laparoscopic

腹腔镜
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在妇科腹腔镜手术期间,气腹和Trendelenburg位置(TP)可导致颅内压升高(ICP)。然而,目前尚不清楚围手术期液体治疗是否影响ICP.这项研究的目的是通过测量视神经鞘直径(ONSD)与眼球横径(ETD)的比值,评估限制性液体(RF)治疗与常规液体(CF)治疗对妇科腹腔镜手术患者ICP的影响。
    方法:将64例进行腹腔镜妇科手术的患者随机分为CF组和RF组。主要结果是两组之间在预定时间点的ONSD/ETD比率的差异。次要结果是术中循环参数(包括平均动脉压,心率,和尿量变化)和术后恢复指标(包括拔管时间,麻醉后护理室的停留时间,术后并发症,和住院时间)。
    结果:两组之间的ONSD/ETD比率和ONSD随时间的变化没有统计学上的显着差异(均p>0.05)。从T2到T4,两组的ONSD/ETD比率和ONSD均高于T1(均p<0.001)。从T1到T2,两组的ONSD/ETD比率均增加了14.3%。然而,RF组的拔管时间短于CF组[中位数差异(95%CI)-11(-21至-2)min,p=0.027]。其他次要结果没有差异。
    结论:在接受腹腔镜妇科手术的患者中,射频没有显著降低ONSD/ETD比值,但缩短了气管拔管时间,与CF相比。
    背景:ChiCTR2300079284。2023年12月29日注册。
    BACKGROUND: During gynecological laparoscopic surgery, pneumoperitoneum and the Trendelenburg position (TP) can lead to increased intracranial pressure (ICP). However, it remains unclear whether perioperative fluid therapy impacts ICP. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the impact of restrictive fluid (RF) therapy versus conventional fluid (CF) therapy on ICP in gynecological laparoscopic surgery patients by measuring the ratio of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) to the eyeball transverse diameter (ETD) using ultrasound.
    METHODS: Sixty-four patients who were scheduled for laparoscopic gynecological surgery were randomly assigned to the CF group or the RF group. The main outcomes were differences in the ONSD/ETD ratios between the groups at predetermined time points. The secondary outcomes were intraoperative circulatory parameters (including mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and urine volume changes) and postoperative recovery indicators (including extubation time, length of post-anaesthesia care unit stay, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay).
    RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the ONSD/ETD ratio and the ONSD over time between the two groups (all p > 0.05). From T2 to T4, the ONSD/ETD ratio and the ONSD in both groups were higher than T1 (all p < 0.001). From T1 to T2, the ONSD/ETD ratio in both groups increased by 14.3%. However, the extubation time in the RF group was shorter than in the CF group [median difference (95% CI) -11(-21 to -2) min, p = 0.027]. There were no differences in the other secondary outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery, RF did not significantly lower the ONSD/ETD ratio but did shorten the tracheal extubation time, when compared to CF.
