BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used to treat disease in the oligometastatic (OM) setting due to mounting evidence demonstrating its efficacy and safety. Given the low population representation in prospective studies, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes of HNC patients with extracranial OM disease treated with SBRT.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted with Cochrane, Medline, and Embase databases queried from inception to August 2022 for studies with extracranial OM HNC treated with stereotactic radiotherapy. Polymetastatic patients (>five lesions), mixed-primary cohorts failing to report HNC separately, lack of treatment to all lesions, nonquantitative endpoints, and other definitive treatments (surgery, conventional radiotherapy, and radioablation) were excluded. The meta-analysis examined the pooled effects of 12- and 24-month local control (LC) per lesion, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Weighted random-effects were assessed using the DerSimonian and Laird method, with heterogeneity evaluated using the I2 statistic and Cochran Qtest. Forest plots were generated for each endpoint.
RESULTS: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria (639 patients, 831 lesions), with twelve eligible for quantitative synthesis with common endpoints and sufficient reporting. Fourteen studies were retrospective, with a single prospective trial. Studies were small, with a median of 32 patients (range: 6-81) and 63 lesions (range: 6-126). The OM definition varied, with a maximum of two to five metastases, mixed synchronous and metachronous lesions, and a few studies including oligoprogressive lesions. The most common site of metastasis was the lung. Radiation was delivered in 1-10 fractions (20-70 Gy). The one-year LC (LC1), reported in 12 studies, was 86.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 79.3-91.9%). LC2 was 77.9% (95% CI: 66.4-86.3%), with heterogeneity across studies. PFS was reported in five studies, with a PFS1 of 43.0% (95% CI: 35.0-51.4%) and PFS2 of 23.9% (95% CI: 17.8-31.2%), with homogeneity across studies. OS was analyzed in nine studies, demonstrating an OS1 of 80.1% (95% CI: 74.2-85.0%) and OS2 of 60.7% (95% CI: 51.3-69.4%). Treatment was well tolerated with no reported grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Grade 3 toxicity rates were uniformly below 5% when reported.
CONCLUSIONS: SBRT offers excellent LC and promising OS, with acceptable toxicities in OM HNC. Durable PFS remains rare, highlighting the need for effective local or systemic therapies in this population. Further investigations on concurrent and adjuvant therapies are warranted.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a technique to treat oligoprogressive sites among patients with breast cancer who are otherwise doing well on systemic therapy. This study systematically reviewed the efficacy and safety of SBRT in the setting of oligoprogressive breast cancer. A literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE database. Studies regarding SBRT and oligoprogressive breast cancer were included. Key outcomes of interest were toxicity, local control, progression, and overall survival. From 863 references, five retrospective single-center cohort studies were identified. All studies included patients with both oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease; 112 patients with oligoprogressive breast cancer were identified across these studies. Patient age ranged from 22 to 84, with a median of 55 years of age. Most patients had hormone-receptor-positive and HER2-negative disease. SBRT doses varied from 24 to 60 Gy in 1-10 fractions based on the location/size of the lesion. Forty toxicity events were reported, of which the majority (n = 25, 62.5%) were grade 1-2 events. Among 15 patients who received SBRT concurrently with a CDK4/6 inhibitor, 37.5% of patients experienced grade 3-5 toxicities. Progression-free and overall survival ranged from 17 to 57% and 62 to 91%, respectively. There are limited data on the role of SBRT in oligoprogressive breast cancer, and prospective evaluation of this strategy is awaited to inform its safety and efficacy.

For decades, the distant progression of breast cancer has been the purview of systemic therapy alone or with low to moderate-dose radiation therapy intended for the palliation of symptomatic metastases. However, for decades there have been anecdotes of long-term disease-free survival with more aggressive local treatment of one or more metastases. The hypothesis of oligometastases is that the treatment of a clinically limited number of distant metastases can change the natural history of stage IV breast cancer. The advance in the technology of stereotactic body radiation (SBRT) has made it more possible to offer a non-invasive, yet potentially disease-modifying, metastases-directed ablative treatment in place of surgery or a palliative radiation regimen. Although there are promising local control and survival outcomes in phase I/II trials, there is still a lack of phase III evidence of ablative SBRT results showing any change in the natural history of metastatic breast cancer. Limited oligometastases may call for an ablative approach with SBRT when definitive long-term local control is needed for the best palliation against symptomatic progression in challenging locations. Some oligometastases that have progression on a certain systemic regimen, while others remain stable or in remission, may also be treated with SBRT in the hopes of prolonging the use of that regimen. Whether SBRT should represent the standard management for stage IV breast cancer of a limited number or of limited progression requires confirmation by phase III data. This review will discuss the data from key clinical trials as it applies to decision making in typical clinical cases considered for potentially ablative SBRT for oligometastases or oligoprogression.

