internship and residency

实习和居住
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:过渡到住院医师(TTR)课程促进了医学生-住院医师的过渡,并且是高级医学生培训的组成部分。作者为TTR课程建立了一套通用的技能,学生应在完成TTR课程的每项技能中表现出预期的委托水平。
    方法:在2020年至2022年之间使用了改进的Delphi方法,并进行了3次调查迭代,以建立要纳入TTR课程的技能。九位TTR专家建议了一般候选人技能,并进行了文献检索,以确保没有错过任何重要技能。从TTR教育工作者的电子邮件列表中征集了一个利益相关者小组,居住项目主任,以及小组成员机构的居民。共识被定义为超过75%的参与者选择积极的包容性回应。委托问卷要求小组成员为每种技能分配预期的委托水平,1表示仅观察,6表示独立执行。
    结果:利益相关者小组最初由118名受访者组成,他们在教育背景和临床专业中都有代表。第2次迭代的反应率为54%,第3次迭代的反应率为42%,委托问卷的反应率为33%。经过3次迭代,54项技能达成共识,并合并为37项最终技能,分为18项临床技能(例如,住院患者问题的评估和管理),14沟通技巧(例如,传递严肃的新闻或进行艰难的对话),4个人和专业技能(例如,临床任务的优先级),和1程序技能(面罩通风)。报告了所有技能的委托级别中位数,有19个技能,预期委托水平为4(独立执行并对所有发现进行双重检查)。
    结论:这些共识技能可以作为标准化的国家TTR课程框架的基础。委托指导可以帮助教育领导者优化TTR课程开发和实施的培训和资源分配。
    OBJECTIVE: Transition to residency (TTR) courses facilitate the medical student-residency transition and are an integral part of senior medical student training. The authors established a common set of skills for TTR courses, and an expected level of entrustment students should demonstrate in each skill on TTR course completion.
    METHODS: A modified Delphi approach was used with 3 survey iterations between 2020 and 2022 to establish skills to be included in a TTR course. Nine TTR experts suggested general candidate skills and conducted a literature search to ensure no vital skills were missed. A stakeholder panel was solicited from email lists of TTR educators, residency program directors, and residents at the panelists\' institutions. Consensus was defined as more than 75% of participants selecting a positive inclusion response. An entrustment questionnaire asked panelists to assign a level of expected entrustment to each skill, with 1 indicating observation only and 6 indicating perform independently.
    RESULTS: The stakeholder panel initially consisted of 118 respondents with representation across educational contexts and clinical specialties. Response rates were 54% in iteration 2, 42% in iteration 3, and 33% on the entrustment questionnaire. After 3 iterations, 54 skills met consensus and were consolidated into 37 final skills categorized into 18 clinical skills (e.g., assessment and management of inpatient concerns), 14 communication skills (e.g., delivering serious news or having difficult conversations), 4 personal and professional skills (e.g., prioritization of clinical tasks), and 1 procedural skill (mask ventilation). Median entrustment levels were reported for all skills, with 19 skills having a level of expected entrustment of 4 (perform independently and have all findings double-checked).
    CONCLUSIONS: These consensus skills can serve as the foundation of a standardized national TTR curriculum framework. Entrustment guidance may help educational leaders optimize training and allocation of resources for TTR curriculum development and implementation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:对于准备从事普外科职业的学生来说,外科实习是重要的轮换;但是,这些轮换通常因机构和服务而异。这项改良的德尔菲研究是为了达成一组共识的角色,责任,以及四年级医学生对外科实习的期望。
    方法:关于角色的候选陈述,责任,亚实习生的期望分为7个领域:轮换结构,四舍五入和病人护理,手术室行为,技术技能,知识库,诊所,和专业性。专家小组由主要利益相关者组成:项目主管,职员主管,其他教育学院,学员,和最近的副实习生。2023年1月至4月进行了三轮Delphi回合,以达成共识,先验定义为Cronbachα≥0.8和80%或更高的小组协议。
    结果:招募了46名专家小组成员参加Delphi回合,100%,95.7%,第一次反应率为97.8%,第二,第三轮,分别。到了第三轮,67项声明作为基本作用达成共识,责任,以及对外科副实习生的期望。这67项声明中的主要主题包括副实习生在工作时间方面近似实习生的作用,患者护理责任,基本技术技能,和知识库。小组成员将舍入和患者护理评为最重要的领域,紧随其后的是专业精神。按降序排列的其他关键评估领域是知识库,手术室行为,诊所,和技术技能。到了第三轮,德尔福流程中的显著分歧包括技术技能、四舍五入和病人护理(93.3%和88.9%同意,分别)。
    结论:这项研究为核心角色提供了全国共识,责任,以及对医学生完成外科实习的期望。学生可以使用这些建议来准备子实习,而教师以及居民和研究员可以使用它们来评估申请人的普通外科住院医师职位。
    OBJECTIVE: Surgical subinternships are important rotations for students preparing for a career in general surgery; however, these rotations often vary by institution and service. This modified Delphi study was conducted to reach a consensus set of roles, responsibilities, and expectations of fourth-year medical students on their surgical subinternships.
