online forum

在线论坛
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:有证据表明,社会互动与神经退行性疾病的发展呈负相关。PREDICT-帕金森病(PREDICT-PD)是一项在线英国队列研究,对参与者的未来帕金森病(PD)风险进行分层。
    目的:本研究旨在探索在PREDICT-PD平台中评估有发展PD风险的人的数字社会特征及其社会资本的方法和可行性,对基于网络的社交参与与PD的潜在预测风险指标之间的关系进行假设。
    方法:构建了一个基于Web的应用程序,以通过PREDICT-PD门户进行社交互动。从该队列的现有成员那里寻求反馈,并告知飞行员的设计。敬业的员工使用每周的参与活动,由PD相关研究组成,事实,和查询,激发讨论。数据由托管平台收集。我们使用社交网络分析,通过帖子和回复的累积数量以及自我网络来检查随着时间的推移产生的联系模式。我们使用网络度量来描述这种联系,桥接,以及平台上参与者之间的社会资本联系。使用描述性统计学分析相关的人口统计学数据和帕金森风险评分(表示为奇数1:x)。进行回归分析以估计风险评分(经过对数转换)与网络度量之间的关系。
    结果:总体而言,219名参与者参加了嵌入研究网站的为期4个月的试点论坛。在它,200人(n=80,40%的男性和n=113,57%的女性)连接在一个大的群体,大多数用户可以通过其他用户直接或间接地联系到对方。共有59%(20/34)的讨论是由参与者自发开始的。参与是异步的,一些人充当讨论小组之间的“经纪人”。随着越来越多的参与者加入论坛并通过在线帖子相互联系,不同的连接用户群开始出现。该试点表明,队列网络平台中的论坛应用程序是可行且可接受的,并促进了数字社交互动。在PREDICT-PD研究中,将参与者基于网络的社交参与与先前收集的个人数据进行匹配是可行的,显示出未来分析的潜力,将在线网络特征与随着时间的推移的PD风险相关联,以及测试数字社交参与作为一种干预措施,以改变患神经退行性疾病的风险。
    结论:试点结果表明,在线论坛可以作为一种干预措施,以增强社交联系,并调查在线参与模式是否会通过长期随访影响发展为PD的风险。这凸显了利用在线平台研究社会资本在调节PD风险中的作用的潜力,并强调了此类方法在未来研究或干预中的可行性。
    BACKGROUND: There is evidence that social interaction has an inverse association with the development of neurodegenerative diseases. PREDICT-Parkinson Disease (PREDICT-PD) is an online UK cohort study that stratifies participants for risk of future Parkinson disease (PD).
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the methodological approach and feasibility of assessing the digital social characteristics of people at risk of developing PD and their social capital within the PREDICT-PD platform, making hypotheses about the relationship between web-based social engagement and potential predictive risk indicators of PD.
    METHODS: A web-based application was built to enable social interaction through the PREDICT-PD portal. Feedback from existing members of the cohort was sought and informed the design of the pilot. Dedicated staff used weekly engagement activities, consisting of PD-related research, facts, and queries, to stimulate discussion. Data were collected by the hosting platform. We examined the pattern of connections generated over time through the cumulative number of posts and replies and ego networks using social network analysis. We used network metrics to describe the bonding, bridging, and linking of social capital among participants on the platform. Relevant demographic data and Parkinson risk scores (expressed as an odd 1:x) were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Regression analysis was conducted to estimate the relationship between risk scores (after log transformation) and network measures.
