leg ulcers

腿部溃疡
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    伤口愈合协会动脉功能不全溃疡治疗指南最初于2006年发布,最后更新于2014年。这些准则提供了建议,以及他们各自的证据水平,关于七个类别:诊断,手术,感染控制,伤口床准备,敷料,辅助治疗和长期维持。在过去的9年里,有关动脉溃疡治疗这些方面的其他文献已经发表.一个由院士组成的咨询小组,选择临床医生和研究人员更新2014年指南.成员包括血管外科医生,内科医生,整形外科医生,麻醉师,急诊医生和皮肤科医生,都有伤口愈合的专业知识。本文的目标是评估相关的新发现,指南的更新版本将基于这些发现。
    The Wound Healing Society guidelines for the treatment of arterial insufficiency ulcers were originally published in 2006, with the last update in 2014. These guidelines provided recommendations, along with their respective levels of evidence, on seven categories: diagnosis, surgery, infection control, wound bed preparation, dressings, adjuvant therapy and long-term maintenance. Over the last 9 years, additional literature regarding these aspects of arterial ulcer management has been published. An advisory panel comprised of academicians, clinicians and researchers was chosen to update the 2014 guidelines. Members included vascular surgeons, internists, plastic surgeons, anaesthesiologists, emergency medicine physicians and dermatologists, all with expertise in wound healing. The goal of this article is to evaluate relevant new findings upon which an updated version of the guidelines will be based.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于静脉腿部溃疡的S2k指南是在德国静脉和淋巴瘤学会(DGPL)的领导下主动创建的。该指南小组还由德国血液学和淋巴学会的代表组成,德国皮肤病学会,德国普通医学学会,德国血管学会,德国血管外科和血管医学学会,德国外科学会,德国皮肤外科学会,德国伤口愈合和伤口治疗协会,血液学家和淋巴学家和倡议ChronischeWunden的专业协会。本指引的目的是在协商一致的基础上,结合各专业团体的不同方法和知识水平,因此,可以为静脉腿部溃疡患者提供最佳治疗的基本概念。共提出并商定了70项具体建议,划分为诊断的主题领域,治疗,预防复发,和日常挑战。因此,该指南反映了科学知识的现状,并旨在广泛用作日常临床实践中治疗静脉性腿部溃疡患者的最佳可用文件。
    This S2k guideline on venous leg ulcers was created on the initiative and under the leadership of the German Society of Phlebology and Lymphology (DGPL). The guideline group also consisted of representatives from the German Society for Phlebology and Lymphology, German Dermatological Society, German Society for General Medicine, German Society for Angiology, German Society for Vascular Surgery and Vascular Medicine, German Society for Surgery, German Society for Dermatosurgery, German Society for Wound Healing and Wound Treatment, Professional Association of Phlebologists and Lymphologists and Initiative Chronische Wunden. The aim of this guideline is to combine the different approaches and levels of knowledge of the respective professional groups on the basis of consensus, so that a basic concept for the best possible treatment of patients with venous leg ulcers can be provided. A total of 70 specific recommendations were formulated and agreed upon, divided into the subject areas of diagnostics, therapy, prevention of recurrences, and everyday challenges. The guideline thus reflects the current state of scientific knowledge and is intended to be widely used as the best available document for the treatment of patients with venous leg ulcers in everyday clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Background Leg ulcers are a common cause of morbidity and disability and result in significant health and social care expenditure. The UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Clinical Guideline (CG)168, published in July 2013, sought to improve care of patients with leg ulcers, recommending that patients with a break in the skin below the knee that had not healed within two weeks be referred to a specialist vascular service for diagnosis and management. Aim Determine the impact of CG168 on referrals to a leg ulcer service. Methods Patients referred with leg ulceration during an 18-month period prior to CG168 (January 2012-June 2013) and an 18-month period commencing six months after (January 2014-June 2015) publication of CG168 were compared. Results There was a two-fold increase in referrals (181 patients, 220 legs vs. 385 patients, 453 legs) but no change in mean age, gender or median-duration of ulcer at referral (16.6 vs. 16.2 weeks). Mean-time from referral to specialist appointment increased (4.8 vs. 6 weeks, p = 0.0001), as did legs with superficial venous insufficiency (SVI) (36% vs. 44%, p = 0.05). There was a trend towards more SVI endovenous interventions (32% vs. 39%, p = 0.271) with an increase in endothermal (2 vs. 32 legs, p = 0.001) but no change in sclerotherapy (24 vs. 51 legs) treatments. In both groups, 62% legs had compression. There was a reduction in legs treated conservatively with simple dressings (26% vs. 15%, p = 0.0006). Conclusions Since CG168, there has been a considerable increase in leg ulcer referrals. However, patients are still not referred until ulceration has been present for many months. Although many ulcers are multi-factorial and the mainstay of treatment remains compression, there has been an increase in SVI endovenous intervention. Further efforts are required to persuade community practitioners to refer patients earlier, to educate patients and encourage further investment in chronically underfunded leg ulcer services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号