libraries

图书馆
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在回顾有关人才管理的现有文献,目的是通过解决人才管理的关键方面来影响图书馆和信息管理,如人才管理策略,职业发展的重要性,评估有才华的员工,和组织弹性。
    从Scopus和WebofScience索引的各种学术论文中检索到有关人才发展和职业管理的文献,以进行细致的文献综述作为本研究的平台。根据作者的意见,开发了两个模型。文献提供了准确的信息,即人才管理在促进组织卓越方面起着决定性的作用,在一般的各种组织中,尤其是在图书馆中。
    本研究为图书馆和信息专业人员实施有效的人才管理和保留政策提供了建设性建议。此外,这项研究为现有文献的语料库增加了巨大的价值,为未来视野中的图书馆管理提供了一个平台。
    本研究为政策制定者和图书馆管理员提供了建设性的建议,以培养有才华的员工,在未来几十年内实现卓越的图书馆和信息服务。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to review the extant literature on talent management with the objective of influencing library and information management by addressing the key facets of talent management, such as talent management strategies, importance of career development, evaluation of talented employees, and organizational resilience.
    UNASSIGNED: Literature on the development of talent and career management was retrieved from various scholarly papers indexed in Scopus and Web of Science to have a meticulous literature review serving as the platform of the present study. In light of the authors\' observations, two models were developed. The literature provides precise information that talent management plays a decisive role in promoting organizational excellence invariably in all kinds of organizations in general and libraries in particular.
    UNASSIGNED: This study provides constructive recommendations for the implementation of effective talent management and retention policies for library and information professionals. Moreover, this study adds immense value to the corpus of existing literature to set a platform for the augmentation of library management in futuristic vision.
    UNASSIGNED: This study provides constructive recommendations to policy makers and library administrators to foster talented employees for excelling library and information services for the next several decades.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自第一个卫生图书馆标准出现以来,在这个领域已经发表了大量的文献,通常专注于特定的标准,或一套标准。在文献综述的情况下,它们通常是局部的,并被整合到更广泛的研究中。
    目的:确定和分析过去70年来全球不同国家制定的国家卫生图书馆标准,追溯其历史发展和现状。
    方法:在Scopus中对已发表的文献进行了全面搜索,WebofScience,Medline,Lisa,和谷歌学者到2023年5月。回顾了检索到的论文的参考文献列表和引文。经过筛选和资格,共有112篇论文被纳入最终评选。
    结果:确定了由一组盎格鲁-撒克逊和欧洲国家发布的40多个国家医院图书馆标准。按照时间顺序,标准已经安排了几十年,从1950年代到现在,以及它们外表的背景,他们的主要贡献,并分析了它们之间的关系。随着时间的推移,标志着它们演变和发展的主要趋势也已经确立。
    结论:标准在当今卫生图书馆面临的重要挑战中发挥着关键作用,以证明其服务在组织运作和改善患者护理方面的巨大影响和价值。
    BACKGROUND: Since the emergence of the first health library standards, a large body of literature has been published in this field, most often focusing on a particular standard, or set of standards. In the case of literature reviews, they have been usually partial and integrated into a broader study.
    OBJECTIVE: Identify and analyse national health library standards developed in different countries worldwide over the past 70 years, tracing their historical development and current status.
    METHODS: A comprehensive search of published literature was conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, Medline, LISA, and Google Scholar up to May 2023. The reference lists and citations of retrieved papers were reviewed. After screening and eligibility, a total of 112 papers were included in the final selection.
    RESULTS: More than 40 national hospital library standards published by a group of Anglo-Saxon and European countries were identified. In a chronological approach, the standards have been arranged by decades, from the 1950s to the present day, and the context of their appearance, their main contributions, and the relationships between them have been analysed. The major trends that have marked their evolution and development over time have also been established.
