Cervical artificial disc replacement preserves the range of motion after the decompression, and this technology has achieved good clinical results. The indications, surgical procedures, and perioperative management of cervical disc arthroplasty are different from traditional anterior cervical decompression and fusion. The Health Management and Enhanced Recovery of Cervical Spine Disorders Committee, Chinese Research Hospital Association has established an expert group to draw up this expert consensus through literature analysis and professional discussions. The purpose of this consensus is to standardize the surgical indications and patient selection of cervical artificial disc replacement, to guide surgical procedures and perioperative management, and to improve the clinical outcomes of cervical artificial disc replacement.
颈椎人工椎间盘置换术在减压的同时保留了手术节段的活动度，该项技术可取得较好的临床效果。颈椎人工椎间盘置换术的适应证、手术操作和围手术期管理均不同于传统的前路减压固定融合术。中国研究型医院学会颈椎疾病健康管理与加速康复专业委员会组建专家组，结合文献分析和专家组反复讨论，形成本共识，旨在规范颈椎人工椎间盘置换术的手术适应证和病例选择、指导手术操作和围手术期管理，以提高颈椎人工椎间盘置换术的临床疗效，供业界同仁参考。.

BACKGROUND: Thoracolumbar intervertebral disc extrusion (TL-IVDE) is the most common cause of acute paraparesis and paraplegia in dogs; however, guidelines on management of the condition are lacking.
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the current literature as it relates to diagnosis and management of acute TL-IVDE in dogs, and to formulate clinically relevant evidence-based recommendations.
METHODS: None.
METHODS: A panel of 8 experts was convened to assess and summarize evidence from the peer-reviewed literature in order to develop consensus clinical recommendations. Level of evidence available to support each recommendation was assessed and reported.
RESULTS: The majority of available literature described observational studies. Most recommendations made by the panel were supported by a low or moderate level of evidence, and several areas of high need for further study were identified. These include better understanding of the ideal timing for surgical decompression, expected surgical vs medical outcomes for more mildly affected dogs, impact of durotomy on locomotor outcome and development of progressive myelomalacia, and refining of postoperative care, and genetic and preventative care studies.
CONCLUSIONS: Future efforts should build on current recommendations by conducting prospective studies and randomized controlled trials, where possible, to address identified gaps in knowledge and to develop cost effectiveness and number needed to treat studies supporting various aspects of diagnosis and treatment of TL-IVDE.

The literature on cervical provocation discography (C-PD) is sparse. A \"Startle Response\" during C-PD is a known phenomenon that might be mistaken as an indicator of discogenic pain at the provoked disc level, but this has not been quantitatively described.
To determine the incidence of the Startle Response and its concordance/discordance with true-positive C-PD in patients referred for surgical planning or evaluation after ruling out other axial pain generators.
Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who received C-PD at an outpatient spine center. The primary outcome was the rate of discordance of the Startle Response with true-positive C-PD according to the operational criteria of the Spine Intervention Society (SIS) guidelines.
One hundred five discs were provoked in 36 individuals (19 female, mean age [SD] = 45.7 [10.9] years). C-PD was performed at a median of three levels (range = 1-5) with C4/5 (N = 30), C5/6 (N = 30), and C6/7 (N = 31) the most commonly evaluated. Twenty-six of 36 patients reported responses consistent with true-positive C-PD. A Startle Response was observed in 14 patients (39%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 23-57%), and 22 of 105 (21%, 95% CI = 14-30%) provoked discs. Of the 14 patients who exhibited a Startle Response, four had negative C-PD results (29%, 95% CI = 8-58%). As assessed per disc, C-PD results were positive in 12 of the 22 (55%, 95% CI = 32-76%) provoked discs that generated a Startle Response.
The present data demonstrate high discordance, 45% (95% CI = 24-68%), between the Startle Response and true-positive C-PD. Clinicians should be aware of this phenomenon and take care to distinguish it from a true-positive response during C-PD, as defined by the SIS guidelines. Misinterpretation of the Startle Response as a positive C-PD result may lead to inappropriate future care decisions in a substantial proportion of patients.

Degenerative disease of the spine, in the form of intervertebral disc degeneration and bony growth, causing osteophytes and impinging upon the spinal canal and neural foramina, is the most frequent disorder affecting the spine. In this chapter we first discuss briefly the indications for computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging in suspected degenerative spine disease. We then describe changes of disc height, signal intensity, and disc contour with aging and repeated microtrauma, as well as the imaging techniques most appropriate to image them. A grading system for lumbar disc changes is provided. Stenosis of the canal and neural foramina is reviewed next, concluding with a description of degenerative changes affecting the vertebral endplates and bone marrow.

Identifying the etiology of pain for patients suffering from chronic low-back pain remains problematic. Noninvasive imaging modalities, used in isolation, have not consistently provided sufficient evidence to support performance of a lumbar fusion. Provocative testing has been used as an adjunct in this assessment, either alone or in combination with other modalities, to enhance the diagnostic capabilities when evaluating patients with low-back pain. There have been a limited number of studies investigating this topic since the publication of the original guidelines. Based primarily on retrospective studies, discography, as a stand-alone test, is not recommended to formulate treatment strategies for patients with low-back pain. A single randomized cohort study demonstrated an improved potential of discoblock over discography as a predictor of success following lumbar fusion. It is therefore recommended that discoblock be considered as a diagnostic option. There is a possibility, based on a matched cohort study, that an association exists between progression of degenerative disc disease and the performance of a provocative discogram. It is therefore recommended that patients be counseled regarding this potential development prior to undergoing discography.

