本数据简要文章中提供的数据提供了有关公众参与和建立共识的概念和经验方法的科学文献的见解。它由从Scopus搜索引擎检索到的具有“公众参与”功能的文章组成,“共识”,和标题中的“值和属性”,abstract,作者关键词。书目上的信息被记录下来,即标题,作者(S),出版年份,源标题。关于如何分析文章的元数据在数据集中提供。从121种出版物中,大多数文献(103)通过案例研究来分析公众参与。根据归纳确定的因素对研究进行了分析,分为两类:1)公众参与:演员,方法,和公众参与程度,和2)共识:方法,冲突。这些数据与题为“从遗产规划的角度来看城市规划中的公众参与和共识建立:系统的文献综述”的研究文章有关。本文将重点放在公众参与因素上,因为共识因素已经在主要文章中进行了解释。本文显示了在分析的研究中实施了哪些参与因素。鉴于此,这篇文章有助于研究公众参与的研究人员和实践者,因为它揭示了公众参与过程中建立共识的方法的多样性,这有助于他们意识到他们想要达到的参与水平以及达到这种水平的手段。
The data presented in this Data in Brief article offers an insight into the scientific literature on conceptual and empirical approaches to public participation and consensus-building. It consists of articles retrieved from the Scopus search engine which feature \"public participation\", \"
consensus\", and \"value and attribute\" in the title, abstract, and author keywords. Information on the bibliography is recorded, namely title, author(s), year of publication, and source title. Metadata on how the articles were analyzed is provided in the dataset. From 121 publications, most literature (103) analyzes public participation through case studies. The studies were analyzed according to factors that were identified inductively and grouped in two categories: 1) public participation: actor,
method, and level of public participation, and 2)
consensus: approaches, conflict. The data is related to the research article entitled \"Public participation and
consensus-building in urban planning from the lens of heritage planning: A systematic literature review\". This paper focuses on the public participation factors as the factors on
consensus are already explained in the main article. This paper shows which factors of participation were implemented in the analyzed studies. Given that, this article contributes to researchers and practitioners working on public participation because it reveals the diversity of approaches for consensus-building in public participation processes, which help them realize which level of participation they want to achieve and the means to reach it.