network analysis

网络分析
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    精神病理学的网络方法,评估个体症状之间的关联,最近已被用于评估精神障碍的治疗方法。虽然存在各种在干预研究中进行网络分析的选择,目前缺少对各种方法的概述和评估。因此,我们对干预研究中的网络分析进行了综述.如果研究建立了症状网络,分析了之前收集的数据,在治疗精神障碍期间或之后,并获得了有关治疗效果的信息。对纳入的56项研究进行了方法学和分析策略的回顾。大约一半的研究基于随机试验的数据进行了网络干预分析,而另一半比较了治疗组之间的网络。大多数研究估计了横截面网络,即使有重复的措施。除五项研究外,其他所有研究都在小组层面上调查了网络。这篇综述强调,当前的方法学实践限制了通过干预研究中的网络分析可以获得的信息。我们讨论了某些方法论和分析策略的优势和局限性,并提出需要进一步的工作才能在干预研究中充分利用网络方法的潜力。
    The network approach to psychopathology, which assesses associations between individual symptoms, has recently been applied to evaluate treatments for mental disorders. While various options for conducting network analyses in intervention research exist, an overview and an evaluation of the various approaches are currently missing. Therefore, we conducted a review on network analyses in intervention research. Studies were included if they constructed a symptom network, analyzed data that were collected before, during or after treatment of a mental disorder, and yielded information about the treatment effect. The 56 included studies were reviewed regarding their methodological and analytic strategies. About half of the studies based on data from randomized trials conducted a network intervention analysis, while the other half compared networks between treatment groups. The majority of studies estimated cross-sectional networks, even when repeated measures were available. All but five studies investigated networks on the group level. This review highlights that current methodological practices limit the information that can be gained through network analyses in intervention research. We discuss the strength and limitations of certain methodological and analytic strategies and propose that further work is needed to use the full potential of the network approach in intervention research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:癌症患者通常会出现多种躯体和心理症状。躯体和心理症状被认为是相互联系的,并且可能会相互加强。网络分析允许检查个体症状的相互关联性。这项范围审查的目的是检查有关癌症患者和癌症幸存者的躯体和心理症状之间的关联的当前知识状态。基于网络分析。
    方法:本范围审查遵循Arksey和O\'Malley的五阶段框架。文献检索是在5月份进行的,2023年在PubMed,APAPsycINFO,EmbaseCochrane中央,和CINAHL数据库。
    结果:纳入了32项研究,11使用纵向数据。17项研究报告了这种关联的强度:躯体和心理症状相关,尽管躯体症状和心理症状之间的关联更强。其他发现是在经历更严重症状的患者中,躯体症状和心理症状之间的关联更强;随着时间的推移,症状之间的关联保持相当稳定;不同的症状在网络中处于中心地位。疲劳是一半研究中最核心的。
    结论:尽管躯体症状和心理症状之间的关联更强,躯体和心理症状相关,特别是在经历更严重症状的患者中。疲劳是最主要的症状之一,桥接躯体和心理领域。这些发现以及基于网络分析的未来研究可能有助于理清癌症患者躯体和心理症状之间复杂的相互作用。
    OBJECTIVE: Patients with cancer often experience multiple somatic and psychological symptoms. Somatic and psychological symptoms are thought to be connected and may reinforce each other. Network analysis allows examination of the interconnectedness of individual symptoms. The aim of this scoping review was to examine the current state of knowledge about the associations between somatic and psychological symptoms in patients with cancer and cancer survivors, based on network analysis.
    METHODS: This scoping review followed the five-stage framework of Arksey and O\'Malley. The literature search was conducted in May, 2023 in PubMed, APA PsycINFO, Embase Cochrane central, and CINAHL databases.
