intermediate care

中级护理
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    开发了居家医院(HITH)护理模式,以支持COVID-19的应对措施,并需要以新的方式提供护理,以确保二级护理服务可以免费为病重的患者提供护理,而不会被需要医院护理的COVID-19患者压垮。中级护理服务,由护理和专职健康领导,迎接挑战,并合作开发了具有明确途径的HITH护理模式。这在家中提供了医院级别的急性健康服务,这是住院护理的临床安全替代选择。HITH的建立释放了床位容量和资源,因此在资源和人员受到限制的情况下,无法扩大医院住院容量。通过使用面对面访问和远程医疗来实现护理交付。技术支持了允许患者的护理服务,whanau(家庭)和临床医生要联系起来。
    Hospital in the Home (HITH) model of care was developed to support the COVID-19 response and the need to deliver care in new ways to ensure secondary care services were free to deliver care to the sickest patients and not be overwhelmed by the COVID-19 patients needing hospital-level care. Intermediate Care Services, led by nursing and allied health stepped up to the challenge and collaborated on the development of the HITH model of care with defined pathways. This provided hospital-level acute health services in the home that was a clinically safe alternative option to inpatient care. The establishment of HITH released bed capacity and resources and therefore prevented the need for expanding hospital inpatient capacity at a time where resources and staff were constrained. Care delivery was achieved by utilising both in-person visits and telehealth. Technology supported the care delivery which allowed patients, whanau (family) and clinicians to be connected.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:缺乏有关中期和长期护理中心(ILCC)不良事件(AE)的数据。我们旨在综合用于识别和表征AE的仪器的现有科学证据。我们还旨在描述ILCC中最常见的不良事件。
    方法:根据Prisma建议对文献进行叙述性系统综述。在PubMed数据库中搜索了2000年至2021年之间发表的文章。两名审稿人通过盲目和独立审查独立筛选和审查研究。我们使用Cochrane的偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。分歧通过协商一致解决。与第三位审阅者讨论了未通过讨论解决的差异。提取描述性数据并进行定性内容分析。
    结果:我们发现了2191篇文章。根据纳入和排除标准,通过标题和摘要筛选了272篇论文,选择66项研究进行全面审查.用于识别AE的工具大多是识别特定AE或AE风险的工具(94%),其余6%是多维的。最常见的类别检测到药物相关的不良事件(n=26,40%);跌倒(n=7,11%);精神病不良事件(6.9%);营养不良(4.6%),和感染(4.6%)。使用多维工具的研究指的是脆弱,依赖性,或缺乏能量作为AE的预测因子。然而,他们没有考虑到检测AE的重要性。我们发现每个居民/月有2-11起药物不良事件(ADE)。我们发现跌倒的患病率(12.5%),谵妄(9.6-89%),疼痛(68%),营养不良(2-83%),和压疮(3-30%)。尿路感染,下呼吸道感染,皮肤和软组织感染,胃肠炎是这种情况下最常见的感染。不同护理环境之间的转换(从医院到ILCC,反之亦然)暴露AE风险。
    结论:有许多仪器可以检测ILCC中的AE,大多数都有特定的方法。不良事件影响ILCC患者的显著比例,护士敏感的结果,医院感染,药物不良事件是最常见的。系统审查已在Prospero注册,ID:CRD42022348168。
    BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data about adverse events (AE) in intermediate and long-term care centers (ILCC). We aimed to synthesize the available scientific evidence on instruments used to identify and characterize AEs. We also aimed to describe the most common adverse events in ILCCs.
    METHODS: A narrative systematic review of the literature was conducted according to Prisma recommendations. The PubMed database was searched for articles published between 2000 and 2021. Two reviewers independently screened and reviewed the studies through blind and independent review. We evaluated bias risk with Cochrane\'s risk of bias tool. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. Discrepancies that were not resolved by discussion were discussed with a third reviewer. Descriptive data was extracted and qualitative content analysis was performed.