    RESULTS: Overall, 219 participants took part in a 4-month pilot forum embedded in the study website. In it, 200 people (n=80, 40% male and n=113, 57% female) connected in a large group, where most pairs of users could reach one another either directly or indirectly through other users. A total of 59% (20/34) of discussions were spontaneously started by participants. Participation was asynchronous, with some individuals acting as \"brokers\" between groups of discussions. As more participants joined the forum and connected to one another through online posts, distinct groups of connected users started to emerge. This pilot showed that a forum application within the cohort web platform was feasible and acceptable and fostered digital social interaction. Matching participants\' web-based social engagement with previously collected data at individual level in the PREDICT-PD study was feasible, showing potential for future analyses correlating online network characteristics with the risk of PD over time, as well as testing digital social engagement as an intervention to modify the risk of developing neurodegenerative diseases.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results from the pilot suggest that an online forum can serve as an intervention to enhance social connectedness and investigate whether patterns of online engagement can impact the risk of developing PD through long-term follow-up. This highlights the potential of leveraging online platforms to study the role of social capital in moderating PD risk and underscores the feasibility of such approaches in future research or interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人们越来越关注使用亚硝酸钠(SN)作为一种新兴的自杀手段,尤其是年轻人。鉴于传统公共卫生监测来源关于该主题的信息有限,我们研究了一个网上自杀论坛的帖子,\"被制裁的自杀,“这是有关SN使用和采购的主要信息来源。
    本研究旨在确定SN购买和使用的趋势,通过数据挖掘从论坛上的订阅者帖子获得。我们还旨在确定与SN共同出现的物质和主题,以及SN的用户和来源的地理分布。
    我们收集了该网站于2018年3月成立至2022年10月的所有公开可用信息。使用数据驱动方法,包括自然语言处理和机器学习,我们分析了SN提及随着时间的推移,包括SN消费者的位置和采购SN的来源。我们开发了基于变压器的源和位置分类器,以确定SN源的地理分布。
    与SN有关的帖子显示受欢迎程度上升,与疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)广泛的流行病学研究在线数据(=0.727;P<.001)和国家毒物数据系统(=0.866;P=.001)的数据相比,SN的实际使用与自杀意图之间存在统计学上的显着相关性。我们观察到止吐药的频繁出现,苯二氮卓类药物,和具有SN的酸调节剂。我们提出的基于机器学习的源和位置分类器可以检测到潜在的SN源,准确率为72.92%,并显示在美国和其他地方的消费。
    可以从在线论坛获得有关SN和其他新兴自杀机制的重要信息。
    UNASSIGNED: There is growing concern around the use of sodium nitrite (SN) as an emerging means of suicide, particularly among younger people. Given the limited information on the topic from traditional public health surveillance sources, we studied posts made to an online suicide discussion forum, \"Sanctioned Suicide,\" which is a primary source of information on the use and procurement of SN.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to determine the trends in SN purchase and use, as obtained via data mining from subscriber posts on the forum. We also aim to determine the substances and topics commonly co-occurring with SN, as well as the geographical distribution of users and sources of SN.
    UNASSIGNED: We collected all publicly available from the site\'s inception in March 2018 to October 2022. Using data-driven methods, including natural language processing and machine learning, we analyzed the trends in SN mentions over time, including the locations of SN consumers and the sources from which SN is procured. We developed a transformer-based source and location classifier to determine the geographical distribution of the sources of SN.
    UNASSIGNED: Posts pertaining to SN show a rise in popularity, and there were statistically significant correlations between real-life use of SN and suicidal intent when compared to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (⍴=0.727; P<.001) and the National Poison Data System (⍴=0.866; P=.001). We observed frequent co-mentions of antiemetics, benzodiazepines, and acid regulators with SN. Our proposed machine learning-based source and location classifier can detect potential sources of SN with an accuracy of 72.92% and showed consumption in the United States and elsewhere.