    RESULTS: Thirty-two studies were included, with eleven using longitudinal data. Seventeen studies reported on the strength of the associations: somatic and psychological symptoms were associated, although associations among somatic as well as among psychological symptoms were stronger. Other findings were the association between somatic and psychological symptoms was stronger in patients experiencing more severe symptoms; associations between symptoms over time remained rather stable; and different symptoms were central in the networks, with fatigue being among the most central in half of the studies.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although the associations among somatic symptoms and among psychological symptoms were stronger, somatic and psychological symptoms were associated, especially in patients experiencing more severe symptoms. Fatigue was among the most central symptoms, bridging the somatic and psychological domain. These findings as well as future research based on network analysis may help to untangle the complex interplay of somatic and psychological symptoms in patients with cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肠道微生态网络是人体内一个复杂的微生物群落,在连接膳食营养和宿主生理学中起着关键作用。为了理解微生物之间的复杂关系及其在这个群落中的功能,网络分析已经成为一种强大的工具。通过将微生物及其相关组学数据之间的相互作用表示为网络,我们可以全面了解驱动人类肠道微生物群的生态机制。此外,基于网络的方法提供了对肠道微生物群的更直观的分析,简化对其复杂动力学和相互依存关系的研究。这篇综述全面概述了在肠道微生态背景下构建和分析网络的方法。我们讨论了各种类型的网络建模方法,包括共现网络,因果网络,动态网络,和多组学网络,并描述用于识别重要网络属性的分析技术。我们还强调了网络建模在这一领域的挑战和局限性,例如数据稀缺性和异质性,并为克服这些局限性提供了未来的研究方向。通过探索这些基于网络的方法,研究人员可以对肠道内微生物群落的复杂关系和功能角色获得有价值的见解,最终推进我们对肠道微生物群对人类健康影响的理解。
    The gut microecological network is a complex microbial community within the human body that plays a key role in linking dietary nutrition and host physiology. To understand the complex relationships among microbes and their functions within this community, network analysis has emerged as a powerful tool. By representing the interactions between microbes and their associated omics data as a network, we can gain a comprehensive understanding of the ecological mechanisms that drive the human gut microbiota. In addition, the network-based approach provides a more intuitive analysis of the gut microbiota, simplifying the study of its complex dynamics and interdependencies. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the methods used to construct and analyze networks in the context of gut microecological background. We discuss various types of network modeling approaches, including co-occurrence networks, causal networks, dynamic networks, and multi-omics networks, and describe the analytical techniques used to identify important network properties. We also highlight the challenges and limitations of network modeling in this area, such as data scarcity and heterogeneity, and provide future research directions to overcome these limitations. By exploring these network-based methods, researchers can gain valuable insights into the intricate relationships and functional roles of microbial communities within the gut, ultimately advancing our understanding of the gut microbiota\'s impact on human health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:猴痘(mpox)的全球传播显着增加,特别是在非流行国家。
    目的:我们旨在调查1970年至2023年与水痘相关的临床症状的变化,并探讨它们之间的相互关系。
    方法:在本系统综述和荟萃分析中,搜索了3个电子数据库,以查找1970年1月至2023年4月进行的英语同行评审研究,这些研究报告了确诊的水痘病例中的任何症状。我们将水痘流行病分为3个时期:1970-2002年(第1期,在非洲地区),2003-2021年(第二阶段,非洲以外的流行病),和2022-2023年(第3期,全球疫情)。按照PRISMA准则,我们进行了荟萃分析,以估计每种症状的合并患病率.使用网络分析对症状之间的相关性进行分析和可视化。
