lean

精益
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)存在于瘦弱人群中。然而,与非瘦患者相比,这些患者的预后肝脏和心血管风险的大小尚不清楚.我们的目的是调查这个话题,并探讨这些风险是否根据与NAFLD严重程度相关的因素而发生变化。
    方法:在PubMed和Embase数据库中搜索队列研究(截至2024年4月发表),这些研究评估了患有NAFLD的瘦和非瘦个体的肝脏和心血管(CV)结局,并报告了未调整或调整的数据。我们使用随机效应模型汇集了风险比(RR)或风险比(HRs),并进行了亚组和荟萃回归分析。
    结果:我们确定了22项研究,研究对象超过100万NAFLD患者(13.0%为瘦)。精益NAFLD在未调整分析中显示肝脏相关事件的风险相似(RR1.08,95%CI0.79-1.49,I2=31%),但与非精益NAFLD相比,调整后分析的风险更高(HR1.66,95%CI1.17-2.36,I2=83%)。精益NAFLD具有较高的肝脏相关死亡率风险(RR2.22,95%CI1.57-3.15,I2=0%;HR2.26,95%CI1.14-4.51,I2=0%)。对于CV结果,在未经调整的分析中,瘦NAFLD患任何心血管疾病的风险较低(RR=0.82,95%CI0.70-0.95,I2=88%),但在调整后的分析中风险相似(HR0.89,95%CI0.77-1.02,I2=78%),与非瘦NAFLD相比,心血管死亡率风险相似(RR1.09,95%CI0.71-1.66,I2=85%;HR1.26,95%CI0.89-1.78,I2=46%)。
    结论:瘦弱的NAFLD患者的肝脏结局较差,但与非瘦NAFLD患者相比,CV结果相似,强调密切监测这两个群体的重要性。
    OBJECTIVE: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is present in lean people. However, the magnitude of the prognostic hepatic and cardiovascular risk in these patients compared to non-lean counterparts remains unclear. We aimed to investigate this topic, and to explore whether these risks change based on factors related to NAFLD severity.
    METHODS: PubMed and Embase databases were searched for cohort studies (published through April 2024) that evaluated liver and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in lean and non-lean individuals with NAFLD and reported unadjusted or adjusted data. We pooled risk ratios (RRs) or hazard ratios (HRs) using a random-effects modeling and performed subgroup and meta-regressions analyses.
    RESULTS: We identified 22 studies with over 1 million NAFLD patients (13.0% were lean). Lean NAFLD showed a similar risk of liver-related events in unadjusted analysis (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.79-1.49, I2 = 31%), but a higher risk in adjusted analysis (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.17-2.36, I2 = 83%) compared to non-lean NAFLD. Lean NAFLD had a higher risk of liver-related mortality (RR 2.22, 95% CI 1.57-3.15, I2 = 0%; HR 2.26, 95% CI 1.14-4.51, I2 = 0%). For CV outcomes, lean NAFLD had a lower risk of any cardiovascular disease in unadjusted analysis (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.70-0.95, I2 = 88%), but similar risk in adjusted analysis (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.77-1.02, I2 = 78%), and similar risk of cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.71-1.66, I2 = 85%; HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.89-1.78, I2 = 46%) compared to non-lean NAFLD.
