Results Fourteen patients presented for gender-affirming pelvic surgery over an eight-month period at a single institution and were offered intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia. Their analgesic results were compared to a similar historical group of 13 patients who were not offered or declined intrathecal morphine. Conclusions Intrathecal morphine injection is a potent analgesic modality for patients presenting for gender-affirming pelvic surgery.

Surgery is linked with fear and stress that disrupt metabolic and neuroendocrine activities, which impair normal maintained glucose metabolism that leads to stress hyperglycaemia. This study aimed to compare the effect of general and spinal anaesthesia on perioperative blood glucose levels in patients undergoing lower abdominal and pelvic surgery.
UNASSIGNED: This prospective observational cohort study recruits 70 adult patients who underwent lower abdominal and pelvic surgery under general and spinal anaesthesia; 35 in each group. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select study participants. Capillary blood glucose was measured at four perioperative times. An independent t-test, dependent t-test, and Manny-Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis, as appropriate. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
UNASSIGNED: No statistically significant difference was observed in mean blood glucose levels at baseline and 5 min after induction of general anaesthesia and complete blocks of spinal anaesthesia. But at the end of surgery and 60 min after the end of surgery the mean blood glucose levels were statistically significantly higher in the general anaesthesia group compared with the spinal anaesthesia group (P<0.05). And the blood glucose level was significantly increased from baseline compared with the different time intervals in the general anaesthesia group.
UNASSIGNED: The mean blood glucose levels were lower in patients undergoing surgery under spinal anaesthesia compared with general anaesthesia. The authors recommend spinal over general anaesthesia whenever possible for patients undergoing lower abdominal and pelvic surgery.

To determine the feasibility of a double-blinded randomized, placebo-controlled study in determining the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing postoperative infections (POIs) in elective nonhysterectomy laparoscopic procedures for benign gynecologic conditions.
Double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
University-affiliated tertiary referral hospital in Sydney, Australia.
Women older than 18 years undergoing elective nonhysterectomy laparoscopic procedures for benign gynecologic conditions were eligible for the study and approached.
Before surgery, participants were randomized to receive either 2-g cephazolin or placebo (10-mL normal saline) administered by the anesthetist. Participants and other research staff were blinded to group allocation.
The primary outcome was study feasibility measured by recruitment rates, compliance rates of drug administration, compliance rates of delivery, maintenance of double blinding, and follow-up rates. Secondary outcomes included rate of POIs, length of hospitalization, readmission to hospital, unscheduled presentations to healthcare facilities, and antibiotic-related reactions. Between February 2019 and March 2021, 170 patients were approached with 117 participants (68.8%) recruited and randomized. The study had a high compliance rate of trial drug delivery (95.7%) and a high follow-up rate (99.1%).
This pilot study has demonstrated feasibility of a large-scale study with a recruitment rate of 68% of patients approached and excellent trial drug delivery and follow-up rates. As anticipated, it is underpowered for identifying clinically significant findings for POI rates. A large-scale study is appropriate and essential to determine the health-related risks of antibiotic prophylaxis with an emphasis on antimicrobial stewardship. The sample size for a large-scale study is 1678 participants based on infection rates in this pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic surgery has the potential to leave behind a large raw surface, which can bleed and ooze postoperatively. The adoption of precision surgical approach for rectal cancers has led to reduction in blood loss. We aimed to assess 1) the feasibility and 2) the safety of using a self-assembling peptide (SAP) haemostatic agent (PuraStat®) after rectal cancer surgery to reduce the incidence of pelvic collections.
METHODS: This prospective cohort pilot study compared the results of 25 consecutive cases of total mesorectal excision (TME) with use of 5-10 ml of SAP, and 25 consecutive cases without PuraStat® application (CON, control group). The groups were compared for complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III and IV classification), postoperative drain output and length of hospital stay (LOS). Statistical analysis was carried out using paired samples T test and Fisher\'s exact test.
RESULTS: Fifty patients (SAP = 25, CON = 25) were enrolled into this study. Mean drain outputs (ml) on day 1, day 2 and day 3 were 60 ± 18, 89 ± 42 and 64 ± 45 in SAP group, and 102 ± 31, 95 ± 52, 66 ± 37 in CON group. This was significantly better for SAP group in day one after surgery. The mean LOS was shorter in SAP group (5.7 versus 7.4 days in CON, p 0.04). Clavien-Dindo III & IV complications were seen in two and five cases respectively (p 0.18). R0 resection rate (p 0.32) and lymph node harvest (p 0.13) were similar in both groups. There were no complications seen in relation to the application of the SAP.
CONCLUSIONS: These initial data suggest that SAP is a safe product, and feasible to apply in the pelvis after TME surgery. It appears to shorten the LOS and reduce the postoperative drain output and may reduce the incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade III & IV complications.