    结果:荟萃分析纳入了61项研究,这些研究报告了1期的720例患者中的21种症状,2期的1756例患者中的39种症状以及3期的12,277例患者中的37种症状。所有三个时期的患者中最常见的症状是皮疹(第1期:92.6%,95%CI78.2%-100%;第2期:100%,95%CI99.9%-100%;第3期:94.8%,95%CI90.9%-98.8%),其次是淋巴结病(第1期:59.8%,95%CI50.3%-69.2%;第二阶段:74.1%,95%CI64.2%-84.1%;第3期:61.1%,95%CI54.2%-68.1%)。发烧(99%,95%CI97%-100%),淋巴结肿大(80.5%,95%CI75.4%-85.0%),头痛(69.1%,95%CI4%-100%)是第1期的主要症状,第3期明显减少:37.9%,31.2%,和28.7%,分别。寒战/严寒(73.3%,95%CI60.9%-85.7%),疲劳(68.2%,95%CI51.6%-84.8%),和吞咽困难/吞咽困难(61.2%,95%CI10.5%-100%)在第2阶段出现为主要新症状,在第3阶段显着降低。与前2个时期相比,第3期的大多数其他症状保持不变或减少。在第2阶段,恶心/呕吐的相关性最高(有13种症状),与淋巴结肿大(r=0.908)和结膜炎(r=0.900)呈高度正相关。相比之下,皮疹和头痛是相关性最高的2个症状(分别为21个和21个症状,分别)在第3期与发烧呈高度正相关(r分别为0.918和0.789)。
    结论:水痘患者的症状表现变得更加多样化,导致它们的相关性增加。尽管皮疹的患病率保持稳定,其他症状有所减轻。有必要监视水痘的演变性质以及临床特征的相应变化。流行病国家可能会将注意力转移到症状和高协同风险之间的潜在关联上。
    背景:PROSPERO注册:CRD42023403282;http://tinyurl.com/yruuas5n。
    BACKGROUND: The worldwide spread of monkeypox (mpox) has witnessed a significant increase, particularly in nonendemic countries.
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the changing clinical symptoms associated with mpox from 1970 to 2023 and explore their interrelations.
    METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, 3 electronic databases were searched for English peer-reviewed studies conducted from January 1970 to April 2023 that reported any symptoms among confirmed mpox cases. We categorized the mpox epidemics into 3 periods: 1970-2002 (period 1, within the African region), 2003-2021(period 2, epidemics outside Africa), and 2022-2023 (period 3, worldwide outbreak). Following PRISMA guidelines, a meta-analysis was performed to estimate the pooled prevalence for each symptom. The correlation among symptoms was analyzed and visualized using network analysis.
    RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 61 studies that reported 21 symptoms in 720 patients from period 1, 39 symptoms in 1756 patients from period 2, and 37 symptoms in 12,277 patients from period 3. The most common symptom among patients from all 3 periods was rash (period 1: 92.6%, 95% CI 78.2%-100%; period 2: 100%, 95% CI 99.9%-100%; and period 3: 94.8%, 95% CI 90.9%-98.8%), followed by lymphadenopathy (period 1: 59.8%, 95% CI 50.3%-69.2%; period 2: 74.1%, 95% CI 64.2%-84.1%; and period 3: 61.1%, 95% CI 54.2%-68.1%). Fever (99%, 95% CI 97%-100%), enlarged lymph nodes (80.5%, 95% CI 75.4%-85.0%), and headache (69.1%, 95% CI 4%-100%) were the main symptoms in period 1, with a significant decrease in period 3: 37.9%, 31.2%, and 28.7%, respectively. Chills/rigors (73.3%, 95% CI 60.9%-85.7%), fatigue (68.2%, 95% CI 51.6%-84.8%), and dysphagia/swallowing difficulty (61.2%, 95% CI 10.5%-100%) emerged as primary new symptoms in period 2 and decreased significantly in period 3. Most other symptoms remained unchanged or decreased in period 3 compared to the former 2 periods. Nausea/vomiting had the highest degree of correlation (with 13 symptoms) and was highly positively correlated with lymphadenopathy (r=0.908) and conjunctivitis (r=0.900) in period 2. In contrast, rash and headache were 2 symptoms with the highest degree of correlation (with 21 and 21 symptoms, respectively) in period 3 and were highly positively correlated with fever (r=0.918 and 0.789, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: The manifestation of symptoms in patients with mpox has become more diverse, leading to an increase in their correlation. Although the prevalence of rash remains steady, other symptoms have decreased. It is necessary to surveil the evolving nature of mpox and the consequential changes in clinical characteristics. Epidemic countries may shift their focus on the potential association among symptoms and the high synergy risk.