OBJECTIVE: The complexity of metastatic breast cancer, its rapidly evolving treatment, and the changing trajectory toward long-term survivorship create unique challenges for the provision of supportive care. The experiences of health professionals enacting supportive care in contexts of those living long-term with incurable cancer have received limited research attention. This qualitative study aimed to gain further insight into health professionals\' experiences of supportive care in this context.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted via phone and online with 25 health and community-care professionals who support people living with metastatic breast cancer in Australia. A mix of sampling strategies was used. Thematic analysis was undertaken. Findings were interpreted through an ethics of care lens.
RESULTS: Three key themes were identified. First, participants experienced supportive care as highly relational. Second, they encountered numerous moral and ethical dilemmas in enacting supportive care. Finally, enacting supportive care was complicated by fragmented and sporadic provision in a system in which supportive care is differentially valued across professions and settings.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings draw attention to complexities in enacting supportive care in the context of metastatic breast cancer, with implications to patients and professionals. To improve the quality of care provided to patients and minimise the risk of professional burnout, greater attention is needed in supportive care guidelines to the ethical, moral, and emotional complexities experienced by professionals in this context.
CONCLUSIONS: People living with metastatic breast cancer are a growing proportion of cancer survivors. The knowledge gained through this study may help professionals to better meet the supportive care needs of people living with metastatic breast cancer, a treatable but not curable condition.

UNASSIGNED: Eribulin prolongs overall survival (OS) of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC), particularly in later chemotherapy (ChT) treatment. However, the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and efficacy of first or second-line therapy in eribulin-treated patients remain unknown. Using eribulin in the first- or second-line may demonstrate the non-inferiority of HRQoL compared to S-1, an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative, while maintaining OS.
UNASSIGNED: This randomised, controlled, open-label, phase III trial was conducted at 50 hospitals in Japan. Patients were enrolled from June 2016 and October 2019. Patients with HER2-negative MBC once under or no previous ChT were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive eribulin or S-1. HRQoL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) every six weeks until week 24 and every nine weeks until week 42. The primary endpoint was the deterioration defined as more than 10 points worsening of the general health score of QLQ-C30 or death within one year after randomisation. The secondary endpoints included OS. (Trial ID: UMIN000021398).
UNASSIGNED: Three hundred and two patients were enrolled, with 152 and 148 assigned to the eribulin and S-1 groups, respectively. The questionnaire compliance rate was 85.6%. Risk difference of global health status deterioration through one year was -0.66% (95% CI: -12.47-11.16; non-inferiority P = 0.077) for eribulin compared to S-1 groups. Median time to first deterioration for global health status score was 5.64 (95% CI: 3.51-8.00) and 5.28 months (95% CI: 3.28-7.80) in the eribulin and S-1 groups, respectively. The median OS was 34.7 and 27.8 months, (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54-0.96; P = 0.026); the median progression-free survival was 7.57 and 6.75 months in the eribulin and S-1 groups, (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.67-1.16; P = 0.35), respectively. No new adverse events occurred.
UNASSIGNED: The time of the first clinical deterioration was similar between the two groups and OS significantly increased in eribulin-treated patients.
UNASSIGNED: This study was funded by CSPOR-BC and Eisai CO., Ltd.