    RESULTS: We found 2191 articles. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 272 papers were screened by title and abstract, and 66 studies were selected for full review. The instruments used to identify AEs were mostly tools to identify specific AEs or risks of AEs (94%), the remaining 6% were multidimensional. The most frequent categories detected medication-related AEs (n=26, 40%); falls (n=7, 11%); psychiatric AEs (6.9%); malnutrition (4.6%), and infections (4.6%). The studies that used multidimensional tools refer to frailty, dependency, or lack of energy as predictors of AEs. However, they do not take into account the importance of detecting AEs. We found 2-11 adverse drug events (ADE) per resident/month. We found a prevalence of falls (12.5%), delirium (9.6-89%), pain (68%), malnutrition (2-83%), and pressure ulcers (3-30%). Urinary tract infections, lower respiratory tract infections, skin and soft tissue infections, and gastroenteritis were the most common infections in this setting. Transitions between different care settings (from hospitals to ILCC and vice versa) expose AE risk.
    CONCLUSIONS: There are many instruments to detect AEs in ILCC, and most have a specific approach. Adverse events affect a significant proportion of patients in ILCC, the nurse-sensitive outcomes, nosocomial infections, and adverse drug events are among the most common. The systematic review was registered with Prospero, ID: CRD42022348168.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨营养不良与口腔健康不良等潜在影响因素之间的关系。短期护理老年人吞咽困难和死亡率。
    方法:这项横断面研究是多学科多中心项目SOFIA(吞咽功能,老年人口腔健康和食物摄入量),其中包括瑞典五个地区36个短期护理单位的老年人(≥65岁)。用最小饮食观察和营养表格(MEONF-II)的II版测量营养状况,口腔健康与修订的口腔评估指南(ROAG),吞咽困难的水吞咽测试,死亡率随访1年。使用描述性分析和逻辑回归模型对数据进行分析,以计算营养不良与这些因素之间关联的比值比。
    结果:在391名参与者中,中位年龄为84岁,53.3%为女性.总组1年内死亡率为25.1%,营养不良的参与者比营养充足的参与者更高。严重吞咽困难(OR:6.51,95%CI:2.40-17.68),口腔健康不良(OR:5.73,95%CI:2.33-14.09)和女性性别(OR:2.2,95%CI:1.24-3.93)与营养不良独立相关.
    结论:营养不良者的死亡率高于营养不良者。严重吞咽困难,口腔健康状况差和女性性别是短期护理中老年人营养不良的预测因素.这些健康风险应在短期护理中给予更多关注,并及早发现。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between malnutrition and potential contributing factors such as poor oral health, dysphagia and mortality among older people in short-term care.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional study is a part of the multidisciplinary multicentre project SOFIA (Swallowing function, Oral health and Food Intake in old Age), which includes older people (≥65 years) in 36 short-term care units in five regions of Sweden. Nutritional status was measured with version II of the Minimal Eating Observation and Nutrition Form (MEONF-II), oral health with the Revised Oral Assessment Guide (ROAG), dysphagia with a water swallow test, and the mortality rate was followed for 1 year. Data were analysed using descriptive analysis and logistic regression models to calculate odds ratios for the association between malnutrition and these factors.
    RESULTS: Among the 391 participants, the median age was 84 years and 53.3% were women. Mortality rate was 25.1% within 1 year in the total group, and was higher among malnourished participants than among their well-nourished counterparts. Severe dysphagia (OR: 6.51, 95% CI: 2.40-17.68), poor oral health (OR: 5.73, 95% CI: 2.33-14.09) and female gender (OR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.24-3.93) were independently associated with malnutrition.