    BACKGROUND: ChiCTR2300079284. Registered on December 29, 2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项荟萃分析的目的是比较机器人远端胃切除术(RDG)与腹腔镜远端胃切除术(LDG)对胃癌的疗效。研究仅包括那些使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)的研究。在几个主要的全球数据库中进行了系统的文献检索,包括PubMed,Embase,和谷歌学者,到2024年6月根据预定义的纳入和排除标准筛选文章。基线数据和主要和次要结果测量(例如,手术时间,估计失血量,淋巴结切除术,住院时间,和第一次排气的时间)被提取。使用ROBINS-I评估PSM研究的质量,并使用ReviewManager5.4.1软件对数据进行分析。该荟萃分析共纳入了12项倾向评分匹配的研究,涉及3688例患者。机器人辅助手术导致更长的手术时间(WMD30.64分钟,95%CI15.63-45.66;p<0.0001),估计失血较少(WMD29.54毫升,95%CI-47.14-11.94;p=0.001),更多的淋巴结产率(WMD5.14,95%CI2.39-7.88;p=0.0002),与腹腔镜手术相比,住院时间更短(WMD-0.36,95%CI-0.60-0.12;p=0.004)。两种手术方法在首次肛门排气时间上无显著差异,整体并发症,和主要并发症。机器人远端胃癌切除术减少术中出血量,增加淋巴结产量,与腹腔镜手术相比,缩短了住院时间,尽管手术时间更长。两组在首次排气时间和并发症发生率上无显著差异。
    The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of robot distal gastrectomy (RDG) versus laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) for gastric cancer. Studies included only those that utilized propensity score matching (PSM). A systematic literature search was conducted in several major global databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar, up to June 2024. Articles were screened based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Baseline data and primary and secondary outcome measures (e.g., operative time, estimated blood loss, lymph-node yield dissection, length of hospital stay, and time to first flatus) were extracted. The quality of PSM studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I, and data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4.1 software. A total of 12 propensity score-matched studies involving 3688 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Robot-assisted surgery resulted in a longer operative time (WMD 30.64 min, 95% CI 15.63 - 45.66; p < 0.0001), less estimated blood loss (WMD 29.54 mL, 95% CI - 47.14 - 11.94; p = 0.001), more lymph-node yield (WMD 5.14, 95% CI 2.39 - 7.88; p = 0.0002), and a shorter hospital stay (WMD - 0.36, 95% CI - 0.60 - 0.12; p = 0.004) compared with laparoscopic surgery. There were no significant differences between the two surgical methods in terms of time to first flatus, overall complications, and major complications. Robot distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer reduces intraoperative blood loss, increases lymph-node yield, and shortens hospital stay compared with laparoscopic surgery, despite a longer operative time. There are no significant differences in time to first flatus and complication rates between the two groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    我们描述了一例肾上腺海绵状血管瘤,由于肿瘤生长和瘤内出血而手术切除。
    一名73岁的女性患者在随诊肾上腺肿瘤时出现肾上腺肿瘤增大和瘤内出血。计算机断层扫描显示,左侧肾上腺肿瘤在1年内从23毫米生长到44毫米。血液检查显示代谢正常。影像学怀疑副神经节瘤和转移性肿瘤。进行了腹腔镜肾上腺切除术,以防止由于进一步出血引起的肿瘤破裂。手术期间肿瘤周围未观察到粘连或出血。病理诊断为肾上腺海绵状血管瘤。
    肾上腺海绵状血管瘤在术前难以与其他肾上腺肿瘤区分开来,包括恶性肿瘤.此病例的术中发现表明,腹腔镜肾上腺切除术是相对较小的肾上腺海绵状血管瘤的安全治疗选择。
    UNASSIGNED: We describe a case of an adrenal cavernous hemangioma that was surgically resected because of tumor growth and intratumoral hemorrhage.
    UNASSIGNED: A 73-year-old woman presented with an enlarged adrenal tumor and intratumoral hemorrhage during the follow-up of an incidental adrenal tumor. A computed tomography showed that the left adrenal tumor had grown from 23 to 44 mm over 1 year. Blood tests revealed a normal metabolic profile. Paragangliomas and metastatic tumors were suspected on imaging. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy was performed to prevent tumor rupture due to further bleeding. No adhesions or bleeding were observed around the tumor during surgery. Pathological diagnosis was adrenal cavernous hemangioma.