    METHODS: Candidate statements on roles, responsibilities, and expectations of subinterns were categorized into 7 domains: rotation structure, rounding and patient care, operating room conduct, technical skills, knowledge base, clinic, and professionalism. Expert panels were assembled of key stakeholders: program directors, clerkship directors, other education faculty, trainees, and recent subinterns. Three Delphi rounds were conducted from January to April 2023 to reach consensus defined a priori as a Cronbach α ≥ 0.8 and 80% or greater panel agreement.
    RESULTS: Forty-six expert panelists were recruited to participate in Delphi rounds, with 100%, 95.7%, and 97.8% response rates in the first, second, and third rounds, respectively. By the third round, 67 statements reached consensus as essential roles, responsibilities, and expectations of surgical subinterns. Key themes from these 67 statements included subinterns approximating the role of an intern with respect to work hours, patient care responsibilities, basic technical skills, and knowledge base. Panelists rated rounding and patient care as the most important domain, followed closely by professionalism. Additional key domains for evaluation in descending order were knowledge base, operating room conduct, clinic, and technical skills. By the third round, notable disagreements in the Delphi process included technical skills and rounding and patient care (93.3% and 88.9% agreement, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a national consensus on core roles, responsibilities, and expectations for medical students completing surgical subinternships. Students can use these recommendations to prepare for subinternships, whereas faculty as well as residents and fellows can use them to evaluate applicants for general surgery residency positions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景技术标准化评估信(SLOE)正越来越广泛地纳入住院医师申请流程,以制作推荐信,驻留应用程序数据包中已经很关键的组件,更客观。然而,目前尚不清楚这些信件的审稿人是否就其SLOE确定的申请人的实力达成共识。目的我们测量了由SLOE确定的关于申请人竞争力的教师协议水平以及2种算法预测教师共识排名的能力。方法使用来自急诊医学SLOE数据库住院医师理事会的2021-2022匹配周期的数据作为蓝图,作者创建了50个代表国家数据的虚构SLOE。然后,七名教师按照申请人竞争力的顺序对这些SLOE进行了评级,定义为建议的排名位置。共识是使用先验建立的截止值进行评估的,和2个预测模型,基于点的系统和线性回归模型,进行了测试,以确定他们预测共识排名的能力。结果教师对SLOEs的解释有很强的共识。在狭窄的协议窗口内,教师表现出类似的排名模式,83%和93%的“接近”和“松散”协议,分别。预测模型与共识排名具有很强的相关性(基于点的系统r=0.97,线性回归r=0.97)。结论教师通过SLOE对申请人的竞争力表现出强烈的共识,进一步支持使用SLOE进行选择和建议。两个模型预测共识竞争力排名具有很高的准确性。
    Background Standardized letters of evaluation (SLOE) are becoming more widely incorporated into the residency application process to make the letter of recommendation, an already critical component in a residency application packet, more objective. However, it is not currently known if the reviewers of these letters share consensus regarding the strength of an applicant determined by their SLOE. Objective We measured the level of faculty agreement regarding applicant competitiveness as determined by SLOEs and the ability of 2 algorithms to predict faculty consensus rankings. Methods Using data from the 2021-2022 Match cycle from the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine SLOE Database as a blueprint, authors created 50 fictional SLOEs representative of the national data. Seven faculty then rated these SLOEs in order of applicant competitiveness, defined as suggested rank position. Consensus was evaluated using cutoffs established a priori, and 2 prediction models, a point-based system and a linear regression model, were tested to determine their ability to predict consensus rankings. Results There was strong faculty consensus regarding the interpretation of SLOEs. Within narrow windows of agreement, faculty demonstrated similar ranking patterns with 83% and 93% agreement for \"close\" and \"loose\" agreement, respectively. Predictive models yielded a strong correlation with the consensus ranking (point-based system r=0.97, linear regression r=0.97). Conclusions Faculty displayed strong consensus regarding the competitiveness of applicants via SLOEs, adding further support to the use of SLOEs for selection and advising. Two models predicted consensus competitiveness rankings with a high degree of accuracy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:通过具有通常的实习经验而没有教授具体的指南内容,将护理学位学生对最佳实践指南的知识与知识进行比较。
    方法:非随机后验设计,对照组。
    方法:招募了巴塞罗那自治大学护理学位的143名学生。干预组接受了三项基于问题的学习方法的最佳实践指南的课堂培训。对照组只参加了实习,没有具体的指南内容。使用临时干预后问卷评估知识。该信息是在2016年至2018年之间收集的。
    结果:知识的平均得分较低,5.1的10,和不同的指南。最好的结果是由实习的学生获得的,并且在某些场合咨询了指南。需要学术界和医疗保健部门的同步努力和领导才能支持循证实践。理论学习与实践相结合的最佳实践指南的咨询,增加对最佳做法指南的了解,并将有利于实施循证做法。一些学生参与了问卷设计。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare knowledge of Nursing Degree students about Best Practice Guidelines when there are included as teaching content in a subject vs knowledge through having the usual internship experience without teaching specific guidelines contents.