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO Registration: CRD42023403282; http://tinyurl.com/yruuas5n.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    心理障碍的网络理论认为,症状系统引起,或者与,其他症状的表现。迄今为止,关于症状网络的大量文献已经发表,尽管尚未对精神分裂症的症状网络进行系统评价,分裂情感障碍,和精神分裂症样(被诊断为精神分裂症的人;PDS)。本研究旨在比较过去21年中PDS症状网络出版物的统计数据,并确定文献中的一致性和差异。更具体地说,我们将专注于中心性统计。32项研究符合纳入标准。结果表明,认知,社会,职业功能是症状网络的核心。阳性症状,在许多不包括认知评估的研究中,妄想尤其重要.代表认知的节点在那些研究中最为重要。代表阴性症状的节点不像测量阳性症状的项目那样重要。一些包括情绪和影响测量的研究发现,测量抑郁的项目或分量表是网络中的中心节点。认知,社会,职业功能似乎是精神分裂症的核心症状,因为它们在网络中更重要,与评估阳性症状的变量相比。尽管研究设计存在异质性,但这似乎是一致的。
    The network theory of psychological disorders posits that systems of symptoms cause, or are associated with, the expression of other symptoms. Substantial literature on symptom networks has been published to date, although no systematic review has been conducted exclusively on symptom networks of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and schizophreniform (people diagnosed with schizophrenia; PDS). This study aims to compare statistics of the symptom network publications on PDS in the last 21 years and identify congruences and discrepancies in the literature. More specifically, we will focus on centrality statistics. Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. The results suggest that cognition, and social, and occupational functioning are central to the network of symptoms. Positive symptoms, particularly delusions were central among participants in many studies that did not include cognitive assessment. Nodes representing cognition were most central in those studies that did. Nodes representing negative symptoms were not as central as items measuring positive symptoms. Some studies that included measures of mood and affect found items or subscales measuring depression were central nodes in the networks. Cognition, and social, and occupational functioning appear to be core symptoms of schizophrenia as they are more central in the networks, compared to variables assessing positive symptoms. This seems consistent despite heterogeneity in the design of the studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:抗菌素耐药性(AMR)是由近端驱动因素的复杂相互作用驱动的多因素挑战,例如抗生素的过度使用和滥用以及传染病的高负担,和远端因素,涵盖更广泛的社会条件,如贫困,卫生条件不足,和医疗保健系统的缺陷。然而,区分近端和远端驱动器仍然是一个概念上的挑战。
    目的:我们进行了一项综述,旨在系统地绘制有关AMR近端和远端驱动因素的当前证据,并研究它们之间的关系。
    方法:分析了47篇综述,并保留了独特的因果关系,构建了AMR的因果关系网络。为了区分近端和远端驱动器,我们计算了一个“驾驶员距离指数(Di)”,定义为驾驶员在其通往AMR的因果途径中的平均相对位置。
    结果:文献的主要重点仍然是近端驱动因素,关于远端驱动因素的现有证据支离破碎。网络分析显示,AMR的近端驱动因素与耐药性传播(Di=0.49,SD=0.14)和抗生素使用(Di=0.58,SD=0.2)的风险相关。与抗生素发现挑战相关的中间驱动因素恶化(Di=0.62,SD=0.07),感染预防(Di=0.67,SD=0.14)和监测(Di=0.69,SD=0.16)。远端驱动器,比如生活条件,获得卫生基础设施,人口增长和城市化,政策执行方面的差距是发展和治理挑战,充当系统中解决AMR的深层杠杆点。
    结论:旨在解决多种慢性AMR挑战的综合AMR策略必须利用上游干预的机会,专门针对远端驱动因素。
    BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a multifactorial challenge driven by a complex interplay of proximal drivers, such as the overuse and misuse of antimicrobials and the high burden of infectious diseases, and distal factors, encompassing broader societal conditions such as poverty, inadequate sanitation, and healthcare system deficiencies. However, distinguishing between proximal and distal drivers remains a conceptual challenge.