    UNASSIGNED: Vital information about SN and other emerging mechanisms of suicide can be obtained from online forums.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究通过提供有关在线健康社区中医疗保健的作用和价值的宝贵见解,为理论和实践做出了重要贡献。这项研究强调了患者及其家人对健康信息在线来源的依赖日益增加,以及技术支持有健康信息需求的个人的潜力。本研究通过使用偏最小二乘结构方程模型以及多组和重要性性能图分析来分析横截面调查的数据,从而建立了理论框架。这项研究的结果确定了最有益的技术相关问题,如易于网站导航和与其他在线成员的互动,这对在线健康社区的发展和管理具有重要意义。医疗保健专业人员还可以使用此信息有效地向患有慢性疾病的人传播相关信息。本研究建议论坛管理员和参与者之间的主动参与,以改善技术使用和互动,强调有效技术使用准则的好处,以增强用户的信息寻求过程。总的来说,这项研究的重要贡献在于它确定了在信息寻求过程中帮助在线健康社区参与者的因素,向专业人士提供有价值的信息,使用技术传播与COPD等慢性疾病相关的信息。
    This study significantly contributes to both theory and practice by providing valuable insights into the role and value of healthcare in the context of online health communities. This study highlights the increasing dependence of patients and their families on online sources for health information and the potential of technology to support individuals with health information needs. This study develops a theoretical framework by analyzing data from a cross-sectional survey using partial least squares structural equation modeling and multi-group and importance-performance map analysis. The findings of this study identify the most beneficial technology-related issues, like ease of site navigation and interaction with other online members, which have important implications for the development and management of online health communities. Healthcare professionals can also use this information to disseminate relevant information to those with chronic illnesses effectively. This study recommends proactive engagement between forum admins and participants to improve technology use and interaction, highlighting the benefits of guidelines for effective technology use to enhance users\' information-seeking processes. Overall, this study\'s significant contribution lies in its identification of factors that aid online health community participants in the information-seeking process, providing valuable information to professionals on using technology to disseminate information relevant to chronic illnesses like COPD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于涉及自我识别的乱伦的暴力事件,全球学术注意力已转移到乱伦(非自愿独身)现象。推动这些意识形态扩散的平台越来越多,暴力事件日益严重。这项研究构成了意大利背景下有限的实证研究之一。这项研究旨在检查被识别为incels的个体之间的心理健康及其与自尊和时间观点的关联。58名年龄在18至45岁之间的男性受试者参与了该研究。参与者,通过在线交流渠道招募,完成了三份侧重于评估心理健康的问卷,自尊,和时间取向。结果表明,incel受试者的自尊心较低,并且倾向于以享乐主义的当下为中心的观点,旨在立即满足而不是未来的计划。值得注意的是与未来时间视角相关的数据,这对incel受试者的幸福感没有任何预测价值。他们有长期计划的能力,推迟立即满足,而控制行为通过对可能的后果的预期和评价出现减弱。这项研究讨论了制定有针对性的干预计划的意义,鉴于incel现象越来越普遍。是的,因此,至关重要的是,不要低估了乱伦在未来可能构成的潜在威胁。
    The global scholarly attention has shifted toward the phenomenon of inceldom (involuntary celibacy) due to violent incidents involving self-identified incels. There is a growing number of platforms promoting the proliferation of these ideologies, and cases of violence are becoming increasingly severe. This research constitutes one of the limited empirical investigations within an Italian context. This study aims to examine the mental well-being and its associations with self-esteem and temporal perspectives among individuals identifying as incels. Fifty-eighth male subjects aged between 18 and 45 years old participated in the study. Participants, recruited through online communication channels, completed three questionnaires focused on assessing mental well-being, self-esteem, and temporal orientation. The results reveal that incel subjects exhibit low self-esteem and are inclined toward a hedonistic present-focused perspective aimed at immediate gratification rather than future planning. Of note are the data related to the future temporal perspective, which does not show any predictive value on the well-being of incel subjects. Their ability to plan for the long term, defer immediate gratification, and control behavior through the anticipation and evaluation of possible consequences appears diminished. This study discusses the implications of developing targeted intervention programs, given that the incel phenomenon is becoming increasingly widespread. It is, therefore, crucial not to underestimate the potential threat that inceldom could pose in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:现有的医疗保健研究,包括重病研究,往往低估了历史上被边缘化社区的个人。很难捕捉个人围绕其医疗保健交流经历的细微差别观点。需要新的研究策略,以增加来自不同背景的个人的参与。