    METHODS: Non-randomized post-test-only design with a comparison group.
    METHODS: 143 students of the nursing degree at the Autonomous University of Barcelona were recruited. The intervention group received a classroom training in three Best Practice Guidelines with Problem-Based Learning methodology. The comparison group only attended internship, without specific guidelines contents. Knowledge was evaluated with an ad hoc post intervention questionnaire. The information was collected between 2016 and 2018.
    RESULTS: The average score of knowledge was low, 5.1 out of 10, and differs between guides. The best results were obtained by the students with internships and that had consulted the guides on some occasions. Synchronized effort and leadership in Academia and Healthcare are needed to favour evidence-based practice. The combination of the consultation of the Best Practice Guidelines in theoretical learning combined with the practice, increases the knowledge of the Best Practice Guidelines and will favour the implementation of evidence-based practice. Some students were involved in questionnaire design.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:为了消除美国的结核病(TB),初级保健提供者必须在潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)的诊断和管理中发挥更大的作用.存在针对LTBI管理的临床实践指南和建议,但需要创新工具来提高医学生和居民对LTBI检测和治疗循证实践的认识。
    目的:为了评估LTBI-ASSIST的影响,免费的在线决策支持援助,作为一种新颖的教育工具和机制,为医学学员提供临床实践指南。
    方法:单个站点,通过电子调查对受训人员进行的随机对照试验。
    方法:约翰霍普金斯大学医学院的医学生和内科住院医师。
    方法:参与者以1:1的比例随机分配,以接受美国临床实践指南和潜伏性结核病管理建议(控制臂)或指南以及LTBI-ASSIST(LTBI-ASSIST臂)的介绍,因为他们完成了基于病例的知识评估并报告了对LTBI护理领域的信心。
    方法:(1)在基于案例的知识评估中正确回答的问题比例;(2)LTBI护理领域报告的置信度变化。
    结果:一百三十名参与者完成了知识评估。那些随机接受LTBI-ASSIST工具的人在基于案例的知识评估中表现更好,平均得分为75.9%(95%CI:70.6-81.1),与仅接受指南组的57.4%(52.8-62.0)相比(p<0.001)。同样,LTBI-ASSIST组报告了更高的置信度变化(以评估后的置信度减去评估前的置信度来衡量),与对照组相比,在LTBI护理的七个领域中的六个领域。
    结论:LTBI-ASSIST可以有效地补充现有指南,以教育医学学员和帮助提供者找到基于证据的指南。指南支持的临床实践中遇到的问题的答案。
    背景:NIH临床试验登记号。NCT05772065。
    BACKGROUND: In order to eliminate tuberculosis (TB) in the USA, primary care providers must take on an expanded role in the diagnosis and management of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Clinical practice guidelines and recommendations exist for LTBI management, but there is a need for innovative tools to improve medical students\' and residents\' knowledge of evidence-based practices for LTBI testing and treatment.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of LTBI-ASSIST, a free online decision support aid, as a novel educational tool and mechanism of delivering clinical practice guidelines for medical trainees.
    METHODS: A single site, randomized controlled trial of trainees delivered by electronic survey.
    METHODS: Medical students and Internal Medicine residents at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
    METHODS: Participants were randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive the US clinical practice guidelines and recommendations for Latent TB management (control arm) or the guidelines plus an introduction to LTBI-ASSIST (LTBI-ASSIST arm) as they completed a case-based knowledge assessment and reported confidence with domains of LTBI care.
    METHODS: (1) Proportion of questions answered correctly on a case-based knowledge assessment; (2) change in reported confidence with domains of LTBI care.
    RESULTS: One hundred and thirty participants completed the knowledge assessment. Those randomized to receive the LTBI-ASSIST Tool performed better on the case-based knowledge assessment with a mean score of 75.9% (95% CI: 70.6-81.1), compared to 57.4% (52.8-62.0) in the group that received the guidelines only (p <0.001). Similarly, the LTBI-ASSIST group reported a higher change in confidence (measured as post-assessment confidence minus pre-assessment confidence), compared to the control group, in six of the seven domains of LTBI care.
    CONCLUSIONS: LTBI-ASSIST can be an effective supplement to existing guidelines in educating medical trainees and helping providers find evidence-based, guideline-supported answers for questions encountered in clinical practice.
    BACKGROUND: NIH Clinical Trial Registry No. NCT05772065.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号