OBJECTIVE: This systematic review provides an update on outcomes for patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) type 1 to 4 treated with approved therapeutics, including the most recent, risdiplam, for an observation period of up to 48 months.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in July 2023 in four databases. Selected publications were assessed for internal validity and risk of bias by two authors and relevant data were extracted into standardised tables. Results were summarised narratively as substantial heterogeneity of studies prevents meaningful quantitative analysis.
RESULTS: Twenty observational studies and one RCT were included in the analysis, fifteen studies on nusinersen, one on onasemnogene abeparvovec and two on risdiplam. Evidence supports the effectiveness of the therapies in motor function improvement for up to 48 months of follow-up in the SMA types specified in their respective indications. Better results were observed with earlier treatment initiation and higher baseline function. Whilst motor improvement was consistently observed, regardless of SMA type or treatment used, we noted no significant improvements in respiratory and nutritional outcomes. Quality of life endpoints were rarely investigated. Adverse events were common but seldom classified as treatment-related except for post-lumbar puncture syndrome, which was frequently reported across nusinersen studies.
CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of SMA with the new therapies changes the disease phenotype with changes in motor function far exceeding any improvement in respiratory and nutritional function. Questions persist on long-term efficacy, potential regressions, impact on quality of life and social functioning, therapy duration, and discontinuation indicators.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an uncommon disorder associated with genes characterized by the gradual weakening and deterioration of muscles, often leading to substantial disability and premature mortality. Over the past decade, remarkable strides have been made in the field of SMA therapeutics, revolutionizing the landscape of patient care. One pivotal advancement is the development of gene-targeted therapies, such as nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec and risdiplam which have demonstrated unprecedented efficacy in slowing disease progression. These therapies aim to address the root cause of SMA by targeting the survival motor neuron (SMN) gene, effectively restoring deficient SMN protein levels. The advent of these innovative approaches has transformed the prognosis for many SMA patients, offering a glimmer of hope where there was once limited therapeutic recourse. Furthermore, the emergence of small molecule compounds and RNA-targeting strategies has expanded the therapeutic arsenal against SMA. These novel interventions exhibit diverse mechanisms of action, including SMN protein stabilization and modulation of RNA splicing, showcasing the multifaceted nature of SMA treatment research. Collective efforts of pharmaceutical industries, research centers, and patient advocacy groups have played an important role in expediting the translation of scientific discoveries into visible clinical benefits. This review not only highlights the remarkable progress achieved in SMA therapeutics but also generates the ray of hope for the ongoing efforts required to enhance accessibility, optimize treatment strategies, rehabilitation (care and therapies) and ultimately pave the way for an improved quality of life for individuals affected by SMA.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to systematically collect data on cost-effectiveness analyses that assess technologies to treat type I and II spinal muscular atrophy and evaluate their recommendations.
METHODS: A structured electronic search was conducted in 4 databases. Additionally, a complementary manual search was conducted. Complete economic studies that evaluated nusinersen, risdiplam, onasemnogene abeparvovec (OA), and the best support therapy (BST) from the health system\'s perspective were selected. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were compared with various thresholds for the analysis. The review was registered a priori in PROSPERO (CRD42022365391).
RESULTS: Twenty studies were included in the analyses. They were all published between 2017 and 2022 and represent the recommendations in 8 countries. Most studies adopted 5, 6, or 10-state Markov models. Some authors took part in multiple studies. Four technologies were evaluated: BST (N = 14), nusinersen (N = 19), risdiplam (N = 5), and OA (N = 9). OA, risdiplam, and nusinersen were considered inefficient compared with the BST. Risdiplam and OA were generally regarded as cost-effective when compared with nusinersen. Because nusinersen is not a cost-effective drug, no recommendation can be derived from this result. Risdiplam and OA were compared in 2 studies that presented opposite results.
CONCLUSIONS: Nusinersen, risdiplam, and OA are being adopted worldwide as a treatment for spinal muscular atrophy. Despite that, the pharmacoeconomic analyses show that the technologies are not cost-effective compared with the BST. The lack of controlled studies for risdiplam and OA hamper any conclusions about their face-to-face comparison.

