UNASSIGNED: This project aims to compare the survival outcomes of non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients with different famotidine administration routes, and explore the risk factors influencing patients\' clinical outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Data of patients admitted to the ICU from 2008 to 2019 and receiving famotidine therapy were collected from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Patients selected for ICU admission > 1 day and treated with famotidine were divided into the group via intravenous (IV) dosing and the group via non-intravenous (Non-IV) dosing. Cox analysis and bilateral stepwise regression were utilized to determine independent prognostic factors affecting patient survival. Survival of patients on different routes of administration before and after propensity score matching (PSM) was compared using Kaplan - Meier (K-M) survival curves.
UNASSIGNED: This investigation included 351 patients. After PSM was matched with a 1:2 ratio, 109 patients were clustered in the IV group and 84 patients in the Non-IV group. Cox multivariate results uncovered that survival prognosis in ICH patients receiving famotidine was associated with age (HR = 1.031, 95%CI:1.011-1.050, p = 0.002), chloride ion levels (HR = 1.061, 95%CI:1.027-1.096, p < 0.001), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (HR = 1.034, 95%CI:1.007-1.062, p = 0.012), intracranial pressure (ICP) (HR = 1.059, 95%CI:1.027-1.092, p < 0.001), red blood cell distribution width (RDW) (HR = 1.156, 95%CI:1.030-1.299, p = 0.014), mechanical ventilation (HR = 2.526, 95%CI:1.341-4.760, p = 0.004), antibiotic use (HR = 0.331, 95%CI:0.144-0.759, p = 0.009), and Non-IV route (HR = 0.518, 95%CI:0.283-0.948, p = 0.033). The K-M curve results indicated that the 30-day survival rate of Non-IV group ICH patients was substantially higher than that of IV group patients (before PSM, p = 0.036; after PSM, p = 0.011). In the subgroup analysis of age, ICP, mechanical ventilation, and antibiotic use, there was a great heterogeneity interaction between the administration of famotidine and the 30-day mortality rate (P for interaction < 0.05). The Non-IV route considerably reduced the risk of death in patients with normal ICP (7-15 mmHg) (HR = 0.518, 95%CI:0.283-0.948, p = 0.033).
UNASSIGNED: Among ICH patients receiving famotidine, those receiving famotidine via Non-IV have a better 30-day survival rate compared to those receiving IV, especially in patients with normal ICP (7-15 mmHg).

OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetics and physiological effects following oral and intravenous (IV) administration of gabapentin in goats.
METHODS: Prospective, crossover study with a 3 week washout period between treatments.
METHODS: A total of eight healthy, client-owned, female goats.
METHODS: Gabapentin (10 mg kg-1) was administered to goats either orally or IV. Gabapentin concentrations were measured in serum samples collected 0-96 hours post-administration using liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure and temperature were recorded before and throughout the study. Correlations of the mean serum concentrations of gabapentin to those of each physiological parameter were determined using the Pearson method.
RESULTS: The mean and standard deviation of oral bioavailability for gabapentin was 60.9 ± 11.2%. Maximum serum concentration of gabapentin was lower following oral (1.19 ± 0.29 μg mL-1) than after IV administration (59.76 ± 14.38 μg mL-1, p < 0.0001). Half-lives were longer following PO (8.18 ± 0.57 hours) than after IV administration (1.79 ± 0.06 hours, p < 0.0001). Time to maximum concentration was 6.86 ± 2.27 hours following oral administration. Heart rate was inversely correlated with serum gabapentin concentrations. Slight ataxia was observed in three animals, and one became recumbent following IV gabapentin.
CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin is well-absorbed following oral administration to goats but yielded significantly lower serum concentrations than the IV route. The longer half-life of gabapentin following oral than after IV administration may result from prolonged absorption throughout the caprine gastrointestinal tract. IV gabapentin may cause slight ataxia in some goats.

