nanobacteria

纳米细菌
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肾结石疾病是医学上已知的最古老的疾病之一;然而,结石形成和发展的机制仍不清楚。在过去的几十年里,在肾结石的外科治疗中已经开发和使用了多种理论和策略,由于最近的技术进步。作者和其他研究小组的观察表明,肾结石形成有五种完全不同的主要机制。尿液过饱和和结晶是肾内晶体沉淀的驱动力。兰德尔的斑块被认为是草酸钙结石形成的起源。性激素可能是肾结石发展的关键参与者,因此可能是抑制肾结石形成的新药的潜在靶标。微生物组,包括产生脲酶的细菌,纳米细菌和肠道微生物群,可能会对泌尿系统健康产生深远的影响,积极和消极的,由于其代谢输出和其他贡献。最后,免疫反应,特别是巨噬细胞分化,在肾脏草酸钙晶体形成中起着至关重要的作用。在本研究中,回顾了有关肾结石形成的这五个方面的最新知识。这些知识可用于探索新颖的研究机会,并提高泌尿科医师对肾结石的发生和发展的理解。肾病学家和初级保健。
    Kidney stone disease is one of the oldest diseases known to medicine; however, the mechanisms of stone formation and development remain largely unclear. Over the past decades, a variety of theories and strategies have been developed and utilized in the surgical management of kidney stones, as a result of recent technological advances. Observations from the authors and other research groups suggest that there are five entirely different main mechanisms for kidney stone formation. Urinary supersaturation and crystallization are the driving force for intrarenal crystal precipitation. Randall\'s plaques are recognized as the origin of calcium oxalate stone formation. Sex hormones may be key players in the development of nephrolithiasis and may thus be potential targets for new drugs to suppress kidney stone formation. The microbiome, including urease‑producing bacteria, nanobacteria and intestinal microbiota, is likely to have a profound effect on urological health, both positive and negative, owing to its metabolic output and other contributions. Lastly, the immune response, and particularly macrophage differentiation, play crucial roles in renal calcium oxalate crystal formation. In the present study, the current knowledge for each of these five aspects of kidney stone formation is reviewed. This knowledge may be used to explore novel research opportunities and improve the understanding of the initiation and development of kidney stones for urologists, nephrologists and primary care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:1998年,Kajander和Ciftçioñlu描述了未知的细胞培养污染物。这些污染物最初被称为纳米细菌,后来被称为钙化纳米颗粒(CNP)。它们的确切性质尚不清楚且有争议。CNP具有独特和不寻常的特征,这就排除了将它们置于任何已建立的生命进化分支中的可能性。
    目的:本系统评价的目的是评估1998年以来关于CNPs的公开数据,特别是与牙科疾病有关的数据。
    方法:进行了国家医学图书馆(PubMed)和摄影仪器工程师协会(SPIE)的电子和手动搜索。使用纳米细菌和钙化纳米颗粒作为关键词。搜索产生了135篇全长论文。根据审查标准对标题和摘要进行进一步筛选,得出了43篇符合研究目标的论文。
    结论:评论显示纳米细菌的存在仍然存在争议。一些研究人员描述了CNPs可能参与牙髓和唾液腺钙化,以及CNP在治疗破裂和/或侵蚀牙齿中的可能治疗用途。
    BACKGROUND: Unknown cell-culture contaminants were described by Kajander and Ciftçioğlu in 1998. These contaminants were called nanobacteria initially and later calcifying nanoparticles (CNPs). Their exact nature is unclear and controversial. CNPs have unique and unusual characteristics, which preclude placing them into any established evolutionary branch of life.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to assess published data concerning CNPs since 1998 in general and in relation to dental diseases in particular.
    METHODS: The National Library of Medicine (PubMed) and Society of Photographic Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) electronic and manual searches were conducted. Nanobacteria and calcifying nanoparticles were used as keywords. The search yielded 135 full-length papers. Further screening of the titles and abstracts that followed the review criteria resulted in 43 papers that met the study aim.
    CONCLUSIONS: The review showed that the existence of nanobacteria is still controversial. Some investigators have described a possible involvement of CNPs in pulpal and salivary gland calcifications, as well as the possible therapeutic use of CNPs in the treatment of cracked and/or eroded teeth.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号