UNASSIGNED: To review the clinical characteristics and effect of treatment in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and three copies of the SMN2 gene.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a literature search in October 2022 to identify English-language clinical research on SMA that included SMN2 copy number according to PRISMA guidelines.
UNASSIGNED: Our search identified 44 studies examining the impact of three SMN2 copies on clinical characteristics (21 on phenotype, 13 on natural history, and 15 on functional status and other signs/symptoms). In children with type I SMA or presymptomatic infants with an SMN1 deletion, three SMN2 copies was associated with later symptom onset, slower decline in motor function and longer survival compared with two SMN2 copies. In patients with SMA type II or III, three SMN2 copies is associated with earlier symptom onset, loss of ambulation, and ventilator dependence compared with four SMN2 copies. Eleven studies examined treatment effects with nusinersen (nine studies), onasemnogene abeparvovec (one study), and a range of treatments (one study) in patients with three SMN2 copies. In presymptomatic infants, early treatment delayed the onset of symptoms and maintained motor function in those with three SMN2 copies. The impact of copy number on treatment response in symptomatic patients is still unclear.
UNASSIGNED: SMN2 copy number is strongly correlated with SMA phenotype in patients with SMN1 deletion, while no correlation was found in patients with an SMN1 mutation. Patients with three SMN2 copies show a highly variable clinical phenotype. Early initiation of treatment is highly effective in presymptomatic patients with three SMN2 copies.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare neuromuscular disease, with an estimated incidence of about 1 in 10,000 live births. To date, three orphan drugs have been approved for the treatment of SMA: nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec, and risdiplam. The aim of this narrative review was to provide an overview of the pre- and post-marketing evidence on the pharmacological treatments approved for the treatment of SMA by identifying preclinical and clinical studies registered in clinicaltrials.gov and in the EU PAS register from their inception until the 4 January 2023. The preclinical evidence on the drugs approved for SMA allowed a significant acceleration in the experimental phase of these drugs. However, since these drugs had been authorized through accelerated programs, the conduction of post-marketing studies was requested as a condition of their marketing approval to better understand their risk-benefit profiles in real-world settings. As of the 4 January 2023, a total of 69 post-marketing studies concerning the three orphan drugs approved for SMA were identified in clinicaltrials.gov (N = 65; 94.2%) and in the EU PAS register (N = 4; 5.8%). Currently, ongoing studies are primarily aimed at providing evidence concerning the risk-benefit profile of the three drugs in specific populations that were not included in the pivotal trials and to investigate the long-term safety and clinical benefits of these drugs. Real-world data sources collecting information regarding the natural history of the disease and post-marketing surveillance of the available therapies are increasingly becoming essential for generating real-world evidence on this rare disease and its orphan drugs.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a severe hereditary lower motor neuron disorder characterised by degeneration of alpha motor neurons in the spinal cord, resulting in progressive weakness and paralysis of proximal muscles. A systematic literature search was carried out by using PRISMA guidelines and searching through different databases that could provide findings of evidence on the health outcomes of the approved therapies for the management of paediatric SMA type 1 regarding efficacy with follow-up in terms of motor and respiratory functions and the tolerability and incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) post-treatment from real-world publications. Half of the publications (50%) had a prospective observational design. Eight studies (66.7%) assessed nusinersen, and three studies (25%) assessed onasemnogene abeparvovec with a duration of follow-up ranging from 6 months to 3 years to evaluate the motor and respiratory functions using different assessment tools, hospitalisation rates, and the tolerability and incidence of ADRs post-treatment. The three currently approved treatments for SMA type 1 provided good support and health outcomes in terms of motor function, respiratory outcomes, reduction of hospitalisations, and improvement of survival. Nevertheless, uncertainties regarding continued improvement after long-term illness and the generalizability of results are still unknown.

