malignancy

恶性肿瘤
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:立体定向放射治疗(SBRT)是早期非小细胞肺癌(ES-NSCLC)患者的一种治疗方法。监测指南在治疗后有所不同。虽然患者在治疗后2年内更有可能局部复发,关于频繁和长期监测的益处的数据仍然很少。我们评估了一组NSCLC患者,以评估监测模式和结果。
    方法:回顾性评估接受SBRT治疗的ES-NSCLC患者。SBRT后进行影像学检查,以了解复发或新的恶性肿瘤的证据。中位扫描间隔(MSI)计算为监测扫描之间的中位月数。通过t检验比较有或没有新疾病的患者之间的MSI。使用χ²比较患有=T2疾病的患者与有或没有先前恶性肿瘤的患者之间的新疾病发展和生存率,Kaplan-Meier分析,和格雷的测试。
    结果:一组168例患者,中位随访时间为23.4个月,符合审查标准,其中50%为新发疾病。有或没有新疾病的患者之间的MSI没有差异。>=cT2肿瘤的患者总体生存率较差,并且有新疾病发生率较高的趋势。新的疾病继续发生,甚至在治疗后5年。
    结论:增加扫描频率并没有增加对新疾病的检测。患者在治疗后5年持续失败。较大的肿瘤倾向于更频繁的失败,这些患者的OS较差。应优化监测指南,以防止治疗后过度监测并继续长期监测。
    BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a treatment for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC). Surveillance guidelines vary after treatment. While patients are more likely to locally recur within 2 years of treatment, there remains a paucity of data on the benefit of frequent and long-term surveillance. We evaluated a cohort of NSCLC patients to evaluate surveillance patterns and outcomes.
    METHODS: Patients with ES-NSCLC treated with SBRT were retrospectively evaluated. Imaging was reviewed after SBRT for evidence of recurrence or new malignancy. The median scan interval (MSI) was calculated as the median number of months between surveillance scans. The MSI between patients with or without new disease was compared by t-test. New disease development and survival between patients with =T2 disease and with or without prior malignancy was compared using χ², Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Gray\'s test.
    RESULTS: A cohort of 168 patients with median follow up of 23.4 months met criteria for review with 50% developing new disease. MSI did not differ between patients with or without new disease. Patients with >=cT2 tumors had worse overall survival and trended towards higher incidence of new disease. New disease continued to occur, even 5 years after treatment.
    CONCLUSIONS: Increased scan frequency did not increase detection of new disease. Patients continued to fail 5 years after treatment. Larger tumors trended toward more frequent failures and those patients experienced worse OS. Surveillance guidelines should be optimized to prevent over surveillance after treatment and to continue long-term surveillance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    癌症患者的止血失调与各种临床状况有关,从血栓栓塞并发症到弥散性血管内凝血。尽管癌症和血栓栓塞并发症之间有很好的联系,所涉及的机制尚未完全阐明。癌症中有几个易感因素导致血栓产生增加,如固定和化疗。已引入术语“癌症相关血栓形成”(CAT)来描述癌症和血栓栓塞事件之间的密切双向关系。常规凝血测试(PT/aPTT)在检测低凝状态而不是高凝状态方面更准确;因此,他们对CAT管理的贡献是有限的。传统上,D-二聚体水平是评估血栓风险的最常见的实验室研究。然而,D-二聚体水平仅显示凝血级联的快照,它们不能提供对不断发展的凝块形成的动态评估。非常规检测,例如粘弹性方法和微粒形成是识别有发展CAT风险的患者的有前途的工具。美国临床肿瘤学会最近的指南建议反对通过单一测试估计血栓形成风险,并建议使用考虑多种风险因素的评分系统。本综述概述了目前对CAT病理生理机制的见解,并全面回顾了CAT实验室评估的最新进展以及近期有血栓栓塞并发症风险的患者管理指南。
    Dysregulated hemostasis in cancer patients is associated with various clinical conditions, from thromboembolic complications to disseminated intravascular coagulation. Despite the well-established association between cancer and thromboembolic complications, the mechanisms involved are not completely elucidated. There are several predisposing factors in cancer for increased thrombus generation, such as immobilization and chemotherapy. The term cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) has been introduced to describe the close bidirectional relationship between cancer and thromboembolic events. Conventional coagulation tests (PT/aPTT) are more accurate in detecting a hypocoagulable rather than a hypercoagulable state; thus, their contribution to CAT management is limited. Traditionally, D-dimer levels have been the most common laboratory study for the evaluation of thrombotic risk. However, D-dimer levels only display a snapshot of the coagulation cascade, and they cannot provide a dynamic evaluation of evolving clot formation. Non-conventional assays, such as viscoelastic methods and microparticle formation are promising tools for the identification of patients at risk for developing CAT. Recent guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology counsel against the estimation of thrombotic risk through a single test and recommend the use of scoring systems that take into account several risk factors. The present review outlines the current insights into the pathophysiological mechanisms of CAT and provides a comprehensive review of the latest advances in the laboratory assessment of CAT and the recent guidelines for the management of patients at risk for developing thromboembolic complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:一个国际工作组最近发表了一套关于特发性炎症性肌病(IIM)恶性肿瘤筛查的共识指南。这些指南根据“高”提出了不同的调查策略,“中度”或“标准”恶性肿瘤风险组。这项研究比较了澳大利亚三级转诊中心目前的恶性肿瘤筛查实践与这些指南中概述的建议。