Background: Metastatic breast cancer is associated with a poor prognosis and therefore, innovative therapies are urgently needed. Here, we report on the results of a Phase I-II study using DeltaRex-G for chemotherapy resistant metastatic carcinoma of breast. Patients and Methods: Endpoints: Dose limiting toxicity; Antitumor activity. Eligibility: ≥18 years of age, pathologic diagnosis of breast carcinoma, adequate hematologic and organ function. Treatment: Dose escalation of DeltaRex-G 1-4 x 1011cfu intravenously thrice weekly x 4 weeks with 2-week rest period. Treatment cycles repeated if there is ≤ Grade 1 toxicity until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Safety: NCI CTCAE v3 for adverse events reporting, vector related testing. Efficacy: RECIST v1.0, International PET criteria and Choi criteria for response, progression free and overall survival. Results: Twenty patients received escalating doses of DeltaRex-G from 1 × 1011 cfu to 4 × 1011 cfu thrice weekly for 4 weeks with a 2-week rest period. Safety: ≥ Grade 3 treatment-related adverse event: pruritic rash (n = 1), no dose limiting toxicity, no replication-competent retrovirus, nor vector-neutralizing antibodies detected. No vector DNA integration was observed in peripheral blood lymphocytes evaluated. Efficacy: by RECIST v1.0: 13 stable disease, 4 progressive disease; tumor control rate 76%; by PET and Choi Criteria: 3 partial responses, 11 stable disease, 3 progressive disease; tumor control rate 82%. Combined median progression free survival by RECIST v1.0, 3.0 months; combined median overall survival, 20 months; 1-year overall survival rate 83% for Dose Level IV. Biopsy of residual tumor in a participant showed abundant CD8+ killer T-cells and CD45+ macrophages suggesting an innate immune response. Two patients with pure bone metastases had >12-month progression free survival and overall survival and are alive 12 years from the start of DeltaRex-G therapy. These patients further received DeltaRex-G + DeltaVax for 6 months. Conclusion: Taken together, these data indicate that 1) DeltaRex-G has a distinctively high level of safety and exhibits anti-cancer activity, 2) PET/Choi provide a higher level of sensitivity in detecting early signs of tumor response to DeltaRex-G, 3) DeltaRex-G induced 12- year survival in 2 patients with pure bone metastases who subsequently received DeltaVax immunotherapy, and 4) DeltaRex-G may prove to be a biochemical and/or immune modulator when combined with other cancer therapy/immunotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: This study explored the value of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) support groups, and factors that affect attendance, from the perspective of people with MBC.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 women with MBC (support group attendees n = 16; non-attendees n = 12) between January 2022 and July 2023. Data were analysed using an inductive approach to thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Three themes were generated: the value of sharing experiential knowledge, spaces for open and honest conversations, and opportunities to find connection and community. These factors were the main reasons that some participants valued, and chose to attend, an MBC support group. Stage-specificity and professional facilitation were identified as important aspects of group structure. Key reasons for non-attendance were concerns about misinformation, confronting the death of group members, and satisfaction with existing support networks.
CONCLUSIONS: MBC support groups are beneficial for some people with MBC, providing opportunities to connect with others with the same diagnosis. For others, different forms of peer support such as online forums or one-on-one support may be preferred. We argue that ensuring those with MBC have equal access to the peer support they need will be essential in supporting people to live as well as possible with MBC.
CONCLUSIONS: MBC support groups, if appropriately led, can provide emotional and informational benefits for people with MBC. This research may also have relevance to other metastatic cancers where novel therapies are extending survival, resulting in an emerging cancer population with distinct supportive and survivorship needs.

Pyrotinib is a novel irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has shown efficacy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This study explored the efficacy and safety of pyrotinib in the treatment of HER2-positive MBC patients in the real world.
From September 2018 to February 2022, 137 female patients with HER2-positive MBC treated in this center were enrolled in this study. The follow-up period ended on January 12, 2023. The primary endpoint of this study was progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), central nervous system (CNS)-PFS, CNS-ORR, CNS-CBR, CNS-DCR, and adverse event (AE) were the secondary endpoints.
The ORR, DCR and CBR were 41.98 % (55/131), 87.79 % (115/131) and 44.27 % (58/131) in this cohort, respectively. The median PFS for this cohort was 10.37 months [95 % confidence interval (CI): 9.205-11.535] and the median OS was 37.53 months (not reached). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that trastuzumab sensitivity was an independent predictor of improved PFS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.579 (0.371-0.904, p=0.016)] and improved OS [0.410 (0.213-0.790, p=0.008)]. Patients treated with a pyrotinib-based regimen as second-line and third-or-post-line therapy had poorer PFS [second-line: 3.315 (1.832-6.000, p<0.001); third-or-post-line: 3.304 (1.749-6.243, p<0.001)] and OS [second-line: 4.631 (1.033-20.771, p=0.045); third-or-post-line: 5.738 (1.212-27.174, p=0.028)]. There were 38 brain metastases (BM) patients in this study, the CNS-mPFS [14.37 months (7.815-20.925) vs. 7.83 months (7.047-8.613), p=0.375] and mOS [not reached vs. 36.40 months (18.551-54.249), p=0.034] were better in brain radiotherapy (BRT) group than NBRT group. 18.98 % (26/137) of patients experienced grade 3 or higher diarrhea. No AE-related death was reported.
This study confirms the promising antitumor activity and acceptable safety of real-world pyrotinib-based regimens for the treatment of HER2-positive MBC patients, particularly those who are trastuzumab-sensitive and who are receiving pyrotinib-based regimens as advanced first-line therapy. It has also been demonstrated that these regimens combined with BRT, provide better intracranial responses and long-term survival benefits for these patients with BM.