(1) Background: We aim to examine and improve phosphate prescribing as part of a quality assurance program by examining the change in the proportion of patients receiving phosphate with normal or high preceding serum phosphate concentrations before and after the introduction of the 24 h time limit to default phosphate prescription. (2) Methods: This was a quality assurance study conducted across three Australian adult intensive care units (ICUs). All adult patients with ICU lengths of stay greater than or equal to 48 h who had their serum phosphate concentrations measured were included. A 24 h time limit was introduced to the protocolised prescription in the electronic clinical information system for enteral and intravenous phosphate at participating ICUs. Patient characteristics, phosphate administration, and outcomes were compared before and after this time limit was introduced. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients to whom phosphate was prescribed after measurement of a normal or high serum phosphate level. Secondary outcomes were ICU length of stay, mortality, and discharge destination. (3) Results: A total of 1192 patients were included from three ICUs over the two periods. The proportion of patients with a normal or high measured phosphate level who then received phosphate supplementation was significantly lower in the second study period (30.3% vs. 9.9%; p < 0.001). This difference persisted when adjusted for potential confounders in a mixed-effects logistic regression model (an adjusted odds ratio for receiving phosphate with normal or high serum concentration 0.214, 95% confidence interval of 0.132-0.347; p < 0.001). No significant difference was seen in the typical ICU length of stay, in-hospital case-fatality rate, and hospital discharge destination between these groups. (4) Conclusions: This multicentre before-after study has demonstrated that the introduction of a 24 h limit on electronic phosphate prescriptions resulted in significantly fewer patients receiving phosphate when their serum phosphate concentration was normal or high, without any adverse impact on patient outcomes.

Aim: Several studies have found subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) administration of similar drugs for long-lasting immunological and autoimmune diseases to have similar clinical effectiveness, meaning that what patients report they prefer is, or should be, a major factor in treatment choices. Therefore, it is important to systematically compile evidence regarding patient preferences, treatment satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQL) using SC or IV administration of the same drug. Materials & methods: PubMed database searches were run on 15 October 2021. Studies involving patients with experience of both home-based SC and hospital-based IV administration of immunoglobulins or biological therapies for the treatment of any autoimmune disease or primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) were included. The outcomes assessed were patient preferences, treatment satisfaction and HRQL. Preference data were meta-analyzed using a random-effects model. Results: In total, 3504 citations were screened, and 46 publications describing 37 studies were included in the review. There was a strong overall preference for SC over IV administration, with similar results seen for PIDs and autoimmune diseases: PID, 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64-94%) preferred SC; autoimmune diseases, 83% (95% CI: 73-92%); overall, 82% (95% CI: 75-89%). The meta-analysis also found that 84% (95% CI: 75-92%) of patients preferred administration at home to treatment in hospital. Analysis of treatment satisfaction using the life quality index found consistently better treatment interference and treatment setting scores with SC administration than with IV administration. Conclusion: Compared with IV infusions in hospital, patients tend to prefer, to be more satisfied with and to report better HRQL with SC administration of the same drug at home, primarily due to the greater convenience. This study contributes to evidence-based care of patients with autoimmune diseases or PIDs.

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of acute intravenous beta-blocker administration on myocardial blood flow (MBF) during same-day hybrid coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Previous research on the discontinuation of oral beta-blockers before MPI has shown mixed results, with no studies yet exploring the acute intravenous administration in the context of same-day hybrid imaging. This retrospective study included patients with suspected chronic coronary syndromes undergoing same-day hybrid CCTA/13N-ammonia PET MPI. Exclusion criteria comprised coronary artery stenosis ≥ 50% or regional perfusion abnormalities on PET, and baseline oral beta-blocker medication. Intravenous metoprolol (up to 30 mg) was administered as needed for heart rate control before CCTA. MBF measurements were obtained at rest (rMBF) and during stress (sMBF), and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) was calculated. After excluding 281 patients, 154 were eligible for propensity-score matching, resulting in 108 patients divided into two equal groups based on beta-blocker administration. The groups showed no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Among those who received beta-blockers, there was a significant decrease in sMBF (2.21 [IQR 1.72-2.78] versus 2.46 [2.08-2.99] ml∙min-1∙g-1, p = 0.027) and MFR (3.46 [2.70-4.05] versus 3.79 [3.22-4.46], p = 0.030), respectively, compared to those who did not receive beta-blockers. In contrast, rMBF remained unaffected (0.65 [0.54-0.78] versus 0.64 [0.55-0.76] ml∙min-1∙g-1, p = 0.931). Acute intravenous beta-blocker administration significantly impacts MBF, leading to a slight reduction in sMBF and MFR. In contrast, rMBF appears unaffected, suggesting that beta-blockers primarily affect the coronary capacity to respond to vasodilators.

UNASSIGNED: Solid organ transplant recipients are at high risk for developing severe zoster-associated neuralgia, and the pharmaceutic therapies of pain management for these patients with limited organ function are challenging. Intravenous lidocaine infusion showed positive analgesic effects and is used for the management of neuropathic pain. This case series reports the safety and effectiveness of intravenous lidocaine infusion in the treatment of intractable zoster-associated neuralgia in solid organ transplant recipients.
UNASSIGNED: Five solid organ transplant recipients suffering from refractory zoster-associated neuralgia (numeric rating scale 8-10, despite using high doses of antiepileptic drugs or combined with opioids) were enrolled. Intravenous lidocaine (5 mg/kg ideal bodyweight) was administered over 1.5 h with the monitoring of vital signs. Pain intensity, patient satisfaction, adverse events, typical liver, and kidney function were evaluated. All subjects reported high satisfaction with their treatment and effective pain relief at the 6-month follow-up. One patient experienced short and mild numbness in the mouth and dizziness after the therapy, but no major adverse reactions were reported.
UNASSIGNED: This case series provides evidence that intravenous lidocaine infusion provided effective pain relief as an analgesic treatment option for transplant patients with intractable zoster-associated neuralgia.

