Supraglottic airway devices are increasingly used during the resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients in the United States and worldwide. In this study, we aimed to compare the neurologic outcomes of OHCA patients managed with the King Laryngeal Tube (King LT) to the neurologic outcomes of patients managed with the iGel.
We used the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) public use research dataset for our analysis. Non-traumatic OHCA cases with attempted EMS resuscitation enrolled from 2013-2021 were included. We used two-level mixed effects multivariable logistic regression analyses with treating EMS agency as the random effect to determine the association between supraglottic airway device and outcome. The primary outcome was survival with a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score of 1 or 2 at discharge. Secondary outcomes included survival to hospital admission and survival to hospital discharge. Age, sex, calendar year of OHCA, initial ECG rhythm, witnessed status (unwitnessed, bystander witnessed, 9-1-1 responder witnessed), bystander CPR, response interval, and OHCA location (private/home, public, institutional) were used as covariables.
In comparison to use of the King LT, use of the iGel was associated with greater neurologically favorable survival (aOR: 1.45 [1.33, 1.58]). In addition, use of the iGel was associated with greater survival to hospital admission (1.07 [1.02, 1.12]) and survival to hospital discharge (1.35 [1.26, 1.46]).
This study adds to the body of literature suggesting that use of the iGel during OHCA resuscitation is associated with better outcomes than use of the King LT.

This study aimed to investigate the overall success of tracheal intubation using the intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction-Disposable (iLTS-D™, VBM, Sulz a. N., Germany) compared to the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Fastrach™ (Teleflex, Athlone, Ireland). We hypothesised that the iLTS-D™ would be non-inferior to the LMA Fastrach™ for tracheal intubation and ventilation.
Multicentric, non-inferiority, randomised controlled study.
Operating rooms from two tertiary and one secondary centre in Switzerland from January 2017 to July 2019. The investigators were trained anaesthetists with extensive experience with laryngeal masks but limited to laryngeal tubes. The study was discontinued after the planned interim analysis.
Ninety-nine adult patients were included after randomisation. The inclusion criteria were American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 to 3 in patients scheduled for elective surgery requiring tracheal intubation. Patients with a history of difficult intubation were excluded.
After anaesthesia induction and once neuromuscular blockade was obtained, ventilation was initiated, and tracheal intubation was performed through the randomised device with the flexible endoscope tip placed proximally to the tip of the tracheal tube (visualised blind intubation).
The primary outcome was the intubation success rate after two attempts. The secondary outcomes were time to intubation, successful ventilation rate, time to achieve ventilation, and gastric access success rate.
The overall intubation success rate was significantly higher in the Fastrach™ group than in the iLTS-D™ group (91.8% vs 70.0%, p = 0.006). No difference was found in the ventilation success rate (94% for iLTS-D™ and 100% for LMA Fastrach™ [p = 0.829]). The time to achieve ventilation and intubation were similar between the groups. No major airway complications were noted.
Although both supraglottic devices provided the same effective ventilation rate, the LMA Fastrach™ was superior to the iLTS-D™ as a conduit for intubation in 99 adult patients without a known difficult intubation. These preliminary results need to be confirmed in studies that include a larger population.
Clinicaltrials.gov, 21.09.2016, Identification Number NCT02922595.

Airway management in patients with out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is important and several methods are used. The establishment of a supraglottic airway device (SAD) is a common technique used during OHCA. Two types of SAD are routinely used in Norway; the Kings LTS-D™ and the I-gel®. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical performance of these two devices in terms of difficulty, number of attempts before successful insertion and overall success rate of insertion.
All adult patients with OHCA, in whom ambulance personnel used a SAD over a one-year period in the ambulance services of Central Norway, were included. After the event, a questionnaire was completed and the personnel responsible for the airway management were interviewed. Primary outcomes were number of attempts until successful insertion, by either same or different ambulance personnel, and the difficulty of insertion graded by easy, medium or hard. Secondary outcomes were reported complications with inserting the SAD\'s.
Two hundred and fifty patients were included, of whom 191 received I-gel and 59 received LTS-D. Overall success rate was significantly higher in I-gel (86%) compared to LTS-D (75%, p = 0.043). The rates of successful placements were higher when using I-gel compared to LTS-D, and there was a significant increased risk that the insertion of the LTS-D was unsuccessful compared to the I-gel (risk ratio 1.8, p = 0.04). I-gel was assessed to be easy to insert in 80% of the patients, as opposed to LTS-D which was easy to insert in 51% of the patients.
Overall success rate was significantly higher and the difficulty in insertion was significantly lower in the I-gel group compared to the LTS-D in patients with OHCA.

