linear accelerator

直线加速器
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    海马保护,作为脑部放射治疗的危险器官,可以保护患者的生活质量。传统上,预防性颅骨照射(PCI)已用于小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者,因为它可以提高生存率。这项研究旨在通过使用三种不同的治疗机来发现成功的PCI并同时保护海马体的贡献参数。为此,使用三个线性加速器中的三个半弧为45名SCLC患者生成了治疗计划(LINAC;ElektaInfinity,Synergy,和Axesse;Elekta有限公司,斯德哥尔摩,瑞典)具有不同的辐射场尺寸和多叶准直器(MLC)叶片厚度特征。处方剂量为25Gy,分为10个部分。基于放射疗法肿瘤学组0933剂量约束计算海马体的阈值。计划和治疗系统模板对所有三个LINAC都是通用的。计划评估基于95%等剂量的剂量学目标覆盖率,计划的最大剂量,合格指数(CI),计划调制程度(MOD),和患者特定质量保证(QA)合格率。Infinity的平均目标覆盖率最高(97.3%),其次是Axesse(96.6%)和Synergy(95.5%)。Synergy的平均最大剂量较高(27.5Gy),其次是Infinity(27.0Gy)和Axesse(26.9Gy)。Axesse计划的最高CI(0.93),其次是Infinity(0.91)和Synergy(0.88)。与Infinity(3.07)和Axesse(3.69)相比,Synergy(2.88)的计划MOD较低。最后,患者特定的QA在所有Infinity计划中都是成功的,除了一个协同计划,在17/45Axesse计划中,正如从该处理单元的现场大小所预期的那样。基于整体性能,目标覆盖率的最有利组合,海马体保留,用LINAC获得了计划的可交付性,具有最大的田间开口和最薄的MLC叶子。
    Hippocampus protection, as an organ at risk in brain radiotherapy, might protect patients\' quality of life. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has been used traditionally in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients as it increases survival. This study aimed to discover the contributing parameters for a successful PCI with simultaneous protection of the hippocampus by using three different treatment machines. For this purpose, treatment plans were generated for 45 SCLC patients using three half-arcs in three linear accelerators (LINACs; Elekta Infinity, Synergy, and Axesse; Elekta Ltd, Stockholm, Sweden) with different radiation field sizes and multileaf collimator (MLC) leaf thickness characteristics. The prescribed dose was 25 Gy in 10 fractions. Thresholds for the hippocampus were calculated based on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0933 dose constraints. The planning and treatment system templates were common to all three LINACs. Plan evaluation was based on the dosimetric target coverage by the 95% isodose, the maximum dose of the plan, the conformity index (CI), the degree of plan modulation (MOD), and the patient-specific quality assurance (QA) pass rate. The mean target coverage was highest for Infinity (97.3%), followed by Axesse (96.6%) and Synergy (95.5%). The mean maximum dose was higher for Synergy (27.5 Gy), followed by Infinity (27.0 Gy) and Axesse (26.9 Gy). Axesse plans had the highest CI (0.93), followed by Infinity (0.91) and Synergy (0.88). Plan MOD was lower for Synergy (2.88) compared with Infinity (3.07) and Axesse (3.69). Finally, patient-specific QA was successful in all Infinity plans, in all but one Synergy plan, and in 17/45 Axesse plans, as was expected from the field size in that treatment unit. Based on overall performance, the most favorable combination of target coverage, hippocampus sparing, and plan deliverability was obtained with the LINAC, which has the largest field opening and thinnest MLC leaves.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究调查了散射箔材料和采样支架的放置如何影响来自用于FLASH放射治疗的改进型医用直线加速器的电子束中的电子能量分布。我们分析了电离室各个位置的电子能谱,镜子,和下巴-评估铜的影响,Pb-Cu,Pb,和Ta箔。我们的发现表明,靠近源增强了电子能量分布对箔材料的依赖性,通过材料选择实现精确的光束控制。蒙特卡罗模拟对于设计箔片以实现期望的能量分布是有效的。将采样支架移动到远离源的位置减少了箔材料的影响,促进更均匀的能量传播,特别是在0.5-10MeV范围内的12MeV电子束。这些见解强调了定制材料选择和采样支架定位在优化电子能量分布和通量强度方面的关键作用,用于FLASH放射治疗研究。有利于实验设计和临床应用。
