杂草,作为托儿所行业最大的挑战之一,已经被各种方法控制,如化学和非化学实践。尽管这些做法已经被广泛建立和测试,以控制杂草,没有系统或荟萃分析综述来提供这些做法的定量杂草控制功效信息.对苗圃生产中的杂草控制做法有系统的了解,可视化研究趋势,系统的审查,并进行了荟萃分析。共有267项相关研究纳入研究趋势,83项纳入荟萃分析。这项研究的结果表明,在过去的2-3年(1995-2021年)中,对苗圃杂草控制的兴趣已从化学优势杂草控制转变为与非化学技术的化学共存。开发新的管理策略和实施多种综合杂草管理组合是杂草防治的未来趋势。系统评价结果表明,化学方法控制杂草效果最高,虽然非化学品的平均水平最低,尽管如此,所有三种杂草控制实践(化学,非化学,并结合使用)与不采用策略时相比,杂草的生物量和密度显着降低。杂草控制挑战可能是开发新的非化学和综合杂草控制技术的催化剂。
Weeds, as one of the biggest challenges in the nursery industry, have been controlled by various methods, such as chemical and non-chemical practices. Although these practices have been widely established and tested to control weeds, there is no systematic or meta-analysis
review to provide quantitative weed control efficacy information of these practices. To provide a systematic understanding of weed control practices in nursery production, a visualization research trend, a systematic
review, and a meta-analysis were conducted. A total of 267 relevant studies were included for the research trend and 83 were included in the meta-analysis. The results in this study showed that interests in nursery weed control have switched dramatically in the past 2-3 decades (1995-2021) from chemical dominant weed control to chemical coexistent with non-chemical techniques. Developing new management tactics and implementing diverse combinations of integrated weed management present the future trend for weed control. The systematic
review results showed that chemical methods had the highest weed control efficacy, while non-chemical had the lowest on average, nonetheless, all three weed control practices (chemical, non-chemical, and combined) reduced the weed biomass and density significantly compared with when no strategy was employed. Weed control challenges could be the catalyst for the development of new non-chemical and integrated weed control techniques.