    方法:我们对新诊断的IIM患者进行了回顾性分析。记录有关恶性肿瘤筛查的相关人口统计学和临床数据。使用描述性统计将现有做法与指南进行比较;使用澳大利亚医疗保险福利计划计算费用。
    结果:在确定的47名患者中(66%为女性,中位年龄:63岁[IQR:55.5-70],中位病程:4年[IQR:3-6]),只有1人筛查出恶性肿瘤.20名患者(43%)处于高风险,20人(43%)处于中等风险;其余7人(15%)有IBM,拟议的指南不建议进行筛查。只有3名(6%)患者接受了与国际肌炎评估和临床研究建议完全一致的筛查。大多数(N=39,83%)进行了筛查;其余5名(11%)过度筛查的患者患有IBM。指南不遵守的主要原因是在诊断后的3年内缺乏对高风险个体的重复年度筛查(0%依从性)。筛查的平均费用大大低于遵循指南的预期(每位患者$481.52[SD423.53]vs$1341[SD935.67]),在高危女性患者中观察到的差异最大($2314.29/患者)。
    结论:实施拟议的指南将显著影响临床实践,并导致潜在的额外经济负担。
    OBJECTIVE: An inaugural set of consensus guidelines for malignancy screening in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) were recently published by an international working group. These guidelines propose different investigation strategies based on \"high\", \"intermediate\" or \"standard\" malignancy risk groups. This study compares current malignancy screening practices at an Australian tertiary referral center with the recommendations outlined in these guidelines.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed IIM patients. Relevant demographic and clinical data regarding malignancy screening were recorded. Existing practice was compared with the guidelines using descriptive statistics; costs were calculated using the Australian Medicare Benefit Schedule.
    RESULTS: Of the 47 patients identified (66% female, median age: 63 years [IQR: 55.5-70], median disease duration: 4 years [IQR: 3-6]), only one had a screening-detected malignancy. Twenty patients (43%) were at high risk, while 20 (43%) were at intermediate risk; the remaining seven (15%) had IBM, for which the proposed guidelines do not recommend screening. Only three (6%) patients underwent screening fully compatible with International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies recommendations. The majority (N = 39, 83%) were under-screened; the remaining five (11%) overscreened patients had IBM. The main reason for guideline non-compliance was the lack of repeated annual screening in the 3 years post-diagnosis for high-risk individuals (0% compliance). The mean cost of screening was substantially lower than those projected by following the guidelines ($481.52 [SD 423.53] vs $1341 [SD 935.67] per patient), with the highest disparity observed in high-risk female patients ($2314.29/patient).
    CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the proposed guidelines will significantly impact clinical practice and result in a potentially substantial additional economic burden.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肥胖是公认的癌症危险因素。腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)是一种安全的手术,可提供加速的体重减轻和合并症改善或缓解。此外,它被批准为各种非肿瘤手术的桥接程序,肿瘤手术的数据非常有限。这项研究的目的是介绍一系列严重肥胖和伴随癌症的患者,这些患者在确定的肿瘤手术之前接受了LSG。
    方法:对三个机构进行了回顾性审查(2008-2023年),确定5例接受LSG作为桥接手术的癌症和严重肥胖患者。分析的变量是初始重量,初始体重指数(BMI),恶性肿瘤的类型,合并症,LSG和肿瘤外科之间的间隔,第二次干预前的体重和BMI,过量体重减轻百分比(%EWL),术后发病率和死亡率。
    结果:确定的恶性肿瘤是2种前列腺癌,1壶腹周围神经内分泌肿瘤,1直肠癌,1例肾透明细胞癌。患者平均年龄为50.2岁,平均初始BMI47.4kg/m2,肿瘤手术前的平均BMI为37kg/m2。LSG和肿瘤手术之间的平均时间间隔为8.3个月。达到的平均EWL%为45.2%。LSG后发生两次血栓栓塞事件,虽然没有患者在明确的肿瘤治疗后出现并发症。肿瘤手术后的平均随访时间为61.6个月。
    结论:在精心挑选的患者中,LSG可以作为肿瘤外科手术前的桥接手术。实现的体重减轻可以使随后的肿瘤手术更容易和更安全。
    BACKGROUND: Obesity is a well-established risk factor for cancer. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is established as a safe procedure providing accelerated weight loss and comorbidity improvement or remission. Additionally, it is approved as a bridging procedure for various non-oncologic surgeries, with very limited data for oncologic procedures. The aim of this study is to present a series of patients with severe obesity and concomitant cancer who underwent LSG prior to definitive oncological procedure.
