OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review is to review the functional, clinical and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing large to massive rotator cuff repair with long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) autograft, as well as compare these to standard arthroscopic cuff repair.
METHODS: A review of the online Medline database was conducted on 20 October 2022 according to PRISMA guidelines and registered prospectively on the PROSPERO database. Clinical studies assessing patients with large to massive rotator cuff tears undergoing LHBT autograft repair were included. All studies reported on functional outcomes, range of movement (ROM) and radiological re-tear rates. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS) tool was used to appraise all studies.
RESULTS: The search strategy identified ten studies for inclusion including a total of 594 patients. Five studies were comparable (346 patients), assessing LHBT autograft repair against arthroscopic rotator cuff repair without autograft. A variety of techniques of LHBT autograft were used across all studies, including bridging and augmentation styles. Radiographic comparison showed lower re-tear rates in the LHBT autograft group with two studies demonstrating statistically significant results. Pain scores, functional outcomes and ROM were significantly improved post-operatively in all studies for LHBT autograft patients, with no significant difference when compared to standard arthroscopic repair.
CONCLUSIONS: LHBT autograft looks to significantly improve functional scoring and range of motion in patients with large to massive rotator cuff tears. When compared to standard arthroscopic cuff repair, LHBT autograft appears to significantly reduce the re-tear rate. Further randomised studies are needed to assess the efficacy of this technique.

OBJECTIVE: Japan has adopted its own reimbursement system, which differs from other countries in terms of its diagnostic procedure combination (DPC) methods. However, there are few reports on the cost analysis of open repair and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysms in Japan. We aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of these two procedures.
METHODS: This study included patients who underwent open repair (n = 224) and EVAR (n = 87) between January 2012 and December 2022. After propensity score matching, we compared the two groups.
RESULTS: The drug and blood products, procedures, and DPC costs were significantly higher in the open repair group (p < 0.001) than in the EVAR group. The surgical equipment and total costs were significantly higher in the EVAR group than in the open repair group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the 5-year survival rate (88.5% in the open repair group vs. 72.0% in the EVAR group; p = 0.33) and freedom from re-intervention rate at 5 years (93.1% in the open repair group vs. 89.9% in the EVAR group; p = 0.15) between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Open repair is more cost-effective than EVAR. The cost-effectiveness of EVAR may therefore depend on the cost of the endograft.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes for thoracoscopic repair of EA/TEF and compare with open repair.
METHODS: Patients who underwent EA/TEF repair during 2000-2020 were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with delayed repair were excluded. Demographic, operative, outcome data was collected. Outcomes were compared using Wilcoxon-rank sum tests for continuous, Chi-squared/Fisher\'s exact tests for categorical data.
RESULTS: There were 104 patients with primary repair, 49 (47.1%) underwent thoracoscopic repair per surgeon\'s choice. Type C accounted for 101 (97.1%) of the cases. Gestational age and birth weight were higher in the thoracoscopy group (p = 0.001). The rate of ≥3 VACTERL anomalies was higher in the OR group (p = 0.016). Operative time, rate of anastomotic leak, time to first oral feeding were similar (p > 0.05). Thoracoscopy group had decreased length of ventilation (p = 0.026) and length of stay (p = 0.029). The incidence of anastomotic stricture was higher in the thoracoscopy group (p = 0.012). Recurrent TEF was one case in each group. Rates of tube feeding at discharge and in first year were similar (p > 0.05), rate in third year was decreased (p = 0.032) in the thoracoscopy group. Rates of anti-reflux medication in first and third years, and fundoplication rate were similar (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Many of the short- and long-term outcomes are comparable between thoracoscopic and open repair of EA/TEF. Length of ventilation, length of stay are decreased in the thoracoscopy group. Anastomotic stricture is higher, the need for long-term tube feeding is lower after thoracoscopic repair. Although these results could be affected by selection bias, they are still promising for advancing thoracoscopic repair of EA/TEF safely and efficiently.
METHODS: Level III.

We present a case of a 4.2-cm hepatic artery aneurysm following remote pancreaticoduodenectomy, which extended to the first division of the right hepatic artery. Given the absence of collateral flow from the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and the inability to place a covered stent, we treated the patient with a saphenous vein graft to the right hepatic artery bifurcation. A CT scan at 1-year demonstrated a patent bypass to the right hepatic artery. We would advise caution when considering hepatic embolization following pancreaticoduodenectomy due to loss of SMA-based collaterals. Techniques that preserve arterial flow should be favored in this situation.