    This study investigates how scattering foil materials and sampling holder placement affect electron energy distribution in electron beams from a modified medical linear accelerator for FLASH radiotherapy. We analyze electron energy spectra at various positions-ionization chamber, mirror, and jaw-to evaluate the impact of Cu, Pb-Cu, Pb, and Ta foils. Our findings show that close proximity to the source intensifies the dependence of electron energy distribution on foil material, enabling precise beam control through material selection. Monte Carlo simulations are effective for designing foils to achieve desired energy distributions. Moving the sampling holder farther from the source reduces foil material influence, promoting more uniform energy spreads, particularly in the 0.5-10 MeV range for 12 MeV electron beams. These insights emphasize the critical role of tailored material selection and sampling holder positioning in optimizing electron energy distribution and fluence intensity for FLASH radiotherapy research, benefiting both experimental design and clinical applications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Controlled Clinical Trial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:没有随机证据比较全脑放疗(WBRT)和立体定向放射外科(SRS)治疗多发性脑转移瘤。这项前瞻性非随机对照单臂试验试图缩小差距,直到获得前瞻性随机对照试验结果。
    方法:我们纳入了除小细胞肺癌以外的所有组织学中4-10例脑转移和ECOG表现状态≤2的患者,生殖细胞肿瘤,和淋巴瘤。回顾性WBRT队列从2012-2017年接受治疗的连续患者中选择2:1。进行倾向得分匹配,以调整混杂因素,如性别,年龄,原发性肿瘤组织学,dsGPA评分,和全身治疗。使用基于LINAC的单等中心技术,在80%等剂量线处使用15-20Gyx1的处方剂量进行SRS。历史对照由3Gyx10或2.5Gyx14的等效WBRT剂量方案组成。
    结果:从2017-2020年招募患者,随访结束于7月1日,2021年。40名患者被招募到SRS队列中,70名患者被纳入WBRT队列中作为对照。中位OS,SRS队列的iPFS分别为10.4个月(95%-CI9.3-NA)和7.1个月(95%-CI3.9-14.2),和6.5个月(95%-CI4.9-10.4),WBRT队列为5.9个月(95%-CI4.1-8.8),分别。OS(HR:0.65;95%-CI0.40-1.05;P=0.074)和iPFS(P=.28)差异无统计学意义。在SRS队列中未观察到III级毒性。
    结论:该试验未达到其主要终点,因为与WBRT相比,SRS的OS改善无统计学意义,因此无法证明其优越性。免疫治疗和靶向治疗时代的前瞻性随机试验是必要的。
    There is no randomized evidence comparing whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of multiple brain metastases. This prospective nonrandomized controlled single arm trial attempts to reduce the gap until prospective randomized controlled trial results are available.
    We included patients with 4-10 brain metastases and ECOG performance status ≤ 2 from all histologies except small-cell lung cancer, germ cell tumors, and lymphoma. The retrospective WBRT-cohort was selected 2:1 from consecutive patients treated within 2012-2017. Propensity-score matching was performed to adjust for confounding factors such as sex, age, primary tumor histology, dsGPA score, and systemic therapy. SRS was performed using a LINAC-based single-isocenter technique employing prescription doses from 15-20Gyx1 at the 80% isodose line. The historical control consisted of equivalent WBRT dose regimens of either 3Gyx10 or 2.5Gyx14.
    Patients were recruited from 2017-2020, end of follow-up was July 1st, 2021. 40 patients were recruited to the SRS-cohort and 70 patients were eligible as controls in the WBRT-cohort. Median OS, and iPFS were 10.4 months (95%-CI 9.3-NA) and 7.1 months (95%-CI 3.9-14.2) for the SRS-cohort, and 6.5 months (95%-CI 4.9-10.4), and 5.9 months (95%-CI 4.1-8.8) for the WBRT-cohort, respectively. Differences were non-significant for OS (HR: 0.65; 95%-CI 0.40-1.05; P =.074) and iPFS (P =.28). No grade III toxicities were observed in the SRS-cohort.