    CONCLUSIONS: Mortality rate was higher among malnourished people than those who were well nourished. Severe dysphagia, poor oral health and female gender was predictors of malnutrition among older people in short-term care. These health risks should be given more attention in short-term care with early identification.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    中级护理(IC)用于不需要重症监护病房(ICU)的人力和技术支持但需要比普通病房更多的护理和监测的患者。尽管在许多国家普遍存在,组织和人员配备模式存在明显的可变性,以及提供的监测和干预措施。在这篇文章中,作者将讨论IC的历史背景,回顾IC对ICU和IC患者预后的影响,并强调未来的研究可以揭示如何优化IC组织和结果。
    Intermediate care (IC) is used for patients who do not require the human and technological support of the intensive care unit (ICU) yet require more care and monitoring than can be provided on general wards. Though prevalent in many countries, there is marked variability in models of organization and staffing, as well as monitoring and interventions provided. In this article, the authors will discuss the historical background of IC, review the impact of IC on ICU and IC patient outcomes, and highlight where future studies can shed light on how to optimize IC organization and outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在日本,老年成人患者占所有住院患者的70%,以及基于以患者为中心的护理(PCC)的中间护理,确保在家庭服务和急性护理服务之间的接口处的护理连续性和质量,并恢复患者的独立性和信心,这对于他们继续独立生活是必要的。目前,在日本没有建立中间护理的概念,PCC的实施已被推迟。因此,在这项研究中,在英国开发的原始PREM的基础上创建了日文版的中间护理评估指数(患者报告的经验测量(PREM)),收集了日本具有中级护理功能的病房的数据,以确认2020年至2022年的内部一致性和有效性。发现日本版本的PREM具有具有两个潜在因素的因素结构。鉴于与共享决策评价指标具有明显的相关性,这是PCC的顶峰,日本版本的PREM的理论有效性,它以PCC为理论基础,已确认。
    Older adult patients account for 70% of all hospitalized patients in Japan, and intermediate care based on patient-centered care (PCC) that ensures continuity and quality of care at the interface between home services and acute care services and restores patient\'s independence and confidence is necessary for them to continue living independently. At present, no concept of intermediate care is established in Japan, and the implementation of PCC has been delayed. Thus, in this study, a Japanese version of the intermediate care evaluation index (patient-reported experience measure (PREM)) was created on the basis of the original PREM developed in the UK, and data in wards with intermediate care functions in Japan were collected to confirm internal consistency and validity from 2020 to 2022. The Japanese version of PREM was found to have a factor structure with two potential factors. Given the clear correlation with the shared decision-making evaluation index, which is the pinnacle of PCC, the theoretical validity of the Japanese version of PREM, which is based on PCC as a theoretical basis, was confirmed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    针对脑损伤患者的过渡性护理模式是泰国医疗保健系统中相对较新的补充。这项研究的目的是探索泰国伊桑老年中风幸存者及其家庭护理人员在从医院到家庭的不同过渡期的经验。根据纳入和排除标准,招募了15位年龄较大的中风幸存者及其家庭护理人员。通过参与者观察和半结构化访谈收集数据。使用数据分析启用程序的四个阶段和Leininger-Templin-ThompsonEthnoscript编码启用程序分析了47个参与观察现场笔记和24个访谈转录。出现了三个主题:我对在家中管理护理感到失落;对我们的家庭来说,保持护理的连续性一直是具有挑战性的;这是谁适合并方便家庭护理责任的问题。这项研究的结果强调了在患者过渡到家中期间,泰伊桑人的护理分散。因此,应制定过渡性护理计划,规定在这一期间由谁负责监测和支持患者和家属.
    The transitional care model for people who have suffered brain injuries is a relatively recent addition to the Thai healthcare system. The aim of this study was to explore experience of Thai Isan older stroke survivors and their family caregivers across different points of transition from hospital to home. Fifteen dyads of older stroke survivors and their family caregivers were recruited following the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were collected through participant observations and semi-structured interviews. Forty-seven participation observation field notes and twenty-four interview transcriptions were analyzed using the Four Phases of the Data Analysis Enabler and the Leininger-Templin-Thompson Ethnoscript Coding Enabler. Three themes emerged: I feel lost with managing care at home; it has been challenging for our family to maintain continuity of care; and it is a matter of who fits in and is convenient for family care responsibilities. The findings of this study have highlighted the dispersion of care among Thai-Isan people during the patient\'s transition to home. Therefore, a transitional care plan should be developed that specifies who is responsible for monitoring and supporting patients and families throughout this period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着对通过多部门方法提供的过渡支持模式的日益关注,第三部门组织(TSO)支持社区重返社会和住院后独立生活。这项研究旨在确定这些类型的程序的核心要素,主持人,以及服务实施的障碍,并了解提供者和接受者对方案经验的看法。
    一项集体案例研究从英国的两个“医院之家”项目中收集了数据。归纳主题分析产生了每个程序的丰富描述,和分析活动产生了跨案例的见解。
    计划为老年人提供了一系列个性化支持,并解决了许多出院后的需求,包括福祉评估,支持日常生活的工具性活动,社会心理支持,以及由服务用户的需求和偏好指导的其他个性化服务。结果表明,这些计划可以充当“安全网”并促进独立生活。熟练的志愿者可以积极影响老年人回家的经历。
    当正在研究的项目与现有证据相结合时,它有助于讨论如何更广泛地提供TSO服务,以支持老年人的过渡经验。
    UNASSIGNED: With increasing attention to models of transitional support delivered through multisectoral approaches, third-sector organizations (TSOs) have supported community reintegration and independent living post-hospitalization. This study aimed to identify the core elements of these types of programs, the facilitators, and barriers to service implementation and to understand the perspectives of providers and recipients of their experiences with the programs.