BACKGROUND: Open surgical repair of suprarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (SRAAA) and type IV thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) remains a surgical challenge because of the inducted intraoperative visceral and renal ischemia. We reported a novel three-step technique named \"Debranch, Perfuse, Reconstruct\" (DPR), using debranching and passive arterial shunt to reduce these ischemic complications. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the 30-day and 1-year mortality of these DPR technique. The secondary aim was to evaluate the impact on renal function and the primary patency of the repaired arteries METHODS: This retrospective study included all consecutive patients who underwent elective surgery for SRAA or type IV TAAA using DPR technique between January 2011 and June 2022. Debranch: Using partial side clamping, a multibranch graft was implanted side-to-end into the descending thoracic aorta. The left renal artery (LRA) was anastomosed end to end to the graft. As needed, the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), the celiac trunk (CT), and the right renal artery (RRA) could also be anastomosed to the graft. Perfusion: cannulas were connected to the last branch of the multibranch graft to perfuse other arteries during aortic cross-clamping. Repair: a tube or bifurcated graft was used for the aortic repair. The branch used as a passive temporary arterial shunt were ligated at the end of the intervention. Clinical, radiological, and biological pre- and postoperative were reviewed using a standardized database. Procedural complications and re-interventions were analyzed as well as artery patency.
RESULTS: There were 40 patients who underwent DPR technique, the mean age was 67 ± 13 years, 2 women.: 23 patients presented with a SRAA et 17 with a type IV TAAA. The 30-day and 1-year mortality rate were 2.5% (one patient). Two respiratory complications (5%) and three mesenteric ischemic complications (7%) have been recorded. No patient developed signs of cardiac or spinal cord dysfunction. We did not observe a significant change in postoperative renal function. CT, SMA, LRA, and RRA bypass patency rates at one year were 95%, 100%, 90%, and 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The SRAA and type IV TAAA repair with DPR technique provides short visceral and renal ischemia times with a low mortality rate. This technique could be an option to consider for visceral and renal protection during open surgical repair.

BACKGROUND: Management of subclavian artery injuries (SAI) and iliac artery injuries (IAI) in adolescent trauma patients poses a considerable challenge due to their complex anatomical locations. The aim of our study was to determine the association between the injury mechanism and type of repair with the outcomes of patients with traumatic SAI and IAI.
METHODS: In this retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program database2017-2020, adolescent (<18 y) patients with SAI and IAI undergoing either endovascular or open repair were included. Patients were stratified by mechanism (blunt versus penetrating) and type of repair (endovascular [E] versus open [O]) and compared. Outcomes measured were mortality and major complications. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed.
RESULTS: Over 4 y, 170 pediatric patients were identified, of which 73 (43%) sustained an SAI and 97 (57%) had IAI. The mean age was 15 and 79% were male. Overall, 39% were managed endovascularly. Both groups had comparable median injury severity score (E: 23 versus O: 25, P = 0.278). For patients with blunt injury (n = 60), the type of repair was neither associated with major complications (E: 39% versus O: 33%, P = 0.694) nor mortality (E: 2.6% versus O: 4.8%, P = 0.651). For patients with penetrating injuries (n = 110), the endovascular repair had significantly lower morbidity (19% versus 41%, P = 0.034) and mortality (3.7% versus 21%, P = 0.041). On multivariable logistic regression, endovascular repair was identified as the only modifiable risk factor associated with reduced mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 0.201, 95% confidence interval [0.14-0.76], P = 0.038).
CONCLUSIONS: Difficult-to-access vascular injuries result in significant morbidity and mortality. Endovascular repair was found to be the only modifiable factor associated with decreased mortality of patients with penetrating injury, whereas the type of repair was not associated with mortality in those with blunt injury.