    CONCLUSIONS: Standards have a key role to play in the important challenge facing health libraries today to demonstrate the high impact and value of their services in the functioning of their organisations and in improving patient care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:2022年11月人工智能聊天机器人ChatGPT的出现引起了不同学科的广泛关注。尽管在各个部门广泛采用,探索其在图书馆中的应用,尤其是在医疗领域,仍然有限。
    目的:医学图书馆中的ChatGPT等许多感兴趣的领域仍未被探索,本综述旨在综合目前对其已知的内容,以确定差距并促进进一步的研究。
    方法:采用库珀的综合审查方法,这项研究涉及对ChatGPT的现有文献及其在库上下文中的潜在实现的全面分析。
    结果:在各种数据库中进行的系统文献检索得出了166篇论文,30个因不相关而被排除在外。经过抽象审查和方法评估,共入选136篇。关键评估技能计划定性清单进一步缩小到29篇论文,形成本研究的基础。文献分析揭示了ChatGPT在医学图书馆中的多种应用,包括帮助用户查找相关医疗信息,回答问题,提供建议和便利获取资源。在这种情况下,还强调了与ChatGPT相关的潜在挑战和道德考虑。
    结论:定位为综述,我们的研究阐明了ChatGPT在医学图书馆中的应用,并讨论了相关注意事项.将ChatGPT集成到医学图书馆服务中,有望增强信息检索和用户体验,有利于图书馆用户和更广泛的医学界。
    BACKGROUND: The emergence of the artificial intelligence chatbot ChatGPT in November 2022 has garnered substantial attention across diverse disciplines. Despite widespread adoption in various sectors, the exploration of its application in libraries, especially within the medical domain, remains limited.
    OBJECTIVE: Many areas of interest remain unexplored like ChatGPT in medical libraries and this review aims to synthesise what is currently known about it to identify gaps and stimulate further research.
    METHODS: Employing Cooper\'s integrative review method, this study involves a comprehensive analysis of existing literature on ChatGPT and its potential implementations within library contexts.
    RESULTS: A systematic literature search across various databases yielded 166 papers, with 30 excluded for irrelevance. After abstract reviews and methodological assessments, 136 articles were selected. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist further narrowed down to 29 papers, forming the basis for the present study. The literature analysis reveals diverse applications of ChatGPT in medical libraries, including aiding users in finding relevant medical information, answering queries, providing recommendations and facilitating access to resources. Potential challenges and ethical considerations associated with ChatGPT in this context are also highlighted.
    CONCLUSIONS: Positioned as a review, our study elucidates the applications of ChatGPT in medical libraries and discusses relevant considerations. The integration of ChatGPT into medical library services holds promise for enhancing information retrieval and user experience, benefiting library users and the broader medical community.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    体外增强放疗(EBRT)和术中放疗(IORT)对早期乳腺癌患者有效。然而,IORT和EBRT对患者预后的差异仍有待阐明。这项荟萃分析的目的是调查局部复发(LR)的差异,远处转移,无病生存率(DFS),和这两种疗法之间的总生存期(OS)。我们搜查了Cochrane图书馆,PubMed,WebofScience和Embase,从成立到1月10日,2022年。我们使用Cochrane偏差风险评估工具来评估纳入研究的偏差风险,STATA15.0工具用于荟萃分析.最终纳入了8项研究。荟萃分析表明,在两种放射治疗之间,LR的长期风险存在不一致的发现。LR的短期风险没有显着差异,转移率,DFS,和OSIORT会更方便,耗时少,成本更低,更有效地减少副作用和毒性。然而,这些益处必须与长期LR风险增加的可能性相平衡.