    目的:本研究的目的是通过定性在线论坛开发一种混合方法方法,以更好地了解个人的健康交流经验,包括来自历史上被边缘化的群体的人,如黑人和拉丁裔人;老年人;和低收入人群,残疾,或严重的疾病。
    方法:我们使用了多相混合方法,社区知情的研究方法来设计研究工具和参与参与者。我们聘请了一群不同的合作者,他们有丰富的医疗保健系统导航经验,他们提供了关于仪器的反馈,添加了测试概念,并为参与者提供了创建安全体验的指导(第一阶段)。我们在2021年4月至5月之间进行了一项全国性的定量调查,人际关系,和系统级域,特别关注患者和临床医生之间的人际沟通(第二阶段)。我们进行了两个异步,定性在线论坛,一种用于市场研究的技术,在2021年6月至8月之间,这使我们能够将学习和测试概念和消息的背景化(第3阶段)。使用在线论坛使我们能够更深入地调查调查结果和假设,以更好地了解浮出水面的“为什么”和“什么”,并测试公共信息以鼓励围绕健康采取行动。
    结果:我们邀请了46个社区合作伙伴,包括来自联邦合格健康中心的患者和临床医生,为研究仪器设计提供信息。在定量调查中,1854名成年人回答说:包括50.5%的女性,65岁以上的人占25.2%,51.9%的低收入人群。近三分之二的人被认定为非西班牙裔白人(65.7%),10.4%被确定为非西班牙裔黑人,15.5%的人被认定为西班牙裔/拉丁裔。另有580人参加网上论坛,包括60.7%的女性,17.4%65岁以上的人,和49.0%的低收入个人。在参与者中,70.3%被认定为非西班牙裔白人,16.0%为非西班牙裔黑人,9.5%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔。我们收到了富人,来自我们在线论坛参与者的不同输入,他们强调了对参与论坛的满意度和更多的知识。
    结论:我们在65岁以上的人群中取得了适度的代表性,被认定为非西班牙裔黑人,在我们的在线论坛上收入很低。在线论坛的规模(N=580)反映了93名黑人和55名西班牙裔/拉丁裔参与者的声音。被认定为西班牙裔/拉丁美洲人的个人人数仍然不足,可能是因为在线论坛仅以英语提供。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,在混合方法研究中使用在线论坛定性方法的可行性,澄清,并阐述了设计公共卫生和临床沟通干预措施时的定量结果。
    Existing health care research, including serious illness research, often underrepresents individuals from historically marginalized communities. Capturing the nuanced perspectives of individuals around their health care communication experiences is difficult. New research strategies are needed that increase engagement of individuals from diverse backgrounds.
    The aim of this study was to develop a mixed methods approach with qualitative online forums to better understand health communication experiences of individuals, including people from groups historically marginalized such as Black and Latino individuals; older adults; and people with low income, disability, or serious illness.
    We used a multiphase mixed methods, community-informed research approach to design study instruments and engage participants. We engaged a diverse group of collaborators with lived experience of navigating the health care system who provided feedback on instruments, added concepts for testing, and offered guidance on creating a safe experience for participants (phase 1). We conducted a national quantitative survey between April and May 2021 across intrapersonal, interpersonal, and systems-level domains, with particular focus on interpersonal communication between patients and clinicians (phase 2). We conducted two asynchronous, qualitative online forums, a technique used in market research, between June and August 2021, which allowed us to contextualize the learnings and test concepts and messages (phase 3). Using online forums allowed us to probe more deeply into results and hypotheses from the survey to better understand the \"whys\" and \"whats\" that surfaced and to test public messages to encourage action around health.
    We engaged 46 community partners, including patients and clinicians from a Federally Qualified Health Center, to inform study instrument design. In the quantitative survey, 1854 adults responded, including 50.5% women, 25.2% individuals over 65 years old, and 51.9% individuals with low income. Nearly two-thirds identified as non-Hispanic white (65.7%), 10.4% identified as non-Hispanic Black, and 15.5% identified as Hispanic/Latino. An additional 580 individuals participated in online forums, including 60.7% women, 17.4% individuals over 65 years old, and 49.0% individuals with low income. Among the participants, 70.3% identified as non-Hispanic white, 16.0% as non-Hispanic Black, and 9.5% as Hispanic/Latino. We received rich, diverse input from our online forum participants, and they highlighted satisfaction and increased knowledge with engagement in the forums.