    CONCLUSIONS: Lean NAFLD patients have worse liver outcomes, but similar CV outcomes compared to non-lean NAFLD patients, highlighting the importance of monitoring both groups closely.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    医疗保健对社会做出了重大贡献,社区的经济和环境效益。相应地,它是能源和消耗品的重要雇主和消费者,往往成本很高。精益,质量改进方法侧重于消除非增值(NVA)活动(从客户角度来看不增加价值的步骤),以改善人员流动,信息或货物。越来越多,精益思想正在从最初的消除NVA的重点演变为涵盖可持续性的更全面的方法。然而,很少的工作是故意进行的,包括精益医疗干预中的环境可持续性结果。现实主义审查方法有助于理解干预工作的程度,为谁,在什么背景下,为什么和如何,并且已被证明在医疗保健环境中与精益干预相关的研究中很有用。该协议为现实主义者的审查提供了详细信息,该审查将使人们了解某些机制被激活的特定环境,从而将环境可持续性结果纳入精益医疗改善干预措施的设计中。
    Healthcare makes a significant contribution to the social, economic and environmental benefits of communities. It is correspondingly a significant employer and consumer of both energy and consumables, often at high costs. Lean, a quality improvement methodology focuses on the elimination of non-value add (NVA) activities (steps that do not add value from the perspective of the customer) to improve the flow of people, information or goods. Increasingly, Lean thinking is evolving from its initial focus on eliminating NVA to a more holistic approach that encompasses sustainability. However, little work has been undertaken intentionally, including environmental sustainability outcomes in Lean healthcare interventions. Realist review methodology facilitates an understanding of the extent to which an intervention works, for whom, in what context, why and how, and has proven useful in research relating to Lean interventions in healthcare settings. This protocol provides details for a realist review that will enable an understanding of the specific contexts in which certain mechanisms are activated that enable the inclusion of environmental sustainability outcomes in the design of Lean healthcare improvement interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    妊娠糖尿病(GDM)影响全球近15%的妊娠,并且在全球范围内呈上升趋势。虽然这种增长被认为主要来自超重和肥胖,正常和体重不足的女性也会受到影响,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家。然而,非超重女性的GDM仍未得到充分研究。因此,我们调查了全球正常和体重不足女性的患病率.
    在OvidMEDLINE进行了全面的文献检索,OvidEmbase,科克伦图书馆检索的研究根据预定义的纳入/排除标准筛选合格性。提取体重指数(BMI)正常和体重不足的女性的GDM患病率,平均患病率是在全球范围内计算的,世界卫生组织区域,和国家。在可用时描述妊娠结局。
    共纳入145项研究。非超重女性(BMI<25kg/m2)的GDM全球平均患病率为7.3%,体重不足女性(BMI<18.5kg/m2)为5.0%。非超重女性的GDM患病率在亚洲最高(平均12.1%),在非洲地区最低(0.7%)。患病率最高的国家是越南(21.1%),芬兰(19.8%),波兰(19.3%),孟加拉国(18.65%),和中国(17.7%)。非超重GDM女性出生的大胎龄婴儿(LGA)的全球平均患病率为9.9%,低于GDM普通人群的平均患病率(14%)。
    GDM比以前认识到的非超重女性更常见,尤其是在亚洲,但在欧洲国家也是如此。与之前报道的所有GDM女性相比,非超重GDM女性的LGA婴儿患病率较低,尽管有关妊娠结局的数据有限。这些发现挑战了建议限制GDM管理体重增加的指南。应紧急对未超重女性GDM的病理生理学和并发症进行进一步研究,以告知适当的管理指南并支持最佳的妊娠结局。
    UNASSIGNED: Gestational diabetes (GDM) affects nearly 15% of pregnancies worldwide and is increasing globally. While this growth is thought to be primarily from overweight and obesity, normal and underweight women are affected as well, particularly in low and middle-income countries. However, GDM in non-overweight women remains understudied. Thus, we examined the prevalence among normal and underweight women globally.
    UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive literature search was performed in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library. Studies retrieved were screened for eligibility against predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Prevalence of GDM among women with normal and underweight body mass index (BMI) was extracted, and average prevalence was calculated globally, by World Health Organization region, and by country. Pregnancy outcomes were described when available.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 145 studies were included. The average global prevalence of GDM among non-overweight women (BMI <25 kg/m2) was 7.3% and among underweight women (BMI <18.5 kg/m2) was 5.0%. GDM prevalence in non-overweight women was highest in Asia (average 12.1%) and lowest in the African region (0.7%). The countries with the highest prevalence were Vietnam (21.1%), Finland (19.8%), Poland (19.3%), Bangladesh (18.65%), and China (17.7%). The average global prevalence of large for gestational age infants (LGA) born to non-overweight women with GDM was 9.9%, which is lower than the average prevalence in the general population with GDM (14%).
