This comprehensive review explores the role of deep learning (DL) in glioma segmentation using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. The study surveys advanced techniques such as multiparametric MRI for capturing the complex nature of gliomas. It delves into the integration of DL with MRI, focusing on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and their remarkable capabilities in tumor segmentation. Clinical applications of DL-based segmentation are highlighted, including treatment planning, monitoring treatment response, and distinguishing between tumor progression and pseudo-progression. Furthermore, the review examines the evolution of DL-based segmentation studies, from early CNN models to recent advancements such as attention mechanisms and transformer models. Challenges in data quality, gradient vanishing, and model interpretability are discussed. The review concludes with insights into future research directions, emphasizing the importance of addressing tumor heterogeneity, integrating genomic data, and ensuring responsible deployment of DL-driven healthcare technologies. EVIDENCE LEVEL: N/A TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

The Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) is a standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diagnostic method for muscle-invasive bladder cancer that was published in 2018. Several studies have demonstrated that VI-RADS has high diagnostic power and reproducibility. However, reading VI-RADS requires a certain amount of expertise, and radiologists need to be aware of the various pitfalls. MRI of the bladder includes T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging (DCEI). T2WI is excellent for understanding anatomy. DWI and DCEI show high contrast between the tumor and normal anatomical structures and are suitable for staging local tumors. Bladder tumors are classified into five categories according to their size and morphology and their positional relationship to the bladder wall based on the VI-RADS diagnostic criteria. If the T2WI, DWI, and DCEI categories are the same, the category is the VI-RADS category. If the categories do not match, the DWI category is the VI-RADS category. If image quality of DWI is not evaluable, the DCEI category is the final category. In many cases, DWI is dominant, but this does not mean that T2WI and DCEI can be omitted from the reading of the bladder. In this educational review, typical and atypical teaching cases are demonstrated, and how to resolve misdiagnosis and the limitations of VI-RADS are discussed. The most important aspect of VI-RADS reading is to practice multiparametric reading with a solid understanding of the characteristics and role of each sequence and an awareness of the various pitfalls.

Bladder cancer (BC), predominantly comprising urothelial carcinomas (UCs), ranks as the tenth most common cancer worldwide. UCs with variant histology (variant UC), including squamous differentiation, glandular differentiation, plasmacytoid variant, micropapillary variant, sarcomatoid variant, and nested variant, accounting for 5-10% of cases, exhibit more aggressive and advanced tumor characteristics compared to pure UC. The Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS), established in 2018, provides guidelines for the preoperative evaluation of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). This technique integrates T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to distinguish MIBC from non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). VI-RADS has demonstrated high diagnostic performance in differentiating these two categories for pure UC. However, its accuracy in detecting muscle invasion in variant UCs is currently under investigation. These variant UCs are associated with a higher likelihood of disease recurrence and require precise preoperative assessment and immediate surgical intervention. This review highlights the potential value of mpMRI for different variant UCs and explores the clinical implications and prospects of VI-RADS in managing these patients, emphasizing the need for careful interpretation of mpMRI examinations including DCE-MRI, particularly given the heterogeneity and aggressive nature of variant UCs. Additionally, the review addresses the fundamental MRI reading procedures, discusses potential causes of diagnostic errors, and considers future directions in the use of artificial intelligence and radiomics to further optimize the bladder MRI protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform a head-to-head comparison of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and the combination of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET plus MRI (PSMA + MRI) for detecting intraprostatic clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).
METHODS: Relevant databases were searched through November 2023. Only studies directly comparing mpMRI and PSMA + MRI (PET/MRI or PET/CT + mpMRI) were included. A meta-analysis with a random-effects model was used to estimate pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve for each approach.
RESULTS: A total of 19 studies were included. On a patient-level analysis, PSMA + MRI had higher sensitivity (9 studies) than mpMRI for csPCa detection (96% [95% confidence interval (CI): 92%, 98%] vs 89% [95% CI: 81%, 94%]; P = 0.04). The patient-level specificity (4 studies) of PSMA + MRI was 55% (95% CI: 31%-76%) compared with 50% (95% CI: 44%-57%) of mpMRI ( P = 0.67). Region-level sensitivity (10 studies) was 85% (95% CI: 74%-92%) for PSMA + MRI and 71% (95% CI: 58%-82%) for mpMRI ( P = 0.09), whereas specificity (4 studies) was 87% (95% CI: 76%-94%) and 90% (95% CI: 82%-95%), respectively ( P = 0.59). Lesion-level sensitivity and specificity were similar between modalities with pooled data from less than 4 studies.
CONCLUSIONS: PSMA + MRI had superior pooled sensitivity and similar specificity for the detection of csPCa compared with mpMRI in this meta-analysis of head-to-head studies.