BACKGROUND: Trans-vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is a recently popularised minimally invasive surgical procedure, aimed at minimising abdominal wall scars and improving pain and patient recovery times. Although vNOTES has been studied in the context of post-operative pain and cosmesis, women\'s acceptance of the technique has only been cursorily examined. In this survey-based observational study, we assessed the acceptability of this technique among a cohort of Middle Eastern women.
METHODS: A cohort of 175 Middle Eastern women were surveyed using a 13-item questionnaire at a single gynaecology centre. The survey used was a translated version of a questionnaire from a previous study (1) and comprised open-response, five-point Likert Scale and agree-disagree items.
RESULTS: Among 175 Middle Eastern women participated in this study most of them holding neutral view on abdominal and gynaecological procedures via vagina. 47% of participants were unsure regarding the effect of surgery via vagina on their sexual function. Although 61% of the participants showed no preference towards vNOTES over laparoscopic cholecystectomy, more than half of them indicated preference if vNOTES shown to be as effective and safe as laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The gender of the surgeon was shown to have no influence on the perspectives of the majority of participants to undergo vNOTES.
CONCLUSIONS: vNOTES may hold value for women who have conservative upbringing and/or value cosmesis. This study provides information regarding Middle Eastern women\'s perspectives on vNOTES, which may be of considerable clinical use as the popularity of this surgical technique continues to increase.

BACKGROUND: Screw fixation of pelvic ring fractures is a common, but demanding procedure and navigation techniques were introduced to increase the precision of screw placement. The purpose of this case series is to demonstrate a lower screw malposition rate using percutaneous fixation of pelvic ring fractures and sacroiliac dislocations guided by navigation system based on 3D-fluoroscopic images compared to traditional imaging techniques and to evaluate the functional outcomes of this innovative procedure.
METHODS: 10 cases of disrupted pelvic ring lesions treated in our hospital from February 2018 to December 2018 were included for closed reduction and percutaneous screw fixation of using with O-Arm and the acquisition by the Navigator. Preoperative assessment was performed on the patients by means of X Ray imaging and CT scan. Routine CT was carried out on third postoperative day to evaluate screw placement. Measures of radiation exposure were extracted directly from reports provided by system. Quality of life was evaluated by SF 36-questionnaire 6 months after surgery.
RESULTS: 12 iliosacral- and 2 ramus pubic-screws were inserted. In post-operative CT-scans the screw position was assessed and graded using the score described by Smith. No wound infection or iatrogenic neurovascular damage were observed. No re-operations were performed. The exposure to radiation is, for the patient, slightly greater than that resulting from the use of traditional fluoroscopic systems, while it is naught for the surgical team, which at the time of image acquisition is located outside the room.
CONCLUSIONS: The execution of an intraoperative 3D-fluoroscopic scan can on its own suffice as a post-operative control examination since its accuracy is similar to that of the post-operative CT. The use of a navigated 3d fluoroscopy exposes the patient to an amount of radiation slightly greater than that of traditional fluoroscopy, but the dose is lower than a CT examination. For the operating team, exposure to radiation is naught. 3D-fluoroscopic navigation is a safe tool providing high accuracy of percutaneous screw placement for pelvic ring fractures. Finally, despite the small cohort of patients studied, the excellent results obtained regarding the patients\' quality of life and the absence of complications allow us to look positively at the future of this technique, which needs further studies and improvement.

Background: There currently is no standard practice for optimal urinary catheter removal after rectal resection (proctectomy). Delayed removal may increase urinary tract infection risk, an important hospital quality metric. This study aimed to assess the effect of catheter duration on urinary tract infection rate. We hypothesized that early removal would be associated with fewer infections. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent proctectomy from January 2007 to December 2017 with urinary catheter placement in our colorectal surgery department. The main outcome measures were urinary tract infection, post-operative urinary retention, and length of stay. Patients were divided into early (post-operative day one or two) and late (day three or later) removal groups. Results: A series of 2,429 patients were included; 1,176 in the early and 1,253 in the late group. The early group had a shorter median length of stay (5.26 versus 7 days). The urinary tract infection (n = 77) multivariable logistic regression model showed no association between timing of removal and infection; however, females had more infections (odds ratio [OR] 2.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.65-4.41). The post-operative urinary retention model (n = 280) showed no association between the timing of removal and retention; however, patients who underwent pre-operative radiation (OR 1.55; 95% CI 1.15-2.09) or total proctocolectomy (OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.21-2.49) or were male (OR 1.35; 95% CI 1.02-1.78) were more likely to have retention. When analyzed by specific removal day, each one-day delay in removal increased the odds of infection by 21% (OR 1.21; 95% CI 1.09-1.35] and decreased the odds of retention by 12% (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.80-0.97] with a cross-over at 9 days. Patients who experienced retention were not more likely to have infection. Conclusion: Early urinary catheter removal after proctectomy was associated with a lower urinary tract infection rate and a shorter hospital stay.