    UNASSIGNED: GDM is more common than previously recognized in non-overweight women, particularly in Asia, but also in European countries. Non-overweight women with GDM had lower prevalence of LGA babies compared to prior reported prevalence in all women with GDM, though data on pregnancy outcomes was limited. These findings challenge guidelines that recommend restriction of weight gain for GDM management. Further research on the pathophysiology and complications of GDM in women who are not overweight should be urgently conducted to inform appropriate management guidelines and support optimal pregnancy outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:肥胖和非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)是胃肠道(GI)癌症的已知危险因素。然而,瘦NAFLD患者的胃肠道癌变尚不清楚。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在研究瘦肉NAFLD与胃肠道癌症风险之间的关系。
    方法:PubMed,系统搜索Embase和CochraneLibrary数据库(从开始日期到2023年4月),以进行队列研究,评估瘦(亚洲人的体重指数[BMI]<25kg/m2或<23kg/m2)和非瘦(亚洲人的BMI≥25kg/m2或≥23kg/m2)NAFLD个体的胃肠道癌症。从符合条件的研究中提取数据,使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,以获得具有95%置信区间(CI)的风险比(RR).亚组分析,还进行了荟萃回归和敏感性分析。本研究在PROSPERO(CRD42023420902)注册。
    结果:纳入了8项研究,涉及56,745名NAFLD个体(11%为瘦肉)和704例消化道癌症病例。稀薄的NAFLD与较高的肝脏风险相关(RR1.77,95%CI1.15-2.73),胰腺癌(RR1.97,95%CI1.01-3.86)和结直肠癌(RR1.53,95%CI1.12-2.09),与非瘦NAFLD相比。食道没有观察到显著差异,胃,胆管癌和小肠癌。
    结论:这项研究表明,瘦NAFLD患者的肝脏风险增加,与非瘦NAFLD患者相比,胰腺癌和结直肠癌,强调需要为这一特定患者群体探索量身定制的癌症预防策略。需要进一步的研究来探索瘦NAFLD与特定胃肠道癌症之间关联的潜在机制。
    Obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are known risk factors for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. However, GI carcinogenesis in lean NAFLD patients remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the association between lean NAFLD and GI cancer risk.
    PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched (from inception date to April 2023) for cohort studies assessing GI cancers in lean (body mass index [BMI] < 25 kg/m2 or < 23 kg/m2 in Asians) and non-lean (BMI ≥25 kg/m2 or ≥ 23 kg/m2 in Asians) NAFLD individuals. Data from eligible studies were extracted, and meta-analysis was carried out using a random effects model to obtain risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses, meta-regressions and sensitivity analyses were also performed. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023420902).
    Eight studies with 56,745 NAFLD individuals (11% were lean) and 704 cases of incident GI cancers were included. Lean NAFLD was associated with higher risk of hepatic (RR 1.77, 95% CI 1.15-2.73), pancreatic (RR 1.97, 95% CI 1.01-3.86) and colorectal cancers (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.12-2.09), compared to non-lean NAFLD. No significant differences were observed for oesophagus, gastric, biliary and small intestine cancers.
    This study shows that lean NAFLD patients have an increased risk of liver, pancreatic and colorectal cancers compared to non-lean NAFLD patients, emphasizing the need to explore tailored cancer prevention strategies for this specific patient group. Further research is required to explore the mechanisms underlying the association between lean NAFLD and specific GI cancers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在二手航空市场快速增长的同时,促进再制造分析的重要性增加了。然而,报废(EoL)飞机零部件再制造业务仍不发达。拆卸,再制造中最具挑战性和核心的活动,直接影响到EoL产品回收的盈利能力和可持续性。拆卸顺序计划(DSP)在物理分离之前为所有可能恢复的组件设计了有序且有目的的分离。然而,EoL条件的复杂性和不确定性导致不可预测的DSP决策输入。鉴于工业4.0(I4.0)的影响和利益相关者的利益,EoLDSP需要具有成本效益的解决方案的紧急证据。在I4.0技术中,作为由虚拟现实组成的认知和视觉工具,X-reality(XR)尤其成为主流,增强现实,混合现实最近,随着I4.0现象的推进,精益管理已经通过互补协作进行了理论化和测试。由于将精益和XR集成到EoLDSP中的研究在文献中没有得到充分的探索,在DSP中,XR和lean作为辅助推动者进行了研究。本研究有两个目的:(1)确定DSP的关键概念,I4.0,XR,和精益,并通过回顾EoL飞机再制造的先前努力来扩展文献,XR辅助DSP,和XR精益应用;(2)在分析了关系优势和不断发展的适应性之后,提出了“智能拆卸序列规划(SDSP)”作为新的EoL决策支持议程。从最近的相关主题中突出了障碍和局限性,提供了用于开发数字化拆卸分析的具体学术信息,并为未来的拆卸研究增加了新的趋势。