    We achieved modest overrepresentation of people who were over 65 years old, identified as non-Hispanic Black, and had low income in our online forums. The size of the online forums (N=580) reflected the voices of 93 Black and 55 Hispanic/Latino participants. Individuals who identify as Hispanic/Latino remained underrepresented, likely because the online forums were offered only in English. Overall, our findings demonstrate the feasibility of using the online forum qualitative approach in a mixed methods study to contextualize, clarify, and expound on quantitative findings when designing public health and clinical communications interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究的重点是与规范相关的用户观点,关于迷幻物质的信念和实践,因为它们在丹麦在线论坛上表达。该研究将对在线药物研究的兴趣与对语篇分析的关注相结合,以解释个人和共享知识之间关于迷幻药的使用和含义的辩证关系。
    方法:对来自154个在线讨论线程的1,865个帖子进行了主题编码和分析,受到话语研究的社会认知方法的启发。所有主题都分为54个类别,并进行了进一步分析,以绘制意义建构中的重复出现的模式,从而导致数量有限的主要话语。
    结果:确定了五种主要话语:娱乐性,治疗,精神,科学和表演话语。我们建议这些话语可以被视为论坛用户在描述时借鉴和复制的可用框架,讨论,并协商他们对迷幻药的理解和使用。
    结论:这项研究证明了对用户感知采取细微差别方法的重要性。未来的药物政策和实践发展应考虑到这些细微差别,并期望使用迷幻药的动机和方式发生重大变化。
    This study focuses on user-perspectives related to norms, beliefs and practices concerning psychedelic substances as they are articulated in a Danish online forum. The study combines an interest in online drug research with a focus on discourse analysis to account for the dialectical relationship between individual and shared knowledge regarding the use and meaning of psychedelics.
    A total of 1,865 posts from 154 threads of online discussion were coded and analyzed thematically, inspired by a socio-cognitive approach to the study of discourse. All topics were arranged into 54 categories which were further analyzed to map recurring patterns in the construction of meaning resulting in a limited number of dominant discourses.
    Five dominant discourses were identified: the recreational, the therapeutic, the spiritual, the scientific and the performance discourse. We suggest that these discourses can be seen as the available frameworks which forum users draw upon and reproduce when they describe, discuss, and negotiate their understandings and uses of psychedelics.
    This study demonstrates the importance of having a nuanced approach to user perceptions. Future drug policy and practice development should take these nuances into account and expect significant variation in the motives and modalities of the use of psychedelics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:成功减少和戒烟的关键因素,以及防止吸烟复发是获得和参与社会支持。最近的技术进步使吸烟者可以通过在线社区论坛获得社会支持。虽然与戒烟干预相关的社区论坛现在是常见的做法,在理解Cutrona和Suhr(1992)确定的不同类型的社会支持如何以及何时(情感,尊重,信息性,有形的,和网络)在这样的论坛上交流。需要“超级用户”(成功论坛的关键标志)的社区论坛,像QuitNow,在这些平台上探索和利用有前途的社会支持交流的时机已经成熟。
    目的:这项研究的目的是描述QuitNow社区论坛在退出旅程的不同阶段发表的帖子,并确定社会支持结构何时以及如何存在于职位中。
    方法:共收集了506个帖子(包括原始帖子和响应帖子)。使用常规的内容分析,对原始帖子进行归纳编码以生成类别和子类别,并根据社会支持的5种类型对回答进行演绎编码。使用MicrosoftExcel软件分析数据。
    结果:总体而言,在退出的第一个月,个人在论坛上的参与度最高,然后在随后的几个月逐渐减少。关于原始帖子,他们中的大多数都属于分享戒烟成功的类别,放弃挣扎,更新,退出策略,并渴望退出。寻求建议和描述无烟福利是代表最少的类别。关于回应,鼓励(情感),恭维(尊重),在所有退出阶段,建议/建议(信息)始终是最突出的支持类型。陪伴(网络)随着时间的推移保持稳定的下降轨迹。
    结论:这项研究的结果强调了在QuitNow社区论坛上如何以及何时交换不同类型的社会支持的复杂性。这些发现为如何在这些在线环境中更有策略地采用和利用社会支持来支持戒烟提供了指导。
    BACKGROUND: A key factor in successfully reducing and quitting smoking, as well as preventing smoking relapse is access to and engagement with social support. Recent technological advances have made it possible for smokers to access social support via online community forums. While community forums associated with smoking cessation interventions are now common practice, there is a gap in understanding how and when the different types of social support identified by Cutrona and Suhr (1992) (emotional, esteem, informational, tangible, and network) are exchanged on such forums. Community forums that entail \"superusers\" (a key marker of a successful forum), like QuitNow, are ripe for exploring and leveraging promising social support exchanges on these platforms.