BACKGROUND: Laryngeal tube (LT) application by rescue personnel as an alternate airway during the early stages of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is still subject of debate. We evaluated ease of handling and efficacy of ventilation administered by emergency medical technicians (EMTs) using LT and bag-valve-mask (BVM) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation of patients with OHCA.
METHODS: An open prospective randomized multicenter study was conducted at six emergency medical services centers over 18 months. Patients in OHCA initially resuscitated by EMTs were enrolled. Ease of handling (LT insertion, tight seal) and efficacy of ventilation (chest rises visibly, no air leak) with LT and BVM were subjectively assessed by EMTs during pre-study training and by the attending emergency physician on the scene. Outcome and frequency of complications were compared.
RESULTS: Of 97 eligible patients, 78 were enrolled. During pre-study training EMTs rated efficacy of ventilation with LT higher than with BVM (66.7% vs. 36.2%, p = 0.022), but efficacy of on-site ventilation did not differ between the two groups (71.4% vs. 58.5%, p = 0.686). Frequency of complications (11.4% vs. 19.5%, p = 0.961) did not differ between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: EMTs preferred LT ventilation to BVM ventilation during pre-study training, but on-site there was no difference with regard to efficacy, ventilation safety, or outcome. The results indicate that LT ventilation by EMTs during OHCA is not superior to BVM and cannot substitute for BVM training. We assume that the main benefit of the LT is the provision of an alternative airway when BVM ventilation fails. Training in BVM ventilation remains paramount in EMT apprenticeship and cannot be substituted by LT ventilation.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01718795).

The Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable (LTS-D) and the Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway (SLMA) are second generation supraglottic airway devices (SADs) with an added channel to allow gastric drainage. We studied the efficacy of these devices when using pressure controlled mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia for short and medium duration surgical procedures and compared the oropharyngeal seal pressure in different head and-neck positions.
Eighty patients in each group had either LTS-D or SLMA for airway management. The patients were recruited in two different institutions. Primary outcome variables were the oropharyngeal seal pressures in neutral, flexion, extension, right and left head-neck position. Secondary outcome variables were time to achieve an effective airway, ease of insertion, number of attempts, maneuvers necessary during insertion, ventilatory parameters, success of gastric tube insertion and incidence of complications.
The oropharyngeal seal pressure achieved with the LTS-D was higher than the SLMA in, (extension (p=0.0150) and right position (p=0.0268 at 60 cm H2O intracuff pressures and nearly significant in neutral position (p = 0.0571). The oropharyngeal seal pressure was significantly higher with the LTS-D during neck extension as compared to SLMA (p= 0.015). Similar oropharyngeal seal pressures were detected in all other positions with each device. The secondary outcomes were comparable between both groups. Patients ventilated with LTS-D had higher incidence of sore throat (p = 0.527). No major complications occurred.
Better oropharyngeal seal pressure was achieved with the LTS-D in head-neck right and extension positions , although it did not appear to have significance in alteration of management using pressure control mechanical ventilation in neutral position. The fiberoptic view was better with the SLMA. The post-operative sore throat incidence was higher in the LTS-D.
ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02856672 , Unique Protocol ID:BnaiZionMC-16-LG-001, Registered: August 2016.