OBJECTIVE: Our main goal of this meta-analytical analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) against multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the context of identifying biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer (PCa).
METHODS: A thorough search covering articles published until March 2023 was carried out across major databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Studies examining the direct comparison of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI in patients with PCa suffering biochemical recurrence were included in the inclusion criteria. Using the renowned Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Performance Studies-2 technique, each study\'s methodological rigor was assessed.
RESULTS: We analyzed data from six eligible studies involving 290 patients in total. The combined data showed that for PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI, respectively, the pooled overall detection rates for recurrent PCa after definitive treatment were 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45-0.89) and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.44-0.91). The detection rates for local recurrence were specifically 0.52 (95% CI: 0.39-0.65) and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.31-0.89), while they were 0.50 (95% CI: 0.26-0.74) and 0.32 (95% CI: 0.18-0.48) for lymph node metastasis. Notably, there was no discernible difference between the two imaging modalities in terms of the overall detection rate (P = 0.95). The detection rates for local recurrence and lymph node metastasis did not differ statistically significantly (P = 0.55, 0.23).
CONCLUSIONS: The performance of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI in identifying biochemical recurrence in PCa appears to be comparable. However, the meta-analysis\' findings came from research with modest sample sizes. In this context, more extensive research should be conducted in the future.

OBJECTIVE: We to systematically evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI radiomics in detecting extracapsular extension (EPE) of prostate cancer (PCa).
METHODS: A literature search of online databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar online scientific publication databases was performed to identify studies published up to July 2023. The summary estimates were pooled with the hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristic (HSROC) model. This study was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement, the quality of included studies was assessed with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool (QUADAS-2) and the radiomics quality score (RQS). Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed to explore the impact of varying clinical settings.
RESULTS: A total of ten studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.77 (95% CI 0.68-0.84, I2 = 83.5%) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.67-0.82, I2 = 83.5%), respectively, with an area under the HSROC curve of 0.88 (95% CI 0.85-0.91). Study quality was not high while assessing with the RQS. Substantial heterogeneity was observed between studies; however, meta-regression analysis did not reveal any significant contributing factors.
CONCLUSIONS: MRI radiomics demonstrated moderate sensitivity and specificity, offering similar diagnostic performance with previous risk stratifications and models that primarily based on radiologists\' subjective experience. However, all studies included were retrospective, thus the performance of radiomics needs to validate in prospective, multicenter studies.