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to characterize the posts made on the QuitNow community forum at different stages in the quit journey, and determine when and how the social support constructs are present within the posts.
    METHODS: A total of 506 posts (including original and response posts) were collected. Using conventional content analysis, the original posts were coded inductively to generate categories and subcategories, and the responses were coded deductively according to the 5 types of social support. Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel software.
    RESULTS: Overall, individuals were most heavily engaged on the forum during the first month of quitting, which then tapered off in the subsequent months. In relation to the original posts, the majority of them fit into the categories of sharing quit successes, quit struggles, updates, quit strategies, and desires to quit. Asking for advice and describing smoke-free benefits were the least represented categories. In relation to the responses, encouragement (emotional), compliment (esteem), and suggestion/advice (informational) consistently remained the most prominent types of support throughout all quit stages. Companionship (network) maintained a steady downward trajectory over time.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study highlight the complexity of how and when different types of social support are exchanged on the QuitNow community forum. These findings provide directions for how social support can be more strategically employed and leveraged in these online contexts to support smoking cessation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:癌症影响个体,他们的家庭成员,和朋友,而且越来越多,其中一些人转向在线癌症论坛来表达他们的想法/感受,并寻求支持,例如询问与癌症有关的问题。这些在线论坛表达的想法/感受和所需的支持可能会有所不同,具体取决于(1)个人是否患有或患有癌症或(2)个人是患有或患有癌症的人的家庭成员或朋友;这些论坛帖子中使用的语言可能反映了这些差异。
    目的:使用自然语言处理方法,我们的目标是确定(1)自我声明患有或患有癌症的用户与(2)自我声明为患有或患有癌症的个人的家庭成员或朋友的用户在在线癌症论坛上发布的帖子中表达的支持需求和关注的差异。
    方法:使用潜在狄利克雷分配(LDA),这是一种自然语言处理算法和语言查询和字数(LIWC),一本心理语言学词典,我们分析了在线癌症论坛上发布的帖子,目的是描述与这些不同群体用户相关的语言特征。
    结果:自我声明患有或患有癌症的用户更有可能发布与医院就诊相关的LDA主题(Cohend=0.671),并使用与健康相关的LIWC类别(Cohend=0.635)和焦虑相关的单词(Cohend=0.126)。相比之下,声明为家庭成员或朋友的用户倾向于发布与失去家庭成员(Cohend=0.702)有关的LDA主题,而关注过去(Cohend=0.465)和死亡(Cohend=0.181)的LIWC类别则更多与这些用户相关。
    结论:使用LDA和LIWC,我们发现,与癌症患者的家人或朋友相比,癌症患者在在线癌症论坛上发布的帖子中表达的支持需求和担忧存在差异。因此,在线癌症论坛的回应者需要认识到支持需求和关注的这些差异,并根据这些发现调整他们的回应。
    BACKGROUND: Cancer affects individuals, their family members, and friends, and increasingly, some of these individuals are turning to online cancer forums to express their thoughts/feelings and seek support such as asking cancer-related questions. The thoughts/feelings expressed and the support needed from these online forums may differ depending on if (1) an individual has or had cancer or (2) an individual is a family member or friend of an individual who has or had cancer; the language used in posts in these forums may reflect these differences.