OBJECTIVE: Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). It is critical to better understand the risk factors, natural history, and treatment outcomes, including patients in a modern cohort.
METHODS: In this single center retrospective cohort study, we identified patients with MBC and LMD who received care from 2000 to 2024 and abstracted key clinical, treatment, and survival data.
RESULTS: We identified 111 patients with MBC and LMD, including patients with the following subtypes: HR+/HER2- (n = 53, 47.7%), HER2+ (n = 30, 27.0%), and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC; n = 28, 25.2%). Median time from the diagnosis of MBC to LMD was 16.4 months (range 0-101.3 months). After the diagnosis of LMD, most patients received systemic therapy (n = 66, 59.5%) and/or central nervous system (CNS)-directed therapy (n = 94, 84.7%) including intrathecal therapy (n = 42, 37.8%) and/or CNS-directed radiation therapy (n = 70, 63.1%). In all patients, median overall survival (OS) from the diagnosis of LMD to death was 4.1 months (range 0.1-78.1 months) and varied by subtype, with HR+/HER2- or HER2+ MBC patients living longer than those with TNBC (4.2 and 6.8 months respectively vs. 2.0 months, p < 0.01, HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.36-3.39). Patients who received CNS-directed therapy lived longer than those who did not (4.2 vs. 1.3, p = 0.02 HR 0.54, 0.32-0.91). Patients diagnosed with LMD from 2015 to 2024 lived longer than those diagnosed from 2000 to 2014 (6.4 vs. 2.9 months, p = 0.04, HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.99). On multivariable analysis, having TNBC was associated with shorter OS from time of LMD to death (p = 0.004, HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.25-3.30).
CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the largest case series of patients with MBC and LMD. Patients diagnosed with LMD from 2015 to 2024 lived longer than those diagnosed from 2000 to 2014, although median OS was short overall. Patients with TNBC and LMD had particularly short OS. Novel therapeutic strategies for LMD remain an area of unmet clinical need.

OBJECTIVE: Opportunities exist for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) to engage in shared decision-making (SDM). Presenting patient-reported data, including patient treatment preferences, to oncologists before or during a treatment plan decision may improve patient engagement in treatment decisions.
METHODS: This randomized controlled trial evaluated the standard-of-care treatment planning process vs. a novel treatment planning process focused on SDM, which included oncologist review of patient-reported treatment preferences, prior to or during treatment decisions among women with MBC. The primary outcome was patient perception of shared decision-making. Secondary outcomes included patient activation, treatment satisfaction, physician perception of treatment decision-making, and use of treatment plans.
RESULTS: Among the 109 evaluable patients from December 2018 to June 2022, 28% were Black and 12% lived in a highly disadvantaged neighborhood. Although not reaching statistical significance, patients in the intervention arm perceived SDM more often than patients in the control arm (63% vs. 59%; Cramer\'s V = 0.05; OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.55-2.57). Among patients in the intervention arm, 31% were at the highest level of patient activation compared to 19% of those in the control arm (V = 0.18). In 82% of decisions, the oncologist agreed that the patient-reported data helped them engage in SDM. In 45% of decision, they reported changing management due to patient-reported data.
CONCLUSIONS: Oncologist engagement in the treatment planning process, with oncologist review of patient-reported data, is a promising approach to improve patient participation in treatment decisions which should be tested in larger studies.
BACKGROUND: NCT03806738.