UNASSIGNED: No consensus exists on the ideal methodology to evaluate the economic impact and value of new, potentially curative gene therapies. We aimed to identify and describe published methodologic recommendations for the economic evaluation of gene therapies and assess whether these recommendations have been applied in published evaluations.
UNASSIGNED: This study was conducted in three stages: a systematic literature review of methodologic recommendations for economic evaluation of gene therapies; an assessment of the appropriateness of recommendations; and a review to assess the degree to which the recommendations were applied in published evaluations.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 2,888 references were screened, 83 articles were reviewed to assess eligibility, and 20 papers were included. Fifty recommendations were identified, and 21 reached consensus thresholds. Most evaluations were based on naive treatment comparisons and did not apply consensus recommendations. Innovative payment mechanisms for gene therapies were rarely considered. The only widely applied recommendations related to modeling choices and methods.
UNASSIGNED: Methodological recommendations for economic evaluations of gene therapies are generally not being followed. Assessing the applicability and impact of the recommendations from this study may facilitate the implementation of consensus recommendations in future evaluations.

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) is a genetic disease that causes weakness and wasting in the voluntary muscles of infants and children. SMA has been the leading inherited cause of infant death. More specifically, SMA is caused by the absence of the SMN1 gene. In May 2019, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved onasemnogene abeparvovec, SMN1 gene replacement therapy, for all children with SMA younger than two years of age, without end-stage weakness. The objective of the study is to review the safety and efficacy of a novel gene therapy, onasemnogene abeparvovec (Zolgensma), for SMA and assess current challenges for gene therapy. For this, we have conducted a literature search on PubMed, MEDLINE, and Ovid (2019 to 2022) in the English language using the terms SMA, onasemnogene, and gene therapy. The search included articles, websites, and published papers from reputable health organizations, hospitals, and global organizations dedicated to bringing awareness to Spinal Muscular Atrophy. We found the first gene therapy for SMA to be onasemnogene, directly providing the survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene to produce the survival motor neuron (SMN) protein. Onasemnogene is approved by the Food and Drug Administration and has the added benefit of being a one-time dose. On the downside, a major side effect of this treatment is hepatotoxicity. There is substantial evidence that the efficacy of therapy is increased when administered early to children under three months of age. Therefore, we concluded that onasemnogene appears to be an efficacious therapy for younger pediatric patients with SMA type 1. Drug cost and potential hepatotoxicity are major concerns. Long-term benefits and risks have not been determined, but it is more cost-effective and requires less time of treatment compared to the other used drug, nusinersen. Therefore, the combined safety, cost, and effectiveness of onasemnogene abeparvovec make it a reliable treatment option for treating SMA Type 1.

UNASSIGNED: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in England has appraised three treatments for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), namely, nusinersen, onasemnogene abeparvovec, and risdiplam. As rare disease treatments (RDTs) commonly face challenges in health technology assessment (HTA) processes due to their clinical and economic uncertainties, an in-depth review of these appraisals is useful to enable a deeper understanding of economic modeling considerations for SMA.
UNASSIGNED: This review is a detailed analysis of NICE appraisals for SMA and aims to compare the economic modeling evidence from the three RDTs. This is done by examining differences and similarities and by discussing critical outstanding issues across the economic evaluations of the appraisals.
UNASSIGNED: This article aims to contribute to the development of evidence that can be used as guidance to inform resource allocation decisions for RDTs for SMA, but also to be a resource about approaches for the generation, analysis and interpretation of economic modeling evidence for RDTs more broadly.

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive hereditary disease which leads to progressive muscle weakness and atrophy. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aims to explore the efficacy and safety of onasemnogene abeparvovec in SMA patients. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane through April 2022. Ten reports enrolling 250 SMA patients were included. CHOP INTEND and motor-milestone significant improvements were detected at both short- and long-term follow-up. Common adverse events included pyrexia, vomiting, thrombocytopenia and elevated aminotransferases. Thrombocytopenia (79.3%, 95%CI: 65.8~90.5) and elevated aminotransferases (71.7%, 95%CI: 62.5~80.1) were more common in SMA patients aged older than 8 months. Despite the paucity of randomized control trial data and low quality of evidence to establish the safety and efficacy of onasemnogene abeparvovec in the treatment of SMA, the data suggest that it is a valuable option for patients with this condition.