nodal boost

节点升压
  • 文章类型: Journal Article

    这项多中心研究旨在回顾性评估在局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC)患者中,与序贯增强(Seq)相比,高增强同时整合增强(SIB)对病理淋巴结的影响。
    97例盆腔和/或主动脉旁(PAo)淋巴结阳性LACC患者接受确定性放化疗治疗。分析两组:序贯加强组和同时整合加强(SIB)组。终点是远程复发无生存(DRFS),复发免费生存(RFS),总生存率(OS),局部骨盆和PAo控制和毒性。
    SIB组和Seq组的3年DRFS分别为65%和31%(对数秩p<0.001)。3年RFS分别为58%和26%(log-rankp=0.009)。多变量分析的DRFS预后因素为SIB,PAo受累,最大盆腔淋巴结直径≥2cm。腺癌组织学和近距离放射治疗的缺乏往往是预后因素。SIB在首次成像时提供了最佳的骨盆控制,占97%。两组之间的毒性没有显着差异。
    节点SIB在节点阳性LACC的治疗中似乎是不可避免的。它提供了最好的DRFS,RFS和盆腔控制无额外毒性,缩短治疗时间。
    UNASSIGNED:
    UNASSIGNED: This multicenter study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the impact of high boost simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to pathologic lymph nodes compared to Sequential boost (Seq) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC).
    UNASSIGNED: 97 patients with pelvic and/or para-aortic (PAo) node-positive LACC treated by definitive chemoradiation were included. Two groups were analyzed: Sequential boost group and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) group. Endpoints were Distant Recurrence Free Survival (DRFS), Recurrence Free Survival (RFS), Overall Survival (OS), locoregional pelvic and PAo control and toxicities.
    UNASSIGNED: 3-years DRFS in SIB and Seq groups was 65% and 31% respectively (log-rank p < 0.001). 3-years RFS was 58% and 26% respectively (log-rank p = 0.009). DRFS prognostic factors in multivariable analysis were SIB, PAo involvement and maximum pelvic node diameter ≥ 2cm. Adenocarcinoma histology and absence of brachytherapy tended to be prognostic factors. SIB provided the best pelvic control at first imaging with 97%. There was no significant difference in terms of toxicities between groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Nodal SIB seems to be unavoidable in the treatment of node-positive LACC. It provides the best DRFS, RFS and pelvic control without additional toxicity, with a shortened treatment duration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase I
    UNASSIGNED:局部晚期宫颈癌(LACC)的标准治疗方法是同步放化疗(CRT),然后进行近距离放射治疗(BRT)。在放疗(RT)中增加化疗(ChT)与总生存率提高7.5%相关,但具有更多的3-4级急性毒性(16.4%vs4.9%,单独CRT与RT)。在患有继发于肿瘤相关肾积水的肾功能不全的晚期疾病中,风险收益比可能较差;临界心功能;和虚弱的患者。单独RT后BRT实现长期局部控制<62%。使用较旧技术的低分割RT(HF-RT)可实现可比的疾病控制和低的晚期毒性率(4-8%)。剂量适应的HF-RT使用强度调节的RT与节点同步整合增强(nSIB)可以改善肿瘤控制和毒性,当ChT是禁忌的。
    UNASSIGNED:HYACINCT研究是一项两阶段研究,旨在确定在ChT禁忌时在LACC中使用nSIB的HF-RT的有效性和安全性。第一阶段是使用标准3+3设计的剂量递增研究,确定nSIB联合盆腔HF-RT的最大耐受剂量(MTD)(2.67Gyx15分)。第二阶段是使用Simon的两阶段设计的单臂临床试验,评估HF-RT与nSIB在肿瘤反应方面的疗效。经活检证实的成年女性,未经处理的LACC,与ChT的禁忌症将包括在本试验中。
    未经评估:对于第一阶段,主要终点是剂量限制性毒性(DLT),或任何3级急性或亚急性毒性。DLT发生率为33%的剂量水平定义为最大耐受剂量(MTD)。对于2期,主要终点是治疗后3个月的完全反应。次要结局是无进展和总生存期,急性和晚期毒性,和患者报告的结果(EPIC,EORTCQLQC30+CX24、PGIC、PCIS)。试用注册:NCT05210270。
    UNASSIGNED: The standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) followed by brachytherapy (BRT). The addition of chemotherapy (ChT) to radiotherapy (RT) is associated with a 7.5% improvement in overall survival but with more grade 3-4 acute toxicities (16.4% vs 4.9%, CRT vs RT alone). The risk-benefit ratio could be less favorable in advanced disease with renal dysfunction secondary to tumor-related hydronephrosis; borderline cardiac function; and frail patients. RT alone followed by BRT achieves long-term locoregional control <62%. Hypofractionated RT (HF-RT) using older techniques result in comparable disease control and low late toxicity rates (4-8%). Dose-adapted HF-RT using intensity-modulated RT with nodal simultaneous integrated boost (nSIB) could improve tumor control and toxicity, when ChT is contraindicated.
    UNASSIGNED: The HYACINCT study is a two-phase study to determine the effectiveness and safety of HF-RT with nSIB in LACC when ChT is contraindicated. Phase 1 is a dose-escalation study using standard 3 + 3 design, to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for nSIB in combination with pelvic HF-RT (2.67 Gy x 15 fractions). Phase 2 is a single-arm clinical trial using Simon\'s two-stage design, to assess the efficacy of HF-RT with nSIB in terms of tumor response. Adult women with biopsy-proven, untreated LACC, with contraindication to ChT will be included in this trial.
    UNASSIGNED: For the phase 1, the primary endpoint is dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), or any grade ?3 acute or sub-acute toxicity. The dose level at which incidence of DLT is ?33% is defined as the maximum tolerance dose (MTD). For the phase 2, the primary endpoint is complete response at 3 months post-treatment. Secondary outcomes are progression-free and overall survival, acute and late toxicity, and patient-reported outcomes (EPIC, EORTCQLQ C30 + CX24, PGIC, PCIS). Trial registration: NCT05210270.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号