Percutaneous treatments are used in the therapy of small- to medium-sized hernias of intervertebral discs to reduce the intradiscal pressure in the nucleus and theoretically create space for the herniated fragment to implode inward, thus reducing pain and improving mobility and quality of life. These techniques involve the percutaneous removal of the nucleus pulposus by using a variety of chemical, thermal, or mechanical techniques and consist of removal of all or part of nucleus pulposus to induce more rapid healing of the abnormal lumbar disc. These guidelines are written to be used in quality improvement programs for assessing fluoroscopy- and/or computed tomography-guided percutaneous intervertebral disc ablative techniques.

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines are defined as systematically developed statements to assist practitioner and patient decisions about appropriate health care for specific clinical circumstances. The clinical guideline industry has been erupting even faster than innovation in health care, constantly adding unhealthy perspectives with broad and complex mandates to health care interventions. Clinical guidelines are based on evidence-based medicine (EBM) and comparative effectiveness research (CER). Multiple issues related to the development of clinical guidelines are based on conflicts of interest, controversies, and limitations of the guideline process. Recently, the American Pain Society (APS) developed and published multiple guidelines in managing low back pain resulting in multiple publications. However, these guidelines have been questioned regarding their development process, their implementation, and their impact on various specialties.
OBJECTIVE: To reassess the APS guidelines\' evidence synthesis for low back pain diagnostic interventions using the same methodology utilized by the APS authors. The interventions examined were diagnostic techniques for managing low back pain of facet joint origin, discogenic origin, and sacroiliac joint origin.
METHODS: A literature search by two authors was carried out utilizing appropriate databases from 1966 through July 2008. Methodologic quality assessment was also performed by at least 2 authors utilizing the same criteria applied in APS guidelines. The guideline reassessment process included the evaluation of individual studies and systematic reviews and the translation into practice recommendations.
RESULTS: Our reassessment of Chou et al\'s evaluation, utilizing Chou et al\'s criteria, showed good evidence for lumbar facet joint nerve blocks, fair evidence for lumbar provocation discography, and fair to poor evidence for sacroiliac joint blocks to diagnose sacroiliac joint pain. The reassessment illustrates that Chou et al have utilized multiple studies inappropriately and have excluded appropriate studies. Also, Chou et al failed to eliminate their bias in their study evaluations.
CONCLUSIONS: The reassessment, using appropriate methodology and including high quality studies, shows evidence that differs from published APS guidelines.

Discography is an exquisitely sensitive but not specific diagnostic test for the diagnosis of discogenic low-back pain. The restriction of the definition of a positive discographic study to one that elicits concordant pain from a morphologically abnormal disc improves the definition\'s accuracy. Fusion surgery based on discography alone, however, is not reliably associated with clinical success. Therefore, discography is not recommended as a standalone test for treatment decisions in patients with low-back pain. Magnetic resonance imaging is a sensitive and noninvasive test for the presence of degenerative disc disease. Discography should not be attempted in patients with normal lumbar MR images. Discography appears to have a role in the evaluation of patients with low-back pain, but it is best limited to the evaluation of abnormal interspaces identified on MR imaging, the investigation of adjacent-level disc disease, and as a means to rule out cases of nonorganic pain from surgical consideration.

OBJECTIVE: Discography has been used as a diagnostic test in the evaluation of patients with recalcitrant low-back pain. Recently, its usefulness has been questioned because of the occurrence of false-positive results as well as the influence of psychological factors on test results. The purpose of this review is to establish the literature support for and against the use of discography. A search of the English-language literature published between 1966 and 2001 was performed. Papers were selected based on inclusion criteria described in the text, and the quality of information was graded using previously described methods.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors propose a set of practice parameters based on the literature. Although the data were not judged adequate for the determination of a treatment standard, parameters for the use of discography are provided at a guideline and option level.

One hundred ten cases of the transient neurological phenomenon, cervical cord neurapraxia (CCN), are presented. The authors established a classification system for CCN, developed a new computerized measurement technique for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, investigated the relationship of the cervical cord to the canal, and analyzed clinical, x-ray, and MR data. One hundred nine males and one female were included in the study; the average age of the participants was 21 years (range 13-33 years). All episodes occurred during sports participation; 87% occurred while the patient was playing football. Follow-up review lasting an average of 3.3 years was available for 105 patients (95%). Narrowing of the sagittal diameter of the cervical canal in the adult spine was confirmed to be a causative factor. Cervical cord neurapraxia was not associated with permanent neurological injury and no permanent morbidity occurred in patients who returned to contact activities. Of the patients returning to contact activities, 35 (56%) experienced a recurrent episode. The risk of recurrence was increased with smaller spinal canal/vertebral body ratio (p < 0.05), smaller disc-level canal diameter (p < 0.05), and less space available for the cord (p < 0.05). There was no correlation between either the classification of the CCN episode or the disease noted on MR imaging and x-ray films and the risk of recurrence. The authors conclude that: 1) CCN is a transient neurological phenomenon and individuals with uncomplicated CCN may be permitted to return to their previous activity without an increased risk of permanent neurological injury; 2) congenital or degenerative narrowing of the sagittal diameter of the cervical canal is a causative factor; 3) the overall recurrence rate after return to play is 56%; and 4) the risk of recurrence is strongly and inversely correlated with sagittal canal diameter and it is useful in the prediction of future episodes of CCN (p < 0.001). These data will enable the physician to counsel individuals regarding a predicted risk of recurrence based on canal measurements.