    External boost radiotherapy (EBRT) and intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) are shown to be effective in patients with early-stage breast cancer. However, the difference between IORT and EBRT for patients\' prognosis remains to be elucidated. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to investigate differences in local recurrence (LR), distant metastases, disease free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) between these two therapies. We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science and Embase, from inception to Jan 10th, 2022. We used The Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment tool to assess the risk of bias of the included studies, and the STATA15.0 tool was used for the meta-analyses. Eight studies were ultimately included. Meta-analysis demonstrated that there was an inconsistent finding in the long-term risk of LR between the two radiotherapies, and there was no significant difference in short-term risk of LR, the metastasis rate, DFS, and OS IORT would be more convenient, less time-consuming, less costly, and more effective at reducing side effects and toxicity. However, these benefits must be balanced against the potential for increased risk of LR in the long term.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:神经丝轻链(NfL)是评估心脏骤停(CA)后神经功能的新型生物标志物。尽管荟萃分析已经证实了其预测价值,它没有对其研究进行更详细的分析。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估CA后自主循环恢复患者血清NfL水平与神经系统预后的关系。根据样本采集时间进行亚组分析,评估神经功能的时间,研究设计,是否收到TTM,样品测定方法,以及患者神经系统疾病的存在。分析这些因素对血清NfL预测价值的影响。
    方法:已发布Cochrane评论和更新,MEDLINE的扩展搜索,科克伦图书馆,Embase,Scopus,ClinicalKey,CINAHL,和WebofScience在2022年3月之前的相关研究通过纳入和排除标准进行评估.使用随机效应模型或固定效应模型计算标准平均差和95%置信区间,以评估一个可变因子NfL水平与CA患者预后之间的关联。根据样品采集时间进行亚组分析。还使用Egger和Begg检验评估了预后分析和发表偏倚。
    结果:在1209篇相关的筛查文章中,6项研究(1360例患者)符合纳入标准,并选择进行荟萃分析。预后良好组(CPC1-2,CPC:脑性能分类评分)血清NfL水平明显低于预后不良组(CPC3-5)SMD(标准化均差)=0.553,95CI(置信区间)=0.418-0.687,I2=65.5%P<0.05。并且在每个采样时间点也存在这种关系(入院时收集NfL标本:SMD:0.48,95CI:0.24-0.73;CA后24小时收集标本:SMD:0.60,95CI:0.32-0.88;CA后48小时获得标本:SMD:0.51,95CI:0.18-0.85;CA后72小时获得标本:SMD:0.59,9538)
    结论:NfL可能在心脏骤停后自发循环患者中发挥潜在的神经预后作用,无论CA后何时采集样本.
    Neurofilament light chain (NfL) is a novel biomarker for the assessment of neurological function after cardiac arrest (CA). Although meta-analysis has confirmed its predictive value, it has not conducted a more detailed analysis of its research. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship between serum NfL level and neurological prognosis in patients with spontaneous circulation recovery after CA, and subgroup analysis was conducted according to sample collection time, time to assess neurological function, study design, whether TTM was received, the method of specimen determination, and the presence of neurological disease in patients. To analyze the influence of these factors on the predictive value of serum NfL.
    Published Cochrane reviews and an updated, extended search of MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, ClinicalKey, CINAHL, and Web of Science for relevant studies until March 2022 were assessed through inclusion and exclusion criteria. The standard mean difference and 95% confidence interval were calculated using the random-effects model or fixed-effects model to assess the association between one variable factor NfL level and the outcome of CA patients. Subgroup analysis according to sample collection time was performed. The prognosis analysis and publication bias were also assessed using Egger\'s and Begg\'s tests.
    Among 1209 related articles for screening, 6 studies (1360 patients) met the inclusion criteria and were selected for meta-analysis. The level of serum NfL in the good prognosis group (CPC1-2, CPC: cerebral performance category score) was significantly lower than that in the poor prognosis group (CPC3-5)SMD(standardized mean difference) = 0.553, 95%CI(confidence interval) = 0.418-0.687, I2 = 65.5% P<0.05). And this relationship also exists at each sampling time point (NfL specimens were collected on admission: SMD:0.48,95%CI:0.24-0.73; Samples were collected 24 hours after CA: SMD:0.60,95%CI:0.32-0.88;Specimens were obtained 48 hours after CA: SMD:0.51, 95%CI:0.18-0.85;Specimens were obtained 72 hours after CA: SMD:0.59, 95%CI:0.38-0.81).