    UNASSIGNED: A collective case study collected data from two UK-based \'Home from Hospital\' programs. An inductive thematic analysis generated rich descriptions of each program, and analytical activities generated insights across the cases.
    UNASSIGNED: Programs provided a range of personalized support for older adults and addressed many post-discharge needs, including well-being assessments, support for instrumental activities of daily living, psychosocial support, and other individualized services directed by the needs and preferences of the service user. Results suggest that these programs can act as a \'safety net\' and promote independent living. Skilled volunteers can positively impact older adults\' experience returning home.
    UNASSIGNED: When the programs under study are considered in tandem with existing evidence, it facilitates a discussion of how TSO services could be made available more widely to support older adults in their transition experiences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:通过定义急性老年社区医院(AGCH)与荷兰(老年)医院护理和其他以床为基础的中间护理模式的目标群体界限,来完善急性老年社区医院(AGCH)的入院标准。
    方法:一项定性研究,包括带有案例插图的三阶段细化程序。内科医生,医学专家,执业护士,以及荷兰医院(n=10)或中级护理机构(n=10)的医师助理参加.他们从临床实践中收集了案例插图(第一阶段)。然后通过调查(第二阶段)和两个焦点小组(第三阶段)记录每个病例的转诊考虑和决定。对于主题数据分析,使用了归纳法和演绎法。
    结果:医学专家护理(MSC)和医学通才护理(MGC)的结合,与荷兰的其他中间护理模式相比,AGCH是独一无二的。与(老年)医院护理相比,AGCH提供的MSC范围更为有限。基于这些发现,制定了13项完善的入院标准,例如“AGCH提供了监测治疗有效性所需的诊断测试”。除了录取标准,额外的临床和组织考虑因素在转诊决策中发挥了作用;确定了10个主题.
    结论:本病例小插图研究确定了AGCH和其他护理模式之间的目标群体界限,允许我们完善AGCH录取标准。我们的发现可能有助于确定跨学科AGCH团队所需的能力并开发分诊工具。确定的考虑主题可以用作进一步研究的概念框架。这些发现也可能对荷兰以外的医疗保健系统感兴趣,他们渴望为离家较近的老年人设计综合护理。
    OBJECTIVE: To refine the admission criteria of the Acute Geriatric Community Hospital (AGCH) by defining its target group boundaries with (geriatric) hospital care and other bed-based intermediate care models in the Netherlands.
    METHODS: A qualitative study consisting of a three-phase refinement procedure with case vignettes. Physicians, medical specialists, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants in hospitals (n = 10) or intermediate care facilities (n = 10) in the Netherlands participated. They collected case vignettes from clinical practice (phase one). The referral considerations and decisions for each case were then documented through surveys (phase two) and two focus groups (phase 3). For thematic data analysis, inductive and deductive approaches were used.
    RESULTS: The combination of medical specialist care (MSC) and medical generalist care (MGC), is unique for the AGCH compared to other intermediate care models in the Netherlands. Compared to (geriatric) hospital care, the AGCH offers a more limited scope of MSC. Based on these findings, 13 refined admission criteria were developed such as \'The required diagnostic tests to monitor the effectiveness of treatment are available at the AGCH\'. Besides admission criteria, additional clinical and organizational considerations played a role in referral decision-making; 10 themes were identified.