    In parallel with the fast growth of the second-hand aviation market, the importance of promoting remanufacturing analytics has increased. However, end-of-life (EoL) aircraft parts remanufacturing operations are still underdeveloped. Disassembly, the most challenging and central activity in remanufacturing, directly affects the EoL product recovery\'s profitability and sustainability. Disassembly sequence planning (DSP) devises ordered and purposeful parting for all potentially recoverable components before physical separations. However, the complexities and uncertainties of the EoL conditions engender unpredictable DSP decision inputs. The EoL DSP needs emergent evidence of cost-effective solutions in view of Industry 4.0 (I4.0) implications and stakeholders\' benefits. Among the I4.0 technologies, X-reality (XR) particularly hits the mainstream as a cognitive and visual tool consisting of virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality. Recently, with the advance of I4.0 phenomenon, lean management has been theorized and tested through complementary collaboration. Since the research of integrating lean and XR into the EoL DSP is underexplored in literature, XR and lean are investigated as assistive enablers in the DSP. This study has a two-fold purpose: (1) identifying the key concepts of DSP, I4.0, XR, and lean, and extending the literature by reviewing the previous efforts of EoL aircraft remanufacturing, XR-assisted DSP, and XR-lean applications; (2) proposing \"Smart Disassembly Sequence Planning (SDSP)\" as a new EoL decision-support agenda after analyzing relational advantages and evolving adaptability. The barriers and limitations are highlighted from the recent associated topics, concrete academic information for developing digitalized disassembly analytics is provided, and new trends are added for future disassembly research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:尽管非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)通常发生在超重或肥胖个体中,它越来越多地在瘦弱人群中被发现。在NAFLD患者中,瘦与全因死亡风险增加之间的关联仍存在争议。我们旨在对文献进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估这种关联,并比较瘦NAFLD患者和非瘦NAFLD患者的长期结局。
    方法:对于本系统综述和荟萃分析,我们搜索了PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI),万芳,和中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)从成立到2021年10月15日,相关原创研究文章没有任何语言限制。我们的主要结果是通过定性综合比较瘦NAFLD患者和非瘦NAFLD患者的全因死亡率。用随机效应模型汇集相对风险(RR)和相应的95%机密间隔(CI)。使用I平方(I²)统计量评估异质性,而使用Egger检验确定发表偏倚。进行亚组和敏感性分析。至于次要结果,我们估计道,心血管,和肝脏相关的死亡率,以及糖尿病的发病率,高血压,肝硬化,通过定量合成,患有NAFLD的瘦小和非瘦小个体的癌症。以人年随访为分母来估计死亡率和发病率。
    结果:我们确定了12项研究(n=26,329),其中7例(n=7924)用于评估瘦和非瘦NAFLD患者的全因死亡风险。与非瘦肉患者相比,瘦肉患者的死亡风险更高(RR=1.39,95%CI1.08-1.82,异质性:I²=43%)。在瘦弱的NAFLD人群中,全因死亡率为13.3(95%CI:6.7-26.1)/1000人年,肝脏相关死亡率为3.6(95%CI:1.0-11.7),与心血管相关的死亡率为7.7(95%CI:6.4-9.2)。新发糖尿病的发病率为每1000人年13.7(95%CI8·2-22.7),新发高血压为56.1(95%CI:40.2-77.9),肝硬化为2.3(95%CI:1.0-5.0),癌症为25.7(95%CI:20.3-32.4)。
    结论:与非瘦患者相比,瘦患者的全因死亡风险更高。体重指数(BMI)不应用作确定是否需要对NAFLD患者进行进一步观察和治疗的标准。
    BACKGROUND: Although nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) commonly occurs in overweight or obese individuals, it is increasingly being identified in the lean population. The association between lean and an increased risk of all-cause mortality among patients with NAFLD remains controversial. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate this association and compare the long-term outcomes of lean NAFLD patients and non-lean NAFLD patients.
    METHODS: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) from inception to October 15, 2021, for relevant original research articles without any language restrictions. Our primary outcome was to compare the all-cause mortality in lean NAFLD patients and non-lean NAFLD patients by qualitative synthesis. Relative risks (RRs) and corresponding 95% confidential intervals (CIs) were pooled with a random effect model. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I-squared (I²) statistics while publication bias was determined using Egger\'s tests. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. As for secondary outcomes, we estimated total, cardiovascular, and liver-related mortality, as well as the incidence of diabetes, hypertension, cirrhosis, and cancer in lean and non-lean individuals with NAFLD by quantitative synthesis. Person-years of follow-up were used as the denominator to estimate the mortality and incidence.