    METHODS: A retrospective review (2008-2023) was conducted in three institutions, identifying 5 patients with cancer and severe obesity who underwent LSG as bridging procedure. Variables analyzed were initial weight, initial body mass index (BMI), type of malignancy, comorbidities, interval between LSG and oncological surgery, weight and BMI before the second intervention, percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), and postoperative morbidity and mortality.
    RESULTS: Malignancies identified were 2 prostate cancers, 1 periampullary neuroendocrine tumor, 1 rectal cancer, and 1 renal clear cell carcinoma. Mean age of patients was 50.2 years, mean initial BMI 47.4 kg/ m 2 , and mean BMI before oncological surgery 37 kg/ m 2 . Mean time interval between LSG and oncological surgery was 8.3 months. Mean %EWL achieved was 45.2%. Two thromboembolic events were encountered after LSG, while none of the patients developed complications after definitive oncological treatment. The mean follow-up after oncological surgery was 61.6 months.
    CONCLUSIONS: LSG can be proposed as bridging procedure before oncological surgery in meticulously selected patients. Achieved weight loss can render subsequent oncological procedures easier and safer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究试图比较两种常见的风险分层系统,以评估甲状腺恶性肿瘤的诊断性能。
    方法:美国放射学会(ACR)甲状腺成像,报告和数据系统(TI-RADS)和美国甲状腺协会(ATA)指南在571个甲状腺结节中进行了比较,并进行了明确的细针穿刺(FNA)细胞学检查或术后组织病理学检查。超声特征,如成分,回声,形状,margin,尺寸,评估每个甲状腺结节的血管分布。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定和比较诊断性能测量,和决策曲线分析(DCA)。
    结果:在571个结节中,65(11.4%)为恶性。AUC,灵敏度,特异性,正预测值,阴性预测值分别为0.691、49.2%,84.9%,29.6%,ATA指南为92.8%,0.776,72.3%,79.2%,30.9%,和95.7%,对于ACRTI-RADS,分别。ACRTI-RADS更敏感(p=0.003),而ATA指南更具特异性(p<0.001)。DCA表明,ACRTI-RADS比ATA指南提供了更大的净收益。此外,ACRTI-RADS的不必要活检净减少量高于ATA指南.与ATA指南相比,ACRTI-RADS的指示活检总数和不必要的FNA率更低(293vs.527和80.2vs.87.8)。ACRTI-RADS在7个恶性结节(全部分类为TR2)中没有活检指征,而ATA指南遗漏了一个。低回声是恶性肿瘤的最重要预测因子(OR=8.34,95%CI:3.75-19.45),其次是高比宽的形状(OR=6.73,95%CI:3.07-14.77)。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,每个系统在评估甲状腺结节方面都有特殊的优势。ACRTI-RADS降低了不必要的FNA速率,然而,使用该系统,分类为TR2的恶性结节可能会被遗漏.建议使用多普勒和其他超声方式进一步评估该组结节。
    OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare two common risk stratification systems in terms of their diagnostic performance for the evaluation of thyroid malignancy.