OBJECTIVE: Radiation therapy is used frequently for patients with prostate cancer. Dose escalation to intraprostatic lesions (IPLs) has been shown to improve oncologic outcomes, without increasing toxicity. Both multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and PSMA PET can be used to identify IPLs.
METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to determine the ability of mpMRI, PSMA PET and their combination to detect IPLs prior to radical prostatectomy (RP) as correlated with the histology. Trials included patients that had mpMRI, PSMA PET, or both, prior to RP. The quality of the histopathological-radiological co-registration was assessed as high or low for each study. Recorded outcomes include sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). A meta-analysis was conducted using a bivariate model to determine the pooled sensitivity and specificity for each imaging modality. This systematic review was registered through PROSPERO (CRD42023389092).
RESULTS: Altogether, 42 studies were included in the systematic review. Of these, 20 could be included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity (95 % CI), specificity (95 % CI) and AUROC for mpMRI (n = 13 studies) were 64.7 % (50.2 % - 76.9 %), 86.4 % (79.7 % - 91.1 %), and 0.852; the pooled outcomes for PSMA PET (n = 12) were 75.7 % (64.0 % - 84.5 %), 87.1 % (80.2 % - 91.9 %), and 0.889; for their combination (n = 5), the pooled outcomes were 70.3 % (64.1 % - 75.9 %), 81.9 % (71.9 % - 88.8 %), and 0.796. When reviewing studies with a high-quality histopathological-radiological co-registration, IPL delineation recommendations varied by study and the imaging modality used.
CONCLUSIONS: All of mpMRI, PSMA PET or their combination were found to have very good diagnostic outcomes for detecting IPLs. Recommendations for delineating IPLs varied based on the imaging modalities used and between research groups. Consensus guidelines for IPL delineation would help with creating consistency for focal boost radiation treatments in future studies.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to assess and summarize the clinical values of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) parameter changes as early biomarkers of tumor responses following radiation therapy (RT) in patients with spinal metastases.
METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on five electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Cochrane, and Embase. Studies were included if they mentioned DCE-MRI parameter changes before and after RT in patients with spinal metastases with a correlation to tumor responses based on clinical and imaging criteria. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 was used to assess study quality.
RESULTS: This systematic review included seven studies involving 107 patients. All seven studies evaluated the transfer constant (Ktrans), six studies evaluated the plasma volume fraction (Vp), three studies evaluated the extravascular extracellular space volume fraction, and two studies evaluated the rate constant. There were variations in the type of primary cancer, RT techniques used, post-treatment scan time, and median follow-up time. Despite the variations, however, the collected evidence generally suggested that significant differences could be detected in DCE-MRI parameters between before and after RT, which might reflect treatment success or failures in long-term follow-up. Responders showed higher reduction and lower values of Ktrans and Vp after RT. DCE-MRI parameters showed changes and detectable recurrences significantly earlier (up to 6 months) than conventional MRI with favorable diagnostic values.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this systematic review suggested that DCE-MRI parameter changes in patients with spinal metastases could be a promising tool for treatment-response assessment following RT. Lower values and higher reduction of Ktrans and Vp after treatment demonstrated good prediction of local control. Compared to conventional MRI, DCE-MRI showed more rapid changes and earlier prediction of treatment failure.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two diagnostic methods, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI, in detecting primary prostate cancer without limitations on the Gleason score.
METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature review, searching databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until June 2023. Our objective was to identify studies that compared the efficacy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI in detecting primary prostate cancer. To determine heterogeneity, the I2 statistic was used. Meta-regression analysis and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis were conducted to identify potential sources of heterogeneity.
RESULTS: Initially, 1286 publications were found, but after careful evaluation, only 16 studies involving 1227 patients were analyzed thoroughly. The results showed that the 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT method had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.87 (95 % CI: 0.80-0.92) and 0.80 (95 % CI: 0.69-0.89), respectively, for diagnosing prostatic cancer. Similarly, the values for mpMRI were determined as 0.84 (95 % CI: 0.75-0.92) and 0.74 (95 % CI: 0.61-0.86), respectively. There were no significant differences in diagnostic effectiveness observed when comparing two primary prostate cancer methodologies (pooled sensitivity P = 0.62, pooled specificity P = 0.50). Despite this, the funnel plots showed symmetry and the Egger test results (P values > 0.05) suggested there was no publication bias.
CONCLUSIONS: After an extensive meta-analysis, it was found that both 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI demonstrate similar diagnostic effectiveness in detecting primary prostate cancer. Future larger prospective studies are warranted to investigate this issue further.

The role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in assessing penile cancer is not well defined. However, this modality may be successfully applied for preoperative staging and patient selection; postoperative local and regional surveillance; and assessments of treatment response after oncological therapies. Previous studies have been mostly limited to a few small series evaluating the accuracy of MRI for the preoperative staging of penile cancer. This review discusses the principles of non-erectile mpMRI, including functional techniques and their applications in evaluating the male genital region, along with clinical protocols and technical considerations. The latest clinical classifications and guidelines are reviewed, focusing on imaging recommendations and discussing potential gaps and disadvantages. The development of functional MRI techniques and the extraction of quantitative parameters from these sequences enables the noninvasive assessment of phenotypic and genotypic tumor characteristics. The applications of advanced techniques in penile MRI are yet to be defined. There is a need for prospective trials and feasible multicenter trials due to the rarity of the disease, highlighting the importance of minimum technical requirements for MRI protocols, particularly image resolution, and finally determining the role of mpMRI in the assessment of penile cancer.