    This trial did not meet its primary endpoint as the OS-improvement of SRS compared to WBRT was non-significant and thus superiority could not be proven. Prospective randomized trials in the era of immunotherapy and targeted therapies are warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基于线性加速器(LINAC)的立体定向放射外科(SRS)治疗三叉神经痛(TN)的疗效可能与伽玛刀SRS(GK-SRS)相似,但大部分数据来自接受GK-SRS治疗的患者.我们的目的是分析在我们机构的患者中基于LINAC的TN治疗的结果。
    我们回顾性分析了2006年至2018年接受基于LINAC的TNSRS患者的数据。数据来自患者的医疗记录。非参数统计用于分析。
    在这段时间内接受基于LINAC的SRS治疗的41名患者中(通常使用4mm准直器的剂量为90Gy),32例患者获得了SRS治疗后>3周的随访数据.治疗前BarrowNeurologicalInstitute(BNI)疼痛评分中位数为5(范围4-5)。随访时间为0.9~113.2个月,中位数为5个月。有显著改善后BNI疼痛评分(P<0.001),23例(72%)患者的BNI疼痛评分改善为1-3。一名患者有令人烦恼的感觉减退。大约38%的初始疼痛控制患者出现症状复发(BNI>3)。生存分析显示疼痛复发的中位时间为30个月。先前的微血管减压术(MVD)手术与治疗前后BNI疼痛评分的变化之间没有关系。
    结果表明,基于LINAC的SRS是治疗TN的有效手段。在该患者队列中,先前的MVD手术并未影响SRS从治疗前后降低BNI评分的功效。
    UNASSIGNED: Linear accelerator (LINAC)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) may have similar efficacy to Gamma Knife SRS (GK-SRS), but the preponderance of data comes from patients treated with GK-SRS. Our objective was to analyze the outcomes for LINAC-based treatment of TN in patients at our institution.
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively analyzed data for patients who underwent LINAC-based SRS for TN from 2006 to 2018. Data were collected from the patients\' medical records. Nonparametric statistics were used for the analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the 41 patients treated with LINAC-based SRS (typically 90 Gy dosed using a 4 mm collimator for one fraction) during that time, follow-up data of >3 weeks post-SRS were available for 32 patients. The median pretreatment Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain score was 5 (range 4-5). The follow-up period ranged from 0.9 to 113.2 months (median 5 months). There was significant improvement in postradiation BNI pain score (P < 0.001), with 23 (72%) patients who improved to a BNI pain score of 1-3. One patient had bothersome hypoesthesia postradiation. Approximately 38% of patients who had initial pain control had recurrence of symptoms (BNI > 3). Survival analysis showed a median time to pain recurrence of 30 months. There was no relationship between prior microvascular decompression (MVD) surgery and change in BNI pain score pre- to posttreatment.