    METHODS: The American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) and the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines were compared among 571 thyroid nodules with definitive fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology or postoperative histopathology. Ultrasound characteristics such as composition, echogenicity, shape, margin, size, and vascularity were assessed for each thyroid nodule. Diagnostic performance measures were determined and compared through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
    RESULTS: Of 571 nodules, 65 (11.4%) were malignant. The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 0.691, 49.2%, 84.9%, 29.6%, and 92.8% for ATA guideline, and 0.776, 72.3%, 79.2%, 30.9%, and 95.7%, for ACR TI-RADS, respectively. ACR TI-RADS was more sensitive (p = 0.003), while the ATA guideline was more specific (p < 0.001). DCA demonstrated that the ACR TI-RADS provided a greater net benefit than the ATA guideline. In addition, the net reduction in unnecessary biopsies is higher for ACR TI-RADS than ATA guidelines. The total number of indicated biopsies and unnecessary FNA rates were lower in ACR TI-RADS compared to ATA guideline (293 vs. 527 and 80.2 vs. 87.8). ACR TI-RADS presented no biopsy indication in seven malignant nodules (all categorized as TR2), whereas ATA guideline missed one. Hypoechogenicity was the most significant predictor of malignancy (OR = 8.34, 95% CI: 3.75-19.45), followed by a taller-than-wide shape (OR = 6.73, 95% CI: 3.07-14.77).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that each system has particular advantages in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. ACR TI-RADS reduces unnecessary FNA rates, however, malignant nodules categorized as TR2 might be missed using this system. Further evaluation of this group of nodules using Doppler and other ultrasound modalities is recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    在肿瘤患者静脉血栓栓塞(CAVTE)的一级和二级预防中,直接口服抗凝剂(DOACS)的数据量和经验的增加最近导致了一些国际指南的变化。我们在斯洛伐克共和国的条件下反映了这些变化。在CAVTE的一级预防中,我们认识到肿瘤外科患者和非手术患者:住院和外出患者。低分子量肝素在CAVTE的一级预防中仍然占主导地位。关于CAVTE的治疗和二级预防,我们建议始终考虑使用DOAC的可能性,因为它们被证明不劣于LMWH。然而,LMWH应优先于DOAC以及华法林(VKA)在所有患者谁是在临床上不稳定的情况下,出血和/或与全身治疗相互作用的高风险。主要在胃肠道上部的腔内肿瘤和泌尿生殖系统肿瘤患者中出血风险高。至于数据的缺乏,LMWH在患有原发性肿瘤和中枢神经系统转移性疾病的患者和血液肿瘤学中仍然是优选的。
    The increasing volume of the data and experience with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACS) in the primary and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism in oncologic patients (CAVTE) has recently lead to changes in several international guidelines. We reflect these changes within the conditions in Slovak republic. In the primary prevention of CAVTE we recognise oncosurgical patients and nonsurgical patients: hospitalised and out patients. Low molecular weight heparins are still dominant in the primary prevention of CAVTE. Regarding the treatment and the secondary prevention of CAVTE, we recommend always to consider the possibility to use DOACs as they proved to be non inferior to LMWH. However, LMWH should be prefered over DOACs as well as over warfarin (VKA) in all patients who are in a clinically unstable condition with the high risk of bleeding and/or interaction with the systemic treatment. Primarily in the patients with intraluminal tumours of the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract and genitourinary tumours with the high risk of bleeding. As for the lack of data, LMWH are still preferd also in patients with primary tumours and metastatic disease of the central nervous system and in hemato oncology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先天性免疫错误(IEI)是由免疫系统中遗传决定的缺陷引起的一组疾病,导致感染,自身免疫,自身炎症和恶性肿瘤风险增加。在某些情况下,恶性肿瘤可能是潜在IEI的第一个迹象。由于这些患者的治疗策略可能不同,儿科血液肿瘤学家对潜在IEI的认识很重要。这篇文章,由一组儿科免疫学专家撰写,血液肿瘤学,病理学和遗传学,旨在为儿科血液肿瘤学家提供有关如何识别可能的潜在IEI以及可以进行哪些诊断测试的指南,并考虑了治疗的可能性。
    Inborn errors of immunity (IEI) are a group of disorders caused by genetically determined defects in the immune system, leading to infections, autoimmunity, autoinflammation and an increased risk of malignancy. In some cases, a malignancy might be the first sign of an underlying IEI. As therapeutic strategies might be different in these patients, recognition of the underlying IEI by the pediatric hemato-oncologist is important. This article, written by a group of experts in pediatric immunology, hemato-oncology, pathology and genetics, aims to provide guidelines for pediatric hemato-oncologists on how to recognize a possible underlying IEI and what diagnostic tests can be performed, and gives some consideration to treatment possibilities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:癌症可以表现为中风。几种癌症类型已经建立了筛查指南。我们调查了中风幸存者与普通人群对指南推荐的癌症筛查的依从性。
    方法:我们使用来自CDC的行为危险因素监测系统(BRFSS)调查的2012-2018年数据进行了横断面分析。BRFSS是一项全国代表性的非制度化美国人电话调查,收集有关健康状况和行为的数据,包括癌症筛查。我们定义了指南推荐的结直肠,肺,根据美国预防服务工作组的建议进行乳腺癌筛查。我们使用特定的调查方法来估计有和没有中风的人的最新筛查率。我们使用逻辑回归估计在校正潜在的混杂因素后,与没有中风史的患者相比,中风幸存者进行最新筛查的几率。
    结果:在符合结直肠癌筛查条件的1,018,440名受访者中,66%是最新的。在符合肺癌筛查资格的6880名受访者中,16%是最新的。在548,434名有资格接受乳腺癌筛查的女性中,78%是最新的。在调整人口统计和混杂因素后,卒中幸存者更有可能进行最新的结直肠癌筛查(OR,1.10;95%CI,1.05-1.16),同样可能接受肺癌筛查(OR,0.99;95%CI,0.62-1.59),并且不太可能接受乳腺癌筛查(OR,0.87;95%CI,0.80-0.94)。
    结论:在全国范围内的分析中,卒中幸存者对指南推荐的癌症筛查的依从性与一般人群相似.