UNASSIGNED: Intravenous leiomyomatosis (IVL) is a special type of uterine leiomyoma and is rare. Intravenous lipoleiomyomatosis (LPL) is a rare subtype of IVL, distinguished by the presence of adipose tissue. Although histologically benign, this disease exhibits aggressive biological behavior such as local invasion and high recurrence rate. The disease initially presents with no obvious clinical features, and cardiac symptoms may only appear in the later stages. Diagnosis primarily relies on imaging studies, and due to its rarity and atypical clinical presentation, imaging diagnosis can be challenging, leading to misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis. Previously, there was no report on the imaging findings of this disease.
UNASSIGNED: This article reports a case of a 52-year-old patient who presented with lower abdominal discomfort due to IVL, and who underwent surgical resection and had a good recovery.
UNASSIGNED: This is the first time we report the imaging features of a disease of intravenous LPL with an extension of the inferior vena cava (IVC), and its characteristic imaging features [ultrasound shows a mass with high echogenicity, computed tomography (CT) shows low-density signal similar to fat, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows high signal on T1-weighted (T1W) image and low signal on T1W with fat-suppression (T1FS)] can lead to an accurate preoperative diagnosis and guide clinical treatment.

This first-in-human study assessed safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of cipargamin (intravenous) in healthy adults. It included part 1, single ascending dose [SAD: 10.5 mg-210 mg; n = 8 (active: 6, placebo: 2)], and part 2, multiple ascending dose [MAD: 60 and 120 mg daily for 5 days; n = 9 (active: 6, placebo: 3)]. Last dose follow-ups were on days 3, 4, and 6 for SAD and 7, 8, and 10 for MAD. Safety and PK review was done at completion of each cohort. We explored the cipargamin use for clinical development in patients with severe malaria. In SAD part, systemic exposure (maximum measured concentration and area under the curve) increased with increasing dose (10.5 mg-210 mg) following single intravenous dose. Cipargamin was eliminated with a mean T1/2 of 21.9-38.9 h. Volume of distribution (92.9 L-154 L) and clearance (2.43 L/h-4.33 L/h) was moderate and low, respectively, across the dose range. In MAD part, the mean accumulation ratio was 1.51 (60 mg) and 2.43 (120 mg) after once-daily cipargamin administration for 5 days. After day 5, the mean T1/2 was 35.5 (60 mg) and 31.9 h (120 mg) with twofold dose increase (60-120 mg) resulting in ~2-fold increased exposure. Cipargamin was well tolerated with commonly reported mild gastrointestinal, neurological, and genitourinary events. Increasing exposure to cipargamin showed higher baseline-corrected QTcF, and model-predicted ΔΔQTcF indicated that an effect on ΔΔQTcF ≥10 ms can be excluded up to 6470 ng/mL. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to inadequate Fridericia\'s QT correction.
RESULTS: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04321252.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Following NOVA (part 1) and the approval of the subcutaneous (SC) route of administration of natalizumab by the European Medicines Agency, an extension phase of the NOVA phase IIIb study (part 2) was initiated to collect patient preference data for SC versus intravenous (IV) dosing in patients receiving every-6-week (Q6W) dosing of natalizumab. This study was performed to evaluate patient preference for SC versus IV natalizumab administration and explore the efficacy, safety, and pharmacology characteristics of both routes of administration.
METHODS: In part 2, participants received natalizumab (Tysabri®) 300 mg via IV infusion Q6W for 36 weeks and then were randomized to 48 weeks of crossover treatment (24 weeks SC Q6W and 24 weeks IV Q6W, or vice versa). The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants who indicated a preference for natalizumab SC administration on the Patient Preference Questionnaire.
RESULTS: A total of 153 participants were randomized in NOVA part 2. Of 123 with patient preference data, 108 (87.8%) preferred the SC route of administration for natalizumab over the IV route; 102 (82.9%) specified \"requires less time in the clinic\" as the reason for the SC preference.
CONCLUSIONS: In NOVA (part 2), most participants on Q6W dosing of natalizumab preferred SC administration versus IV administration.
RESULTS: GOV: NCT03689972. INFOGRAPHIC.