    UNASSIGNED: The results demonstrate that LINAC-based SRS is an effective means to treat TN. Prior MVD surgery did not affect efficacy of SRS in lowering the BNI score from pre- to posttreatment in this patient cohort.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a framework to support automated standardized testing and analysis of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) image quality QA across multiple institutions. A survey was conducted among the participating institutions to understand the variability of the CBCT QA practices. A commercial, automated software platform was validated by seven institutions participating in a consortium dedicated to automated quality assurance. The CBCT image analysis framework was used to compare periodic QA results among 23 linear accelerators (linacs) from seven institutions. The CBCT image quality metrics (geometric distortion, spatial resolution, contrast, HU constancy, uniformity and noise) data are plotted as a function of means with the upper and lower control limits compared to the linac acceptance criteria and AAPM recommendations. For example, mean geometric distortion and HU constancy metrics were found to be 0.13 mm (TG142 recommendation: ≤2 mm) and 13.4 respectively (manufacturer acceptance specification: ≤±50).Image upload and analysis process was fully automated using a MATLAB-based platform. This analysis enabled a quantitative, longitudinal assessment of the performance of quality metrics which were also compared across 23 linacs. For key CBCT parameters such as uniformity, contrast, and HU constancy, all seven institutions used stricter goals than what would be recommended based on the analysis of the upper and lower control limits. These institutional goals were also found to be stricter than that found in AAPM published guidance. This work provides a reference that could be used to machine-specific optimized tolerance of CBCT image maintenance via control charts to monitor performance we well as the sensitivity of different tests in support of a broader quality assurance program. To ensure the daily image quality needed for patient care, the optimized statistical QA metrics recommended to using along with risk-based QA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    Single-isocenter dynamic conformal arc (SIDCA) therapy is a technically efficient way of delivering stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to multiple metastases simultaneously. This study reports on the safety and feasibility of linear accelerator (LINAC) based SRS with SIDCA for patients with multiple brain metastases.
    All patients who received SRS with this technique between November 2017 and June 2019 within a prospective registry trial were included. The patients were irradiated with a dedicated planning tool for multiple brain metastases using a LINAC with a 5 mm multileaf collimator. Follow-up was performed every 3 months, including clinical and radiological examination with cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These early data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Kaplan-Meier method.
    A total of 65 patients with 254 lesions (range 2-12) were included in this analysis. Median beam-on time was 23 min. The median follow-up at the time of analysis was 13 months (95% CI 11.1-14.9). Median overall survival and median intracranial progression-free survival was 15 months (95% CI 7.7-22.3) and 7 months (95% CI 3.9-10.0), respectively. Intracranial and local control after 1 year was 64.6 and 97.5%, respectively. During follow-up, CTCAE grade I adverse effects (AE) were experienced by 29 patients (44.6%; 18 of them therapy related, 27.7%), CTCAE grade II AEs by four patients (6.2%; one of them therapy related, 1.5%), and CTCAE grade III by three patients (4.6%; none of them therapy related). Two lesions (0.8%) in two patients (3.1%) were histopathologically proven to be radiation necrosis.
    Simultaneous SRS using SIDCA seems to be a feasible and safe treatment for patients with multiple brain metastases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Up to 20% of patients with brain metastases treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy and concomitant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) suffer from symptomatic radiation necrosis. The goal of this study is to evaluate Radiosurgery Dose Reduction for Brain Metastases on Immunotherapy (RADREMI) on six-month symptomatic radiation necrosis rates.
    UNASSIGNED: This study is a prospective single arm Phase I pilot study which will recruit patients with brain metastases receiving ICI delivered within 30 days before SRS. All patients will be treated with RADREMI dosing, which involves SRS doses of 18 Gy for 0-2 cm lesions, 14 Gy for 2.1-3 cm lesions, and 12 Gy for 3.1-4 cm lesions. All patients will be monitored for six-month symptomatic radiation necrosis (defined as a six-month rate of clinical symptomatology requiring steroid administration and/or operative intervention concomitant with imaging findings consistent with radiation necrosis) and six-month local control. We expect that RADREMI dosing will significantly reduce the symptomatic radiation necrosis rate of concomitant SRS + ICI without significantly sacrificing the local control obtained by the present RTOG 90-05 SRS dosing schema. Local control will be defined according to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria.
    UNASSIGNED: This study is the first prospective trial to investigate the safety of dose-reduced SRS in treatment of brain metastases with concomitant ICI. The findings should provide fertile soil for future multi-institutional collaborative efficacy trials of RADREMI dosing for this patient population.
