Therapeutic hypercapnia has been proposed as a potential strategy to enhance cerebral perfusion and improve outcomes in patients after cardiac arrest. However, the effects of targeted hypercapnia remain unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of hypercapnia compared to normocapnia on mortality and length of stay in post-cardiac arrest patients. We searched major databases for randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing outcomes between hypercapnia and normocapnia in adult post-cardiac arrest patients. Data on in-hospital mortality and the ICU and hospital length of stay were extracted and pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Five studies (two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three observational studies) with a total of 1,837 patients were included. Pooled analysis showed hypercapnia was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared to normocapnia (56.2% vs. 50.5%, OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.12-1.37, p<0.001). There was no significant heterogeneity (I2 = 25%, p = 0.26). No statistically significant differences were found for ICU length of stay (mean difference 0.72 days, 95% CI -0.51 to 1.95) or hospital length of stay (mean difference 1.13 days, 95% CI -0.67 to 2.93) between the groups. Sensitivity analysis restricted to mild hypercapnia studies did not alter the mortality findings. This meta-analysis did not find a mortality benefit with targeted hypercapnia compared to normocapnia in post-cardiac arrest patients. The results align with current guidelines recommending a normal partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2) target range and do not support routinely targeting higher carbon dioxide levels in this setting.

The effect of mild changes in CO2 levels to organ perfusion and tissue inflammation are well known, whereas an influence of hypercapnia under general anesthesia on adverse events as nausea and vomiting, or length of hospital stay is barely examined. The goal of our meta-analysis was to identify possibly positive effects of hypercapnia versus normocapnia in general anesthesia in adult patients.
We conducted a systematic review of parallel-arm randomised controlled trials comparing hypercapnia versus normocapnia in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia. In July 2018 and September 2019 we searched \"CENTRAL‿, \"MEDLINE‿, and \"Embase‿, checked reference lists of all included studies and relevant systematic reviews for additional references to trials. Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion, extracted data, and completed a \"Risk of bias‿ assessment for all included studies.
Our search identified 297 records after abstract screening 30 full-text papers remained for further examination. Ten publications met our inclusion criteria and were used for narrative description of this systematic review. Three studies were eligible for the meta-analysis normocapnia versus hypercapnia with the outcomes: time to extubation and adverse events. On average, time to extubation was significantly reduced in the hypercapnia group with a mean difference 3.78 (95% CI 0.85 to 6.71). No difference was found regarding adverse events.
The findings of our study do not enable us to produce evidence of a positive influence of increased CO2 partial pressure levels during general anesthesia. A well-planned, adequately powered randomized controlled trial would be desirable in the future.