OBJECTIVE: Supraglottic devices are thought to allow efficient ventilation and continuous chest compressions during cardiac arrest. Therefore, the use of supraglottic devices could increase the chest compression fraction (CCF), a critical determinant of patient survival. The aim of this study was to assess the CCF in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients ventilated with a supraglottic device.
METHODS: We conducted an open prospective multicenter study with temporal clusters. OHCA patients treated by emergency nurses received either intermittent chest compressions with bag-valve mask ventilations (30:2 rhythm; BVM group); or continuous chest compressions with asynchronous ventilations by laryngeal tube (LT group). The primary endpoint was the CCF assessed using an accelerometer connected to the defibrillator. We also investigated the ease of use of the laryngeal tube.
RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were included (41 in each group); 68% were male and the median age was 68 (54-80) years. Patients and cardiac arrest characteristics did not differ between groups. The CCF was 75% (68-79%) in the LT group and 59% (51-68%) in the BVM group (p<0.01). LT insertion failed in nine out of 40 cases (23%). The median time of LT insertion was 26s (11-56 s). CCF was significantly lower when LT insertion failed (58% (48-74%) vs. 76% (72-80%) when LT insertion succeeded; p=0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of the LT during OHCA increases the CCF when compared to standard BVM ventilation. However, the impact of LT use on mortality remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE: In some emergency situations resuscitation and ventilation may have to be performed by basic life support trained personnel, especially in rural areas where arrival of advanced life support teams can be delayed. The use of advanced airway devices such as endotracheal intubation has been deemphasized for basically-trained personnel, but it is unclear whether supraglottic airway devices are advisable over traditional mask-ventilation.
METHODS: In this prospective, randomized clinical single-centre trial we compared airway management and ventilation performed by nurses using facemask, laryngeal mask Supreme (LMA-S) and laryngeal tube suction-disposable (LTS-D). Basic life support trained nurses (n=20) received one-hour practical training with each device. ASA 1-2 patients scheduled for elective surgery were included (n=150). After induction of anaesthesia and neuromuscular block nurses had two 90-second attempts to manage the airway and ventilate the patient with volume-controlled ventilation.
RESULTS: Ventilation failed in 34% of patients with facemask, 2% with LMA-S and 22% with LTS-D (P<0.001). In patients who could be ventilated successfully mean tidal volume was 240±210 ml with facemask, 470±120 ml with LMA-S and 470±140 ml with LTS-D (P<0.001). Leak pressure was lower with LMA-S (23.3±10.8 cm H2O, 95% CI 20.2-26.4) than with LTS-D (28.9±13.9 cm·H2O, 95% CI 24.4-33.4; P=0.047).
CONCLUSIONS: After one hour of introductory training, nurses were able to use LMA-S more effectively than facemask and LTS-D. High ventilation failure rates with facemask and LTS-D may indicate that additional training is required to perform airway management adequately with these devices. High-level trials are needed to confirm these results in cardiac arrest patients.

BACKGROUND: Drowning is a common cause of death in young adults. The 2010 guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council call for in-water-resuscitation (IWR). There has been controversy about IWR amongst emergency and diving physicians for decades. The aim of the present study was assessing the efficacy of IWR.
METHODS: In this randomized cross-over trial, nineteen lifeguards performed a rescue manoeuvre over a 100 m distance in open water. All subjects performed the procedure four times in random order: with no ventilation (NV) and transportation only, mouth-to-mouth ventilation (MMV), bag-mask-ventilation (BMV) and laryngeal tube ventilation (LTV). Tidal volumes, ventilation rate and minute-volumes were recorded using a modified Laerdal Resusci Anne manikin. Furthermore, water aspiration and number of submersions of the test mannequin were assessed, as well as the physical effort of the lifeguard rescuers.One lifeguard subject did not complete MMV due to exhaustion and was excluded from analysis.
RESULTS: NV was the fastest rescue manoeuvre (advantage ∼40s). MMV and LTV were evaluated as efficient and relatively easy to perform by the lifeguards. While MMV (mean 199 ml) and BMV (mean 481 ml) were associated with a large amount of aspirated water, aspiration was significantly lower in LTV (mean 118 ml). The efficacy of ventilation was consistently good in LTV (Vt=447 ml), continuously poor in BMV (Vt=197) and declined substantially during MMV (Vt=1,019 ml initially and Vt=786 ml at the end). The physical effort of the lifeguards was remarkably higher when performing IWR: 3.7 in NV, 6.7 in MMV, 6.4 in BMV and 4.8 in LTV as measured on the 0-10 visual analogue scale.
CONCLUSIONS: IWR in open water is time consuming and physically demanding. The IWR training of lifeguards should put more emphasis on a reduction of aspiration. The use of ventilation adjuncts like the laryngeal tube might ease IWR, reduce aspiration of water and increase the efficacy of ventilation during IWR.