    OBJECTIVE: Using natural language processing methods, we aim to determine the differences in the support needs and concerns expressed in posts published on an online cancer forum by (1) users who self-declare to have or had cancer compared with (2) users who self-declare to be family members or friends of individuals with or that had cancer.
    METHODS: Using latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA), which is a natural language processing algorithm and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC), a psycholinguistic dictionary, we analyzed posts published on an online cancer forum with the aim to delineate the language features associated with users in these different groups.
    RESULTS: Users who self-declare to have or had cancer were more likely to post about LDA topics related to hospital visits (Cohen d=0.671) and use words associated with LIWC categories related to health (Cohen d=0.635) and anxiety (Cohen d=0.126). By contrast, users who declared to be family members or friends tend to post about LDA topics related to losing a family member (Cohen d=0.702) and LIWC categories focusing on the past (Cohen d=0.465) and death (Cohen d=0.181) were more associated with these users.
    CONCLUSIONS: Using LDA and LIWC, we show that there are differences in the support needs and concerns expressed in posts published on an online cancer forum by users with cancer compared with family members or friends of those with cancer. Hence, responders to online cancer forums need to be cognizant of these differences in support needs and concerns and tailor their responses based on these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:孤独是一个公共卫生问题,而且越来越多,经历孤独的人正在网上论坛上寻求支持,其中一些专注于围绕孤独的讨论(孤独论坛)。其中一些人也可能在与孤独或幸福无关的在线论坛(非孤独论坛)上寻求孤独的支持。因此,设计和实施适当和有效的在线孤独干预措施,重要的是要了解在在线孤独论坛上表达和寻求孤独支持的个人如何在非孤独论坛中交流;这可以提供对这些用户的支持需求和关注的进一步见解。
    目的:本研究旨在探讨在在线孤独论坛上表达孤独感并寻求孤独支持的用户如何在在线非孤独论坛中进行交流。
    方法:共有2401名用户在Reddit上的孤独论坛上发布的帖子中表达了孤独,并在非孤独论坛上发布了帖子。使用潜在的Dirichlet分配(自然语言处理算法);语言查询和单词计数(心理语言学词典);以及基于单词分数的语言特征效价,唤醒,和支配地位,确定了这些用户在非孤独论坛中发布的帖子与不属于Reddit上任何孤独论坛的对照组用户的语言使用差异。
    结果:发现在非孤独论坛上发布的帖子中,表达孤独的用户倾向于在悲伤(科恩d=0.10)和寻求社交(科恩d=0.114)上使用更多与语言查询和单词计数类别相关的单词,并使用与效价(科恩d=0.364)和优势(科恩d=0.117)相关的词。此外,他们倾向于发布与潜在Dirichlet分配主题相关的帖子,例如人际关系(Cohend=0.105),家人和朋友以及心理健康(Cohend=0.10)。
    结论:与对照组用户相比,表达孤独的用户在非孤独论坛帖子中的语言使用有明显区别。这些发现可以帮助设计和实施围绕孤独的在线干预措施。
    BACKGROUND: Loneliness is a public health concern, and increasingly, individuals experiencing loneliness are seeking support on online forums, some of which focus on discussions around loneliness (loneliness forums). Some of these individuals may also seek support around loneliness on online forums not related to loneliness or well-being (nonloneliness forums). Hence, to design and implement appropriate and efficient online loneliness interventions, it is important to understand how individuals who express and seek support around loneliness on online loneliness forums communicate in nonloneliness forums; this could provide further insights into the support needs and concerns of these users.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore how users who express the feeling of loneliness and seek support around loneliness on an online loneliness forum communicate in an online nonloneliness forum.