    OBJECTIVE: Cancer can present as stroke. Several cancer types have established screening guidelines. We investigated adherence to guideline-recommended cancer screening in stroke survivors versus the general population.
    METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis using 2012-2018 data from the CDC\'s Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey. BRFSS is a nationally-representative telephone survey of non-institutionalized Americans that collects data about health conditions and behaviors, including cancer screening. We defined guideline-recommended colorectal, lung, and breast cancer screening based on the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. We used survey-specific methods to estimate up-to-date screening rates for those with and without prior stroke. We used logistic regression to estimate the odds of up-to-date screening in stroke survivors compared to those without history of stroke after adjustment for potential confounders.
    RESULTS: Among 1,018,440 respondents eligible for colorectal cancer screening, 66% were up-to-date. Among 6,880 respondents eligible for lung cancer screening, 16% were up-to-date. Among 548,434 women eligible for breast cancer screening, 78% were up-to-date. After adjustment for demographics and confounders, stroke survivors were more likely to have up-to-date colorectal cancer screening (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.16), equally likely to undergo lung cancer screening (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.62-1.59), and less likely to undergo breast cancer screening (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80-0.94).
    CONCLUSIONS: In a nationwide analysis, stroke survivors had similar suboptimal adherence to guideline-recommended cancer screening as the general population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在儿科人群中,在计算机断层扫描成像中很少发现偶然的肺结节,并且在建议适当的后续建议方面可能是一个挑战。基于证据和实用的成像方法进行诊断和适当的指导管理对于最佳的患者护理至关重要。本文提供了小儿肺结节文献的最新综述,并提出了一种实用的算法来管理小儿人群中的肺结节。
    Incidental pulmonary nodules are not infrequently identified on computed tomography imaging in the pediatric population and can be a challenge in suggesting appropriate follow-up recommendations. An evidence-based and practical imaging approach for diagnosis and appropriate directed management is essential for optimal patient care. This article provides an up-to-date review of the pediatric pulmonary nodule literature and suggests a practical algorithm to manage pulmonary nodules in the pediatric population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Patients with malignant tumors are often combined with dyslipidemia, and dyslipidemia is associated with both malignant tumor disease and treatment. The expert group of the Integrative Cardio-Oncology Society of China Anti-Cancer Association summarized the incidence rate and characteristics of dyslipidemia in patients with malignant tumors, and the characteristics and mechanisms of dyslipidemia induced by common antineoplastic drugs, stratified the risk of dyslipidemia in antineoplastic drugs, then formulated the principles of dyslipidemia treatment and monitoring. This consensus refers to domestic and aboard research progress, combineds with China\'s clinical experience to formulate the corresponding prevention and treatment of dyslipidemia. The present consensus provides practical strategies for clinicians in the management of dyslipidemia in malignant tumors and promotes the management of dyslipidemia in malignant tumors in China.
    恶性肿瘤患者常合并血脂异常,血脂异常既与恶性肿瘤疾病有关,又与疾病治疗有关。中国抗癌协会整合肿瘤心脏病学分会专家组总结了恶性肿瘤患者血脂异常的发生率和特征,汇总了常见抗肿瘤药物血脂异常的特点和发生机制,对抗肿瘤药物进行血脂异常危险分层,并制定血脂异常治疗及监测原则。专家参考国内外研究进展,结合中国临床经验制定了相应的血脂异常防治指引,旨在为临床医师提供切实可行的恶性肿瘤血脂管理策略,推进中国恶性肿瘤血脂异常的管理。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号