Infected abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) make up a small minority of AAAs yet are characterized by a high fatality rate, largely attributed to their increased risk of aneurysm rupture. This case details a rare presentation of a 56-year-old man that developed Proteus mirabilis bacteremia secondary to a perineal abscess and subsequently experienced a 3 cm growth of his previously stable AAA over an 8 day period. This case underscores the importance of maintaining a heightened suspicion for infected aortic aneurysms in sick patients and highlights the critical role of surgical management in achieving source control.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative ileus (POI) is a common complication following major abdominal surgery. The majority of the data available regarding POI after abdominal surgery is from the gastrointestinal and urological literature. These data have been extrapolated to vascular surgery, especially with regard to enhanced recovery programs for open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery. However, vascular patients are a unique patient population and extrapolation of gastrointestinal and urological data may not necessarily be appropriate. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to delineate the prevalence and risk factors of POI in patients undergoing open AAA surgery.
METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-institution study of patients who underwent open AAA surgery from January 2016 to July 2023. Patients were excluded if they had undergone nonelective repairs or had expired within 72 hours of their index operation. The primary outcome was rates of POI, which was defined as the presence of two or more of the following after the third postoperative day: nausea and/or vomiting, inability to tolerate oral food intake, absence of flatus, abdominal distension, or radiological evidence of ileus.
RESULTS: A total of 123 patients met study criteria with an overall POI rate of 8.9% (n = 11). Patients who developed a POI had a significantly lower body mass index (24.3 kg/m2 vs 27.1 kg/m2; P = .003), were more likely to undergo a transperitoneal approach (81.8% vs 42.0%; P = .022), midline laparotomy (81.8% vs 37.5%; P = .008), longer total clamp times (151.6 minutes vs 97.7 minutes; P = .018), greater amounts of intraoperative crystalloid infusion (3495 mL vs 2628 mL; P = .029), and were more likely to return to the operating room (27.3% vs 3.6%; P = .016). Proximal clamp site was not associated with POI (P=.463). Patients with POI also had higher rates of postoperative vasopressor use (100% vs 61.1%; P = .014) and greater amounts of oral morphine equivalents in the first 3 postoperative days (488.0 ± 216.0 mg vs 203.8 ± 29.6 mg; P = .016). Patients who developed POI had longer lengths of stay (12.5 days vs 7.6 days; P < .001), a longer duration of nasogastric tube decompression (5.9 days vs 2.2 days; P < .001), and a longer period of time before diet tolerance (9.1 days vs 3.7 days; P < .001). Of those who developed a POI (n = 11), four (36.4%) required total parental nutrition during the admission.
CONCLUSIONS: POI is a morbid complication among patients undergoing elective open AAA surgery that prolongs hospital stay. Patients at risk for developing a POI are those with a lower body mass index, as well as those who had an operative repair via a transperitoneal approach, midline laparotomy, longer clamp times, larger amounts of intraoperative crystalloid infusion, a return to the operating room, postoperative vasopressor use, and higher amounts of oral morphine equivalents. These data highlight important perioperative opportunities to decrease the prevalence of POI.

BACKGROUND: Although renal artery aneurysms (RAAs) are rare and often asymptomatic with slow growth, their natural progression and optimal management are not well understood. Treatment recommendations for RAAs do exist; however, they are supported by limited data.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to explore the management of patients diagnosed with an RAA at our institution from January 1st, 2013, to December 31st, 2020. Patients were identified through a search of our radiological database, followed by a comprehensive chart review for further assessment. Data collection encompassed patient and aneurysm characteristics, the rationale for initial imaging, treatment, surveillance, and all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: One hundred eighty-five patients were diagnosed with or treated for RAAs at our center during this timeframe, with most aneurysms having been discovered incidentally. Average aneurysm size was 1.40 cm (±0.05). Of those treated, the mean size was 2.38 cm (±0.24). Among aneurysms larger than 3 cm in size, comprising 3.24% of the total cases, 83.3% underwent treatment procedures. Only 20% of women of childbearing age received treatment for their aneurysms. There was one instance of aneurysm rupture, with no associated mortality or significant morbidity.
CONCLUSIONS: Our institution\'s management of RAAs over the period of the study generally aligned with guidelines. One potential area of improvement is more proactive intervention for women of childbearing age.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the current evidence and literature on treatment options for proximal hamstring injuries.
RESULTS: Patients with 3-tendon complete tears with greater than 2 cm of retraction have worse outcomes and higher complication rates compared to those with less severe injuries. Endoscopic and open proximal hamstring repair both have favorable patient reported outcomes at 5-year follow up. Proximal hamstring repair in patients who are male, with isolated semimembranosus injury, and have proximal hamstring free tendon rupture are more likely to have earlier return to sports. The Parisian Hamstring Avulsion Score (PHAS) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure to predict return to sports. Proximal hamstring injuries may occur in both elite and recreational athletes and may present with varying degrees of chronicity and severity. Injuries occur most commonly during forceful eccentric contraction of the hamstrings and often present with ischial tuberosity tenderness, ecchymosis, and hamstring weakness. Treatment decision-making is dictated by the tendons involved and chronicity. Many proximal hamstring injuries can be successfully treated with non-surgical measures. However, operative treatment of appropriately indicated proximal hamstring tendon injuries can result in significantly better functional outcomes and faster and more reliable return to sports compared to nonoperative treatment. Both endoscopic and open surgical repair techniques show high satisfaction levels and excellent patient-reported outcomes at short- and mid-term follow-up. Postoperative rehabilitation protocols vary across the literature and ongoing study is needed to clarify the optimal program, though emphasis on eccentric hamstring strengthening may be beneficial.