marsupialisation

袋装化
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:对于治疗Bartholin腺脓肿的最佳选择尚无共识。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在比较Word导管放置和有袋化方法在治疗患有Bartholin腺体囊肿或脓肿的女性中的应用。
    方法:PubMed,Scopus,Embase,WebofScience(WoS),和Cochrane图书馆数据库,搜索了GoogleScholar,以检索1990年1月至2023年7月之间发表的文章,比较了Word导管治疗与Bartholin腺体囊肿或脓肿的妇女的袋式治疗。
    方法:观察性研究和随机对照试验(RCTs)均纳入本荟萃分析。
    方法:审查后,在九篇相关文章中,只有四项(两项观察性研究和两项随机对照试验)被纳入这项荟萃分析,提供735例患者的数据(Word导管组396例与有袋化组中的339)。数据是从选定的文章中提取的,使用数据提取表单。Word导管和有袋化方法的比较表明,Word导管组的复发风险约为7.6%,有袋化组的复发风险约为9.4%。结果表明,当比较Word导管治疗与有袋化时,囊肿或脓肿的复发没有显着差异(OR=0.99,95%CI:0.29-3.43,P=0.990,I2=77%)。
    结论:这项荟萃分析发现,在Word导管和袋化方法之间,复发率没有显着差异。总的来说,袋状化和Word导管置入治疗巴氏囊炎似乎同样有效。
    OBJECTIVE: There is no consensus on the best option for the management of Bartholin\'s gland abscesses. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the Word catheter placement and marsupialization methods in the management of women with a cyst or abscess of the Bartholin\'s glands.
    METHODS: The PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases, as well as Google Scholar, were searched to retrieve articles published between January 1990 and July 2023, comparing the Word catheter treatment with marsupialization for women with a cyst or abscess of the Bartholin\'s glands.
    METHODS: Both observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this meta-analysis.
    METHODS: After the review, out of 9 relevant articles, only 4 (2 observational studies and 2 RCTs) were included in this meta-analysis, providing the data of 735 patients (396 in the Word catheter group vs. 339 in the marsupialization group). The data was extracted from the selected articles, using a data extraction form. Comparison of the Word catheter and marsupialization methods suggested that the risk of recurrence was approximately 7.6% in the Word catheter group and 9.4% in the marsupialization group. The findings indicated no significant difference in the recurrence of cysts or abscesses when comparing the Word catheter treatment with marsupialization (odds ratio = 0.99, 95% confidence interval: 0.29-3.43, P = 0.990, I2 = 77%).
    CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis found no significant difference in the rate of recurrence between the Word catheter and marsupialization methods. In general, marsupialization and Word catheter placement in the treatment of Bartholinitis seem to be equally effective.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    一名75岁的男性患者访问了江陵-元州国立大学牙科医院(江陵,韩国)嘴底有35毫米的波动病变。这是一个圆顶形的外生性病变,其顶部位于沃顿的导管孔口区域。小心切除包裹的病变,最终诊断为非浸润性血管脂肪瘤。据我们所知,这是口内方法治疗老年患者口底非浸润性血管脂肪瘤的第一份报告.将其与ranula区分开来对于手术方法至关重要,因为有更高的过渡到浸润性血管脂肪瘤,老年患者应考虑明确治疗。
    A 75-year-old male patient visited Gangneung-Wonju National University Dental Hospital (Gangneung, South Korea) with a 35-mm fluctuant lesion on the floor of the mouth. It was a dome-shaped exophytic lesion with its top on Wharton\'s duct orifice area. The encapsulated lesion was excised cautiously and the final diagnosis was non-infiltrating angiolipoma. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of an intraoral approach for the treatment of a non-infiltrating angiolipoma on the floor of the mouth in an elderly patient. Differentiating it from a ranula is essential for the surgical approach and, as there is a higher transition to infiltrating angiolipoma, definite treatment should be considered in elderly patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:颅内蛛网膜囊肿(AC)是良性的,脑膜蛛网膜层内的脑脊液填充空间。对儿童和年轻人的神经外科干预进行了广泛的研究,但老年人的最佳策略仍不清楚。因此,我们进行了一项单中心回顾性研究,并对文献进行了系统回顾,在老年队列中比较了膀胱腹膜(CP)分流术与其他手术入路.
    方法:在2005年1月至2018年12月之间进行了回顾性神经外科数据库搜索,并使用PRISMA指南对文献进行了系统回顾。纳入标准:年龄60岁或以上,颅内AC的放射学诊断,神经外科介入,和神经放射学(NOG评分)/临床结果(COG评分)。将来自两个来源的数据汇总并进行统计分析。
    结果:我们的文献检索产生了12项研究(34例患者),与我们的机构数据(13例患者)合并。CP分流(7例;15%),囊肿开窗术(28例;60%)和囊肿囊化/切除术(10例;21%)是最常见的方法。每种方法的平均随访时间为23.6、26.9和9.5个月,分别。手术干预的选择与NOG评分无统计学意义(P=0.417),COG评分(P=0.601),或并发症发生率(P=0.955)。然而,CP分流的并发症发生率最低,只有一名患者发展为慢性硬膜下血肿。
    结论:CP分流术是老年人ACs安全有效的手术治疗策略。与其他方法相比,它具有相似的临床和放射学结果,但风险特征更高。我们提倡将CP分流作为老年人颅内AC的一线神经外科干预措施。
    BACKGROUND: Intracranial arachnoid cysts (AC) are benign, cerebrospinal fluid filled spaces within the arachnoid layer of the meninges. Neurosurgical intervention in children and young adults has been extensively studied, but the optimal strategy in the elderly remains unclear. Therefore, we performed a single center retrospective study combined with a systematic review of the literature to compare cystoperitoneal (CP) shunting with other surgical approaches in the elderly cohort.
    METHODS: Retrospective neurosurgical database search between January 2005 and December 2018, and systematic review of the literature using PRISMA guidelines were performed. Inclusion criteria: Age 60 years or older, radiological diagnosis of intracranial AC, neurosurgical intervention, and neuroradiological (NOG score)/clinical outcome (COG score). Data from both sources were pooled and statistically analyzed.
    RESULTS: Our literature search yielded 12 studies (34 patients), which were pooled with our institutional data (13 patients). CP shunts (7 patients; 15%), cyst fenestration (28 patients; 60%) and cyst marsupialisation/resection (10 patients; 21%) were the commonest approaches. Average duration of follow-up was 23.6, 26.9, and 9.5 months for each approach, respectively. There was no statistically significant association between choice of surgical intervention and NOG score (P = 0.417), COG score (P = 0.601), or complication rate (P = 0.955). However, CP shunting had the lowest complication rate, with only one patient developing chronic subdural haematoma.
    CONCLUSIONS: CP shunting is a safe and effective surgical treatment strategy for ACs in the elderly. It has similar clinical and radiological outcomes but superior risk profile when compared with other approaches. We advocate CP shunting as first line neurosurgical intervention for the management of intracranial ACs in the elderly.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号