    NfL may play a potential neuroprognostication role in postcardiac arrest patients with spontaneous circulation, regardless of when the sample was collected after CA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Advances in conceptualizing settings in health promotion include understanding settings as complex and interlinked systems with a core commitment to health and related outcomes such as health literacy. Traditional settings for the development of health literacy include health care environments and schools. There is a need to identify and conceptualize non-traditional and emerging settings of twenty-first-century everyday life. The aim of this conceptual review is to inform a conceptual model of a \"non-traditional\" setting for the development of health literacy. The model uses the example of the public library to propose four equity-focused antecedents required in a setting for the development of health literacy: the setting acknowledges the wider determinants of health, is open access, involves local communities in how it is run, and facilitates informed action for health. The review concludes that a settings approach to the development of health literacy can be conceptualized as part of a coordinated \"supersetting approach,\" where multiple settings work in synergy with each other.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    由于COVID-19大流行,医学图书馆和信息中心的服务发生了变化。本研究旨在确定COVID-19大流行期间医学图书馆和信息中心的创新服务。在这次范围审查中,PubMed,WebofScience(WOS),Scopus,ProQuest,图书馆,搜索了信息科学与技术文摘(LISTA)数据库,以确定案例研究和案例系列。在筛选确定的研究后,选择了18项研究。结果显示,COVID-19期间医学图书馆和信息中心的主要用户是医疗保健提供者和接受者,研究人员,组织人员,普通图书馆用户。这些图书馆还提供了COVID-19期间的创新服务,包括远程教育服务,虚拟信息服务,虚拟指南,提供信息资源,以及对治疗团队的循证反应。为了提供这些新服务,医学图书馆使用传统的,半传统,以及电话等现代信息和通信技术,电子邮件,在线图书馆平台,电子学习,和社交网络。面对COVID-19危机,医学图书馆和信息中心改变了他们提供服务的方式。分析在此期间提供的服务可以为决策者提供一个模型,以及医学图书馆员和信息专业人员来改善他们的服务。此处提供的信息可用于将来为图书馆服务提供信息,同样的危急情况。
    The services of medical libraries and information centers has changed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to identify the innovative services of medical libraries and information centers during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this scoping review, PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), Scopus, ProQuest, Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts (LISTA) databases were searched to identify case studies and case series. After screening the identified studies, 18 studies were selected. The results showed that the main users of medical libraries and information centers during COVID-19 were health care providers and recipients, researchers, organizational staff, and ordinary library users. Innovative services during the COVID-19 were also provided in these libraries, including distance education services, virtual information services, virtual guidelines, providing information resources, and evidence-based response to treatment teams. To provide these new services, medical libraries used traditional, semi-traditional, and modern information and communication technologies such as telephone, email, online library platforms, e-learning, and social networks. Medical libraries and information centers changed the way they provide services in the face of the COVID-19 crisis. Analyzing the services provided during this period can provide a model for policymakers, and medical librarians and information professionals to improve their services. The information presented here can be used to inform library services during future, similarly critical situations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    人类图书馆(HL)于2000年在丹麦首次成立,已被世界各地的不同社区采用。这是一种创新的方法,可以吸引公众的“读者”与少数群体或边缘化社区的“书籍”进行协作对话,以了解他们的生活经历并减少公众的污名和刻板印象。在HL普及的同时,其研究基础和实施结构仍然有限。这篇系统的叙事综述旨在回顾HL文献,以(1)总结设计,实施,进程,和现有HL计划的结果,以及(2)为未来实施更有效的综合建议,伦理,和明智的HL。在八个电子数据库中进行了系统的搜索,得出了2010年至2022年出版的关于HL的23篇期刊文章和书籍章节。已确定的文献显示了格式上的差异,地点,scale,准备,和招聘。报告了各种具有不同社会身份和不同文化群体的书籍,而读者大多来自大学和学校社区。读者报告了偏见的减少和态度的改善,而读者和书籍都报道了个人成长的各个方面。建议使用未来的HL实施指南,明确阐明道德考虑因素和各种严格的研究方法。
    First started in Denmark in 2000, Human Library (HL) has been adopted by different communities around the world. It is an innovative approach that engages \"readers\" from the general public to have collaborative conversations with \"books\" from minority or marginalized communities to learn about their lived experiences and reduce public stigma and stereotypes. While the HL is popularized, its research base and implementation structure remain limited. This systematic narrative review aims to review the HL literature to (1) summarize the design, implementation, processes, and outcomes of existing HL programs and (2) synthesize recommendations for future implementation of more effective, ethical, and