    UNASSIGNED: Adrenal cavernous hemangioma is difficult to distinguish preoperatively from other adrenal tumors, including malignant tumors. The intraoperative findings of this case suggest that laparoscopic adrenalectomy is a safe treatment option for relatively small adrenal cavernous hemangioma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在探讨腹腔镜全胃切除术(LTG)与开腹全胃切除术(OTG)对进展期胃癌(AGC)患者新辅助化疗(NACT)后的远期疗效。
    方法:术前接受NACT的AGC患者纳入LTG或OTG组。基于使用0.15卡尺宽度的倾向评分,在两组之间进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)(1:2)。比较两组患者PSM前后的3年总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)。OS和DFS率通过Kaplan-Meier方法计算,生存率的任何差异均采用对数秩检验进行评估.使用单变量和多变量Cox比例风险分析来评估LTG和OTG患者之间预后因素对生存和风险比(HR)的同时影响。
    结果:总共144名患者完成了随访,LTG组24例,OTG组120例。经过64.40个月的平均随访,PSM前(P=0.453,P=0.362)和PSM后(P=0.972,P=0.884)两组3年OS和DFS率比较,差异均无统计学意义。多因素Cox比例风险分析表明,ypN分期是OS恶化的独立危险因素(P=0.013)。
    结论:这项研究表明,在NACT后AGC患者中,由经验丰富的手术团队进行的LTG联合D2淋巴结清扫术与OTG相比,3年OS和DFS相当。
    背景:本研究未注册。
    BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to investigate the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) versus open total gastrectomy (OTG) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT).
    METHODS: Patients with AGC who received NACT before surgery were enrolled in either the LTG or OTG group. Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:2) was performed between the two groups based on the propensity score using a 0.15 calliper width. Three-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between these two groups before and after PSM. OS and DFS rates were calculated by the Kaplan‒Meier method, and any differences in survival were evaluated with a log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to estimate the simultaneous effects of prognostic factors on survival and the hazard ratio (HR) between LTG and OTG patients.
    RESULTS: A total of 144 patients completed the follow-up, with 24 patients in the LTG group and 120 patients in the OTG group. After a mean follow-up of 64.40 months, there were no significant differences in the 3-year OS or DFS rates between the two groups before (P = 0.453 and P = 0.362, respectively) or after PSM (P = 0.972 and P = 0.884, respectively). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that ypN stage was an independent risk factor for worse OS (P = 0.013).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that LTG with D2 lymphadenectomy performed by an experienced surgical team resulted in comparable 3-year OS and DFS compared with OTG in patients with AGC after NACT.
    BACKGROUND: This study is not registered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自扩张金属支架(SEMS)放置后的手术桥梁(BTS)是一种广泛认可的梗阻性结直肠癌治疗策略。然而,目前仍缺乏关于SEMS置入后腹腔镜手术的有效性和安全性的证据.这项系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是比较腹腔镜手术与开腹手术对梗阻性结直肠癌患者的短期和长期结局。
    方法:进行了截至2022年12月的电子文献检索,以确定比较腹腔镜和开腹手术在SEMS放置后治疗梗阻性结直肠癌的短期和长期结果的研究。主要结局指标为术后并发症发生率和死亡率。次要结果指标是3年无复发生存率(RFS)和3年总生存率(OS)。使用固定效应或随机效应方法进行荟萃分析,以95%置信区间(95%CIs)计算比值比(OR)。
    结果:荟萃分析包括15项研究和883例患者,其中467人(52.9%)接受了腹腔镜手术,416人(47.1%)在放置SEMS后接受了开腹手术.腹腔镜手术组术后并发症发生率明显低于开腹手术组(OR0.47,95%CI0.32~0.67,P<0.001)。腹腔镜和开腹手术组的3年RFS率或3年OS率无显著差异(3年RFS,OR0.78,95%CI0.50-1.24,P=0.30;3年OS,OR0.68,95%CI0.41-1.12,P=0.13)。
    结论:这项荟萃分析发现,在SEMS置入后接受腹腔镜手术的患者的短期预后优于接受开腹手术的患者。此外,两组的长期结局无显著差异.SEMS放置后的腹腔镜手术可能是阻塞性结直肠癌的安全有效治疗选择。
    BACKGROUND: A bridge to surgery (BTS) after self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement is a widely recognized treatment strategy for obstructive colorectal cancer. However, there is still a lack of evidence for the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery following SEMS placement. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery with those of open surgery following SEMS placement in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer.
    METHODS: An electronic literature search through to December 2022 was performed to identify studies comparing short-term and long-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open surgery following SEMS placement for obstructive colorectal cancer. The main outcome measures were postoperative complication rates and mortality. Secondary outcome measures were the 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates. The meta-analysis was performed using fixed-effect or random-effects methods to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).
    RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 15 studies and 883 patients, of whom 467 (52.9%) underwent laparoscopic surgery and 416 (47.1%) underwent open surgery following SEMS placement. The postoperative complication rate was significantly lower in the laparoscopic surgery group than in the open surgery group (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.32-0.67, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the 3-year RFS rate or 3-year OS rate between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups (3-year RFS, OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.50-1.24, P = 0.30; 3-year OS, OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.41-1.12, P = 0.13).
    CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis found that the short-term outcome was better in patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery following SEMS placement than in those who underwent open surgery. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in long-term outcomes between the two groups. Laparoscopic surgery following SEMS placement may be a safe and effective treatment option for obstructive colorectal cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自从腹腔镜子宫切除术出现以来,一些研究描述了人工制品,比如血管假性侵入,在这些标本的组织学评估中构成潜在的陷阱。经常建议使用宫内操纵器作为产生这些人工制品的因素。
    目的:为了描述可能的伪像,比如血管假性侵入,子宫肌层裂隙,和子宫颈内腔中的肿瘤细胞,在浆膜上,在输卵管腔中,并将它们与临床和病理特征相关联。
    方法:这是一项回顾性单中心研究,对60例接受良性(n=27,45%)或恶性(n=33,55%)子宫病变治疗的患者进行了研究。
    结果:在13例(22%)腺癌和1例(2%)良性子宫病理中发现了血管假性侵犯。在16(27%)子宫中观察到子宫肌层内的裂隙。在六个(10%)子宫切除术中观察到输卵管腔中的细胞。真正的血管栓塞与子宫内操纵器的使用(p=0.47)或手术类型(p=0.21)无关。血管假性侵袭与子宫颈管腔中肿瘤细胞的存在(p=0.013)和子宫肌层中裂隙的存在(p<0.001)相关,但与研究的其他因素无关。
    结论:总体而言,在我们的系列中,我们没有观察到在患有恶性或良性子宫病变的女性子宫切除术期间使用宫内操作器与存在真正的栓塞或血管假性侵犯之间的任何统计学关联.血管假性侵袭也与其他伪影的存在有关。
    BACKGROUND: Since the advent of laparoscopic hysterectomy, several studies have described artefacts, such as vascular pseudoinvasion, constituting potential pitfalls in the histological evaluation of these specimens. The use of an intrauterine manipulator is often suggested as the factor creating these artefacts.
    OBJECTIVE: To describe possible artefacts, such as vascular pseudoinvasion, myometrial clefts, and tumor cells in the lumen of the cervix, on the serosa, and in the tubal lumen, and to correlate them with clinical and pathological characteristics.
    METHODS: This is a retrospective monocentric study of 60 patients having been treated for benign (n = 27, 45%) or malignant (n = 33, 55%) uterine pathologies.
    RESULTS: Vascular pseudoinvasion was found in 13 (22%) adenocarcinomas and in one (2%) benign uterine pathology. Clefts within the myometrium were observed in 16 (27%) uteri. Cells in the tubal lumen were observed in six (10%) hysterectomies. True vascular emboli were not correlated with the use of an intrauterine manipulator (p = 0.47) or the type of surgery (p = 0.21). Vascular pseudoinvasion was correlated with the presence of tumor cells in the lumen of the cervix (p = 0.013) and the presence of clefts in the myometrium (p < 0.001), but not with the other factors studied.