    RESULTS: We identified 12 studies (n = 26,329), 7 of which (n = 7924) were used to evaluate the risk of all-cause mortality between lean and non-lean NAFLD patients. Lean patients with NAFLD were found to be at an elevated risk of death compared to non-lean patients (RR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.08-1.82, heterogeneity: I² = 43%). Among the lean NAFLD population, all-cause mortality was 13.3 (95% CI: 6.7-26.1) per 1000 person-years, 3.6 (95% CI: 1.0-11.7) for liver-related mortality, and 7.7 (95% CI: 6.4-9.2) for cardiovascular-related mortality. The incidence of new-onset diabetes was 13.7 (95% CI 8·2-22.7) per 1000 person-years, new-onset hypertension was 56.1 (95% CI: 40.2-77.9), cirrhosis was 2.3 (95% CI: 1.0-5.0), and cancer was 25.7 (95% CI: 20.3-32.4).
    CONCLUSIONS: Lean patients with NAFLD had a higher risk of all-cause death than non-lean patients. Body mass index (BMI) should not be used as a criterion to determine whether further observation and therapy of patients with NAFLD are warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    目的:关于瘦肉非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)个体发生2型糖尿病(T2DM)风险的数据有限。我们对相关研究进行了荟萃分析。研究设计和方法我们使用PubMed收集数据,Scopus,Cochrane和WebofScience从数据库开始到2022年12月。我们纳入了队列研究,其中通过成像方法或活检诊断为瘦NAFLD。根据预定义的关键词和临床结果选择合格的研究。
    结果:共有16项观察性研究包括304,975名成年人(7.7%患有瘦肉NAFLD)和近1300例糖尿病患者,中位随访时间为5.05年。与无NAFLD的患者相比,无NAFLD的患者发生糖尿病的风险更高(随机效应风险比[HR]2.72,95%CI1.56-4.74;I2=93.8%)。与无NAFLD组相比,无NAFLD的超重/肥胖和有NAFLD的超重/肥胖组参与者的糖尿病事件校正HR(95%CI)分别为1.32(0.99~1.77)和2.98(1.66~5.32).在晚期高NAFLD纤维化评分的NAFLD患者中似乎更大(随机效应HR3.48,95%CI1.92-6.31)。敏感性分析和发表偏倚并没有改变这些发现。
    结论:瘦弱的NAFLD与非超重受试者发生糖尿病的风险增加至少两倍显著相关。这种风险与NAFLD的潜在严重程度相似。非超重个体中NAFLD的存在比超重本身对糖尿病的发展有更显著的影响。
    OBJECTIVE: There is limited data regarding the risk of incident type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among lean nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) individuals. We performed a meta-analysis of relevant studies.
    METHODS: We collected data using PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane and Web of Science from the databases\' inception until December 2022. We included cohort studies in which lean NAFLD was diagnosed through imaging methods or biopsy. Eligible studies were selected according to predefined keywords and clinical outcomes.
    RESULTS: A total of 16 observational studies with 304,975 adult individuals (7.7% with lean NAFLD) and nearly 1300 cases of incident diabetes followed up over a median period of 5.05 years were included in the final analysis. Patients with lean NAFLD had a greater risk of incident diabetes than those without NAFLD (random-effects hazard ratio [HR] 2.72, 95% CI 1.56-4.74; I2 = 93.8%). Compared with the lean without NAFLD group, the adjusted HRs (95% CIs) of incident diabetes for participants in the overweight/obese without NAFLD and overweight/obese with NAFLD groups were 1.32 (0.99- 1.77) and 2.98(1.66-5.32). It appeared to be even greater among NAFLD patients with advanced high NAFLD fibrosis score (random-effects HR 3.48, 95% CI 1.92-6.31). Sensitivity analyses and publication bias did not alter these findings.
