lumbar disc herniation

腰椎间盘突出症
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    ChatGPT是一种先进的语言AI,能够对有关神经根病的腰椎间盘突出症的临床问题做出回应。人工智能(AI)工具越来越多地被认为可以帮助临床医生做出决策。这项研究比较了ChatGPT-3.5和ChatGPT-4.0对已建立的NASS临床指南的反应,并评估了一致性。
    ChatGPT-3.5和ChatGPT-4.0在2012年NASS腰椎间盘突出症神经根病诊断和治疗临床指南中提示了15个问题。将分类的临床问题作为未修改的查询直接输入ChatGPT。语言输出由两名独立作者于2023年9月26日根据操作定义的准确性参数进行评估。过度结论性,补充,和不完整。通过卡方分析比较了ChatGPT-3.5和ChatGPT-4.0的性能。
    在ChatGPT-3.5产生的15个响应中,有7个(47%)是准确的,7名(47%)的结论过高,十五(100%)是补充的,和6(40%)是不完整的。对于ChatGPT-4.0,十个(67%)是准确的,5(33%)的结论过高,10人(67%)是补充的,和6(40%)是不完整的。补充信息有统计学上的显著差异(100%与67%;p=.014)在ChatGPT-3.5和ChatGPT-4.0之间。准确性(47%vs.67%;p=.269),过度结论性(47%与33%;p=.456),和不完整(40%与40%;p=1.000)在ChatGPT-3.5和ChatGPT-4.0之间没有显着差异。ChatGPT-3.5和ChatGPT-4.0对定义和病史以及体格检查类别均具有100%的准确性。ChatGPT-3.5的诊断测试准确率为0%,ChatGPT-4.0的诊断准确率为100%。非手术干预对ChatGPT-3.5的准确率为50%,对ChatGPT-4.0的准确率为63%。手术干预对ChatGPT-3.5的准确率为0%,对ChatGPT-4.0的准确率为33%。
    与ChatGPT-3.5相比,ChatGPT-4.0在问题类别中提供的补充信息更少,总体准确性更高。ChatGPT与NASS指南显示出合理的一致性,但临床医生应谨慎使用ChatGPT,因为它不能防止错误信息。
    UNASSIGNED: ChatGPT is an advanced language AI able to generate responses to clinical questions regarding lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly being considered to assist clinicians in decision-making. This study compared ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4.0 responses to established NASS clinical guidelines and evaluated concordance.
    UNASSIGNED: ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4.0 were prompted with fifteen questions from The 2012 NASS Clinical Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. Clinical questions organized into categories were directly entered as unmodified queries into ChatGPT. Language output was assessed by two independent authors on September 26, 2023 based on operationally-defined parameters of accuracy, over-conclusiveness, supplementary, and incompleteness. ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4.0 performance was compared via chi-square analyses.
    UNASSIGNED: Among the fifteen responses produced by ChatGPT-3.5, 7 (47%) were accurate, 7 (47%) were over-conclusive, fifteen (100%) were supplementary, and 6 (40%) were incomplete. For ChatGPT-4.0, ten (67%) were accurate, 5 (33%) were over-conclusive, 10 (67%) were supplementary, and 6 (40%) were incomplete. There was a statistically significant difference in supplementary information (100% vs. 67%; p=.014) between ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4.0. Accuracy (47% vs. 67%; p=.269), over-conclusiveness (47% vs. 33%; p=.456), and incompleteness (40% vs. 40%; p=1.000) did not show significant differences between ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4.0. ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4.0 both yielded 100% accuracy for definition and history and physical examination categories. Diagnostic testing yielded 0% accuracy for ChatGPT-3.5 and 100% accuracy for ChatGPT-4.0. Nonsurgical interventions had 50% accuracy for ChatGPT-3.5 and 63% accuracy for ChatGPT-4.0. Surgical interventions resulted in 0% accuracy for ChatGPT-3.5 and 33% accuracy for ChatGPT-4.0.