    CONCLUSIONS: Overall, in our series, we did not observe any statistical association between the use of an intrauterine manipulator and the presence of true emboli or vascular pseudoinvasion during hysterectomy in women with malignant or benign uterine pathologies. Vascular pseudoinvasion was also associated with the presence of other artefacts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项荟萃分析旨在比较机器人辅助与机器人辅助的功效。肥胖患者的腹腔镜肾上腺切除术。我们对PubMed进行了广泛的审查,Embase,和Cochrane图书馆数据库,用于研究截至2024年8月肥胖个体的肾上腺切除术。仅包括比较机器人辅助手术与腹腔镜手术的研究。只包括用英语写的文章。我们利用既定的纳入和排除标准,专注于随机对照试验和队列研究。在非随机对照研究中,使用ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险。审查管理器5.4.1用于进行荟萃分析。最终分析纳入了4项回顾性队列研究,共492名肥胖患者(261名接受RA,231名接受LA)。结果表明,与LA相比,RA与住院时间较短和估计失血量较少有关。尽管如此,两种手术方法在OT方面没有明显区别,剖腹手术转换率,术后总并发症,或手术后的死亡率。总之,RA是肥胖个体的可靠和安全的选择。在LOHS和EBL方面,它比LA具有显着的优势。
    This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic adrenalectomy in individuals with obesity. We performed an extensive review of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for research on adrenalectomy in individuals with obesity up to August 2024. Only studies comparing robot-assisted surgery with laparoscopic surgery were included. Only articles written in English were included. We utilized established criteria for inclusion and exclusion, concentrating on randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. The ROBINS-I instrument was employed to assess the bias risk in non-randomized control studies. Review Manager 5.4.1 was utilized to conduct the meta-analysis. The final analysis incorporated four retrospective cohort studies with a total of 492 individuals with obesity (261 receiving RA and 231 undergoing LA). The results showed that RA was linked to a shorter duration of hospitalization and less estimated blood loss in comparison to LA. Nonetheless, there were no notable distinctions between the two surgical methods in terms of OT, laparotomy conversion rates, overall postoperative complications, or death rates after surgery. In conclusion, RA is a reliable and safe choice for individuals with obesity. It offers notable advantages over LA in terms of LOHS and EBL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    引言由于肾盂位置异常引起的尿淤滞,异位盆腔肾脏发生肾结石的可能性更高,改变了输尿管的走向,和肾脏旋转不良。这项回顾性研究强调了安全性,功效,盆腔异位肾经腹膜腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术的可行性。方法对15例异位盆腔肾结石患者行腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术。通过移动肠或使用跨中结肠方法暴露肾脏。使用腹腔镜镊子进行外科手术以从肾盂中去除结石。放置双J支架后,关闭肾盂切口.在插入腹膜内引流器后完成该程序。结果15例患者均行腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术,男女比例为3:2。患者的平均年龄为41(25-58)岁,而石头的平均大小为3.8厘米。此外,7例(46.6%)患者伴有骨盆结石。在15名患者中,有的左边有石头(n=9,60%),而其他人则在右侧有结石(n=6,40%)。平均持续时间为125分钟,范围为(90-190)。发现14例(93.3%)患者无结石。一名患者需要体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)来解决小尺寸8mm的钙质残余结石。在ESWL的一次会议之后,这块石头被完全清除了。所有的石头都被成功移除,导致100%的无石率。结论腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术是一种高效、有效的治疗异位肾盂内大量结石的方法。该方法在去除结石方面具有显著的效率水平,但效果有限。
    Introduction The ectopic pelvic kidneys have a higher likelihood of developing renal stones due to urinary stasis caused by the abnormal position of the renal pelvis, altered course of the ureter, and kidney malrotation. This retrospective study highlights the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of performing transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in cases of pelvic ectopic kidney. Methodology The 15 patients with ectopic pelvic kidneys and nephrolithiasis underwent laparoscopic pyelolithotomy. The kidney was exposed either by moving the bowel or using a trans-mesocolic approach. A surgical procedure was performed to remove stones from the renal pelvis using laparoscopic forceps. Following the placement of a double J stent, the incision in the renal pelvis was closed. The procedure was completed after the intraperitoneal drain was inserted. Results A total of 15 patients underwent the transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy procedure, with a male-to-female ratio of 3:2. The average age of the patients was 41 (25-58) years, while the