    OBJECTIVE: We conducted an umbrella review, aiming to systematically map current evidence about proximal and distal drivers of AMR and to investigate their relationships.
    METHODS: Forty-seven reviews were analysed, and unique causal links were retained to construct a causality network of AMR. To distinguish between proximal and distal drivers, we calculated a \'driver distalness index (Di)\', defined as an average relative position of a driver in its causal pathways to AMR.
    RESULTS: The primary emphasis of the literature remained on proximal drivers, with fragmented existing evidence about distal drivers. The network analysis showed that proximal drivers of AMR are associated with risks of resistance transmission (Di = 0.49, SD = 0.14) and antibiotic use (Di = 0.58, SD = 0.2), which are worsened by intermediate drivers linked with challenges of antibiotic discovery (Di = 0.62, SD = 0.07), infection prevention (Di = 0.67, SD = 0.14) and surveillance (Di = 0.69, SD = 0.16). Distal drivers, such as living conditions, access to sanitation infrastructure, population growth and urbanisation, and gaps in policy implementation were development and governance challenges, acting as deep leverage points in the system in addressing AMR.
    CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive AMR strategies aiming to address multiple chronic AMR challenges must take advantage of opportunities for upstream interventions that specifically address distal drivers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    中药(TCM)的治疗效果涉及多种成分和靶标之间的复杂相互作用。目前,计算方法在模拟中药的各种药理过程中起着举足轻重的作用。网络分析在中医研究中的应用为通过生物网络分析的视角解释草药或配方作用的药理机制提供了有效的手段。随着网络分析的发展,计算科学围绕中药研究的核心链:配方-草药-成分-靶标-表型-ZHENG,促进了广泛的中医相关数据的积累和组织以及相关数据库的建立。尽管如此,近年来,这些数据库的开发和应用出现了同质化的趋势。计算技术的进步,包括深度学习和基础模型,推动复杂系统的探索和建模进入了一个新阶段,可能预示着一个新时代。本审查旨在深入研究与六个关键实体有关的数据库取得的进展:公式,Herb,组件,目标,表型,和郑。系统地讨论了各种数据库类型之间的共性和差异。此外,该综述提出了中药计算药理学的研究瓶颈问题,并展望了中药领域内计算研究的未来方向。
    The therapeutic effects of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) involve intricate interactions among multiple components and targets. Currently, computational approaches play a pivotal role in simulating various pharmacological processes of TCM. The application of network analysis in TCM research has provided an effective means to explain the pharmacological mechanisms underlying the actions of herbs or formulas through the lens of biological network analysis. Along with the advances of network analysis, computational science has coalesced around the core chain of TCM research: formula-herb-component-target-phenotype-ZHENG, facilitating the accumulation and organization of the extensive TCM-related data and the establishment of relevant databases. Nonetheless, recent years have witnessed a tendency toward homogeneity in the development and application of these databases. Advancements in computational technologies, including deep learning and foundation model, have propelled the exploration and modeling of intricate systems into a new phase, potentially heralding a new era. This review aims to delves into the progress made in databases related to six key entities: formula, herb, component, target, phenotype, and ZHENG. Systematically discussions on the commonalities and disparities among various database types were presented. In addition, the review raised the issue of research bottleneck in TCM computational pharmacology and envisions the forthcoming directions of computational research within the realm of TCM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    随着技术的进步和AI利用率的提高,人类工作的性质正在演变,要求个人不仅与其他人合作,还与人工智能技术合作,以实现复杂的目标。这需要从技术驱动的问题转向以人为本的研究和设计议程,将人员和不断发展的团队置于关注的中心。需要一种社会技术方法来将AI视为不仅仅是一种技术工具,但作为团队成员,导致人类人工智能团队(HAIT)的出现。在这种新的工作形式中,人类和人工智能协同结合各自的能力来实现共同的目标。