BACKGROUND: In most patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer, anti-HER2 therapies fail due to the development of acquired resistance, potentially mediated through phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) signaling. We investigated adding taselisib, an α-selective potent oral inhibitor of PI3K, to different HER2-directed regimens in order to improve disease control.
METHODS: Patients (n = 68) with advanced HER2+ breast cancer were enrolled to this open-label, dose-escalation phase Ib study. The primary endpoint was defining the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) for the various taselisib-containing combinations. The secondary endpoint was safety. Exploratory endpoints included circulating tumor DNA analysis. The study included four cohorts: (A) taselisib + trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), (C) taselisib + trastuzumab and pertuzumab (TP), (D) taselisib + TP + paclitaxel, and (E) taselisib + TP + fulvestrant.
RESULTS: Following dose escalation, the taselisib MTD was defined as 4 mg once daily. Treatment was associated with significant toxicities, as 34 out of 68 patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) attributed to taselisib, the most common all-grade AEs being diarrhea, fatigue, and oral mucositis. At a median follow-up of 43.8 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) for the MTD-treated population in cohorts A, C, and E was 6.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2-not applicable (NA)] months, 1.7 (95% CI 1.4-NA) months, and 10.6 (95% CI 8.3-NA) months, respectively. The median PFS for patients in cohort A with prior T-DM1 use was 10.4 (95% CI 2.7-NA) months.
CONCLUSIONS: PIK3CA targeting with taselisib in combination with HER2-targeted therapies was associated with both promising efficacy and substantial toxicities.

OBJECTIVE: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) can improve the prognosis of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, data on treatment recommendations after T-DXd are lacking. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the treatment options after T-DXd and their effectiveness.
METHODS: Patients with HER2-positive MBC were included in this study. Data from clinical records were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was time to treatment failure (TTF). Secondary endpoints were TTF of each treatment and first-line treatment after interstitial lung disease (ILD) and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: A total of 29 patients were included. Among them, 18 (62%) were hormone receptor-positive. All patients had a median TTF (mTTF) of 3.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1-10.03). The mTTF of each treatment, including HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (HER2 TKI), other anti-HER2 treatments, and other treatments, was 2.6, 8.8, and 3.8 months, respectively. No significant differences were observed between treatments, but regimens that include trastuzumab showed a longer TTF than TKI. However, the mTTF among patients who developed T-DXd-related ILD was 2.33 months (95% CI 0.7-not reached), which was shorter than that among those who did not develop ILD (3.83 months, 95% CI 2.1-10.03, hazard ratio: 2.046, 95% CI 0.760-5.507, p = 0.258). The median OS was 14.9 months (95% CI 11.07-29.17).
CONCLUSIONS: Treatments after T-DXd showed a shorter mTTF. Regimens that include trastuzumab may be more effective post-T-DXd treatment than HER2 TKI. Further data are needed to establish the best sequential treatment after T-DXd.

BACKGROUND: DESTINY-Breast03 is a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III study of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) versus trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane. A statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) versus T-DM1 was reported in the primary analysis. Here, we report exploratory efficacy data in patients with and without brain metastases (BMs) at baseline.
METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to receive T-DXd 5.4 mg/kg or T-DM1 3.6 mg/kg. Patients with clinically inactive/asymptomatic BMs were eligible. Lesions were measured as per modified RECIST, version 1.1. Outcomes included PFS by blinded independent central review (BICR), objective response rate (ORR), and intracranial ORR as per BICR.
RESULTS: As of 21 May 2021, 43/261 patients randomized to T-DXd and 39/263 patients randomized to T-DM1 had BMs at baseline, as per investigator assessment. Among patients with baseline BMs, 20/43 in the T-DXd arm and 19/39 in the T-DM1 arm had not received prior local BM treatment. For patients with BMs, median PFS was 15.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 12.5-22.2 months] for T-DXd versus 3.0 months (95% CI 2.8-5.8 months) for T-DM1; hazard ratio (HR) 0.25 (95% CI 0.13-0.45). For patients without BMs, median PFS was not reached (95% CI 22.4 months-not estimable) for T-DXd versus 7.1 months (95% CI 5.6-9.7 months) for T-DM1; HR 0.30 (95% CI 0.22-0.40). Confirmed systemic ORR was 67.4% for T-DXd versus 20.5% for T-DM1 and 82.1% for T-DXd versus 36.6% for T-DM1 for patients with and without BMs, respectively. Intracranial ORR was 65.7% with T-DXd versus 34.3% with T-DM1.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HER2-positive mBC whose disease progressed after trastuzumab and a taxane achieved a substantial benefit from treatment with T-DXd compared with T-DM1, including those with baseline BMs.