    METHODS: A total of 2401 users who expressed loneliness in posts published on a loneliness forum on Reddit and had published posts in a nonloneliness forum were identified. Using latent Dirichlet allocation (a natural language processing algorithm); Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (a psycholinguistic dictionary); and the word score-based language features valence, arousal, and dominance, the language use differences in posts published in the nonloneliness forum by these users compared to a control group of users who did not belong to any loneliness forum on Reddit were determined.
    RESULTS: It was found that in posts published in the nonloneliness forum, users who expressed loneliness tend to use more words associated with the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count categories on sadness (Cohen d=0.10) and seeking to socialize (Cohen d=0.114), and use words associated with valence (Cohen d=0.364) and dominance (Cohen d=0.117). In addition, they tend to publish posts related to latent Dirichlet allocation topics such as relationships (Cohen d=0.105) and family and friends and mental health (Cohen d=0.10).
    CONCLUSIONS: There are clear distinctions in language use in nonloneliness forum posts by users who express loneliness compared to a control group of users. These findings can help with the design and implementation of online interventions around loneliness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    电子烟(e-cigs)是一种越来越受欢迎的吸烟替代品,有助于防止那些试图戒烟的人复发,并有可能减少伤害,因为它们可能比标准香烟更安全。许多妇女在产后恢复吸烟,在怀孕期间停止吸烟,虽然这会影响他们对母乳喂养的决定,关于女性在此期间使用电子烟的意见知之甚少。
    这项研究的目的是探索在线论坛用户的当前态度,动机,以及产后电子烟使用的障碍,特别是作为母乳喂养的母亲。
    数据是通过公开访问(通过Google搜索确定)在线论坛讨论收集的,和识别的先验代码。将所有转录本输入NVivo进行分析,主题分析的模板方法用于编码从中得出主题的所有成绩单。
    确定了四个主题:使用,感知风险,社会支持和证据,其中确定了一些子主题。妇女使用电子烟防止产后恢复吸烟,但是关于他们安全的意见是相互矛盾的。他们担心可能会通过母乳和二手接触从电子烟转移有害产品,因此,他们正在积极地从各种来源寻求和分享有关电子烟的信息。虽然有些女性支持使用电子烟,其他人为使用它们的母亲提供了严厉的判断。
    电子烟可能会减少产后恢复吸烟的妇女人数,并可能提高母乳喂养率。如果母乳喂养的母亲能够获得相关和可靠的信息。医疗保健提供者应考虑与产后有重新吸烟风险的母亲讨论电子烟。
    Electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) are an increasingly popular alternative to smoking, helping to prevent relapse in those trying to quit and with the potential to reduce harm as they are likely to be safer than standard cigarettes. Many women return to smoking in the postpartum period having stopped during pregnancy, and while this can affect their decisions about breastfeeding, little is known about women\'s opinions on using e-cigs during this period.
    The aim of this study is to explore online forum users\' current attitudes, motivations, and barriers to postpartum e-cig use, particularly as a breastfeeding mother.
    Data were collected via publicly accessible (identified by Google search) online forum discussions, and a priori codes identified. All transcripts were entered into NVivo for analysis, with a template approach to thematic analysis being used to code all transcripts from which themes were derived.
    Four themes were identified: use, perceived risk, social support and evidence, with a number of subthemes identified within these. Women were using e-cigs to prevent postpartum return to smoking, but opinions on their safety were conflicting. They were concerned about possible transfer of harmful products from e-cigs via breastmilk and secondhand exposure, so they were actively seeking and sharing information on e-cigs from a variety of sources. Although some women were supportive of e-cig use, others provided harsh judgement for mothers who used them.
    E-cigs have the potential to reduce the number of women who return to smoking in the postpartum period and potentially improve breastfeeding rates, if breastfeeding mothers have access to relevant and reliable information. Health care providers should consider discussing e-cigs with mothers at risk of returning to smoking in the postpartum period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号