average size of the stones was 3.8 cm. Additionally, seven (46.6%) patients had the presence of caliceal stones in conjunction with the pelvic stone. Out of the 15 patients, some had stones on the left side (n = 9, 60%), while others had stones on the right side (n = 6, 40%). The operation with an average duration was 125 minutes with a range of (90-190). Fourteen (93.3%) patients were found to be free of stones. A patient required extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) to address a small caliceal residual stone measuring 8 mm. After just one session of ESWL, this stone was completely cleared. All stones were successfully removed, resulting in a 100% stone-free rate. Conclusions Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy is a highly effective and efficient procedure for treating large and numerous stones in the ectopic pelvic kidney. This method has a significant level of efficiency in removing stones with limited consequences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:研究表明,腹腔镜和开腹胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)切除术的结果相当。我们试图比较机器人之间的结果,腹腔镜,扩大微创手术时代的胃GIST开放切除术。
    方法:使用国家癌症数据库对2010年至2020年接受确定性手术的成年胃GIST患者进行了回顾性分析,不包括转换为开放的病例。患者被分层为微创手术(MIS),(组合机器人(R)和腹腔镜(L)),打开(O)。住院时间(LOS)30天死亡率,90天死亡率,和保证金状态进行了评估。进行亚组分析以评估R和L队列之间的结果。熵平衡用于调整组间差异。Kaplan-Meier生存估计用于比较未调整的5年生存率。
    结果:在15,022名患者中(R=10.4%,L=44.3%,O=45.3%),63.2%的患者为I期,70.6%的患者接受了部分胃切除术。MIS方法与较短的住院LOS(β:-2.58;95%CI:-2.82至-2.33)和较低的30天几率(OR0.45;95%CI:0.30-0.68)和90天死亡率(OR0.54;95%CI:0.39-0.74)相比,两组之间R0切除的可能性相似(OR1.00;95%CI:0.88-1.14)。医院LOS(β:+0.25;95%CI:-0.14-0.64),30天(OR0.99;95%CI:0.40-2.46)和90天死亡率(OR0.89;95%CI:0.47-1.70)的几率,R0切除率(OR1.02;95%CI:0.82-1.27)在R和L队列之间具有可比性。与O相比,MIS方法与5年OS改善相关(对数秩p<0.001)。R和L之间的总生存期没有显着差异(logrankp=0.44)。
    结论:这些研究结果表明,MIS方法可用于部分患者的胃GIST切除术。在接受MIS方法的患者中,机器人技术可以被认为是腹腔镜手术的肿瘤学安全替代方案.
    BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated comparable outcomes between laparoscopic and open resection of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). We sought to compare outcomes among robotic, laparoscopic, and open resection of gastric GIST in the era of expanding minimally invasive surgery.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of adult patients with gastric GIST undergoing definitive surgery using the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2020, excluding cases converted to open. Patients were stratified into minimally invasive surgery (MIS), (combined robotic (R) and laparoscopic (L)), and open (O). Hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and margin status were assessed. Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate outcomes between R and L cohorts. Entropy balancing was used to adjust for intergroup differences. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to compare unadjusted 5-year survival.
    RESULTS: Of the 15,022 patients (R = 10.4%, L = 44.3%, O = 45.3%), 63.2% were stage I and 70.6% underwent partial gastrectomy. MIS approach was associated with shorter hospital LOS (β: - 2.58; 95% CI: - 2.82 to - 2.33) and lower odds of 30-day (OR 0.45; 95% CI: 0.30-0.68) and 90-day mortality (OR 0.54; 95% CI: 0.39-0.74) compared to O. Likelihood of R0 resection similar between groups (OR 1.00; 95% CI: 0.88-1.14). Hospital LOS (β: + 0.25; 95% CI: - 0.14-0.64), odds of 30-day (OR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.40-2.46) and 90-day mortality (OR 0.89; 95% CI: 0.47-1.70), and rate of R0 resection (OR 1.02; 95% CI: 0.82-1.27) were comparable between R and L cohorts. Compared to O, MIS approach was associated with improved 5-year OS (log rank p < 0.001). Overall survival was not significantly different between R and L (log rank p = 0.44).
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that MIS approach may be considered for resection of gastric GIST in select patients. Among patients receiving an MIS approach, the robotic technique can be considered an oncologically safe alternative to laparoscopic surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号