    CONCLUSIONS: This case vignette study defined the target group boundaries between the AGCH and other care models, allowing us to refine the AGCH admission criteria. Our findings may help to determine the required competencies of the interdisciplinary AGCH team and to develop triage instruments. The identified consideration themes can be used as conceptual framework in further research. The findings may also be of interests for healthcare systems outside the Netherlands who aspire to design integrated care for older people closer to home.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:为了激发患者的经验,家庭照顾者,以及巴尔的摩学术医疗中心的中级护理单位(IMCU)的医疗保健专业人员,MD与多病症管理的挑战和复杂性有关,以告知多病症症状管理工具包的开发。
    方法:基于经验的协同设计。
    方法:在2021年7月至10月之间,年龄在55岁及以上的多病患者在巴尔的摩的学术医疗中心接受IMCU治疗,马里兰,美国被招募并亲自面试。在IMCU工作的跨学科医疗保健专业人员几乎接受了采访。参与者被问及他们在识别和治疗症状方面的作用,影响生活质量的因素,随着时间的推移,症状负担和轨迹,以及对症状管理有效和无效的策略。采用归纳主题分析方法进行分析。
    结果:进行了23次访谈:9名患者,2家庭照顾者,12名医疗保健专业人员。患者的平均年龄为67.5(±6.5)岁,超过一半(n=5)是黑人或西班牙裔,平均合并症为3.67例。出现了影响症状管理的五个主要主题:(1)患者与提供者的关系;(2)开放和诚实的沟通;(3)住院和出院期间资源的可及性;(4)护理人员支持,培训,和教育;(5)护理协调和后续护理。
    结论:患者,看护者,和医疗保健专业人员通常有相似的目标,但不同的优先级的多发病率管理。必须确定共同的优先事项,并针对考虑患者和护理人员经验的整体干预措施,以改善结果。
    本文针对与多病患者的疾病轨迹和症状管理的共同经验相关的研究不足。我们发现病人,看护者,和医疗保健专业人员通常有相似的目标,但不同的护理和沟通优先级。了解不同的优先事项将有助于更好地设计干预措施以支持症状管理,从而使患有多种疾病的人可以获得最佳的生活质量。
    我们在报告中遵守了定性研究报告综合标准(COREQ)指南。
    这项研究是在患者和公众参与的整个过程中设计和实施的,包括社区咨询委员会参与项目提案阶段和面试指南开发,在数据收集和分析阶段进行成员检查。我们选择的方法,基于经验的共同设计,强调让社区成员在自己的生活挑战中充当专家的重要性。在研究的未来阶段,公众将参与开发和测试新的干预措施,通过这些定性访谈和共同设计活动,支持多病患者的症状管理。
    OBJECTIVE: To elicit experiences of patients, family caregivers, and healthcare professionals in intermediate care units (IMCUs) in an academic medical centre in Baltimore, MD related to the challenges and intricacies of multimorbidity management to inform development of a multimorbidity symptom management toolkit.
    METHODS: Experience-based co-design.
    METHODS: Between July and October 2021, patients aged 55 years and older with multimorbidity admitted to IMCUs at an academic medical centre in Baltimore, Maryland, USA were recruited and interviewed in person. Interdisciplinary healthcare professionals working in the IMCU were interviewed virtually. Participants were asked questions about their role in recognizing and treating symptoms, factors affecting the quality of life, symptom burden and trajectory over time, and strategies that have and have not worked for managing symptoms. An inductive thematic analysis approach was used for analysis.
    RESULTS: Twenty-three interviews were conducted: 9 patients, 2 family caregivers, and 12 healthcare professionals. Patients\' mean age was 67.5 (±6.5) years, over half (n = 5) were Black or Hispanic, and the average number of comorbidities was 3.67. Five major themes that affect symptom management emerged: (1) the patient-provider relationship; (2) open and honest communication; (3) accessibility of resources during hospitalization and at discharge; (4) caregiver support, training, and education; and (5) care coordination and follow-up care.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals often have similar goals but different priorities for multimorbidity management. It is imperative to identify shared priorities and target holistic interventions that consider patient and caregiver experiences to improve outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: This paper addresses the paucity of research related to the shared experience of disease trajectory and symptom management for people living with multimorbidity. We found that patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals often have similar goals but different care and communication priorities. Understanding differing priorities will help better design interventions to support symptom management so people with multimorbidity can have the best possible quality of life.