    CONCLUSIONS: Lean NAFLD is significantly associated with at least twofold increased risk of incident diabetes in non-overweight subjects. This risk parallels the underlying severity of NAFLD. The presence of NAFLD in non-overweight individuals had a more significant impact on the development of diabetes than being overweight itself.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:各国政府,世界各地的资助者和医院管理人员正在寻找方法,通过减少医疗服务系统中的浪费水平和提高向患者提供护理的价值来解决支出的持续增长。应用过程改进方法来增加高价值护理,减少低价值护理,消除护理过程中的浪费。本研究的目的是回顾文献,以确定医院用于衡量和获取PI计划的财务收益的方法,以确定最佳实践。该评论还探讨了医院在企业层面整理这些收益以改善财务绩效的方式。
    方法:根据PRISMA流程进行了系统评价,并采用了定性研究方法。搜索的数据库是Medline,科克伦图书馆,护理和相关健康文献累积指数(CINHAL),WebofScience和SCOPUS。最初的搜索是在2021年7月进行的,在2023年2月进行了后续搜索,使用相同的搜索术语和数据库来确定在此期间发表的其他研究。搜索词是通过PICO(参与者,干预措施,比较和结果)方法。
    结果:确定了七篇论文,报告了使用基于证据的PI方法减少护理过程浪费或提高护理价值,并包括财务效益分析。对PI计划的积极财务影响进行了衡量,但没有一项研究报告如何在企业一级获取或应用这些财务收益。其中三项研究表明,需要复杂的成本会计系统来实现这一目标。
    结论:该研究表明,医疗保健中PI和财务收益衡量领域的文献很少。在有财务收益记录的地方,它们在成本包含和衡量成本的“水平”方面有所不同。需要进一步研究最佳实践财务测量方法,以使其他医院能够衡量和获取其PI计划带来的财务收益。
    BACKGROUND: Governments, funders and hospital managers around the world are looking for ways to address the continual growth in expenditure by reducing the level of waste in the healthcare delivery system and improving the value of care provided to patients. Process improvement methods are applied to increase high value care, reduce low value care and remove waste from care processes. The purpose of this study is to review the literature to identify the methods used by hospitals to measure and capture financial benefits from PI initiatives to identify best practice. The review also pursues the way hospitals collate these benefits at the enterprise level to achieve improved financial performance.
    METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken in line with the PRISMA process and employed qualitative research methods. Databases searched were Medline, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINHAL), Web of Science and SCOPUS. The initial search was conducted in in July 2021 with a follow up search conducted in February 2023 using the same search terms and databases to identify additional studies published in the intervening period. The search terms were identified through the PICO (Participants, Interventions, Comparisons and Outcomes) method.
    RESULTS: Seven papers were identified that reported reduction in care process waste or improvement of the value of care using an evidence-based PI approach and included financial benefits analysis. Positive financial impact was measured for the PI initiatives but none of the studies reported how these financial benefits were captured or applied at the enterprise level. Three of the studies suggested that sophisticated cost accounting systems were required to enable this.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates the paucity of literature in the field of PI and financial benefits measurement in healthcare. Where financial benefits are documented, they vary in terms of cost inclusions and the \'level\' at which the costs were measured. Further research on best practice financial measurement methods is needed to enable other hospitals to measure and capture financial benefits arising from their PI programs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    虽然在整个人群中节食的患病率越来越高,在正常体重(NW)个体中,减重(WL)可能是体重增加(WG)的危险因素.本工作的目的是系统地回顾所有涉及西北人群饮食限制和体重(BW)演变的研究。文献检索在PROSPERO(CRD42021281442)中注册,并于2021年4月至2022年6月在三个数据库中进行,涉及健康西北成年人的文章。从最初确定的1487条记录中,在系统评价中选择了18名。在八项节食干预研究中,只有一个人在体重恢复后发现了更高的BW,但是其中75%强调了对WL的代谢适应,从而有利于体重恢复并在BW恢复期间/之后持续。十项观察性研究中有八项表明节食与主要后期WG之间存在关系,而观察性研究结果的荟萃分析表明,“节食者”的BW高于“非节食者”。然而,考虑到研究的方法论异质性和发表偏倚,这个结果应该谨慎对待。此外,“饮食”一词描述得很糟糕,我们观察到用于评估节食状态的方法存在很大的异质性。目前的结果表明,从长期来看,在西北人群中,节食可能是WG的主要危险因素。有,然而,真正需要前瞻性随机对照研究,特别评估该人群中饮食诱导的WL与随后的体重之间的关系。
