mixed states

混合状态
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    几十年来,关于混合国家(MS)的争论一直很激烈。然而,从nosographic来看,有几点仍然存在争议,诊断,和治疗观点。多年来出现的不同观点已经变成了一个大,但是异质的,文学体。本综述旨在总结MS的证据,特别关注混合性抑郁症(MxD),以便为临床医生提供指导,并鼓励该主题未来研究的发展。首先,我们回顾MS的历史,专注于他们几个世纪以来的不同解释和分类。在本节中,我们还报告了传统鼻图的替代模型。第二,我们描述了MxD的主要临床特征,并列出了最可靠的评估工具.最后,我们总结了MxD治疗的主要国际指南提供的建议.我们的评论强调,MS和MxD的不同概念化,临床图片的可变性,对药物治疗的异质性反应使MxD成为临床医生的真正挑战。需要进一步的研究来更好地表征MxD患者的表型,以帮助临床医生管理这种微妙的疾病。
    The debate on mixed states (MS) has been intense for decades. However, several points remain controversial from a nosographic, diagnostic, and therapeutic point of view. The different perspectives that have emerged over the years have turned into a large, but heterogeneous, literature body. The present review aims to summarize the evidence on MS, with a particular focus on mixed depression (MxD), in order to provide a guide for clinicians and encourage the development of future research on the topic. First, we review the history of MS, focusing on their different interpretations and categorizations over the centuries. In this section, we also report alternative models to traditional nosography. Second, we describe the main clinical features of MxD and list the most reliable assessment tools. Finally, we summarize the recommendations provided by the main international guidelines for the treatment of MxD. Our review highlights that the different conceptualizations of MS and MxD, the variability of clinical pictures, and the heterogeneous response to pharmacological treatment make MxD a real challenge for clinicians. Further studies are needed to better characterize the phenotypes of patients with MxD to help clinicians in the management of this delicate condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    This systematic review provided a critical synthesis and a comprehensive overview of guidelines on the treatment of mixed states.
    The MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE databases were systematically searched from inception to March 21st, 2018. International guidelines covering the treatment of mixed episodes, manic/hypomanic, or depressive episodes with mixed features were considered for inclusion. A methodological quality assessment was conducted with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation-AGREE II.
    The final selection yielded six articles. Despite their heterogeneity, all guidelines agreed in interrupting an antidepressant monotherapy or adding mood-stabilizing medications. Olanzapine seemed to have the best evidence for acute mixed hypo/manic/depressive states and maintenance treatment. Aripiprazole and paliperidone were possible alternatives for acute hypo/manic mixed states. Lurasidone and ziprasidone were useful in acute mixed depression. Valproate was recommended for the prevention of new mixed episodes while lithium and quetiapine in preventing affective episodes of all polarities. Clozapine and electroconvulsive therapy were effective in refractory mixed episodes. The AGREE II overall assessment rate ranged between 42% and 92%, indicating different quality level of included guidelines.
    The unmet needs for the mixed symptoms treatment were associated with diagnostic issues and limitations of previous research, particularly for maintenance treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    DSM-5包含了混合状态的广泛概念,并使用“具有混合特征”说明符捕获了≥3种相反极性的非重叠症状,该说明符适用于躁狂/轻躁狂和重度抑郁发作。混合状态的药物治疗具有挑战性,因为必须同时治疗躁狂/轻度躁狂和抑郁症状。用于治疗躁狂症状和抗抑郁药的高效抗精神病药物可能会使相反极性的症状恶化。这篇综述旨在为混合状态的药物治疗提供现有证据的综合,重点是混合躁狂/轻躁狂。进行了PubMed搜索,以寻找至少中等大小的随机对照试验(RCT)。包括一个安慰剂组,并包含有关混合发作或躁狂/轻躁狂伴显著抑郁症状的成年患者的急性期和维持治疗的信息。大多数研究是事后亚组,并对RCT对急性躁狂和双相I型障碍混合发作的数据进行汇总分析;只有两项前瞻性检查了混合躁狂/轻躁狂的疗效。阿立哌唑,阿塞那平,卡马西平,奥氮平,和齐拉西酮在急性期治疗中显示出最强的疗效证据.喹硫平和双丙戊酸钠也有效。在严重的情况下,可以考虑使用这些非典型抗精神病药和情绪稳定剂进行联合治疗。奥氮平和喹硫平(单独或与锂/双丙戊酸钠联合使用)在维持治疗中显示出最强的疗效证据。鉴于锂和拉莫三嗪对自杀和抑郁复发的预防作用,它们可能是有益的。需要进一步的前瞻性研究,主要集中在混合状态。
    The DSM-5 incorporates a broad concept of mixed states and captured ≥3 nonoverlapping symptoms of the opposite polarity using a \"with mixed features\" specifier to be applied to manic/hypomanic and major depressive episodes. Pharmacotherapy of mixed states is challenging because of the necessity to treat both manic/hypomanic and depressive symptoms concurrently. High-potency antipsychotics used to treat manic symptoms and antidepressants can potentially deteriorate symptoms of the opposite polarity. This review aimed to provide a synthesis of the current evidence for pharmacotherapy of mixed states with an emphasis on mixed mania/hypomania. A PubMed search was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were at least moderately sized, included a placebo arm, and contained information on acute-phase and maintenance treatments of adult patients with mixed episodes or mania/hypomania with significant depressive symptoms. Most studies were post-hoc subgroup and pooled analyses of the data from RCTs for acute manic and mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder; only two prospectively examined efficacy for mixed mania/hypomania specifically. Aripiprazole, asenapine, carbamazepine, olanzapine, and ziprasidone showed the strongest evidence of efficacy in acute-phase treatment. Quetiapine and divalproex/valproate were also efficacious. Combination therapies with these atypical antipsychotics and mood stabilizers can be considered in severe cases. Olanzapine and quetiapine (alone or in combination with lithium/divalproex) showed the strongest evidence of efficacy in maintenance treatment. Lithium and lamotrigine may be beneficial given their preventive effects on suicide and depressive relapse. Further prospective studies primarily focusing on mixed states are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号