    我们工作的目的是揭示HAIT的当前研究流程,并通过文献计量网络分析得出对该结构的统一理解,从社会技术角度对定义进行范围审查和综合。此外,提取文献中检查的前因和结果,以指导该领域的未来研究。
    通过网络分析,确定了五个对HAIT有不同研究重点的集群。这些聚类围绕(1)人类和(2)任务相关变量,(3)人工智能可解释性,(4)人工智能驱动的机器人系统,(5)人工智能性能对人类感知的影响。尽管有这些不同的研究重点,当前的文学主体主要是由以技术为中心和工程的观点驱动的,迄今没有一致的HAIT定义或术语。
    我们提出了一个统一的定义,结合了以人为本和团队导向的观点,并总结了未来关于HAIT的研究中仍然需要的内容。因此,这项工作有助于支持前沿研究主题的思想,该主题是人类使用AI系统进行工作的理论和概念基础。
    UNASSIGNED: With the advancement of technology and the increasing utilization of AI, the nature of human work is evolving, requiring individuals to collaborate not only with other humans but also with AI technologies to accomplish complex goals. This requires a shift in perspective from technology-driven questions to a human-centered research and design agenda putting people and evolving teams in the center of attention. A socio-technical approach is needed to view AI as more than just a technological tool, but as a team member, leading to the emergence of human-AI teaming (HAIT). In this new form of work, humans and AI synergistically combine their respective capabilities to accomplish shared goals.
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of our work is to uncover current research streams on HAIT and derive a unified understanding of the construct through a bibliometric network analysis, a scoping review and synthetization of a definition from a socio-technical point of view. In addition, antecedents and outcomes examined in the literature are extracted to guide future research in this field.
    UNASSIGNED: Through network analysis, five clusters with different research focuses on HAIT were identified. These clusters revolve around (1) human and (2) task-dependent variables, (3) AI explainability, (4) AI-driven robotic systems, and (5) the effects of AI performance on human perception. Despite these diverse research focuses, the current body of literature is predominantly driven by a technology-centric and engineering perspective, with no consistent definition or terminology of HAIT emerging to date.
    UNASSIGNED: We propose a unifying definition combining a human-centered and team-oriented perspective as well as summarize what is still needed in future research regarding HAIT. Thus, this work contributes to support the idea of the Frontiers Research Topic of a theoretical and conceptual basis for human work with AI systems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    空间异质性是地理学领域的一个基础性研究课题,而Geodetector是研究这种现象的广泛使用的工具。要了解围绕Geodetector的研究进展和知识扩散趋势,我们首次构建了一个作者进化树结构,融合了其在WebofScience数据库中的847个核心引文和Geotree模型。我们的文献统计结果表明,自2010年在《生态指标》杂志上发表以来,Geodetector已经引起了来自48个国家的3123位作者的关注,他们已经发表了涉及十个重要主题的核心论文。这些研究大多集中在空间异质性及其影响因素上。我们对Geotree数据的分析显示,大型团队中学者的发表率与其学术活动之间存在显着相关性。我们对知识扩散链的分析表明,只有2%的作者总数贡献了超过20%的科学合作和知识扩散,他们被认为是地球探测器研究的专家。为今后的学者提供全面的参考,我们总结了引用的国家,五篇经典文章,主要科学领域,和地质探测器研究的核心团队。
    Spatial heterogeneity is a fundamental research topic in the field of geography, and Geodetector is a widely used tool for studying this phenomenon. To understand the research advancements and knowledge diffusion trends surrounding Geodetector, we constructed an author evolutionary tree structure fusing its 847 core citations in the Web of Science database and Geotree model for the first time. The results of our literature statistics indicated that Geodetector has garnered the attention of 3123 authors from 48 countries since its publication in the Ecological Indicators journal in 2010, who have published core papers concerning ten important topics. The majority of these studies focused on spatial heterogeneity and its influencing factors. Our analysis of Geotree data revealed a significant correlation between the publication rate of scholars in large teams and their academic activities. Our analysis of the knowledge diffusion chain shown that only 2% of the total number of authors have contributed to over 20% of the scientific collaborations and knowledge diffusion, and they were recognized as experts in Geodetector research. To provide a comprehensive reference for future scholars, we have summarized the citing countries, five classical articles, main scientific domains, and core teams of Geodetector research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究分析了最相关的作者,来源,关键词的同现,专题地图,以及关于塞马鲁肽的最新和引用最多的研究论文的趋势主题,胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)。