    UNASSIGNED: We have adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies (COREQ) guidelines in our reporting.
    UNASSIGNED: This study has been designed and implemented with patient and public involvement throughout the process, including community advisory board engagement in the project proposal phase and interview guide development, and member checking in the data collection and analysis phases. The method we chose, experience-based co-design, emphasizes the importance of engaging members of a community to act as experts in their own life challenges. In the coming phases of the study, the public will be involved in developing and testing a new intervention, informed by these qualitative interviews and co-design events, to support symptom management for people with multimorbidity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    目的:老年人入院与不必要的结局有关,例如再次入院,制度化,功能下降。为了减少这些结果,荷兰引入了医院护理的替代方案:急性老年社区医院(AGCH).AGCH是位于医院外的急性护理单位,专注于早期康复和全面的老年评估。这项研究的目的是评估与医院护理相比,AGCH护理是否与减少计划外再入院或死亡相关。
    方法:以历史队列为对照的前瞻性队列研究。
    方法:荷兰的A(亚)急性监护病房(AGCH)和6家医院;参与者为患有严重疾病的老年人。
    方法:我们使用逆倾向评分加权来解释基线差异。主要结果是90天再入院或死亡。次要结局包括30天再入院或死亡,时间到死亡,接受长期住宿护理,跌倒的发生和随着时间的推移而发挥作用。使用广义逻辑回归模型和多水平回归分析来估计效果。
    结果:AGCH患者(n=206)的90天再入院或死亡率[比值比(OR)0.39,95%CI0.23-0.67]低于住院患者(n=401)。与医院对照组相比,AGCH患者90天再入院的风险较低(OR0.38,95%CI0.21-0.67),但全因死亡率没有差异(OR0.89,95%CI0.44-1.79)。AGCH患者30天再入院或死亡率较低。次要结果没有差异。
    结论:AGCH患者的再入院率和/或死亡率低于在医院接受治疗的患者。我们的结果支持在荷兰和其他国家寻求替代医院护理的AGCH的实施和成本效益的进一步研究。
    OBJECTIVE: Hospital admission in older adults is associated with unwanted outcomes such as readmission, institutionalization, and functional decline. To reduce these outcomes, the Netherlands introduced an alternative to hospital-based care: the Acute Geriatric Community Hospital (AGCH). The AGCH is an acute care unit situated outside of a hospital focusing on early rehabilitation and comprehensive geriatric assessment. The objective of this study was to evaluate if AGCH care is associated with decreasing unplanned readmissions or death compared with hospital-based care.
    METHODS: Prospective cohort study controlled with a historic cohort.
    METHODS: A (sub)acute care unit (AGCH) and 6 hospitals in the Netherlands; participants were acutely ill older adults.
    METHODS: We used inverse propensity score weighting to account for baseline differences. The primary outcome was 90-day readmission or death. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission or death, time to death, admission to long-term residential care, occurrence of falls and functioning over time. Generalized logistic regression models and multilevel regression analyses were used to estimate effects.
    RESULTS: AGCH patients (n = 206) had lower 90-day readmission or death rates [odds ratio (OR) 0.39, 95% CI 0.23-0.67] compared to patients treated in hospital (n = 401). AGCH patients had a lower risk of 90-day readmission (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21-0.67) but did not differ on all-cause mortality (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.44-1.79) compared with the hospital control group. AGCH patients had lower 30-day readmission or death rates. Secondary outcomes did not differ.
    CONCLUSIONS: AGCH patients had lower rates of readmission and/or death than patients treated in a hospital. Our results support further research on the implementation and cost-effectiveness of AGCH in the Netherlands and other countries seeking alternatives to hospital-based care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号