    While there is an increasing prevalence of dieting in the overall population, weight loss (WL) practices could be a risk factor for weight gain (WG) in normal-weight (NW) individuals. The aim of the present work was to systematically review all the studies implicating diet restriction and body weight (BW) evolution in NW people. The literature search was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021281442) and was performed in three databases from April 2021 to June 2022 for articles involving healthy NW adults. From a total of 1487 records initially identified, eighteen were selected in the systematic review. Of the eight dieting interventional studies, only one found a higher BW after weight recovery, but 75 % of them highlighted metabolic adaptations in response to WL favouring weight regain and persisting during/after BW recovery. Eight of the ten observational studies showed a relationship between dieting and major later WG, while the meta-analysis of observational studies results indicated that \'dieters\' have a higher BW than \'non-dieters\'. However, considering the high methodological heterogeneity and the publication bias of the studies, this result should be taken with caution. Moreover, the term \'diet\' was poorly described, and we observed a large heterogeneity of the methods used to assess dieting status. Present results suggest that dieting could be a major risk factor for WG in the long term in NW individuals. There is, however, a real need for prospective randomised controlled studies, specifically assessing the relationship between WL induced by diet and subsequent weight in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:医疗保健需要有效组织,以确保增长,老龄化和医学上更复杂的人群可以及时获得高质量的,负担得起的护理。心脏外科手术也不例外,特别是由于医院资源的竞争和需求,如手术室和重症监护能力。自从COVID-19大流行导致护理推迟和等待名单延长以来,这受到了更大的挑战。在其他领域,来自制造业的质量改进方法(QIM)已被证明可以有效地提高现有能力和资源的利用率,并提高护理质量。我们进行了系统评价,以评估这种QIM改善心脏手术护理的能力。
    方法:在PubMed,Embase,根据系统评论和荟萃分析方法的首选报告项目,ClarivateAnalytics/WebofScienceCoreCollection和Wiley/Cochrane图书馆。
    结果:确定了10篇文章。使用了以下QIM:精益,丰田生产系统,六西格玛,精益六西格玛,根本原因分析,改善和计划-做-学习-行为。所有报告的患者相关的一个或多个相关改善(例如,感染率,通风时间,死亡率,不良事件,血糖控制)和过程相关的结果(例如,更短的等待时间,更短的传输时间和生产率)。提高成功的要素包括:多学科团队参与,以病人为中心,数据驱动方法,紧迫感和对可持续性的关注。
    结论:在描述QIM计划在心脏手术中的应用的所有十篇论文中,积极的结果,不同程度的,被报道。虽然现有数据的一致性令人鼓舞,证据基础的有限数量和异质性质量凸显了更严格的评估,包括如何在心脏外科手术中最好地采用制造业衍生的QIM。
    OBJECTIVE: Healthcare is required to be effectively organised to ensure that growing, aging and medically more complex populations have timely access to high-quality, affordable care. Cardiac surgery is no exception to this, especially due to the competition for and demand on hospital resources, such as operating rooms and intensive care capacity. This is challenged more since the COVID-19 pandemic led to postponed care and prolonged waiting lists. In other sectors, Quality Improvement Methodologies (QIM) derived from the manufacturing industry have proven effective in enabling more efficient utilisation of existing capacity and resources and in improving the quality of care. We performed a systematic review to evaluate the ability of such QIM to improve care in cardiac surgery.
    METHODS: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Clarivate Analytics/Web of Science Core Collection and Wiley/the Cochrane Library according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis methodology.
    RESULTS: Ten articles were identified. The following QIM were used: Lean, Toyota Production System, Six Sigma, Lean Six Sigma, Root Cause Analysis, Kaizen and Plan-Do-Study-Act. All reported one or more relevant improvements in patient-related (e.g., infection rates, ventilation time, mortality, adverse events, glycaemic control) and process-related outcomes (e.g., shorter waiting times, shorter transfer time and productivity). Elements to enhance the success included: multidisciplinary team engagement, a patient-oriented, data-driven approach, a sense of urgency and a focus on sustainability.
    CONCLUSIONS: In all ten papers describing the application of QIM initiatives to cardiac surgery, positive results, of varying magnitude, were reported. While the consistency of the available data is encouraging, the limited quantity and heterogenous quality of the evidence base highlights that more rigorous evaluation, including how best to employ manufacturing industry-derived QIM in cardiac surgery is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号