此外,总结了被引用最多的25篇论文的内容。2023年8月14日,在Scopus数据库中使用术语semaglutide进行的在线电子搜索中,总共出现了2995个结果。选择了最近发表的500篇文章和引用最多的200篇文献进行文献计量分析。网络分析可视化是在VOSviewer软件(版本1.6.18)的帮助下进行的(科学技术研究中心,莱顿,荷兰)和Biblioshiny(这是一个为bibliometrix提供网络接口的闪亮应用程序)(经济和统计系,那不勒斯费德里科第二大学,那不勒斯,意大利)。排除重复项和社论后,数据分析发现,2461位作者在279种期刊上发表了495篇最新文献,被引用最多的200篇论文由1241位作者以103个来源发表。2014年至2022年研究论文数量呈增长趋势,2022年达到峰值。在最近的semaglutide研究论文中,最相关的作者是Chen和Zhang。有关semaglutide的被引用最多的研究论文的相关作者是Lingvay和Khunti。在最新和引用最多的研究论文中使用的最常见的关键词是semaglutide,肥胖,2型糖尿病,胰高血糖素样肽-1,胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂,抗糖尿病药,利拉鲁肽,心血管疾病(CVD)。最相关的来源是“糖尿病,肥胖与代谢”,用于司马鲁肽的研究论文。趋势主题分析表明,2020年至2022年之间关于司马鲁肽的大部分研究都是针对非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病进行的。被引用最多的论文提供了使用司马鲁肽管理2型糖尿病(T2DM)的基本见解,肥胖,和相关条件,以及它们的潜在好处,副作用,以及可能的作用机制。该分析突出表明,司马鲁肽的药理作用超出了其作为血糖调节剂的作用。
    This study analyzes the most relevant authors, sources, cooccurrence of keywords, thematic map, and trend topics of the most recent and most cited research papers on semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA). Also, the content of the 25 most cited papers is summarized. A total of 2995 results appeared in an online electronic search performed on 14 August 2023 in the Scopus database using the term semaglutide. The most recently published 500 articles and most cited 200 documents were selected for bibliometric analysis. Network analysis visualization was conducted with the help of the VOSviewer software (version 1.6.18) (Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden, the Netherlands) and Biblioshiny (it is a shiny application providing a web interface for bibliometrix) (Department of Economics and Statistics, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy). After excluding duplicates and editorials, the data analysis found that 495 most recent documents were published in 279 journals by 2461 authors, and 200 most cited papers were published in 103 sources by 1241 authors. There is an increasing trend in the number of research papers from 2014 to 2022, with a peak in 2022. The most relevant authors in the most recent semaglutide research papers are Chen and Zhang. The pertinent authors of the most cited research papers on semaglutide are Lingvay and Khunti. The most common keywords used in the most recent and most cited research papers are semaglutide, obesity, diabetes mellitus type 2, glucagon-like peptide-1, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, antidiabetic agent, liraglutide, and cardiovascular disease (CVD). The most relevant source is \"Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism\" for the research papers on semaglutide. Trend topic analysis suggests that most of the research between 2020 and 2022 on semaglutide was done on non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The most cited papers provide essential insights into using semaglutide in managing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), obesity, and related conditions, along with their potential benefits, side effects, and possible mechanisms of action. This analysis highlights that the pharmacological effects of semaglutide extend beyond its role as a glycemic regulator.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号