UNASSIGNED: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80% of lung cancers and is the most common non-cutaneous cancer world-wide. In NSCLC, oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease (OPD) have been recognized as separate entities within the realm of metastatic disease and are emerging concepts in the context of targeted systemic therapies. Our objectives are to discuss the current literature regarding the evolving definitions of OPD in the context of oligometastatic disease (OMD) for NSCLC. Further, to discuss current and future clinical trials that have shaped our local approach with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)/stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR).
UNASSIGNED: Literature on OPD in NSCLC and local ablative therapy (LAT) including SBRT/SABR and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was reviewed.
UNASSIGNED: Oligoprogression is defined as limited (usually 3-5) metastatic areas progressing while on/off systemic therapy in the background of oligometastatic or polymetastatic disease. Prognosis in OPD with treatment (such as LAT and systemic therapy) may be more favorable. Outcomes for patients progressing on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with molecular mutations [such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)] who receive LAT are promising.
UNASSIGNED: Patients presenting with NSCLC metastasis with progression at a limited number of sites on/off a given line of systemic therapy may have favorable outcomes with aggressive LAT, which includes SBRT/SABR/SRS. Further studies need to be completed to further optimize treatment recommendations.

Oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an intermediate state between localized and widely metastatic NSCLC, where systemic therapy in combination with aggressive local therapy when feasible can yield a favorable outcome. While different societies have adopted different definitions for oligometastatic NSCLC, the feasibility of curative intent treatment remains a major determinant of the oligometastatic state. The management involves a multidisciplinary approach to identify such patients with oligometastatic stage, including the presence of symptomatic or potentially symptomatic brain metastasis, the presence of targetable mutations, and programmed death-ligand (PD-L1) expression. Treatment requires a personalized approach with the use of novel systemic agents such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without chemotherapy, and addition of local ablative therapy via surgery or stereotactic radiation therapy when appropriate.

UNASSIGNED: In this review, we aim to collect and discuss available data about the role and composition of tumor microenvironment (TME) in oligometastatic (OMD) and oligoprogressive (OPD) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Furthermore, we aim to summarize the ongoing clinical trials evaluating as exploratory objective the TME composition, through tissue and/or blood samples, in order to clarify whether TME and its components could explain, at least partially, the oligometastatic/oligoprogressive process and could unravel the existence of predictive and/or prognostic factors for local ablative therapy (LAT).
UNASSIGNED: OMD/OPD NSCLC represent a heterogeneous group of diseases. Several data have shown that TME plays an important role in tumor progression and therefore in treatment response. The crucial role of several types of cells and molecules such as immune cells, cytokines, integrins, protease and adhesion molecules, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has been widely established. Due to the peculiar activation of specific pathways and expression of adhesion molecules, metastatic cells seem to show a tropism for specific anatomic sites (the so-called \"seed and soil\" hypothesis). Based on this theory, metastases appear as a biologically driven process rather than a random release of cancer cells. Although the role and the function of TME at the time of progression in patients with NSCLC treated with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been investigated, limited data about the role and the biological meaning of TME are available in the specific OMD/OPD setting.
UNASSIGNED: Through a comprehensive PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov search, we identified available and ongoing studies exploring the role of TME in oligometastatic/oligoprogressive NSCLC.
UNASSIGNED: Deepening the knowledge on TME composition and function in OMD/OPD may provide innovative implications in terms of both prognosis and prediction of outcome in particular from local treatments, paving the way for future investigations of personalized approaches in both advanced and early disease settings.

: The advent of crizotinib, the first small molecule inhibitor against anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), has led to impressive advances in the care of patients with advanced ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer. The development of second-generation ALK inhibitors, starting with the recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of ceritinib, promises to expand the therapeutic landscape for this cohort of patients. With increasing use of molecularly targeted therapy options, it has been observed that disease progression in patients receiving targeted agents has a heterogeneous biology, manifesting as either oligoprogressive or widely progressive disease, which may require development of innovative treatment strategies. This review discusses the first- and second-generation ALK inhibitors approved or in clinical development, as well as the novel challenges and approaches to disease progression in patients on targeted agents.
The identification of driver mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), most prominently epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), has expanded treatment options for a significant cohort of patients. However, the success of targeted agents has brought new challenges, particularly regarding management of progression. Progression manifests heterogeneously, and management of oligoprogression may differ from diffusely progressive disease. Multiple options for treatment at progression exist, and it is becoming evident that selecting the best avenue of care requires understanding the biology and potential drivers of disease progression. This review discusses the array of treatment options available for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC, as well as evaluation and treatment of progressive disease.