sensible HL. A systematic search in eight electronic databases yielded 23 journal articles and book chapters about HL published from 2010 to 2022. The identified literature demonstrated variations in format, venue, scale, preparation, and recruitment. A wide range of books with different social identities and from different cultural groups were reported, while readers were mostly from university and school communities. Reduced prejudices and improved attitudes were reported in readers, while both readers and books reported various facets of personal growth. Future HL using implementation guidelines with clearly articulate ethical considerations and diverse rigorous research methodologies are recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:久坐行为(SB)是健康的负面常规,尤其是在年龄增长的时候。促进积极的生活方式和减少SB是一项全球性的努力。这项研究的目的是分析积极的基于学校的计划对儿童和青少年中断长期坐着进行日常体育锻炼(PA)和日常SB的影响。
    方法:进行系统评价。包括临床试验,这些临床试验分析了通过主动休息和基于教室的PA中断长时间坐的效果。在课堂上实施PA而不中断长时间坐着的研究或实施多模式干预的研究被排除在外。在6个数据库中进行了系统的搜索:Medline,WOS,科克伦图书馆,SPORTDiscus,CINAHL和EMBASE。主要结果是每日PA和每日SB,而中等至剧烈的体力活动(MVPA)被认为是次要结局。
    结果:纳入了六项研究,共有976名6-14岁的参与者。干预措施在久坐时间中断(5-30分钟)的持续时间上是不同的,频率(每天1-3次,每周3次)和总持续时间(五天至三年)。50%的研究评分为“高风险”偏倚。对每日PA进行了三次荟萃分析,MVPA和SB,显示每日PA和MVPA的显着改善。
    结论:旨在中断长时间坐着的校本计划可能是改善每日PA和MVPA水平的良好策略。(注册号:CRD42022358933)。
    Sedentary behavior (SB) is a negative routine for health, especially during advancing age. Promoting an active lifestyle and reducing SB is a global endeavor. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of active school-based programs to interrupt prolonged sitting for daily physical activity (PA) and daily SB in children and adolescents.
    A systematic review was conducted. Clinical trials analyzing the effect of interrupting prolonged sitting with active breaks and classroom-based PA were included. Studies that implemented PA in class without interrupting prolonged sitting or those that implemented multimodal interventions were excluded. A systematic search was conducted in 6 databases: Medline, WOS, Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL and EMBASE. Primary outcomes were daily PA and daily SB, while moderate-to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was considered a secondary outcome.
    Six studies were included, with a total of 976 participants between 6-14 years. The interventions were heterogeneous in duration of the sitting time interruption (5-30 min), frequency (1-3 times per-day up to three times per-week) and total duration (five days to three years). 50% of the studies scored \"high risk\" of bias. Three meta-analyses were performed for daily PA, MVPA and SB, showing a significant improvement in the daily PA and MVPA.
    School-based programs aimed to interrupt prolonged sitting could be a good strategy to improve daily PA and MVPA levels. (Registration number: CRD42022358933).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评论这本书,MaxWertheimer,《生产性思维》,作者:ViktorSarris(2020)。这本书包含了马克斯·韦特海默对生产性思维的研究的原始版本的复制品,1945年死后出版,由ViktorSarris作了简短的序言和更广泛的介绍,普通心理学名誉教授,前法兰克福约翰·沃尔夫冈·歌德大学MaxWertheimer主席。在他的介绍中,萨里斯简要总结了1920年的研究,然后逐章介绍1945年卷的内容,将结果总结在一个名为“韦特海默信条”的部分中。“生产思维的原版已经绝版一段时间了,就像第二版一样,Wertheimer的另一篇文章,他的儿子MichaelWertheimer于1959年出版,他自己是心理学教授。扩展版本于1982年出版,但现在也绝版。原始文本的重新出版为图书馆以及心理学老师的学生提供了一个熟悉经典研究的机会,注入了作者活泼的探究精神,但引用的次数多于阅读。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2022年APA,保留所有权利)。
    Reviews the book, Max Wertheimer, Productive Thinking by Viktor Sarris (2020). This volume contains a reproduction of the original edition of Max Wertheimer\'s study of productive thinking, published posthumously in 1945, with a brief preface and a more extensive introduction by Viktor Sarris, Professor Emeritus of General Psychology and former holder of the Max Wertheimer Chair at the Johann Wolfgang Goethe University in Frankfurt am Main. In his introduction, Sarris briefly summarizes the 1920 study, and then provides a chapter by chapter account of the 1945 volume\'s content, summarizing the results in a section called \"Wertheimer\'s Credo.\" The original edition of Productive Thinking has been out of print for some time, as has a second edition, with an additional article by Wertheimer, published in 1959 by his son Michael Wertheimer, himself a professor of psychology. An expanded edition was published in 1982, but is now also out of print. This republication of the original text offers an opportunity to libraries as well as students of teachers of psychology to acquaint themselves with a classical study, which is infused with the lively spirit of inquiry characteristic of its author, but is more often cited than read. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号