    UNASSIGNED: ChatGPT-4.0 provided less supplementary information and overall higher accuracy in question categories than ChatGPT-3.5. ChatGPT showed reasonable concordance to NASS guidelines, but clinicians should caution use of ChatGPT in its current state as it fails to safeguard against misinformation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腰椎间盘突出症(LDH),作为下背部疼痛最常见的原因之一,给患者和社会带来沉重的经济负担。保守治疗是大多数LDH患者的一线选择。中医是保守治疗的重要组成部分,越来越受到国际社会的重视。
    方法:循证指南。
    方法:我们成立了一个多学科专家指导小组。在系统的文献检索和共识会议的基础上确定了临床问题。我们搜索了有关LDH管理的直接证据的文献,并使用建议的分级来评估其确定性产生的建议,评估,发展,和评估(等级)方法。
    结果:指南小组提出了20条建议,其中涵盖了神通逐瘀汤的使用,参浊汤,四妙散汤,独活寄生汤,腰必通胶囊,腰痛宁胶囊,ostoking,手动治疗,针刀,手工针灸,电针,中国运动技巧(太极拳,八段锦,或易进经),和综合医学,如联合非甾体抗炎药,神经营养,和牵引力。建议不是强就是弱,或以未分级的基于共识的声明的形式。
    结论:这是系统搜索的第一个中医和中西医结合治疗LDH的指南,综合证据,并采用等级法对证据质量进行评级。我们希望这些建议可以帮助支持医护人员照顾LDH患者。
    BACKGROUND: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH), as one of the most common causes of lower back pain, imposes a heavy economic burden on patients and society. Conservative management is the first-line choice for the majority of LDH patients. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is an important part of conservative treatment and has attracted more and more international attention.
    METHODS: Evidence-based guideline.
    METHODS: We formed a guideline panel of multidisciplinary experts. The clinical questions were identified on the basis of a systematic literature search and a consensus meeting. We searched the literature for direct evidence on the management of LDH and assessed its certainty-generated recommendations using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) approach.
    RESULTS: The guideline panel made 20 recommendations, which covered the use of Shentong Zhuyu decoction, Shenzhuo decoction, Simiao San decoction, Duhuo Jisheng decoction, Yaobitong capsule, Yaotongning capsule, Osteoking, manual therapy, needle knife, manual acupuncture, electroacupuncture, Chinese exercise techniques (Tai Chi, Baduanjin, or Yijinjing), and integrative medicine, such as combined non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, neural nutrition, and traction. Recommendations were either strong or weak, or in the form of ungraded consensus-based statement.
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the first LDH treatment guideline for TCM and integrative medicine with a systematic search, synthesis of evidence, and using the GRADE method to rate the quality of evidence. We hope these recommendations can help support healthcare workers caring for LDH patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Lumbar disc herniation is a common disease in the clinical context and does great harm to either the physical or mental health of patients suffering from this disease. Many guidelines and consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation have been published domestically and internationally. According to the expert consensus, clinicians could adopt tailored and personalized diagnosis and treatment management strategies for lumbar disc herniation patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: The objective of the North American Spine Society\'s (NASS) Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation with Radiculopathy is to provide evidence-based recommendations to address key clinical questions surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. The guideline is intended to reflect contemporary treatment concepts for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy as reflected in the highest quality clinical literature available on this subject as of July 2011. The goals of the guideline recommendations are to assist in delivering optimum efficacious treatment and functional recovery from this spinal disorder.
    OBJECTIVE: To provide an evidence-based educational tool to assist spine specialists in the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy.
    METHODS: Systematic review and evidence-based clinical guideline.
    METHODS: This guideline is a product of the Lumbar Disc Herniation with Radiculopathy Work Group of NASS\' Evidence-Based Guideline Development Committee. The work group consisted of multidisciplinary spine care specialists trained in the principles of evidence-based analysis. A literature search addressing each question and using a specific search protocol was performed on English-language references found in Medline, Embase (Drugs and Pharmacology), and four additional evidence-based databases to identify articles. The relevant literature was then independently rated using the NASS-adopted standardized levels of evidence. An evidentiary table was created for each of the questions. Final recommendations to answer each clinical question were developed via work group discussion, and grades were assigned to the recommendations using standardized grades of recommendation. In the absence of Level I to IV evidence, work group consensus statements have been developed using a modified nominal group technique, and these statements are clearly identified as such in the guideline.
    RESULTS: Twenty-nine clinical questions were formulated and addressed, and the answers are summarized in this article. The respective recommendations were graded by strength of the supporting literature, which was stratified by levels of evidence.
    CONCLUSIONS: The clinical guideline has been created using the techniques of evidence-based medicine and best available evidence to aid practitioners in the care of patients with symptomatic lumbar disc herniation with radiculopathy. The entire guideline document, including the evidentiary tables, suggestions for future research, and all the references, is available electronically on the NASS Web site at http://www.spine.org/Pages/PracticePolicy/ClinicalCare/ClinicalGuidlines/Default.aspx and will remain updated on a timely schedule.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号