    UNASSIGNED: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04047602 (registration date: July 25, 2019).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在过去,GRID疗法被用作使用正电压束治疗大体积和深层肿瘤的治疗方式。现在,随着巨伏束被引入放射治疗,一些放射治疗机构使用GRID疗法与巨伏光子用于大肿瘤的姑息治疗。由于GRID可能是削弱医用直线加速器(LINAC)头部产生的光中子的障碍,以及产生光中子的次要来源,因此,在辐射防护方面,评估GRID对患者的光中子剂量的影响很重要。
    方法:在本研究中,使用蒙特卡洛代码MCNPX,对LINAC的完整模型进行了仿真和验证。LINAC的中子源强度(Q),通量(φ)的分布,在有/没有GRID的两种情况下,在治疗表上计算中子的环境剂量当量(H*[10])。最后,在有/没有GRID的情况下,计算MIRD体模的某些组织/器官中中子的吸收剂量和剂量当量。
    结果:我们的结果表明,GRID仅将LINAC头部中光中子的产量提高了0.3%。MIRD体模中的计算表明,GRID覆盖的器官/组织中的中子剂量平均比常规放射疗法低48%。此外,在未发现的器官中(通过GRID),这一数额减少到25%。
    结论:根据本研究的结果,在GRID治疗技术与常规放射治疗相比,身体组织/器官中的中子剂量急剧减少。因此,不会担心GRID对不必要中子剂量增加的影响,从而导致继发性癌症的风险。
    BACKGROUND: In the past, GRID therapy was used as a treatment modality for the treatment of bulky and deeply seated tumors with orthovoltage beams. Now and with the introduction of megavoltage beams to radiotherapy, some of the radiotherapy institutes use GRID therapy with megavoltage photons for the palliative treatment of bulky tumors. Since GRID can be a barrier for weakening the photoneutrons produced in the head of medical linear accelerators (LINAC), as well as a secondary source for producing photoneutrons, therefore, in terms of radiation protection, it is important to evaluate the GRID effect on photoneutron dose to the patients.
    METHODS: In this study, using the Monte Carlo code MCNPX, a full model of a LINAC was simulated and verified. The neutron source strength of the LINAC (Q), the distributions of flux (φ), and ambient dose equivalent (H*[10]) of neutrons were calculated on the treatment table in both cases of with/without the GRID. Finally, absorbed dose and dose equivalent of neutrons in some of the tissues/organs of MIRD phantom were computed with/without the GRID.
    RESULTS: Our results indicate that the GRID increases the production of the photoneutrons in the LINAC head only by 0.3%. The calculations in the MIRD phantom show that neutron dose in the organs/tissues covered by the GRID is on average by 48% lower than conventional radiotherapy. In addition, in the uncovered organs (by the GRID), this amount is reduced to 25%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of this study, in GRID therapy technique compared to conventional radiotherapy, the neutron dose in the tissues/organs of the body is dramatically reduced. Therefore, there will be no concern about the GRID effect on the increase of unwanted neutron dose, and consequently the risk of secondary cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: To fully evaluate the efficacy of intracranial stereotactic irradiation, tumour control needs to be assessed in conjunction with the effects of radiation on normal tissue and the potential for changes in physiology, cognition and quality of life. This prospective pilot study investigated whether intracranial stereotactic irradiation induces cognitive changes in patients with cranial and base of skull lesions that did not directly involve the brain parenchyma. The value of a software-based psychometric approach to neurocognitive testing was also examined.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirty-four patients were enrolled, with 23 having sufficient data for statistical analyses. Pre-treatment baseline composite test score results for memory, attention, motor, language, executive function, and social function were compared to post-radiotherapy scores at final evaluation (median follow-up 24 months, range 12-59 months). Testing was done using the Brain Resource Company® (BRC) Internet accessed cognitive function test batteries, namely the WebNeuro® and IntegNeuro®, and the BRISC® (Brain Resource Inventory for Social Cognition).
    UNASSIGNED: Quantitative results revealed no overall decline in cognitive function, and improvement in both executive functioning (p = 0.0002) and social functioning (p = 0.0016). Qualitatively, 6 patients at the final endpoint, and 4 patients at 12 months, were found to have a decline in one or more domains of function; with some of the patients who declined also showing improvement in certain domains.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, no statistically significant evidence of cognitive decline was observed following intracranial stereotactic irradiation, at either 12 months or beyond.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号