low-back pain (lbp)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景技术腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)引起的腰骶神经根病(LSR)是由神经根的机械压迫引起的病症。由于LDH,已提出了各种物理治疗干预措施来保守管理LSR。然而,缺乏多模式形式的物理治疗干预措施的研究。此外,物理治疗对受压迫神经根扩散张量成像(DTI)参数的影响尚未研究。本研究旨在探讨多模式物理治疗(MPT)对疼痛的影响,残疾,比目鱼H反射,LDH导致的慢性单侧LSR患者压迫神经根的DTI参数。方法采用便利样本进行前瞻性初步临床前-后试验。共招募了14例因L4-L5或L5-S1LDH引起的慢性单侧LSR患者进行研究。参与者总共接受了18个为期六周的MPT计划,其中包括电物理试剂,手动治疗干预,和核心稳定性练习。电物理试剂涉及干扰电流和热包。手动治疗干预包括肌筋膜释放,侧姿势位置分散,被动脊柱旋转动员,和高速低振幅操纵。视觉模拟量表(VAS),罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ),比目鱼H反射振幅,左右振幅(H/H)比,分数各向异性(FA),在基线和干预后测量受压神经根的表观扩散系数(ADC)。结果VAS有明显改善,RMDQ,H/H比,FA,和受压神经根的ADC。此外,与对侧相比,患侧的H反射幅度显着改善。结论该初步试验的观察结果表明,MPT是由于LDH导致的慢性单侧LSR患者的成功干预措施。关于受压神经根的DTI参数,FA升高,ADC降低。未来的研究与对照组,大样本量,需要更长的随访时间。
    Background Lumbosacral radiculopathy (LSR) due to lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a condition caused by mechanical compression of nerve roots. Various physical therapy interventions have been proposed for the conservative management of LSR due to LDH. However, the study of physical therapy interventions in a multimodal form is lacking. Additionally, the effect of physical therapy on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters of the compressed nerve root has not been studied. This study aimed to investigate the effects of multimodal physical therapy (MPT) on pain, disability, soleus H-reflex, and DTI parameters of the compressed nerve root in patients with chronic unilateral LSR due to LDH. Methods A prospective preliminary pre-post clinical trial with a convenience sample was conducted. A total of 14 patients with chronic unilateral LSR due to paracentral L4-L5 or L5-S1 LDH were recruited for the study. Participants received a total of 18 sessions of a six-week MPT program that consisted of electrophysical agents, manual therapy interventions, and core stability exercises. Electrophysical agents involved interferential current and hot pack. Manual therapy interventions included myofascial release, side posture positional distraction, passive spinal rotation mobilization, and high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation. Visual analog scale (VAS), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), soleus H-reflex amplitude, side-to-side amplitude (H/H) ratio, fractional anisotropy (FA), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the compressed nerve root were measured at baseline and post-intervention. Results There were significant improvements in VAS, RMDQ, H/H ratio, FA, and ADC of the compressed nerve root. Furthermore, significant improvement was found in the affected side compared with the contralateral side in H-reflex amplitude. Conclusions The observations of this preliminary trial suggest that MPT is a successful intervention in patients with chronic unilateral LSR due to LDH. Regarding DTI parameters of the compressed nerve root, FA increased and ADC decreased. Future studies with a control group, large sample sizes, and longer follow-up periods are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景技术腰背痛(LBP)是常见的并且显著影响所有年龄组的日常生活。MRI并不经常用作表现为LBP的患者的一线检查。除了有红旗症状.这项研究旨在使用疼痛严重程度及其影响作为MRI结果的预测指标,以帮助医生确定患者是否需要MRI。方法本横断面研究在神经外科门诊进行。问卷包括患者的人口统计学数据,红旗症状,和达拉斯疼痛问卷(DPQ)。然后,主治医师确定患者是否应该进行MRI预约。结果本研究纳入100例LBP患者,其中71例患有慢性LBP(CLBP)。在这71个中,有62个要求进行MRI检查,但只有26个发现与LBP有关。关于CLBP对DPQ衡量的日常活动的影响,CLBP影响其日常活动的患者与要求进行MRI检查的决定之间存在显著关联.然而,DPQ的其他3个参数与主诊医师要求MRI的决定之间未发现显著的统计学关联.结论关于使用DPQ问卷预测CLBP患者的MRI表现,研究表明,疼痛对DPQ的影响不一定与LBP相关的MRI表现相关.这表明DPQ评估工具没有优于医生的临床判断。
    Background Low back pain (LBP) is common and considerably impacts daily lives across all age groups. MRI is not frequently used as a first-line investigation for patients presenting with LBP, except in the presence of red-flag symptoms. This study aimed to use pain severity and its impact as a predictor for MRI findings to help physicians decide whether a patient needs an MRI. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted at the outpatient clinic of the neurosurgery department. The questionnaire included demographic data of the patients, red-flag symptoms, and the Dallas Pain Questionnaire (DPQ). The primary physician then determines whether the patient should have an MRI appointment. Results The study included 100 patients with LBP, of which 71 had chronic LBP (CLBP). Out of these 71, an MRI was requested for 62, but only 26 had findings related to LBP. Regarding the impact of CLBP on daily activities as measured by the DPQ, there was a significant association between those whose CLBP affected their daily activities and the decision to request an MRI. However, no significant statistical association was found between the three other parameters of the DPQ and the primary physician\'s decision to request an MRI. Conclusion Concerning the use of the DPQ questionnaire to predict MRI findings in patients with CLBP, the study indicates that significant pain impact on the DPQ does not necessarily correlate with MRI findings related to LBP. This suggests that the DPQ evaluation tool has no advantage over a physician\'s clinical judgment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号