■一项调查显示,欧洲职业科学家涵盖了广泛的职业科学(OS)研究,然而,不存在欧洲操作系统研究的当代概述,目前的研究可能为OS和职业治疗提供有价值的信息。
■目的是提供当代欧洲操作系统研究的概述。
■进行了范围审查,包括在欧洲进行并发表在英国职业治疗杂志(BJOT)上的研究,斯堪的纳维亚职业治疗杂志(SJOT)或职业科学杂志(JOS)2015年至2020年。对期刊进行了系统搜索,进行了质量评估和专题分析。
■来自93篇文章的研究发现了许多来自北欧国家的研究。大多数研究采用定性研究方法。在数据生成和讨论中使用了操作系统的理论概念。广泛的人口统计,并探索了生活条件。最近的文章对研究人员的定位采取了反身的立场。
■这篇综述突出了操作系统研究的多样性,在欧洲操作系统研究中提出了坚实的理论知识基础。
■这些结果有助于OS学科在欧洲和国际上的进一步发展和成熟。
UNASSIGNED: A survey showed European occupational scientists cover a broad range in occupational science (OS) research, however, no contemporary overviews of European OS research exists, and current research may provide valuable information for OS and occupational therapy.
UNASSIGNED: The aim was to provide an overview of contemporary European OS research.
UNASSIGNED: A scoping
review was performed, including studies conducted in Europe and published in the British Journal of Occupational Therapy (BJOT), the Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy (SJOT) or the Journal of Occupational Science (JOS) between 2015 and 2020. The journals were systematically searched, and quality assessment and thematic analysis were undertaken.
UNASSIGNED: Findings from 93 articles identified many studies from the Nordic countries. Most studies applied qualitative research methods. Theoretical concepts from OS were used in data generating and discussions. A wide range of demographics, and living conditions were explored. Recent articles took a reflexive stance on the positionality of the researcher/s.
UNASSIGNED: This
review highlights the diversity of OS research, suggesting a solid theoretical knowledge base within European OS research.
UNASSIGNED: The results contribute to further development and maturation of the discipline of OS in Europe and internationally.